Abstract
For several decades, the work of Daniel Bar-Tal has illuminated the means by which belief systems are socially constructed and shared widely within societies. His work has offered pivotal insights regarding the ideologies that promote and sustain intense intergroup conflicts and the ways in which these belief systems become firmly rooted in citizens’ minds, shaping their perceptions of reality. In this chapter, we pay tribute to Bar-Tal’s work pertaining to the existence and evolution of an “ethos of conflict” and explore the factors that sustain this ethos as a kind of dominant ideology. Drawing on system justification theory, we highlight the ways in which basic social psychological motives for certainty, security, and social belongingness manifest themselves in the tendency to defend, bolster, and justify the societal status quo—thereby perpetuating an ethos of conflict under circumstances of entrenched conflict and existential threat. We discuss the ways in which system justification motivation contributes to an ethos of conflict that is self-perpetuating and consider the prospects for promoting peaceful forms of social change.
In my view, the challenge that is posed before all of us is to establish a system of beliefs, attitudes, values, and norms that cherish peace, justice, and morality. I know that to many it may look like an unrealistic goal and to others like a long-term goal. I prefer the latter view because it still gives hope.
(Bar-Tal 2013, pp. 457–458)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. New York: Holt.
Altemeyer, B. (1998). The other “authoritarian personality.” In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 30, pp. 48–92). San Diego: Academic.
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Bar-Tal, D. (1990). Group beliefs: A conception for analyzing group structure, processes, and behavior. New York: Springer-Verlag.
Bar-Tal, D. (1998). Societal beliefs in times of intractable conflict: The Israeli case. International Journal of Conflict Management, 9, 22–50.
Bar-Tal, D. (2004). The necessity of observing real life situations: Palestinian–Israeli violence as a laboratory of learning about social behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34, 677–701.
Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Sociopsychological foundations of intractable conflicts. American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.
Bar-Tal, D. (2013). Intractable conflicts: Socio-psychological foundations and dynamics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to conflict resolution. In D. Bar-Tal (Ed.), Intergroup conflicts and their resolution: A social psychological perspective (pp. 217–240). New York: Psychology Press.
Bar-Tal, D., & Halperin, E. (2013). The Israeli–Jewish society: Socio-psychological barriers for peacemaking and overcoming them. Tel-Aviv. Israel: The Tami Steinmetz Center for Peace Research.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Berrebi, C., & Klor, E. F. (2008). Are voters sensitive to terrorism? Direct evidence from the Israeli electorate. American Political Science Review, 102, 279–301.
Bonanno, G. A., & Jost, J. T. (2006). Conservative shift among high-exposure survivors of the September 11th terrorist attacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 28, 311–323.
Canetti, D., Halperin, E., Hobfoll, S. E., Shapira, O., & Hirsch-Hoefler, S. (2009a). Authoritarianism, perceived threat and exclusionism on the eve of the Disengagement: Evidence from Gaza. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 33, 463–474.
Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009b). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53, 363–389.
Darley, J. (2004). Social organization for the production of evil. In J. T. Jost & J. Sidanius (Eds.), Political psychology: Key readings. New York: Psychology Press.
Doise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology (E. Mapstone, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feldman, S. (2003). Enforcing social conformity: A theory of authoritarianism. Political Psychology, 24, 41–74.
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140.
Gaucher, D., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Difficulties awakening the sense of injustice and overcoming oppression: On the soporific effects of system justification. In P. T. Coleman (Ed.), Conflict, interdependence, and justice: The intellectual legacy of Morton Deutsch (pp. 227–246). New York: Springer.
Glick, P. (2002). Sacrificial lambs dressed in wolves’ clothing: Envious prejudice, ideology, and the scapegoating of Jews. In L. Newman & R. Erber (Eds.), What social psychology can tell us about the Holocaust (pp. 113–142). New York: Oxford University Press.
Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 1029–1046.
Greenberg, J., & Jonas, E. (2003). Psychological and political orientation—The left, the right, and the rigid: Comment on Jost et al. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129, 376–382.
Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2011). Socio-psychological barriers to peace making: An empirical examination within the Israeli Jewish society. Journal of Peace Research, 48, 637–651.
Hardin, C. D., & Higgins, E. T. (1996). Shared reality: How social verification makes the subjective objective. In R. M. Sorrentino & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of motivation and cognition: The interpersonal context (Vol. 3, pp. 28–84). New York: Guilford Press.
Heine, S. J., Proulx, T., & Vohs, K. D. (2006). The meaning maintenance model: On the coherence of human motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 88–110.
Hennes, E. P., Nam, H. H., Stern, C., & Jost, J. T. (2012). Not all ideologies are created equal: Epistemic, existential, and relational needs predict system-justifying attitudes. Social Cognition, 30, 669–688.
Hogg, M. A. (2005). Uncertainty, social identity, and ideology. In S. R. Thye & E. J. Lawler (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 22, pp. 203–229). San Diego: Elsevier.
Immediate aftermath: The 3 No’s of Khartoum. (2007). http://www.sixdaywar.org/content/khartoum.asp. Accessed 31 March 2014.
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994). The role of stereotyping in system-justification and the production of false consciousness. British Journal of Social Psychology, 33, 1–27.
Jost, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Nosek, B. A. (2004). A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology, 25, 881–919.
Jost, J. T., Basevich, E., Dickson, E. S., & Noorbaloochi, S. (in press). The place of values in a world of politics: Personality, motivation, and ideology. In T. Brosch & D. Sander (Eds.), Handbook of value: The affective sciences of values and valuation. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jost, J. T., Gaucher, D., & Stern, C. (2015). “The world isn’t fair”: A system justification perspective on social stratification and inequality. In J. Dovidio & J. Simpson (Eds.), APA handbook of personality and social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 317–340). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Jost, J. T., Glaser, J., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sulloway, F. J. (2003). Political conservatism as motivated social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 339–375.
Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 260–265.
Jost, J. T., Ledgerwood, A., & Hardin, C. D. (2008). Shared reality, system justification, and the relational basis of ideological beliefs. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 2, 171–186.
Kahn, D. T., Liberman, V., Halperin, E., & Ross, L. (in press). Intergroup sentiments, political identity, and their influence on responses to potentially ameliorative proposals in the context of an intractable conflict. Journal of Conflict Resolution.
Kay, A. C., & Friesen, J. (2011). On social stability and social change: Understanding when system justification does and does not occur. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 360–364.
Kay, A. C., Jimenez, M. C., & Jost, J. T. (2002). Sour grapes, sweet lemons, and the anticipatory rationalization of the status quo. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1300–1312.
Kelman, H. C., & Hamilton, V. L. (1989). Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Kemmelmeier, M. (1997). Need for closure and political orientation among German university students. The Journal of Social psychology, 137, 787–789.
Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., & Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: Do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413–431.
Krieger, Z. (2012). Lost moments: The Arab peace initiative, 10 years later. http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/03/lost-moments-the-arab-peace-initiative-10-years-later/255231/. 31 March 2014.
Landau, M. J., Solomon, S., Greenberg, J., Cohen, F., Pyszczynski, T., Arndt, J., & Cook, , A (2004). Deliver us from evil: The effects of mortality salience and reminders of 9/11 on support for President George W. Bush. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1136–1150.
Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., Proudfoot, D., & Fitzsimons, G. J. (2013). Response to restrictive policies: Reconciling system justification and psychological reactance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122, 152–162.
Lavi, I., Canetti, D., Sharvit, K., Bar-Tal, D., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2014). Protected by ethos in a protracted conflict? A comparative study among Israelis and Palestinians in the West Bank, Gaza, and East Jerusalem. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 58, 68–92.
Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics. Human Relations, 1, 5–41.
Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 18, 211–250.
Piurko, Y., Schwartz, S. H., & Davidov, E. (2011). Basic personal values and the meaning of left-right political orientations in 20 countries. Political Psychology, 32, 537–561.
Porat, R., Halperin, E., & Bar-Tal, D. (2015). The effect of socio-psychological barriers on the processing of new information about peace opportunities. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 59, 93–119.
Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285–291.
Sharvit, K. (2014). How conflict begets conflict: Activation of the ethos of conflict in times of distress in a society involved in an intractable conflict. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 55, 252–261.
Sherif, M. (1936). The psychology of social norms. New York: Harper.
Stangor, C., & Jost, J. T. (1997). Individual, group and system levels of analysis and their relevance for stereotyping and intergroup relations. In R. Spears, P. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Staub, E. (1989). The roots of evil: The origins of genocide and other group violence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Stern, C., West, T. V., Jost, J. T., & Rule, N. O. (2014). “Ditto Heads”: Do conservatives perceive greater consensus within their ranks than liberals? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40, 1162–1177.
Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Turner, J. C. (1991). Social influence. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Thórisdóttir, H., & Jost, J. T. (2011). Motivated closed-mindedness mediates the effect of threat on political conservatism. Political Psychology, 32, 785–811.
Ullrich, J., & Cohrs, J. C. (2007). Terrorism salience increases system justification: Experimental evidence. Social Justice Research, 20, 117–139.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jost, J., Stern, C., Sterling, J. (2015). Ethos of Conflict: A System Justification Perspective. In: Halperin, E., Sharvit, K. (eds) The Social Psychology of Intractable Conflicts. Peace Psychology Book Series, vol 27. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17861-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17861-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17860-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17861-5
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)