Skip to main content

Computer-Guided Total Hip Arthroplasty

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics

Abstract

Computer-assisted surgery in total hip replacement has proven to be better technology for achieving precision for implant placement. Variables that may be improved include leg length determination, appropriate anatomical offset, pelvic tilt, and appropriate version of the implants. This guidance is valuable for use in robotic applications and with minimally invasive operations. Recent meta-analysis studies have demonstrated these improvements over conventional methods relying on conventional instrumentation. Newer technologies include the use of accelerometers and intraoperative computed tomography for automated registration, which reduce drawbacks of inconvenience and complexity of the technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 899.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bargar WL, Bauer A, Boerner M. Primary and revision total hip replacement using ROBODOC. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998;354:82–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murtha PE, Hafez MA, Jaramaz B, DiGioia AM. Variations in acetabular anatomy with reference to total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008;90-B:308–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murray DW. The definition and measurement of acetabular orientation. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993;75:228–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lewinnek GE, Lewis JL, Tarr R, et al. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1978;60:217–20.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Philippot R, Wegrzyn J, Farizon F, Fessy MH. Pelvic balance in sagittal and Lweinnek reference planes in standing, supine and sitting positions. Orthop Tramatol Surg Res. 2009;95:70–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Hecquet J, Marty C. Pelvic incidence: a fundamental pelvic parameter for three-dimensional regulation of spinal sagittal curves. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:99–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Murphy WS, Klingenstein G, Murphy SB, Zheng G. Pelvic tilt is minimally changes by total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:417–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Babisch J, Layher F, Amiot LP. The rationale for tilt-adjusted acetabular cup navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:357–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhu J, Wan Z, Dorr LD. Quantification of pelvic tilt in total hip arthroplasty. CORR 2010;468:571–575.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Miki H, Kyo T, Sugano N. Anatomical hip range of motion after implantation during total hip arthropalsty with a large change in pelvic inclination. J Arthroplasty. 2012;27:1641–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Stiehl JB, Heck DA. Validation of imageless total hip navigation. In: Stiehl JB, Digioia A, Konermann W, Haacker R, editors. Navigation and minimally invasive surgery in orthopaedics. Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Takao M, Nishii T, Sakai T, Sugano N. Application of a CT-3D fluoroscopy matching navigation system to the pelvic and femoral regions. Comput Aided Surg. 2012;17:69–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tsukada S, Wakui M. Decreased accuracy of acetabular cup placement for imageless navigation in obsese patients. J Orthop Sci. 2010;15:758–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitada M, Nakamura N, Iwana D, Kakimoto A, Nishii T, Sugano N. Evaluation of the accuracy of computed tomography-based navigation for femoral stem orientation and leg length discrepancy. J Arthroplasty. 2011;26:674–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Xu K, Li YM, Zhang HF, Wang CG, Xu YQ, Li ZJ. Computer navigation in total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int J Surg. 2014;12:528–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Barrack RL, Krempec JA, Clohisy JC, McDonald DJ, Ricci WM, Ruh EL, Nunley RM. Accuracy of acetabular component position in hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013;95:1760–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, Petrakos AE, Vemula SP, Domb BG. Does robotic-assisted computer navigation affect acetabular cup positioning in total hip arthroplasty in the obese patient? A comparison study. J Arthroplasty. 2015. doi:10.1016/j.arth.2015.06.062.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Widmer KH, Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res. 2004;22:815.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fukunishi S, Nishio S, Fujihara Y, Okahisa S, Takeda Y, Fukui T, Yoshiya S. Accuacy of combined anteversion in image-free navigated total hip arthroplasty: stem-first or cup-first technique? Int Orthop. 2015;40:9–13.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Dorr LD, Malik A, Dastane M, Wan Z. Combined anteversion technique for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009;467:119–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Renkawitz T, Weber M, Springorum HR, Sendtner E, Woerner M, Ulm K, Weber T, Grifka J. Impingement-free range of movement, acetabular component cover and early clinical results comparing ‘femur-first’ navigation and ‘conventional’ minimally invasive total hip arthroplaslty: a randomized controlled trial. Bone Joint J. 2015;97B:890–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ellapparadja P, Mahajan V, Deakin AH, Deep K. Reproduction of hip offset and leg length in navigated total hip arthroplasty: how accurate are we? J Arthroplasty. 2015;30:1002–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dastane M, Dorr LD, Tarwala R, Wan Z. Hip offset in total hip arthroplasty: quantitative measurement with navigation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:429–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kalteis R, Handel M, Bathis H, Perlick L, Tingart M, Grifka J. Imageless navigation for insertion of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty: is it accurate as CT-based navigation? J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:163–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Nogler M, Mayr E, Krismer M, Thaler M. Reduced variability in cup positioning: the direct anterior surgical approach using navigation. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:789–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Nogler M, Kessler O, Prassl A, Donnelly B, Streicher R, Sledge JB, Krismer M. Reduced variability of acetabular cup positioning with use of an imageless navigation system. Clin Orthop. 2004;426:159–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kanawade V, Dorr LD, Banks SA, Zhang Z, Wan Z. Precision of robotic guided instrumentation for acetabular component positioning. The Journal of Arthroplasty 30 (2015) 392–397

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James B. Stiehl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Stiehl, J.B., Thornberry, R. (2016). Computer-Guided Total Hip Arthroplasty. In: Scuderi, G., Tria, A. (eds) Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_129

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34109-5_129

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-34107-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-34109-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineReference Module Medicine

Publish with us

Policies and ethics