Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Experience with Computer Navigation: Present and Future

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rotatory Knee Instability

  • 1629 Accesses

Abstract

Navigation offers the ability to accurately measure 6 degree-of-freedom knee kinematics in real time. Complex instabilities, such as the pivot shift, can be assessed with differentiation of the rotational and translation components. This objective analysis may allow the surgeon to customise reconstructive surgery. Procedures, such as lateral extra-articular plasty, may be indicated if rotational laxity persists after standard ACL reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Berning ET, Fowler RM (2011) Thermal damage and tracker-pin track infection in computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26(6):977.e21–977.e24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borgstrom PH, Markolf KL, Wang Y et al (2015) Use of inertial sensors to predict pivot shift grade and diagnose an ACL injury during pre-operative testing. Am J Sports Med 43:857–864

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bull AM, Amis AA (1998) The pivot shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 5:141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bull AM, Andersen HN, Basso O, Targett J, Amis AA (1999) Incidence and mechanism of the pivot shift: an in vitro study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 363:219–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A, Katchburian MV, Hassan AN, Amis AA (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84:1075–1081

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Colombet P, Robinson J, Christel P, Franceschi J, Djian P (2007) Using navigation to measure rotation kinematics during ACL reconstruction: a cadaveric pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Colombet P (2011) Knee laxity control in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction versus anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and lateral tenodesis: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 39:1248–1254

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dessenne V, Lavallee S, Julliard R, Orti R, Martelli S, Cinquin P (1995) Computer-assisted knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: first clinical tests. J Image Guid Surg 1:59–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellermann A, Sielbold R (2004) ACL-reconstruction with the Navitrack system: critical analysis of navigation in ACL-surgery, in Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery. Steihl J, Konermann W, Haaker R (eds). Springer, New York, pp 423–429

    Google Scholar 

  10. Engebretsen L, Wijdicks C, Anderson C, Westerhaus B, LaPrade R (2012) Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:698–702

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Geais L (2011) Characterization of the knee kinematics : identify the effects of different parameters on the knee kinematics using a model. ÉCOLE DOCTORALE ED415 Laboratoire de mécanique des structures et des systèmes couplés (EA3196) Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  12. Georgoulis AD, Papadonikolakis A, Papageorgiou CD, Mitsou A, Stergiou N (2003) Three-dimensional tibiofemoral kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament–deficient and reconstructed knee during walking. Am J Sports Med 31(1):75–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hewison CE, Tran MN, Kaniki N, Remtulla A, Bryant D, Getgood A (2015) Lateral extra-articular tenodesis reduces rotational laxity when combined with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature. Arthroscopy 31:2022–2034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Julliard R, Lavallee S, Dessenne V (1998) Computer assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:57–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jung KA, Lee SC, Ahn NK et al (2011) Delayed femoral fracture through a tracker pin site after navigated total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26(3):505.e9–505.e11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kawaguchi Y, Kondo E, Takeda R, Akita K, Yasuda K, Amis AA (2015) The role of fibers in the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament in resisting tibial displacement. Arthroscopy 31(3):435–444

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kittl C, El Daou H, Athwal K, Gupte C, Weiler A, WIlliams A, Amis A (2015) The role of the anterolateral structures and the ACL in controlling internal rotational knee laxity ISAKOS

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klos TV, Habets RJ, Banks AZ, Banks SA, Devilee RJ, Cook FF (1998) Computer assistance in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 354:65–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kocher M, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kurimura M, Matsumoto H, Fujikawa K, Toyama Y (2004) Factors for the presence of anteromedial rotatory instability of the knee. J Orthop Sci 9(4):380–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lane CG, Warren RF, Stanford FC, Kendoff D, Pearle AD (2008) In vivo analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon during computer navigated ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(5):487–492

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lie D, Bull AMJ, Amis AA (2007) Persistence of the mini pivot shift after anatomically placed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 457:203–209

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C et al (2012) An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15:1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T et al (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17(7):708–716

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Monaco E, Maestri B, Labianca L, Speranza A, Ferretti A (2011) Instrumented measurements of knee laxity: KT1000 vs navigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93-B(SUPP II):175

    Google Scholar 

  26. Musahl V, Voos J, O’Loughlin P, Stueber V, Kendoff D, Pearle A (2010) Mechanized pivot shift test achieves greater accuracy than manual pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1208–1213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF, Wrobble RR (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–255

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostendorf C, Fuchs B, Koch P (2006) Femoral stress fracture after computer navigated total knee arthroplasty. Knee 13(5):397–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Pearle AD, Solomon DJ, Wanich T, Moreau-Gaudry A, Granchi CC, Wickiewicz TL et al (2007) Reliability of navigated knee stability examination: a cadaveric evaluation. Am J Sports Med 35:1315–1320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Picard F, DiGioia AM, Moody J, Martinek V, Fu FH, Rytel M, Nikou C, LaBarca RS, Jaramaz B (2001) Accuracy in tunnel placement for ACL reconstruction. Comparison of traditional arthroscopic and computer-assisted navigation techniques. Comput Aided Surg 6(5):279–289

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Robinson J, Carrat L, Granchi C, Colombet P (2007) Influence of anterior cruciate ligament bundles on knee kinematics: clinical assessment using computer-assisted navigation. Am J Sports Med 35:2006–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shafizadeh S, Huber H, Grote S, Hoeher J, Paffrath T, Tiling T, Bouillon B (2005) Principles of fluoroscopic-based navigation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Oper Tech Orthop 15:70–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K, Kolowich P, Anderst W (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(4):975–983

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wiese M, Rosenthal A, Bernsmann K (2004) Clinical experience using the SurgiGATE system, In: Navigation and robotics in total joint and spine surgery. Steihl J, Konermann W, Haaker R (eds). New York.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Zaffagnini S, Bignozzi S, Martelli S, Imakiire N, Lopomo N, Marcacci M (2006) New intraoperative protocol for kinematic evaluation of ACL reconstruction: preliminary results. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14(9):811–816

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Musculoskeletal Surgery, Avon Orthopaedic Centre, Bristol, UK

    James Robinson FRCS(Orth), MS

  2. Clinque du Sport, Bordeaux-Merignac, Mérignac, France

    Philippe Colombet MD

Authors
  1. James Robinson FRCS(Orth), MS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Philippe Colombet MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Robinson FRCS(Orth), MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UPMC Center for Sports Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Volker Musahl

  2. Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Mölndal, Sweden

    Jón Karlsson

  3. Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan

    Ryosuke Kuroda

  4. Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Stefano Zaffagnini

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, J., Colombet, P. (2017). Experience with Computer Navigation: Present and Future. In: Musahl, V., Karlsson, J., Kuroda, R., Zaffagnini, S. (eds) Rotatory Knee Instability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32070-0_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32070-0_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32069-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32070-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation