Abstract
Demographic change (low labor supply) and tertiarization (higher demand in knowledge-intensive professional activities/jobs which are characterized by human interaction and innovation) in globally operating companies lead to a shortage of labor and bring on a change from an employer market to an employee market. The current situation in companies is characterized by the fact that target groups can choose their employer and that the topic of “employer attractiveness” is developing into a crucial competitive advantage for companies. In this context, identifying factors that increase employer attractiveness is of special relevance. Studies indicate that the construct of corporate social responsibility (CSR) is a significant factor when it comes to choosing a profession. It is, however, also pointed out that the specific effect of CSR in the context of choosing an employer has not been sufficiently researched by the industry. By means of a qualitative analysis of the studies on factors which increase employer attractiveness, this article shows the relevance of both CSR and diversity management (DiM) as influencing factors. Based on the analyses, an integrative model which summarizes the analytically derived CSR and DiM factors, and which allows to give recommendations for action with regard to influencing employer attractiveness, is presented. The result is that only applied as joint corporate strategies, CSR, and DiM can facilitate the management of perceived employer attractiveness.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albinger H, Freeman SJ (2000) Corporate social performance and attractiveness as an employer to different job seeking populations. J Bus Ethics 28:243–253
Aretz HJ, Hansen K (2002) Diversity and diversity management im Unternehmen. Eine Analyse aus systemtheoretischer Sicht. LIT-Verlag Dr. Wilhelm Hopf, Münster
Aretz HJ, Hansen K (2003) Erfolgreiches Management von Diversity. Die multikulturelle Organisation als Strategie zur Verbesserung einer nachhaltigen Wettbewerbsfähigkeit. Zeitschrift für Personalforschung 17(1):9–36
Argyris C (1998) Teaching smart people how to learn. In: Harvard business review on knowledge management. Harvard Business Review Paperback, Boston, MA, pp 81–108
Argyris C, Schön D (1978) Organisational learning. A theory of action perspective. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Backhaus KB, Stone BA, Heiner K (2002) Exploring the relationship between corporate social performance and employer attractiveness. Bus Soc 42:292–318
Beile J (2015/2016) Trends in der HR-Berichterstattung. Personalführung 12/2015–01/2016, pp 24–30
Berthon P, Ewing M, Hah LL (2005) Captivating company: dimensions of attractiveness in employer branding. Int J Advert 24:151–172
Bethkenhagen E (2013) Ergebnisbericht HR-Trendstudie. Verfügbar unter. http://www.kienbaum.de/Portaldata/1/Resources/downloads/Ergebnisbericht_HR-Trendstudie2014_Final.pdf [08.02.2016]
Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung (2011) Demografischer Wandel. (S. 23). Bundeszentrale für politischeBildung, Bonn
Carroll AB (1991) The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Bus Horiz 34(4):39–48
Chhabra NL, Sharma S (2012) Employer branding: strategy for improving employer attractiveness. Int J Organ Anal 22(1):48–60
Cox T (1991) The multicultural organization. Executive 5(2):34–47
Demografie-Portal (2016) Erwerbsbevölkerung schrumpft und altert. http://www.demografie-portal.de/SharedDocs/Informieren/DE/ZahlenFakten/Erwerbsbevoelkerung_Altersgruppen.html [05.01.2016]
DGFP (2013) DGfP-Studie Megatrends und HR-Trends. Praxispapier 3/2013. http://static.dgfp.de/assets/publikationen/2013/DGFP-Studie-Megatrends-und-HR-Trends2013.pdf [08.02.2016]
DGFP (2016) Mehr Stellenanzeigen betonen Work-life-balance. Personalführung 3:13
Eichhorst W, Buhlmann F (2015) Die Zukunft der Arbeit und der Wandel der Arbeitswelt. IZA Standpunkte Nr. 77
European Commission (2011) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee to the Regions: a renewed EU strategy 2011–2014 for Corporate Responsibility. COM (2011) 681 final, Brussels
Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend (BMFSFJ) (2016) Geht doch!—So gelingt die Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf (1. Aufl.). schmitz druck&medien GmbH & Co, Brüggen
Fuchs J, Söhnlein D, Brigitte W (2011) Rückgang und Alterung sind nicht mehr aufzuhalten. Institut für Arbeitsmarkt- und Berufsforschung, Nürnberg, pp 1–2
Global Reporting Initiative (o.J.). G4 Leitlinien zur Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. https://www.globalreporting.org/resourcelibrary/German-G4-Part-One.pdf (31.03.2016)
Gottwald M (2013) HR trend report 2013. HaufeLexware, Freiburg
Greening DW, Turban DB (2000) Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Bus Soc 39:254–280
Hanappi-Egger E (2012) Diversitätsmanagemt und CSR. In: Schneider A, Schmidpeter R (eds) Corporate social responsibility: Verantwortungsvolle Unternehmensführung in Theorie und Praxis. Springer, Berlin, pp 177–189
Holste JH (2012) Arbeitgeberattraktivität im demographischen Wandel. Eine multidimensionale Betrachtung. Springer, Wiesbaden
Huber J (2009) Neue Arbeit. Die 4 Herausforderungen des 21. Jahrhunderts. http://health-on-top.de/userdoks/handouts/2009_huber_vortrag.pdf
Jánszky SG (2010) Zukunft der Arbeitswelt im Jahr 2020. Value Worker, Patchwork-Identitäten und HR-Management in fluiden Unternehmen. Personalführung 2:18–26
Jung H (2008) Personalwirtschaft. Oldenbourg Wissenschaftsverlag GmbH, München, p 856
Kim SY, Park H (2011) Corporate social responsibility as an organizational attractiveness for prospective public relations practitioners. J Bus Ethics 103:639–653
Lis B (2010) Corporate social responsibility. Eine empirische Analyse des Einflusses auf potenzielle Arbeitnehmer. Verlag Dr. Kovac, Hamburg
Lis B (2012) The relevance of corporate social responsibility for a sustainable human resource management: An analysis of organizational attractiveness as a determinant in employees’ selection of a (potential) employer. Manag Rev 23(3):279–295
Lis B (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility beeinflusst die Arbeitgeberattraktivität. Pers Q 03(13):37–40
Lohaus D, Rietz C (2015) Arbeitgeberattraktivität. Der Stellenwert von Bekanntheit und Labels in der frühen Rekrutierungsphase. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 59(2):70–84
Meister CJ, Willyerd K (2010) Harvard business manager. Mentoring für Millenialls, p 20
Michaels E, Handfield-Jones H, Axelrod B (2001) The war for talent. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Müller C, Sander G (2009) Innovativ führen mit Diversity-Kompetenz. Vielfalt als Chance. Haupt, Bern
Pattnaik SK, Misra RK (2014) Employer attractiveness: a conceptual framework & scale development. Indian J Ind Relat 50(2):318–327
Quindt K (2013) Diversity Management im Kontext von Business Case und Corporate Social Responsibility.Unveröffentlichter Forschungsbericht an der Business and Information Technology School (BiTS) GmbH Iserlohn, Fachbereich Business Psychology
Schuler RS, Jackson SE, Tarique I (2011) Global talent management and global talent challenges: strategic opportunities for HRM. J World Bus 46:506–516
Schwaab M-O (2008) Die Bedeutung der sozialen Verantwortung für die Arbeitgeberattraktivität. Umwelt WirtschaftsForum 16(4):199–204
Smith WJ, Wokutch RE, Harrington KV, Dennis BS (2001) An examination of the influence of diversity and stakeholder role on corporate social orientation. Bus Soc 40(3):266–294
Stangel-Meseke M (2014) Unconscious bias. In: Charta der Vielfalt e.V. (Hrsg.), Vielfalt erkennen. Strategien für einen sensiblen Umgang mit unbewußten Vorurteilen. Charta der Vielfalt e.V., Berlin, pp 13–20
Stangel-Meseke M (2015) Innovative Personalmanagement-Konzepte. Eine Analyse ihres Gleichstellungspotenzials. SpringerGabler, Berlin
Stangel-Meseke M, Hahn P, Steuer L (2013) Balance durch Diversity-Management—Lösungsansätze für unternehmerische Herausforderungen aus Megatrends. In: Lanwehr R, Müller-Lindenberg M, Mai D (Hrsg.), Balance Management. SpringerGabler, Wiesbaden, pp 145–166
Stangel-Meseke M, Hahn P, Steuer L (2015) Diversity Management und Individualisierung. Maßnahmen und Handlungsempfehlungen für den Unternehmenserfolg. SpringerGabler, Wiesbaden
Suliman A, Al-Khatib H (2014) Corporate social responsibility and employer branding: a study in the public sector. Proceedings of 27th International Business Research Conference. Ryerson University. Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Trank CQ, Rynes SL, Bretz RD (2002) Attracting applicants in the war for talent: differences in work preferences among high achievers. J Bus Psychol 16:331–345
Turban DB, Greening DW (1997) Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Acad Manage J 40:658–763
Turban DB, Keon TL (1993) Organizational attractiveness: demography and turnover in top management groups. An interactionist perspective. J Appl Psychol 78:184–193
Wood DJ (1991) Corporate social performance revisited. Acad Manage Rev 16:691–718
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stangel-Meseke, M. (2017). Influencing Employer Attractiveness by Connecting Corporate Social Responsibility and Diversity Management. In: Hansen, K., Seierstad, C. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility and Diversity Management. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43564-0_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43564-0_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-43563-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-43564-0
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)