Skip to main content
Log in

Nach dem TGN1412-Zwischenfall

Prinzipien der Bewertung von First-in-Man-Studien mit monoklonalen Antikörpern durch das Paul-Ehrlich-Institut

After the TGN1412 incident. Principles for assessment of first-in-man trials with monoclonal antibodies by the Paul Ehrlich Institute

  • Leitthema: Originalien und Übersichtsarbeiten
  • Published:
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz Aims and scope

Zusammenfassung

Der Einsatz monoklonaler Antikörper hat auf vielen klinischen Gebieten zu neuen therapeutischen Möglichkeiten geführt. Er birgt aber auch Risiken, wie das akute Auftreten eines Zytokinsturms bei der Erstanwendung von TGN1412, einem Superagonisten gegen CD28, im März 2006 gezeigt hat. Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Prinzipien, die das Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) bei der wissenschaftlichen Bewertung von Anträgen auf klinische Prüfung zur Erstanwendung von monoklonalen Antikörpern am Menschen anwendet. Diese werden als Verfahrensanweisung in das Qualitätsmanagementsystem des PEI implementiert und stellen eine Ergänzung und Konkretisierung der allgemeinen Leitlinie des Ausschusses für Humanarzneimittel (CHMP) für die Produktklasse der monoklonalen Antikörper dar. Wesentliche Aspekte sind die auf monoklonale Antikörper zugeschnittenen Faktoren zur Abschätzung des Risikos, da nicht jeder monoklonaler Antikörper per se ein Risiko darstellt, sowie die Gründung einer PEI-Expertengruppe, die die wissenschaftliche Bewertung begleitet und prüft.

Abstract

The use of monoclonal antibodies has led to new therapeutic possibilities for many clinical conditions. However, their application also bears risks, as demonstrated by the acute occurrence of a cytokine storm following administration of TGN1412, an anti-CD28 superagonist, in March 2006. This article highlights the principles of the Paul-Ehrlich-Institut (PEI) for the scientific assessment of first-in-man clinical trial applications for monoclonal antibodies. These principles are implemented as a standard operating procedure in the PEI Quality Management System and are intended as a supplement specific to monoclonal antibodies to the published general guideline issued by the Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP). Central aspects are the identification of risk factors for monoclonal antibodies based on defined criteria, since not every novel monoclonal antibody represents a risk per se. Furthermore, a PEI expert group that supports the scientific assessment procedure has been founded.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Suntharalingam G, Perry MR, Ward S, et al. (2006) Cytokine storm in a phase 1 trial of the anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody TGN1412. N Engl J Med 355(10):1018–1028

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Luhder F, Huang Y, Dennehy KM, et al. (2003) Topological requirements and signaling properties of T cell-activating, anti-CD28 antibody superagonists. J Exp Med 197(8):955–966

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bour-Jordan H, Bluestone J (2002) CD28 function: a balance of costimulatory and regulatory signals. J Clin Immunol 22(1):1–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Beyersdorf N, Gaupp S, Balbach K, et al. (2005) Selective targeting of regulatory T cells with CD28 superagonists allows effective therapy of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Exp Med 202(3):445–455

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hohlfeld R, Wekerle H (2004) Autoimmune concepts of multiple sclerosis as a basis for selective immunotherapy: from pipe dreams to (therapeutic) pipelines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(Suppl 2):14599–14606

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Skapenko A, Lipsky PE, Schulze-Koops H (2006) T cell activation as starter and motor of rheumatic inflammation. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 305:195–211

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Winkler U, Jensen M, Manzke O, et al. (1999) Cytokine-release syndrome in patients with Bcell chronic lymphocytic leukemia and high lymphocyte counts after treatment with an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab, IDEC-C2B8). Blood 94(7):2217–2224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hopkin M (2006) Can super-antibody drugs be tamed? Nature 13; 440(7086):855–856

    Google Scholar 

  9. Expert Scientific Group on Phase One Clinical Trials: Final Report (The Stationary Office, Norwich, United Kingdom, 2006) ISBN-10 0 11 703722 2. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Consultations/Closedconsultations/DH_4139038

  10. Agence Française de Sécurité Sanitaire des Produits de Santé (AFSSAPS) Department for the Evaluation of Special Status Medicinal Products, First-in-man clinical trials: Estimation of the starting dose, definition of dose progression and protocol of administration to volunteers, 25 July 2006, reviewed 5 September 2006, http://www.afssaps.sante.fr

  11. Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) First-in-man trials with monoclonal antibodies or other high risk compounds, Standard questions for studies covered by the interim arrangements (2006), http://www.mhra.gov.uk

  12. Schneider CK, Kalinke U, Löwer, J (2006) TGN1412 – a regulator's perspective. Nat Biotechnol 24(5):493–496

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. European Medicines Agency (EMEA) (2007) Guideline on Requirements for First-in-Man Clinical Trials for Potential High-Risk Medicinal Products EMEA/CHMP/SWP/28367/2007. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/swp/2836707en.pdf

  14. European Medicines Agency (EMEA) (1998) ICH Topic S6. Note for Guidance on Preclinical Safety Evaluation of Biotechnology-derived Pharmaceuticals CPMP/ICH/302/95. http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ich/030295en.pdf

  15. Hanke T (2006) Lessons from TGN1412. Lancet 368(9547):1569–1570

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Presta LG, Namenuk AK (2005) Non-human primate Fc receptors and methods of use. In USPTO patent full-text and image database San Francisco: Genentech

  17. Shultz LD, Ishikawa F, Greiner DL (2007) Humanized mice in translational biomedical research. Nat Rev Immunol 7(2):118–130

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2002) Guidance for industry and reviewers: estimating the safe starting dose in clinical trials for therapeutics in adult healthy Volunteers. http://www.fda.gov/CbER/gdlns/dose.pdf

  19. Schäffner G (2007) Using the correct terminology. Reg Affairs J 18(1):3–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. European Medicines Agency (EMEA) (2006) European public assessment Report for Xolair. http://www.emea.europa.eu/humandocs/Humans/EPAR/xolair/xolair.htm

  21. International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) (1997) ICH Guideline E8: General Considerations for Clinical Trials. http://www.ich.org/LOB/media/MEDIA484.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to U. Kalinke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, C.K., Kalinke, U. Nach dem TGN1412-Zwischenfall. Bundesgesundheitsbl. 50, 1213–1220 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-007-0331-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-007-0331-6

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation