Skip to main content

Responses of Plant Cells and Tissues to Pulsed Electric Field Treatments

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Electroporation

Abstract

Cell membrane electroporation/permeabilization may be achieved without affecting cell viability through strict control of the electric pulse parameters. This process is referred to as reversible permeabilization. Even if the cells survive the electric field treatment, they are subjected to stress due to the opening of pores and the struggle of the cells to recover their normal functionality. Very little is known about what actually occurs in the cell and its membranes at the molecular level upon reversible electroporation, and the physiological responses to pulsed electric field (PEF)-induced stress are still largely unknown. This chapter explores the current state of the art on the influence of the complexity of plant tissues on electroporation. Focusing on reversible electroporation, metabolic responses of plant cells and tissues induced by PEF application are also reviewed. One of the first challenges when electroporating plant tissue is their heterogeneous structures where cells vary in shape, size, and cell wall structure. This heterogeneity influences the effect of different electric fields protocols aiming at permeabilizing all cells in the tissue. Once cells are reversibly permeabilized, physiological responses to PEF-induced stress include the production of reactive oxygen species, mobilization of stored energy, activation of stress-related genes, and the production of secondary metabolites. The application of reversible PEF has also been shown to barley seed germination as well as to increase the strength of the cell wall in potatoes and, in consequence, their textural properties. This chapter finishes by revising the effect of reversible PEF on protoplasts (plant cells where the cell walls have been removed) and, in consequence, on the regeneration of new plants. Overall, reports on reversible permeabilization of plant cells and tissues are not common in the literature; however, they have laid the foundation for a fascinating area of research and technological innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Asavasanti S, Ristenpart W, Stroeve P, Barrett DM (2011) Permeabilization of plant tissues by monopolar pulsed electric fields: effect of frequency. J Food Sci 76:E98–E111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balasa A, Toepfl S, Knorr D (2006) Pulsed electric field treatment of grapes. Food factory for the future 3. Gothenburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista Napotnik T, Rebersek M, Vernier PT, Mali B, Miklavčič D (2016) Effects of high voltage nanosecond electric pulses on eukaryotic cells (in vitro). A systematic review. Bioelectrochemistry 110:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cogalniceanu G, Radu M, Fologea D, Brezeanu A (1998) Are the electric field effects coupled with the hormonal reception of cells in plant callus culture? Rom Biotechnol Lett 3:Ö 201–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Dymek K, Dejmek P, Panarese V, Vicente AA, Wadsö L, Finnie C, Gómez Galindo F (2012) Effect of pulsed electric field on the germination of barley seeds. LWT- Food Sci Technol 47:161–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dymek K, Dejmek P, Gómez Galindo F (2014) Influence of pulsed electric field protocols on the reversible permeabilization of rucola leaves. Food Bioprocess Technol 7:761–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eing CJ, Bonnet S, Pacher M, Puchta H, Frey W (2009) Effects of nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure on Arabidopsis thaliana. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 16:1322–1328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evrendilek GA, Zhang QH, Richter ER (1999) Inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Escherichia coli 8739 in apple juice by pulsed electric fields. J Food Prot 62:793–796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganeva V, Galutzov B, Teissie J (1995) Electric field mediated loading of macromolecules in intact yeast cells is critically controlled at the wall level. Biochim Biophys Acta 1240: 229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Galindo F, Wadsö L, Vicente A, Dejmek P (2008a) Exploring metabolic responses of potato tissue induced by electric pulses. Food Biophys 3:352–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Galindo F, Vernier T, Dejmek P, Vicente A, Gundersen M (2008b) Pulsed electric field reduces the permeability of potato cell wall. Bioelectromagnetics 29:296–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez Galindo F, Dejmek P, Lundgren K, Rasmusson AG, Vicente A, Moritz T (2009) Metabolomic evaluation of pulsed electric field-induced stress on potato tissue. Planta 230:469–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guderjan M, Töpfl S, Angersbach A, Knorr D (2005) Impact of pulsed electric field treatment on the recovery and quality of plant oils. J Food Eng 67:281–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helmersson E (2012) Optimisation of vacuum impregnation and pulsed electric field parameters for improving the cryoprotection of potato tubers. Master of Science thesis. University of Lund

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z, Kennedy S, Booske JH, Hagness SC (2006) Experimental studies of persistent poration dynamics of cell membranes induced by electric pulses. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 34:1416–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joersbo M, Brunstedt J (1990) Stimulation of protein synthesis in electroporated plant protoplasts. J Plant Physiol 136:464–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotnik T, Mir LM, Flisar K, Puc M, Miklavčič D (2001) Cell membrane electropermeabilization by symmetrical bipolar rectangular pulses. Part I. Increased efficiency of permeabilization. Bioelectrochemistry 54:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebar Macek A, Miklavčič D (2001) Cell electropermeabilization to small molecules in vitro: control by pulse parameters. Radiol Oncol 35:193–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Mordhorst AP, Lörz H (1992) Electrostimulated regeneration of plantlets from protoplasts derived from cell suspensions of barley (Hordeum vulgare). Physiol Plant 85:289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira RN, Gómez Galindo F, Vicente A, Dejmek P (2009) Effects of pulsed electric field on the viscoelastic properties of potato tissue. Food Biophys 4:229–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phoon PY, Gómez Galindo F, Vicente A, Dejmek A (2008) Pulsed electric field in combination with vacuum impregnation with trehalose improves the freezing tolerance of spinach leaves. J Food Eng 88:144–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pucihar G, Mir LM, Miklavčič D (2002) The effect of pulse repetition frequency on the uptake into electropermeabilized cells in vitro with possible applications in electrochemotherapy. Bioelectrochemistry 57:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rech EL, Ochat SJ, Chand PK, Power JB, Davey MR (1987) Electro-enhancement of division of plant protoplast-derived cells. Protoplasma 141:169–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saw NMMT, Riedel H, Cai Z, Kutuk O, Smetanska I (2012) Stimulation of anthocyanin synthesis in grape (Vitris vinifera) cell cultures by pulsed electric fields and ethephon. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 108:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vallverdú-Queralt A, Oms-Oliu G, Odriozola-Serrano I, Lamuela-Raventós R, Martín Belloso O, Elez-Martínez P (2013) Metabolite profiling of phenolic and carotenoid contents in tomatoes after moderate-intensity pulsed electric field treatments. Food Chem 136:199–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarmush ML, Golberg A, Sersa G, Kotnik T, Miklavčič D (2014) Electroporation based technologies for medicine: principles, applications and challenges. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 16:295–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Federico Gómez Galindo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Galindo, F.G. (2017). Responses of Plant Cells and Tissues to Pulsed Electric Field Treatments. In: Miklavčič, D. (eds) Handbook of Electroporation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32886-7_195

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics