Skip to main content

Managerialism and the Academic Profession in Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Academic Profession in Hong Kong

Abstract

Managerialism has been a main driver of change facing the academic profession in Hong Kong with the rationalization of university governance and managerial structures. There is a common perception that managerialism is not welcomed by academics for the traditional academic ethos of collegiality has been undermined by the growing importance of managerial values and practices. However, whether the rise of managerialism leads to a demoralized academic profession in Hong Kong and a climate of resentment and resistance deserve more in-depth research and analysis. Data reveal that the impacts of managerialism on Hong Kong academics should be scrutinized more carefully for academic values might not be completely superseded by managerial values.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altbach, P. (1998). Comparative higher education: Knowledge, the University and development. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, J., Chandler, J., & Clark, H. (2001). Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 87–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R. (1990). Academic freedom, autonomy and accountability in British Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 15(2), 169–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, R., & McConnell, T. (1999). Autonomy and accountability: Who controls academe? In P. Altbach, R. Berdahl, & P. Gumport (Eds.), American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political, and economic challenges (pp. 70–88). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birnbaum, R. (2000). Management fads in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, K. (2002). The quest for quality education: The quality assurance movement in Hong Kong. In J. Mok & D. Chan (Eds.), Globalization and education: The quest for quality education in Hong Kong (pp. 41–65). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J. (1998). Introduction. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives (pp. 1–13). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., & Newson, J. (1998). Globalizing practices: Corporate managerialism, accountability, and privatization. In J. Currie & J. Newson (Eds.), Universities and globalization: Critical perspectives (pp. 141–152). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, J., & Vidovich, L. (2009). The changing nature of academic work. In M. Tight, K. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 441–452). New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). “New managerialism” and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in Universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2003). New managerialism in UK Universities: Manager-academic accounts of change. In H. Eggins (Ed.), Globalization and reform in higher education (pp. 55–67). Maidenhead: Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK Universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goedegebuure, L., Kaiser, F., Maassen, P., & de Weert, E. (1994). Higher education policy in international perspective: An overview. In L. Goedegebuure, F. Kaiser, P. Maassen, L. Meek, F. van Vught, & E. de Weert (Eds.), Higher education policy: An international comparative perspective (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, C. (1996). The politics of collegiality: Retrenchment strategies in Canadian Universities. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harman, G. (2001). Impact of the NPM on higher education reform in Australia. In B. Nolan (Ed.), Public sector reform: An international perspective (pp. 151–166). Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Henkel, M. (2000). Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London/Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. (2010). Academic freedom, University Governance and the state: The commission of inquiry into the Hong Kong Institute of Education. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postiglione, G. (2002). The transformation of academic autonomy in Hong Kong. In M. Chan & A. So (Eds.), Crisis and transformation in China’s Hong Kong (pp. 307–321). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press & M.E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, P. (1998). Learning to Lead in Higher Education. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schapper, J., & Mayson, S. (2005). Managerialism, internationalization, taylorization and the deskilling of academic work: Evidence from an Australian University. In P. Ninnes & M. Hellsten (Eds.), Internationalizing higher education: Critical explorations of pedagogy and policy (pp. 181–198). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, The University of Hong Kong.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1994a). Managerialism and the academic profession: The case of England. Higher Education Policy, 7(2), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (1994b). Managerialism and the academic profession: Quality and control. London: Quality Support Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trow, M. (2010). Comparative reflections on leadership in higher education. In M. Burrage (Ed.), Twentieth-century higher education: Elite to mass to universal (pp. 435–461). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tse, T. (2013). Endless controversies over education reforms. In K. Law & J. Cheng (Eds.), On the chessboard: Donald Tsang’s legacy for C.Y. Leung (pp. 163–193). Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2002). Higher education in Hong Kong: Report of the University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2004a). Hong Kong higher education: To make a difference, to move with the times. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2004b). Hong Kong higher education: Integration matters. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, L. (2000, July 16). Under Pressure to ‘Publish or Perish’. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael H. Lee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lee, M.H. (2017). Managerialism and the Academic Profession in Hong Kong. In: Postiglione, G., Jung, J. (eds) The Changing Academic Profession in Hong Kong. The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective, vol 19. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56791-4_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56791-4_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-56789-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-56791-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics