Skip to main content

Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Road to Universal Logic

Part of the book series: Studies in Universal Logic ((SUL))

Abstract

Following J.-Y.Béziau in his pioneer work on nonstandard interpretations of the traditional square of opposition, we have applied the abstract structure of the square to study the relation of opposition between states in superposition in orthodox quantum mechanics in [1]. Our conclusion was that such states are contraries (i.e., both can be false, but both cannot be true), contradicting previous analyzes that have led to different results, such as those claiming that those states represent contradictory properties (i.e., they must have opposite truth values). In this chapter, we bring the issue once again into the center of the stage, but now discussing the metaphysical presuppositions which underlie each kind of analysis and which lead to each kind of result, discussing in particular the idea that superpositions represent potential contradictions. We shall argue that the analysis according to which states in superposition are contrary rather than contradictory is still more plausible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In a nutshell, in classical logic, in the presence of a contradiction any proposition whatever may be said derivable, and the resulting system is called trivial. In paraconsistent systems, on the other hand, even if expressions formally representing contradictions are derivable, not every proposition is also derivable, so that the system is not trivial. For the details see [7], and also the discussion in Béziau [3, 5].

  2. 2.

    We have our doubts about the possibility of representing a superposition this way, in particular, in reading the \(+\) sign of a superposition as a conjunction, but we shall do that for the purposes of argumentation in this section (see also [1]).

References

  1. Arenhart, J.R.B., Krause, D.: Contradictions, Quantum Mechanics, and the Square of Oppositions. Preprint available at http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/10582/ (2014)

  2. Arenhart, J.R.B., Krause, D.: Oppositions and quantum mechanics: Superposition and identity. In: Béziau, J.-Y., Gan-Krzywoszynska, K. (eds.) New Dimensions of the Square of Opposition, Philosophia Verlag, Munich (2015), in press

    Google Scholar 

  3. Béziau, J.-Y.: New Light on the square of oppositions and its nameless corners. Log. Investig. 10, 218–232 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Béziau, J.-Y.: The Power of the hexagon. Log. Univers. 6(1–2), 1–43 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Béziau, J.-Y.: Contradiction and Negation. Talk delivered at the XVII EBL 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. da Costa, N.C.A., de Ronde, C.: The paraconsistent logic of superpositions. Found. Phys. 43, 854–858 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. da Costa, N.C.A., Krause, D., Bueno, O.: Paraconsistent logic and paraconsistency. In: Jacquette, D. (ed.) Philosophy of Logic, pp. 655–775. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Ronde, C.: A Defense of the Paraconsistent Approach to Superpositions (Answer to Arenhart and Krause). Available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1404.5186 (2014)

  9. Dirac, P.A.M.: The Principles of Quantum Mechanics, 4th edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hughes, G.E., Cresswell, M.J.: A New Introduction to Modal Logic. Routledge, London (1996)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Lombardi, O., Dieks, D.: Modal interpretations of quantum mechanics. In: Zalta, E. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring 2014 Edition. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/qm-modal/ (2014)

  12. Lowe, E.J.: A Survey of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Muller, F.A., Saunders, S.: Discerning Fermions. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 59, 499–548 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Priest, G.: In Contradiction. Nijhoff, Dordrecht, The Netherlands (1987)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonas R. Becker Arenhart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Additional information

Dedicated to Jean-Yves Béziau on his 50th birthday

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Becker Arenhart, J.R., Krause, D. (2015). Potentiality and Contradiction in Quantum Mechanics. In: Koslow, A., Buchsbaum, A. (eds) The Road to Universal Logic. Studies in Universal Logic. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15368-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics