Skip to main content

Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies: Results of an International and Empirical Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies

Abstract

Reporting on corporate social, environmental and economic responsibility has broadened widely within the last decade. The European Union is the most active region in the world in terms of sustainability reporting, largely on a voluntary basis. Most of the empirical research related to sustainability reporting in Europe has been conducted in Western European countries. In Central and Eastern Europe, only a small number of studies have focused on sustainability reporting. Little, however, is known whether how and why companies in CEE report about their corporate sustainable activities. The aim of the research project is to describe the status quo of SR in CEE, to explain some noteworthy differences between the two subsamples CEE and WE and to predict the future development of SR in the CEE region. To address this research issue, we have established a research consortium with researchers from ten Central and Eastern European Countries: Bulgaria, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia. Two Western European countries, Germany and Austria, have been added to the sample to enable a regional comparison.

The original version of this chapter was revised. An erratum to this chapter can be found at DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-52578-5_15

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The directive 2013/34/EU will be replaced by the new directive 2014/95/EU. Large companies will be required to submit nonfinancial statement(s) either within the annual corporate report or as a separate filing. The new directive still provides companies with significant flexibility in tailoring nonfinancial disclosure.

  2. 2.

    For a deeper analysis of the literature regarding SR in CEE, see Pütter (forthcoming).

  3. 3.

    With the exception of Bulgaria.

  4. 4.

    Only one interview was conducted in Bulgaria.

  5. 5.

    Data sample for Bulgaria has been collected by IPRI gGmbH.

  6. 6.

    Of course, there is a need to be careful when making general statements on a heterogeneous region like CEE. The countries of CEE are rather different in both cultural and historical aspects and also in their development; however, they share a common past.

  7. 7.

    The Brundtland Report was produced by a commission under the chair of Gro Harlem Brundtland convoked by the United Nations in 1983. The commission’s mission was to address growing concerns “about the accelerating deterioration of the human environment and natural resources and the consequences of that deterioration for economic and social development”. The definition of this term in the report is well known and often cited as “sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”.

  8. 8.

    The percentage of SR included in annual reports expresses the share of companies which report sustainability-related information only in annual report and not in an integrated report or a stand-alone SR.

  9. 9.

    We distinguished here between whether a company belongs to an environmentally sensitive industry (manufacturing or energy producer) or to the other industries.

  10. 10.

    Manufacturing and energy production.

  11. 11.

    This also includes health, safety and environment, sustainability development or corporate responsibility departments.

References

  • Alam, A. (2008). Unleashing prosperity: Productivity growth in Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. Washington: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbie, E. (2010). The practice of social research. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskin, J. (2006). Corporate responsibility in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2006(24), 29–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamon, B. M. (1998). Supply chain design and analysis: Models and methods. International Journal of Production Economics, 55(3), 281–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. D., Schaltegger, S., & Zvezdov, D. (2013). Exploring corporate practices in management accounting for sustainability. London: ICAEW.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berglöf, E., & Pajuste, A. (2005). What do firms disclose and why? Enforcing corporate governance and transparency in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21(2), 178–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaesing, D. (2013). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung in Deutschland Und Den USA: Berichtspraxis, Determinanten und Eigenkapitalkostenwirkungen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • del Mar Alonso-Almeida, M., Llach, J., & Marimon, F. (2014). A closer look at the ‘global reporting initiative’ sustainability reporting as a tool to implement environmental and social policies: A worldwide sector analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 21(6), 318–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombi, Á. (2013). Economic growth and development in Central and Eastern Europe after the transformation. Public Finance Quarterly, 58(4), 452–468.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyllick, T., & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(2), 130–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, M. J., & Buhovac, A. R. (2014). Making sustainability work: Best practices in managing and measuring corporate social, environmental, and economic impacts. Sheffield: Berett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S. (2011). Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis. Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S. (2012). The development and state of research on social and environmental reporting in global comparison. Journal für Betriebswirtschaft, 62(1), 45–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S. (2013). The irony of stakeholder management in Germany: The difficulty of implementing an essential concept for CSR. UWF UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 21, 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S., & Drabble, M. (2012). Focus and standardization of sustainability reporting—A comparative study of the United Kingdom and Finland. Business Strategy and the Environment, 21(7), 455–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fifka, M. S., & Pobizhan, M. (2014). An institutional approach to corporate social responsibility in Russia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 82, 192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurvitsh, N., & Sidorova, I. (2012). Survey of sustainability reporting integrated into annual reports of Estonian companies for the years 2007–2010: Based on companies listed on tallinn stock exchange as of October 2011. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2, 26–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, R., & Lülfs, R. (2013). Legitimizing negative aspects in GRI-oriented sustainability reporting: A qualitative analysis of corporate disclosure strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 401–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, C. (2011). Towards a more nuanced understanding of sustainable development reporting in Australia. School of Management & Information Systems, Victoria University, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, P. (Ed.). (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility (Vol. 22). Stuttgart: IPRI-Research Paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, P., Isensee, J., & Michel, U. (2012). “Green Controlling”—Bedarf einer Integration von ökologischen Aspekten in das Controlling. In M. Tschandl & A. Posch (Eds.), Integriertes Umweltcontrolling (pp. 41–50). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Horváth, P., et al. (forthcoming). Status quo and future development of sustainability reporting in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of East European Management Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isenmann, R. (2014). Die Rolle des Internets für die Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung–vom Distributionskanal zum zentralen Einstiegsknoten. In M. S. Fifka (Ed.), CSR und Reporting (pp. 107–123). Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ismayr, W., Richter, S., & Söldner, M. (2010). Die politischen Systeme Osteuropas. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Koleva, P., Rodet-Kroichvili, N., David, P., & Marasova, J. (2010). Is corporate social responsibility the privilege of developed market economies? Some evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(2), 274–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A., & Perego, P. (2010). Determinants of the adoption of sustainability assurance statements: An international investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 19(3), 182–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp, H. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in modern Central and Eastern Europe. In Responsible investment banking (pp. 453–471). Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013.pdf

  • KPMG. (2015). Currents of change—The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015. Retrieved from http://www.kpmg.com/CN/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/Documents/kpmg-survey-of-corporate-responsibility-reporting-2015-O-201511.pdf

  • Lewicka-Strzalecka, A. (2006). Opportunities and limitations of CSR in the postcommunist countries: Polish case. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 440–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marimon, F., Alonso-Almeidab, M., Rodríguezc, M., & Alejandroc, C. (2012). The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: What is the point. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33, 132–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McSweeney, B. (2002). Hofstede’s model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph of faith—a failure of analysis. Human relations, 55(1), 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milne, M. J., & Gray, R. (2013). W(h)ither ecology? The triple bottom line, the global reporting initiative, and corporate sustainability reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nam, Y., Barnett, G. A., & Kim, D. (2014). Corporate hyperlink network relationships in global corporate social responsibility system. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1225–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1999). Environment in the transition to a market economy progress in Central and Eastern Europe and the new independent states. France: OECD Publication Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütter, J. M. (2016). Impact factors on sustainability reporting. In P. Horváth & J. M. Pütter (Eds.), Sustainabilty reporting in Central and Eastern European companies: International empirical impacts. Cham: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütter, J. M. (forthcoming). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung in West-, Mittel- und Osteuropa: Ein Ländervergleich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pütter, J. M., & Bolt, S. (2015). Der Nachhaltigkeitsbericht. Controlling, 27(11), 646–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pütter, J. M., Isensee, J., & Koch, R. (2014). Herausforderung und Bedeutung der integrierten Berichterstattung am Beispiel des Stuttgarter Flughafens. Zeitschrift Controlling, 26(8/9), 483–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca, L. C., & Searcy, C. (2012). An analysis of indicators disclosed in corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Cleaner Production, 20(1), 103–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simeonov, S., & Stefanova, M. (2015). corporate social responsibility in Bulgaria: The current state of the field. In O. S. Idowu, R. Schmidpeter, & S. M. Fifka (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility in Europe: United in sustainable diversity (pp. 313–332). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., & Konrad, A. (2009). Business–society relations in Central-Eastern and Western Europe: How those who lead in sustainability reporting bridge the gap in corporate (social) responsibility. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 25(1), 23–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments, and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4), 206–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolz, J. (2014). Nachhaltigkeitsreporting im internationalen Kontext. In S. M. Fifka (Ed.), CSR und Reporting: Nachhaltigkeits- und CSR-Berichterstattung verstehen und erfolgreich umsetzen (pp. 159–172). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strouhal, J., Gurvits, N., Nikitina-Kalamäe, M., & Startseva, E. (2015). Finding the link between CSR reporting and corporate financial performance: Evidence on Czech and Estonian listed companies. Central European Business Review, 4(3), 48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, W., Higgins, C., & Milne, M. (2013). Why do companies not produce sustainability reports? Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(7), 456–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sucală, I. V. (2015). Managers of transition—Leadership in post-communist Romanian companies. Europe-Asia Studies, 67(4), 652–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2007). Baseline study on CSR practices in the new EU member states and candidate countries. Retrieved from http://www.nadaciapontis.sk/tmp/asset_cache/link/0000016790/baseline%20study%20on%20CSR%20in%20the%20region_main%20layout.pdf

  • Viehöver, M. G., Türk, V., & Vaseghi, S. (2010). CSR assurance in practice: Measuring and auditing sustainability 1. In Responsible business: How to manage a CSR strategy successfully (p. 91).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensen, K., Broer, W., Klein, J., Knopf, J., Braaksma, A. P. (2010). The state of play in sustainability reporting in the EU. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=6727&langId=en

  • Williams, O. F. (2004). The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(4), 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wirtz, B. W. (2010). Business model management. Wiesbaden: Gabler.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Judith M. Pütter .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horváth, P. et al. (2017). Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies: Results of an International and Empirical Study. In: Horváth, P., Pütter, J. (eds) Sustainability Reporting in Central and Eastern European Companies. MIR Series in International Business. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-52578-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics