Abstract
Student engagement indicators, such as behavior and affective states, are known to impact learning. This study uses an established quantitative field observation method to evaluate engagement during students’ use of a new version of an online learning system (Reasoning Mind’s Genie 3). Improvements to Genie 3’s design intended to increase engagement include: using virtual small-group tutoring environment, separating text and speech, and using indicators to focus students’ attention. In this study, Genie 3 classrooms outperformed a traditional classroom on key indicators of engagement, including time on-task, engaged concentration, and boredom. These results have important implications for further improvements to Reasoning Mind, for the design of other online learning systems, and for general pedagogical practices.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
de Baker, R.S.J., D’Mello, S.K., Rodrigo, M.M.T., Graesser, A.C.: Better to be frustrated than bored: The incidence, persistence, and impact of learners’ cognitive-affective states during interactions with three different computer-based learning environments. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 68(4), 223–241 (2010)
Craig, S.D., Graesser, A.C., Sullins, J., Gholson, B.: Affect and learning: An exploratory look into the role of affect in learning with AutoTutor. Journal of Educational Media 29(3), 241–250 (2004)
D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction 22(2), 145–157 (2012)
Ocumpaugh, J., de Baker, R.S.J., Gaudino, S., Labrum, M.J., Dezendorf, T.: Field observations of engagement in reasoning mind. In: Lane, H., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds.) AIED 2013. LNCS, vol. 7926, pp. 624–627. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Khachatryan, G.A., Romashov, A.V., Khachatryan, A.R., Gaudino, S.J., Khachatryan, J.M., Guarian, K.R., Yufa, N.V.: Reasoning Mind Genie 2: An intelligent tutoring system as a vehicle for international transfer of instructional methods in mathematics. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 24(3), 333–382 (2014)
Clark, R.C., Mayer, R.E.: E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning, 3rd edn. Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2011)
Ocumpaugh, J., de Baker, R.S.J., Rodrigo, M.M.T.: Baker-Rodrigo Observation Method Protocol (BROMP) 1.0 Training Manual version 1.0. Technical Report. New York, NY: EdLab. Manila, Philippines: Ateneo Laboratory for the Learning Sciences (2012). http://www.columbia.edu/~rsb2162/BROMP%20QFO%20Training%20Manual%201.0.pdf
Miller, W.L., Baker, R.S., Labrum, M.J., Petsche, K., Wagner, A.Z.: Automated detection of proactive remediation by teachers in Reasoning Mind classrooms. Manuscript in preparation (2014)
McDonald, J.H.: Handbook of Biological Statistics. Sparky House, Baltimore (2014)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mulqueeny, K., Mingle, L.A., Kostyuk, V., Baker, R.S., Ocumpaugh, J. (2015). Improving Engagement in an E-Learning Environment. In: Conati, C., Heffernan, N., Mitrovic, A., Verdejo, M. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9112. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_103
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19773-9_103
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19772-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19773-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)