Abstract
A numerical study of the separated flow about a 6:1 prolate spheroid at high-angle of attack using state-of-the-art Reynolds stress models is presented. The convective fluxes of the mean-flow and the Reynolds stress model equations are approximated by a third-order upwind biased MUSCL scheme. The diffusive flux is approximated by second-order central differencing based on a full-viscous stencil. The objective is to evaluate the applicability of RSM to realistic high-Reynolds separated flows. Comprehensive comparisons of the boundary layer velocity profile and of the Reynolds stress tensor components against the experimental data are presented. A very good agreement between the experimental measurements and calculated boundary layer velocity profiles is obtained. However, only reasonable agreement is obtained for the Reynolds stress components. It is shown that the common first-order upwind approximation of the Reynolds stress model convective flux alone may adversely affect the accuracy of the solution.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
LDV and hot-wire velocity measurements of the flow about a 6:1 prolate spheroid. http://www.dept.aoe.vt.edu/~simpson/prolatespheroid/
References
van Albada GD, van Leer B, Roberts WW (1982) A comparative study of computational methods in cosmic gas dynamics. Astron Astrophys 108(1):76–84
Batten P, Leschziner MA, Goldberg UC (1997) Average-state Jacobians and implicit methods for compressible viscous and turbulent flows. J Comput Phys 137(1):38–78
Ben Nasr N, Gerolymos GA, Vallet I (2014) Low-diffusion approximate Riemann solvers for Reynolds-stress transport. J Comput Phys 268(1):186–235
Cécora R-D, Eisfeld B, Probst A, Crippa S, Radespiel R (2012) Differential Reynolds stress modeling for aeronautics. AIAA paper 2012-0465, 50th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting, Nashville
Chaouat B (2006) Reynolds stress transport modeling for high-lift airfoil flows. AIAA J 44(10):2390–2403
Chesnakas CJ, Taylor D, Simpson RL (1997) Detailed investigation of the three-dimensional separation about a 6:1 prolate spheroid. AIAA J 35(6):990–999
Constantinescu GS, Pasinato H, Wang Y-Q, Forsythe JR, Squires KD (2002) Numerical investigation of flow past a prolate spheroid. J Fluids Eng 124(4):904–910
Craft TJ, Launder BE (1996) A Reynolds stress closure designed for complex geometries. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 17(3):245–254
Eisfeld B (2004) Implementation of Reynolds stress models into the DLR-FLOWer code. IB 124-2004/31, DLR
Fu S (1988) Computational modelling of turbulent swirling flows with second-moment closures. University of Manchester, Institute of Science and Technology
Gerolymos GA, Vallet I (2001) Wall-normal-free Reynolds-stress closure for three-dimensional compressible separated flows. AIAA J 39(10):1833–1842
Gerolymos GA, Joly S, Mallet M, Vallet I (2010) Reynolds-stress model flow prediction in aircraft-engine intake double-S-shaped duct. J Aircr 47(4):1368–1381
Gerolymos GA, Lo C, Vallet I, Younis BA (2012) Term-by-term analysis of near-wall second-moment closures. AIAA J 50(12):2848–2864
Goody MC, Simpson RL, Chesnakas CJ (2000) Separated flow surface pressure fluctuations and pressure-velocity correlations on prolate spheroid. AIAA J 38(2):266–274
Hanjalić K, Launder BE (1972) A Reynolds stress model of turbulence and its application to thin shear flows. J Fluid Mech 52(4):609–638
Jakirlić S, Maduta R (2015) Extending the bounds of “steady” RANS closures: toward an instability-sensitive Reynolds stress model. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 51:175–194
Jakirlic S, Eisfeld B, Jester-Zürker R, Kroll N (2007) Near-wall, Reynolds-stress model calculations of transonic flow configurations relevant to aircraft aerodynamics. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 28:602–615
Kim S-E, Rhee SH, Cokljat D (2003) Application of modern turbulence models to vortical flow around a 6:1 prolate spheroid at incidence. AIAA paper 2003-0429, 41st AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV
Manceau R (2015) Recent progress in the development of the Elliptic blending Reynolds-stress model. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 51:195–220
Menter FR (1994) Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605
Mor-Yossef Y (2014) Unconditionally stable time marching scheme for Reynolds stress models. J Comput Phys 276:635–664
Probst A, Radespiel R (2008) Implementation and extension of a near-wall Reynolds-stress model for application to aerodynamic flows on unstructured meshes. AIAA paper 2008-770, 46th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV
Rotta JC (1951) Statistische theorie nichthomogener turbulenz. Z für Phys 129(6):547–572
Rumsey CL, Pettersson Reif BA, Gatski TB (2006) Arbitrary steady-state solutions with the k-\(\varepsilon\) model. AIAA J 44(7):1586–1592
Scott NW, Duque EPN (2004) Unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes predictions of the flow around a prolate spheroid. AIAA paper 2004-0055, 42nd AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV
Tsai C-Y, Whitney AK (1999) Numerical study of three-dimensional flow separation for a 6:1 ellipsoid. AIAA paper 99-0172, 37th AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno NV
Wetzel TG, Simpson RL, Chesnakas CJ (1998) Measurement of three-dimensional crossflow separation. AIAA J 36(4):557–564
Wikström N, Svennberg U, Alin N, Fureby C (2004) Large eddy simulation of the flow around an inclined prolate spheroid. J Turbul 5(29):1–4
Xiao Z, Zhang Y, Huang J, Chen H, Fu S (2007) Prediction of separation flows around a 6:1 prolate spheroid using RANS/LES hybrid approaches. Acta Mech Sin 23(4):369–382
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mor-Yossef, Y. (2015). Separated Flow Prediction Around a 6:1 Prolate Spheroid Using Reynolds Stress Models. In: Eisfeld, B. (eds) Differential Reynolds Stress Modeling for Separating Flows in Industrial Aerodynamics. Springer Tracts in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15639-2_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15639-2_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15638-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15639-2
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)