Abstract
This chapter presents a methodology for studying low-grade lateritic nickel ore, which usually presents complex mineralogy, with widespread nickel in several mineral phases. The study is focused on determining the mineralogy and the distribution of nickel in the bearing minerals. Laboratory assays comprise homogenization, sampling, and particle size analysis. Chemical analyses by X-ray fluorescence are performed in all fraction sizes, while mineralogical assessments by X-ray diffraction are carried out for the head samples. The mineralogical composition of the samples and the partition of main elements in the bearing minerals are assayed by size fraction through automated image analysis software (MLA) coupled with a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The chemical compositions of the several minerals identified in MLA are determined during systematic observations on SEM with energy-dispersive spectrometer (EDS).
Two samples of lateritic nickel ore have been characterized, one silicate and other oxidized, with nickel grades of 0.60 and 0.28 wt%, respectively. The nickel grades in the oxidized ore vary from 0.16 to 0.26 wt% above 0.037 mm, increasing to 0.41–0.42 wt% below this fraction, where 79 wt% of total nickel is contained. In the silicate ore, the nickel grades vary from 0.42 to 0.47 wt% above 0.15 mm, where 36 wt% of the total nickel are present, while the nickel grades below this fraction increase, varying from 0.60 to 0.68 wt%; the fraction −0.020 mm is responsible for 38 % of total nickel present in the sample.
The silicate ore mineralogy consists mainly of clay minerals with nickel (67 wt%; vermiculite/smectite group) and pyroxene (22 wt%), besides minor phases like goethite, kaolinite, quartz, Cr-spinel, and other minerals. The oxidized ore is composed essentially of goethite (49 wt%) and Cr-spinel (41 wt%), besides quartz, kaolinite, Ni clay minerals, hematite, and other minor phases. Considering the interval −0.30 +0.020 mm, in the silicate ore, the clay minerals are responsible for 93 wt% of total nickel contained, while goethite responds for 93 wt% of total nickel present in the oxidized ore.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Dalvi AD, Bacon WG, Osborne RC (2004) The past and the future of nickel laterites. Inco Limited, Ontario
Wang B, Guo Q, Wei G, Zhang P, Qu J, Qi T (2012) Characterization and atmospheric hydrochloric acid leaching of a limonitic laterite from Indonesia. Hydrometallurgy 129–130:7–13
Oliveira SMBD (1990) Estágio atual do conhecimento a cerca do minério laterítico de níquel no Brasil e no mundo. Rev Inst Geol 11(2):49–57
Colin F, Nahon D, Trescases JJ, Melfi AJ (1990) Lateritic weathering of pyroxenites at Niquelandia, Goias, Brazil; the supergene behavior of nickel. Econ Geol 85(5):1010–1023
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Votorantim Metais, Nickel Business Unit, for permitting the publication of these study results and also to the financial support of FAPESP—Sao Paulo Research Foundation, process 2009-54007-0 to carry out this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Uliana, D., Lé Tassinari, M.M.M., Kahn, H., Angora, M.A. (2015). Process Mineralogy of Lateritic Nickel Ore. In: Dong, F. (eds) Proceedings of the 11th International Congress for Applied Mineralogy (ICAM). Springer Geochemistry/Mineralogy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13948-7_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13948-7_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13947-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13948-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)