Abstract
This article reports a study about the design and development of an orientation course to prepare students’ readiness for online learning. Based on the Instructional Design Process Model, the research project applied the Analysis, Strategies, and Evaluation phases. The analysis identified the complexity of concepts and procedures to be addressed in preparing students and the technology affordance that could be utilized. The strategies of development focused on conceptual and procedural scaffolding that aligned with learning activities and assessment methods. The formative evaluation included collecting and analyzing data related to student performance in the course and students’ reflections in online discussions. More than 600 students voluntarily participated in the course. The formative evaluation results demonstrated that over 95 % of those who completed the course gained technology competency, understood learning strategies, and identified characteristics of successful online learners. The applied thematic analysis of student reflection transcripts revealed that perceived usefulness, readiness for online learning, and effective design were the top three themes with frequent code co-occurrence. The key takeaways include the design and development process of an online orientation course from an instructional design perspective and the methods used for assessment.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Azevedo, R., & Hadwin, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition–Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds. Instructional Science, 33(5), 367–379.
Benson, A. D., & Whitworth, A. (2014). Research on course management systems in higher education Charlotte. NC: Information Age Publishing Inc.
Bigatel, P. M., Ragan, L. C., Kennan, S., May, J., & Redmond, B. F. (2012). The identification of competencies for online teaching success. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 16(1), 59–77.
Bozarth, J., Chapman, D. D., & LaMonica, L. (2004). Preparing for distance learning: Designing an online student orientation course. Educational Technology & Society, 7(1), 87–106.
Britto, M., & Rush, S. (2013). Developing and implementing comprehensive student support services for online students. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 29–42.
Cho, M. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1051–1069.
Cigdem, H., & Yildirim, O. G. (2014). Effects of students’ characteristics on online learning readiness: A vocational college example. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), 15(3), 80–93.
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Combs, K. L., Gibson, S. K., Hays, J. M., Saly, J., & Wendt, J. T. (2008). Enhancing curriculum and delivery: Linking assessment to learning objectives. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(1), 87–102.
Crawley, A. (2012). Supporting online students: A practical guide to planning, implementing, and evaluating services. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Dabbagh, N. (2003). Scaffolding: An important teacher competency in online learning. TechTrends, 47(2), 39–44.
Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and application. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Delen, E., Liew, J., & Willson, V. (2014). Effects of interactivity and instructional scaffolding on learning: Self-regulation in online video-based environments. Computers & Education, 78, 312–320.
Dixon, M., Beveridge, P., Farrior, C., Williams, B. A., Sugar, W., & Brown, A. (2012). Development of an online orientation for an instructional technology masters program. TechTrends: Linking Research and Practice to Improve Learning, 56(6), 44–48.
Dray, B. J., Lowenthal, P. R., Miszkiewicz, M. J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: A validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29–47.
Er, E., Özden, M. Y., & Arifoğlu, A. (2009). LIVELMS: A blended e-learning environment: A model proposition for integration of asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. International Journal of Learning, 16(2), 449–460.
Erwin, T. D. (1991). Assessing student learning and development: A guide to the principles, goals, and methods of determining college outcomes. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K. C., Keller, J. M., & Russell, J. D. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. E. (2011). Applied thematic analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Gustafson, K. L., & Branch, R. M. (2002). Survey of instructional development models (4th ed.). Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University.
Hannafin, M., Land, S., & Oliver, K. (1999). Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models, vol. 2: A new paradigm of instructional technology, pp. 115–140. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Hung, M., Chou, C., Chen, C., & Own, Z. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080–1090.
Instructure, C. (2014). Canvas help center. Retrieved from http://guides.instructure.com
Jones, K. R. (2013). Developing and implementing a mandatory online student orientation. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 17(1), 43–45.
Lawanto, O., Santoso, H. B., Lawanto, K. N., & Goodridge, W. (2014). Self-regulated learning skills and online activities between higher and lower performers on a web-intensive undergraduate engineering course. Journal of Educators Online, 11(3), 1–32.
Lehmann, T., Hähnlein, I., & Ifenthaler, D. (2014). Cognitive, metacognitive and motivational perspectives on preflection in self-regulated online learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 313–323.
Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2012). Distance education: A systems view of online learning (3rd ed.). Belmont, VA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Namey, E., Guest, G., Thairu, L., & Johnson, L. (2008). Data reduction techniques for large qualitative data sets. In G. Guest & K. M. MacQueen (Eds.), Handbook for team-based qualitative research (pp. 137–162). Lanham, MD: Altamira Press.
Ohia, U. O. (2011). A model for effectively assessing student learning outcomes. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4(3), 25–32.
Quality Matters Program. (2013). The Quality Matters higher education rubric. Retrieved from https://www.qualitymatters.org/rubric
Reeves, T. C., Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2005). Design research: A socially responsible approach to instructional technology research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 16(2), 96–115.
Reeves, T. C., Benson, L., Elliott, D., Grant, M., Holschuh, D., Kim, B., et al. (2002). Usability and instructional design heuristics for E-learning evaluation. Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2002 World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications: 14th Conference (pp. 1615–1621).
Richey, R., & Klein, J. D. (Eds.). (2007). Design and development research: Methods, strategies, and issues. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Scagnoli, N. I. (2001). Student orientations for online programs. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(1), 19–27.
Schank, R. C., Berman, T. R., & Macpherson, K. A. (1999). Learning by doing. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. Routledge. (pp. 161–181).
Shelton, K., Saltsman, G., Holstrom, L., & Pederson, K. (2014). Quality scorecard 2014 handbook: Criteria for excellence in the administration of online programs. Retrieved from (with Online Learning Consortium membership) http://onlinelearningconsortium.org/book/quality-scorecard/
Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2012). Teaching and learning at a distance (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education Inc.
Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Stebbins, R. A. (2001). Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.
Stewart, B. L., Goodson, C. E., Miertschin, S. L., Norwood, M. L., & Ezell, S. (2013). Online student support services: A case based on quality frameworks. Journal of Online Learning & Teaching, 9(2), 290–303.
Suskie, L. (2010). Assessing student learning: A common sense guide. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Ullmann, J. (2009). Alternative uses for course management systems: They aren’t just for classes any more. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, 12(3). Retrieved from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/fall123/ullmann123.html
Wang, C., Shannon, D. M., & Ross, M. E. (2013). Students’ characteristics, self-regulated learning, technology self-efficacy, and course outcomes in online learning. Distance Education, 34(3), 302–323.
Wright, C. R., Lopes, V., Montgomerie, T. C., Reju, S. A., & Schmoller, S. (2014). Selecting a learning management system: Advice from an academic perspective. EDUCAUSE Review Online, April 21, 2014. Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/selecting-learning-management-system-advice-academic-perspective
Acknowledgments
Dr. Donna Sundre guided the development of the end-of-orientation questionnaire (EOQ) as well as the assessment project. Angela Bernazani, Jeff Kosovich, Mandalyn Swanson, Dr. Laura Williams, and Dr. Shenghua Zha provided help in planning for the assessment project, mapping objectives, and writing the EOQ questions. Elaine Roberts Kaye contributed in the pilot implementation of the orientation course and data analysis. Dr. Lincoln Gray provided editing suggestions.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendices
Appendix A—Time Management Worksheet
Time Management Worksheet
This tool is to help you track the tasks and related activities when you take courses during summer sessions. Certainly study is of priority during the time; however, other personal activities, such as sleeping and maintaining social life, are also important. Successful completion of the compressed summer-session course(s) needs your plan and balance of different activities.
Remember—Total Hours Per Week: 168
Your Name:
Appendix B—End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ)
Appendix C—EOQ Items Mapping with Orientation Objectives
Objectives | Assessment methods | EOQ questions | Item# |
---|---|---|---|
O-1. Demonstrate metacognitive awareness regarding motivation and time commitment to online courses | End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) | Online Learning Motivation | #1, 9 |
End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) | Time Commitment | #1, 2 | |
Canvas Orientation site track completion of self-assessment about online learning readiness | |||
O-2. Match the technical requirements from the program for the installation and facilitation on their own devices | Checklist or Tracking with Technologies | # 4, | |
End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) | Factual knowledge items about computer configuration | ||
O-3 .Identify representative characteristics of a successful online student | End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) | Awareness of successful online learning tips | #2, 3, 9 |
Post comments to online discussion forum after watching the recording | |||
O-4. Identify appropriate methods for contacting technical assistance and technical support staff. | End-of-Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ) | Factual knowledge items about appropriate contact for support | #5–8 |
O-5. Demonstrate knowledge of online learning management system by successfully completing the following tasks: A. Download a full-text article from the orientation course site and save it locally on a computer or mobile device; B. Submit an assignment, i.e. an uploaded article, to Canvas; C. Create an online discussion entry D. Take an online quiz/survey E. Check grades F. Participate in a Blackboard Collaborate web-conferencing session | Canvas progress moderating of task completion |
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Liu, J.C., Adams, A. (2017). Design of Online Student Orientation with Conceptual and Procedural Scaffolding. In: Lai, FQ., Lehman, J. (eds) Learning and Knowledge Analytics in Open Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-38956-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-38955-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-38956-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)