Skip to main content

The Epistemology of Management: An Introduction

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Philosophy of Management

Part of the book series: Handbooks in Philosophy ((HP))

  • 53 Accesses

Abstract

The epistemological foundations of management studies have been contested throughout the history of the discipline. In this chapter, we first introduce the core of epistemology – the problem of knowledge. The problem of knowledge includes, in fact, several interrelated problems that form a system, such as: What is knowledge? Who or what has the capacity of knowing? How much can be known? What are the sources of knowing? And what knowledge is considered best? We then cluster current epistemological positions in management studies by differentiating between four epistemological orientations that differ in how the scientific statements relate to empirical reality. We refer to these orientations as (1) epistemologies of representation, (2) epistemologies of interpretation, (3) epistemologies of imagination, and (4) epistemologies of intervention. These four orientations serve as a structure to the contributions of this handbook, and also offer a novel way of mapping contemporary epistemologies in management scholarship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2000) Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research: challenges, responses, consequences. J Appl Behav Sci 36(2):136–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2011) Qualitative research and theory development: mystery as method. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alvesson M, Sandberg J (2011) Generating research questions through problematization. Acad Manag Rev 36(2):247–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Audi R (1998) Epistemology: a contemporary introduction to the theory of knowledge. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bettis RA, Ethiraj S, Gambardella A, Helfat C, Mitchell W (2016) Creating repeatable cumulative knowledge in strategic management. Strateg Manag J 37:257–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackler F (1993) Knowledge and the theory of organizations – organizations as activity systems and the reframing of management. J Manag Stud 30(6):863–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolter JD (2016) Posthumanism. In: Jensen KB, Craig RT (eds) The international encyclopedia of communication theory and philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell, Malden, pp 1556–1563

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning, and innovating. Organ Sci 2(1):40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1962) Intuition and science. Spectrum book; S-22. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1989) Treatise on basic philosophy. In: Ethics: the good and the right, vol 8. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1996) Finding philosophy in social science. Yale University Press, New Haven/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (1999) The sociology-philosophy connection. Transaction, New Brunswick/London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunge M (2012) Evaluating philosophies. Springer, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chia R (1995) From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organ Stud 16(4):579–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchman CW (1971) The design of inquiring systems: basic concepts of systems and organization. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotty M (2003) The foundations of social research: meaning and perspective in the research process. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis MS (1971) That’s interesting. Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philos Soc Sci 1(4):309–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Grefte J (2021) Knowledge as justified true belief. Erkenntnis (Online First) 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (1976) Of grammatology, 1st American edn. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida J (1979) In: Bloom H (ed) Living on: border lines: deconstruction and criticism. Seabury, New York, pp 75–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey W (1957) Gesammelte Schriften. Teubner, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson L (1996) For positivist organization theory: proving the hard core. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty D (1992) Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organ Sci 3(2):179–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend P (1975) Against method. Outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleck L (1979) Genesis and development of scientific fact. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Fournier V, Grey C (2000) At the critical moment: conditions and prospects for critical management studies. Hum Relat 53:7–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs RW (1970) A sociology of sociology. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Geiger D, Schreyögg G (2009) Coping with the concept of knowledge: toward a discursive understanding of knowledge. Manag Learn 40(4):475–480

    Google Scholar 

  • George G, Howard-Grenville J, Joshi A & Tihanyi L (2016) Understanding and tackling societal grand challenges through management research. Acad Manag J, 59(6), 1880–1895.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gherardi S (2001) From organizational learning to practice-based knowing. Hum Relat 54(1):131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1993) New rules of sociological method: a positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Polity, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasersfeld E (1995) Radical constructivism: a way of knowing and learning. Studies in mathematics education series, vol 6. Falmer Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith P (2003) Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A (1999) Knowledge in a social world. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman A, Whitcomb D (eds) (2011) Social epistemology: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond JP, Cabantous L, Harding N, Learmonth M (2016) What do we mean by performativity in organizational and management theory? The uses and abuses of performativity. Int J Manag Rev 18(4):440–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grondin J (1997) Introduction to philosophical hermeneutics. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway D (2006) A cyborg manifesto: science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late 20th century. In: Weiss J, Nolan J, Hunsinger J, Trifonas P (eds) The international handbook of virtual learning environments. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 117–158

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890/1950) Principles of psychology. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P, Duberley J (2000) Understanding management research: an introduction to epistemology. Sage, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser A, Leiner L (2009) Why the rigour-relevance gap in management research Is unbridgeable. J Manag Stud 46:516–533

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieser A, Nicolai A, Seidl D (2015) The practical relevance of management research: turning the debate on relevance into a rigorous scientific research program. Acad Manag Ann 9(1):143–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Klag M, Langley A (2013) Approaching the conceptual leap in qualitative research. Int J Manag Rev 15(2):149–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krohn W, Küppers G (1989) Die Selbstorganisation der Wissenschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorino P (2018) Pragmatism and organization studies. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann N (1990) Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt am Main

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard J-F (1986) The postmodern condition: a report on knowledge. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Marti E, Gond JP (2018) When do theories become self-fulfilling? Exploring the boundary conditions of performativity. Acad Manag Rev 43(3):487–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maturana HR, Varela FG (eds) (1980) Autopoiesis and cognition: the realization of the living. Reidel, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty J (1959) Individual fact and essence in Edmund Husserl’s philosophy. Philos Phenomenol Res 20(2):222–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka I (1994) A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci 5(1):14–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N (2019) Why trust in science? Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi M (1966) The tacit dimension ([1st] ed., Terry lectures, 1962). Doubleday, Garden City

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1962) Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1965) Was ist Dialektik? In: Topitsch E (ed) Logik der Sozialwissenschaften, 2nd edn. Köln, Kiepenheuer & Witsch, pp 262–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed B (2002) How to think about fallibilism. Philos Stud 107(2):143–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed M (2005) Reflections on the ‘realist turn’ in organization and management studies. J Manag Stud 42(8):1621–1644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reihlen M, Ringberg T (2013) Uncertainty, pluralism, and the knowledge-based theory of the firm: from J.-C. Spender’s contribution to a socio-cognitive approach. Eur Manag J 31:706–716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1973) The coherence theory of truth. Clarendon library of logic and philosophy. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1985) The strife of systems: an essay on the grounds and implications of philosophical diversity. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1993) Pluralism: against the demand for consensus. Clarendon library of logic and philosophy. Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (1997) Objectivity: the obligations of impersonal reason. University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (2000) Realistic pragmatism: an introduction to pragmatic philosophy. SUNY series in philosophy. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (2003) Epistemology: An introduction to the theory of knowledge. SUNY Press: Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Rescher N (2016) Pragmatism in philosophical inquiry: theoretical considerations and case studies. Springer

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (ed) (1967) The linguistic turn: recent essays in philosophical method. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty R (1982) Consequences of pragmatism: essays, 1972–1980. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  • Russel B (1918/1956) Mysticism and logic and other essays. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sarup M (1993) An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism, 2nd edn. University of Georgia Press, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Spicer A, Alvesson M, Kärreman D (2009) Critical performativity: the unfinished business of critical management studies. Hum Relat 62(4):537–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steel D, Guala F (eds) (2011) The philosophy of social science reader. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin SE (1958) The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas H (2005) Complex knowledge: studies in organizational epistemology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Virues-Ortega J, Hurtado-Parrado C, Martin TL, Julio F (2012) Psycho-neural identity as the basis for empirical research and theorization in psychology: an interview with Mario A. Bunge. Sci Educ 21(10):1527–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1922) Ueber einige Kategorien der verstehenden Soziologie. In: Weber M (ed) Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Mohr, Tübingen, pp 403–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE (1989) Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Acad Manag Rev 14(4):516–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanow D, Schwartz-Shea P (eds) (2015) Interpretation and method: empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman M (1962) The status of the verifiability principle. Philos Phenomenol Res 22(3):334–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuboff S (2019) The age of surveillance capitalism: the fight for a human future at the new frontier of power. Public Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Reihlen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Reihlen, M., Schoeneborn, D. (2022). The Epistemology of Management: An Introduction. In: Neesham, C., Reihlen, M., Schoeneborn, D. (eds) Handbook of Philosophy of Management. Handbooks in Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_66-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48352-8_66-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-48352-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics