Skip to main content

Phase I Studies and First-In-Human Trials

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Clinical Pharmacology: Current Topics and Case Studies
  • 2643 Accesses

Abstract

Clinical trials with new investigational medicinal products have to go through a number of phases, usually beginning with healthy volunteers, to progressively establish their safety and ultimately their efficacy. Disasters occur only rarely during phase I trials, which have a remarkable safety record. In 2006, a contract research organization was conducting the first human testing of TGN1412 an immunomodulatory anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody. All six volunteers receiving TGN1412 became critically ill with potentially life-threatening complications within hours of starting drug infusion. Notably, similar detrimental effects were already known for decades since the first antibody (OKT3) was licensed. A thorough understanding of the pharmacology of a drug often provides a clue to the potential toxicity that one might encounter. Even toxicology studies in higher animals such as monkeys may provide a false sense of security and apparent safety if there is little inter-species cross-reactivity for an antibody or if the response pattern may be highly specific for humans. Clinical pharmacologists with a strong scientific background in the particular field of science should play a key role as investigators. The expertise available in spezialized centers could help to identify early any potential or theoretical risks, improve designs of clinical trial protocols, address other possible shortcomings in the scientific rationale that support the safety of similar agents. The most striking feature of the study with TGN1412 was that six volunteers were exposed simultaneously to a drug with an unknown safety profile in humans. This is irresponsible particularly in a first-in-man dose escalation trial. Exposing only 1 or 2 subjects to start with on a single day, particularly at the start of each dose level, generates significant insights into safety. This chapter discusses considerations in the preclinical development, the clinical trial design, choice of study population, dose finding, necessary clinical environment and finally specificities of first-in-human trials with monoclonal antibodies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. European Medicines Agency (1998) ICH topic E8 general considerations for clinical trials. Note for guidance on general considerations for clinical trials. EMEA/CPMP/ICH/291/95

    Google Scholar 

  2. Duff G (2006) Expert Scientific Group on phase one clinical trials final report. Stationery Office, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  3. European Medicines Agency (1998) ICH guideline S6 pre-clinical safety evaluation of biotechnology-derived products. EMEA/CPMP/ICH/302/95

    Google Scholar 

  4. European Medicines Agency (2000) ICH guideline M3 (R1) non-clinical safety studies for the conduct of human clinical trials for pharmaceuticals. EMEA/CPMP/ICH/286/95

    Google Scholar 

  5. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (2007) Guideline on strategies to identify and mitigate risks for first-in-human clinical trials with investigational medicinal products. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/07

    Google Scholar 

  6. Food and Drug Administration (2005) Guidance for industry. Estimating the maximum safe starting dose in initial clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy volunteers. www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/index.htm

  7. European Medicines Agency, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (2007) Guideline on requirements for first-in-man clinical trials for potential high-risk medicinal products. EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/2007

    Google Scholar 

  8. Paasche-Orlow MK, Taylor HA, Brancati FL (2003) Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. N Engl J Med 348:721–726

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tosi D, Laghzali Y, Vinches M et al (2015) Clinical development strategies and outcomes in first-in-human trials of monoclonal antibodies. J Clin Oncol 33:2158–2165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suntharalingham G, Perry MR, Ward S et al (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med 355:1018–1028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gross JA, St. John T, Allison JP (1990) The murine homologue of the T lymphocyte antigen CD28. Molecular cloning and cell surface expression. J Immunol 15:3201–3210

    Google Scholar 

  12. St. Clair EW (2008) The calm after the cytokine storm: lessons learned from the TGN 1412 trial. J Clin Invest 118:1344–1347

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Kenter MJH, Cohen AF (2006) Establishing risk of human experimentation with drugs: lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368:1387–1391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Legrand N, Cupedo T, van Lent AU et al (2006) Transient accumulation of human mature thymocytes and regulatory T-cells with CD28 superagonist in “human immune system” Rag 2/γc / mice. Blood 108:238–245

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Jilma B, Shah R (2006) Minimizing disasters during early drug development: a pressing need for an improved guidance. Nat Rev Drug Discov 5. www.nature.com

    Google Scholar 

  16. Day M (2006) Agency criticises drug trial. BMJ 332:1290

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Goodyear M (2006) Further lessons from the TGN1412 tragedy. BMJ 333:270–271

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Goodyear M (2006) Learning from the TGN 1412 trial. BMJ 332:677–680

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Knapp P, Raynor DK, Silcock J, Parkinson B (2009) Performance-based readability testing of participant materials for a phase I trial: TGN 1412. J Med Ethics 35:573–578

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Schneider CK, Kalinke U (2007) Nach dem TGN1412-Zwischenfall. Prinzipien der Bewertung von First-in-Man-Studien mit monoklonalen Antikörpern durch das Paul-Ehrlich-Institut. Bundesgesundheitsbl Gesundheitsforsch Gesundheitsschutz 50:1213–1220

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sibille M, Donazzolo Y, Lecoz F, Krupka E (2006) After the London tragedy, is it still possible to consider phase I is safe? Br J Clin Pharmacol 62:502–503

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Kumagai Y, Fukazawa I, Momma T et al (2006) A nationwide survey on serious adverse events in healthy volunteers studies in Japan. Clin Pharmacol Ther 79:P71

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

  • The European Medicines Agency and the American Food and Drug administration provide various guidelines for requirements for phase I trials, which can be downloaded from the home pages: http://www.emea.europa.eu and http://www.fda.gov

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd Jilma .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Derhaschnig, U., Jilma, B. (2016). Phase I Studies and First-In-Human Trials. In: Müller, M. (eds) Clinical Pharmacology: Current Topics and Case Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27347-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics