Skip to main content

Evolution of Complexity

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Evolutionary Developmental Biology

Abstract

To study the evolution of complexity in organisms, we need an understanding of complexity that enables us to measure it. In biology today, organismal complexity has two main operational senses: (1) a horizontal sense: the number of different part types at a given hierarchical level (e.g., the number of cell types in a multicellular individual) and (2) a vertical sense: the number of levels of nestedness of parts within wholes (e.g., a eukaryotic multicellular individual is one level of nestedness above a free-living protist). How do horizontal and vertical complexity behave in evolution? For horizontal complexity, an increasing trend is predicted by current theory, that is, by the zero-force evolutionary law (ZFEL), but at most hierarchical levels, evidence is lacking and the existence of a trend is uncertain. For vertical complexity, there is unambiguous evidence for a trend in the maximum, a rise in the maximum hierarchical level achieved by organisms over the history of life. However, the underlying mechanism of change and the forces driving the trend are unknown. Interestingly, there is some evidence that the rise in vertical complexity, the addition of new levels, is – when it occurs – accompanied by systematic losses in horizontal complexity at lower levels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brandon R, Fleming L (2015) Why flying dogs are rare: a general theory of luck in evolutionary transitions. Stud Hist Phil Biol Biomed Sci 49:24–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcott B (2008) The other cooperation problem: generating benefit. Biol Philos 23:179–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calcott B, Sterelny K (eds) (2011) The major transitions in evolution revisited. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Doolittle WF (2012) A ratchet for protein complexity. Nature 481:270–271

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eldredge N, Salthe SN (1984) Hierarchy and evolution. Oxf Surv Evol Biol 1:184–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnigan GC, Hanson-Smith V, Stevens TH, Thornton JW (2012) Evolution of increased complexity in a molecular machine. Nature 481:360–364

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin BC (1996) How the leopard changed its spots. Simon and Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim NA, Payne JL, Finnegan S, Knope ML, Kowalewski M, Lyons SK, McShea DW, Novack-Gottshall PM, Smith FA, Wang SC (in press) Hierarchical complexity and the size limits of life. Proc R S Lond B Biol Sci

    Google Scholar 

  • Knoll AH, Bambach RK (2000) Directionality in the history of life: diffusion from the left wall or repeated scaling of the right? Paleobiology 26:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marcot J, McShea DW (2007) Increasing hierarchical complexity throughout the history of life: phylogenetic tests of trend mechanisms. Paleobiology 33:182–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (1996) Metazoan complexity and evolution: is there a trend? Evolution 50:477–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (2002) A complexity drain on cells in the evolution of multicellularity. Evolution 56:441–452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW (2015) Three trends in the history of life: an evolutionary syndrome. Evol Biol 43:531–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Brandon RN (2010) Biology’s first law. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Changizi MA (2003) Three puzzles in hierarchical evolution. Integr Comp Biol 43:74–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McShea DW, Venit EP (2001) What is a part? In: Wagner GP (ed) The character concept in evolutionary biology. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 259–284

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Müller GB, Streicher J (1989) Ontogeny of the syndesmosis tibiofibularis and the evolution of the bird hindlimb: a caenogenetic feature triggers phenotypic novelty. Anat Embryol 179:327–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley MA, Wideman JG, Ruiz-Trillo I (2016) Losing complexity: the role of simplification in macroevolution. Trends Ecol Evol 31:608–621

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Payne JL, McClain CR, Boyer AG, Brown JH, Finnegan S, Kowalewski M, Krause RA Jr, Lyons SK, McShea DW, Novack-Gottshall PM, Smith FA, Spaeth P, Stempien JA, Wang SC (2011) The evolutionary consequences of oxygenic photosynthesis: a body size perspective. Photosynth Res 107:37–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Raff RA (1996) The shape of life: genes, development, and the evolution of animal form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidor CA (2001) Simplification as a trend in synapsid cranial evolution. Evolution 55:1419–1442

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson C (2012) The evolutionary history of division of labour. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 279:116–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine JW, Collins AG, Meyer CP (1994) Morphological complexity increase in metazoans. Paleobiology 20:131–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venit EP (2007) Evolutionary Trends in the individuation and polymorphism of colonial marine invertebrates. PhD thesis, Department of Biology, Duke University

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. McShea .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

McShea, D.W. (2017). Evolution of Complexity. In: Nuno de la Rosa, L., Müller, G. (eds) Evolutionary Developmental Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_123-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33038-9_123-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33038-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life SciencesReference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics