Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering ((STME))

Abstract

A numerical study of the separated flow about a 6:1 prolate spheroid at high-angle of attack using state-of-the-art Reynolds stress models is presented. The convective fluxes of the mean-flow and the Reynolds stress model equations are approximated by a third-order upwind biased MUSCL scheme. The diffusive flux is approximated by second-order central differencing based on a full-viscous stencil. The objective is to evaluate the applicability of RSM to realistic high-Reynolds separated flows. Comprehensive comparisons of the boundary layer velocity profile and of the Reynolds stress tensor components against the experimental data are presented. A very good agreement between the experimental measurements and calculated boundary layer velocity profiles is obtained. However, only reasonable agreement is obtained for the Reynolds stress components. It is shown that the common first-order upwind approximation of the Reynolds stress model convective flux alone may adversely affect the accuracy of the solution.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    LDV and hot-wire velocity measurements of the flow about a 6:1 prolate spheroid. http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/~simpson/prolatespheroid/

References

  1. van Albada GD, van Leer B, Roberts WW (1982) A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics. Astron Astrophys 108(1):76–84

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Batten P, Leschziner MA, Goldberg UC (1997) Average-state Jacobians and implicit methods for compressible viscous and turbulent flows. J Comput Phys 137(1):38–78

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben Nasr N, Gerolymos GA, Vallet I (2014) Low-diffusion approximate Riemann solvers for Reynolds-stress transport. J Comput Phys 268(1):186–235

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cécora R-D, Eisfeld B, Probst A, Crippa S, Radespiel R (2012) Differential Reynolds stress modeling for aeronautics. AIAA paper 2012-0465, 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Nashville

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chaouat B (2006) Reynolds stress transport modeling for high-lift airfoil flows. AIAA J 44(10):2390–2403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chesnakas CJ, Taylor D, Simpson RL (1997) Detailed investigation of the three-dimensional separation about a 6:1 prolate spheroid. AIAA J 35(6):990–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Constantinescu GS, Pasinato H, Wang Y-Q, Forsythe JR, Squires KD (2002) Numerical investigation of flow past a prolate spheroid. J Fluids Eng 124(4):904–910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Craft TJ, Launder BE (1996) A Reynolds stress closure designed for complex geometries. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 17(3):245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Eisfeld B (2004) Implementation of Reynolds stress models into the DLR-FLOWer code. IB 124-2004/31, DLR

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fu S (1988) Computational modelling of turbulent swirling flows with second-moment closures. University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gerolymos GA, Vallet I (2001) Wall-normal-free Reynolds-stress closure for three-dimensional compressible separated flows. AIAA J 39(10):1833–1842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gerolymos GA, Joly S, Mallet M, Vallet I (2010) Reynolds-stress model flow prediction in aircraft-engine intake double-S-shaped duct. J Aircr 47(4):1368–1381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerolymos GA, Lo C, Vallet I, Younis BA (2012) Term-by-term analysis of near-wall second-moment closures. AIAA J 50(12):2848–2864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Goody MC, Simpson RL, Chesnakas CJ (2000) Separated flow surface pressure fluctuations and pressure-velocity correlations on prolate spheroid. AIAA J 38(2):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hanjalić K, Launder BE (1972) A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. J Fluid Mech 52(4):609–638

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Jakirlić S, Maduta R (2015) Extending the bounds of “steady” RANS closures: toward an instability-sensitive Reynolds stress model. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 51:175–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Jakirlic S, Eisfeld B, Jester-Zürker R, Kroll N (2007) Near-wall, Reynolds-stress model calculations of transonic flow configurations relevant to aircraft aerodynamics. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:602–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim S-E, Rhee SH, Cokljat D (2003) Application of modern turbulence models to vortical flow around a 6:1 prolate spheroid at incidence. AIAA paper 2003-0429, 41st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV

    Google Scholar 

  19. Manceau R (2015) Recent progress in the development of the Elliptic blending Reynolds-stress model. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 51:195–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mor-Yossef Y (2014) Unconditionally stable time marching scheme for Reynolds stress models. J Comput Phys 276:635–664

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Probst A, Radespiel R (2008) Implementation and extension of a near-wall Reynolds-stress model for application to aerodynamic flows on unstructured meshes. AIAA paper 2008-770, 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rotta JC (1951) Statistische theorie nichthomogener turbulenz. Z für Phys 129(6):547–572

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Rumsey CL, Pettersson Reif BA, Gatski TB (2006) Arbitrary steady-state solutions with the k-\(\varepsilon\) model. AIAA J 44(7):1586–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Scott NW, Duque EPN (2004) Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes predictions of the flow around a prolate spheroid. AIAA paper 2004-0055, 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai C-Y, Whitney AK (1999) Numerical study of three-dimensional flow separation for a 6:1 ellipsoid. AIAA paper 99-0172, 37th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wetzel TG, Simpson RL, Chesnakas CJ (1998) Measurement of three-dimensional crossflow separation. AIAA J 36(4):557–564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wikström N, Svennberg U, Alin N, Fureby C (2004) Large eddy simulation of the flow around an inclined prolate spheroid. J Turbul 5(29):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  29. Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Huang J, Chen H, Fu S (2007) Prediction of separation flows around a 6:1 prolate spheroid using RANS/LES hybrid approaches. Acta Mech Sin 23(4):369–382

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yair Mor-Yossef .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mor-Yossef, Y. (2015). Separated Flow Prediction Around a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid Using Reynolds Stress Models. In: Eisfeld, B. (eds) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15639-2_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15639-2_3

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15638-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15639-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics