Abstract
Citizen science projects represent an important example of mass collaboration at a global scale where nonscientists can contribute to science research across geographical locations. To more broadly and deeply capitalize on the potential for citizen science to invigorate inquiry-based science at school, we need to better understand how and why citizen science opportunities are taken up by particular teachers. In this chapter, we offer a framework for the analysis of conditions that influence voluntary participation in citizen science efforts. The framework is developed with empirical data from a longitudinal case study. The framework focuses on four dimensions that contributed sustained and evolving participation: (1) alignment between the citizen science opportunity with personal interests and teaching goals, (2) access to a networked community with curricular resources and a technical infrastructure, (3) an integrated indoor and outdoor classroom space that promoted place-based inquiry opportunities, and (4) a set of collaborative practices and networked opportunities that created conditions for an expanding set of partnerships. We close with a discussion of how the design of the socio-technical dimensions of citizen science efforts might be informed by both ethnographic and quantitative studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
The Gulf of Maine Research Institute (GMRI) is a nonprofit marine science center located in Portland, Maine. GMRI was incorporated in 1968, with the mission of laying the foundation for a new genre of marine science, education, and community institution, including translating rigorous science into engaging formal and informal educational materials.
- 2.
Since 2002, the state of Maine, as a result of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative, has had a program that equips every middle school student with his or her own laptop computer for use at school and home, and all schools are equipped with high-speed wireless networks, technical assistance, and access to Department of Education-sponsored professional development.
- 3.
Our dataset included 22 e-mails, eight from the Vital Signs staff (primarily the project coordinator, who also ran the professional development and developed most of the curriculum) to Paulson and 14 from Paulson to the Vital Signs staff. We coded 41 unique segments of these e-mails that represented collaborative practices, 29 from Paulson and 12 from the Vital Signs staff.
References
Ardoin, N. M., Schuh, J. S., & Gould, R. (2012). Exploring the dimensions of place: A confirmatory factor analysis of data from three ecoregional sites. Environmental Education Research, 18, 583–607.
Azevedo, F. S. (2013). The tailored practice of hobbies and its implication for the design of interest-driven learning environments. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22, 462–510.
Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500–508.
Bang, M., & Medin, D. (2010). Cultural processes in science education: Supporting the navigation of multiple epistemologies. Science Education, 94, 1008–1026.
Barron, B. (2006). Interest and self-sustained learning as catalysts of development: A learning ecology perspective. Human Development, 49, 193.
Barron, B., Gomez, K., Pinkard, N., & Martin, C. K. (2014). The digital youth network: Cultivating digital media citizenship in urban communities. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Barron, B., Martin, C. K., Mercier, E., Pea, R., Steinbock, D., Walter, S., … Tyson, K. (2009, June). Repertoires of collaborative practice: Theoretical introduction and background. In C. O’Malley, D. D. Suthers, P. Reimann & A. Dimitracopoulou (Eds.), CSCL’09 Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (Vol. 2, pp. 25–27). New Brunswick, NJ: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group report. Washington, DC: Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
Bonney, R., Shirk, J. L., Phillips, T. B., Wiggins, A., Ballard, H. L., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Parrish, J. K. (2014). Next steps for citizen science. Science, 343, 1436–1437.
Brossard, D., Lewenstein, B., & Bonney, R. (2005). Scientific knowledge and attitude change: The impact of a citizen science project. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 1099–1121.
Brown, J. S. (2000). Growing up digital: How the web changes work, education, and the way people learn. Change, 32, 10–20.
Butt, R. (1984). Arguments for using biography in understanding teacher thinking. In R. Halkes & J. K. Olson (Eds.), Teacher thinking (pp. 98–123). Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
Butt, R. L., & Raymond, D. (1989). Studying the nature and development of teachers’ knowledge using collaborative autobiography. International Journal of Educational Research, 13, 403–419.
Butt, R. L., Raymond, D., McCue, G., & Yamagishi, L. (1992). Collaborative autobiography and the teacher’s voice. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 51–98). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Calabrese-Barton, A. M. (2012). Citizen(s’) science. A response to “The future of citizen science.” Democracy and Education, 20. Retrieved from http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol20/iss2/12/
Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). Retrieved from http://www.coppa.org
Collins, A. (2016). A brief history of mass collaboration: How innovations over time have enabled people to work together more effectively. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Cress, U., Feinkohl, I., Jirschitzka, J., & Kimmerle, J. (2016). Mass collaboration as co-evolution of cognitive and social systems. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Darling-Hammond, L. (1998). Teacher learning that supports student learning. Educational Leadership, 55, 6–11.
Elliott, M. (2016). Stigmergic collaboration: A framework for understanding and designing mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Fickel, L. (1999, April). Democracy is messy: Exploring the beliefs and personal theories of a high school social studies teacher. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Fischer, G. (2016). Exploring, understanding, and designing innovative socio-technical environments for fostering and supporting mass collaboration. In U. Cress, J. Moskaliuk, & H. Jeong (Eds.), Mass collaboration and education. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International.
Gallo, T., & Waitt, D. (2011). Creating a successful citizen science model to detect and report invasive species. BioScience, 61, 459–465.
Glazer, J. (1999, April). Considering the professional community: An analysis of key ideas, intellectual roots, and future challenges. Paper presented at the American Education Research Association, Montreal, Canada.
Goodson, I. F. (1992). Sponsoring the teacher’s voice: Teachers’ lives and teacher development. In A. Hargreaves & M. G. Fullan (Eds.), Understanding teacher development (pp. 110–121). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gutierrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32, 19–25.
Halatchliyski, I., Moskaliuk, J., Kimmerle, J., & Cress, U. (2014). Explaining authors’ contribution to pivotal artifacts during mass collaboration in the Wikipedia’s knowledge base. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 9, 97–115.
Haywood, B. K. (2014). A “sense of place” in public participation in scientific research. Science Education, 98, 64–83.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127.
Khatib, F., DiMaio, F., Cooper, S., Kazmierczyk, M., Gilski, M., Krzywda, S., & Foldit Void Crushers Group (2011). Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players. Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, 18, 1175–1177.
Lepczyk, C. A. (2005). Integrating published data and citizen science to describe bird diversity across a landscape. Journal of Applied Ecology, 42, 672–677.
Long, J. (2003). Connecting with the content: How teacher interest affects student interest in a core course (Electronic thesis or dissertation). Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & González, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: A qualitative approach to connect households and classrooms. Theory Into Practice, 31, 132–141.
Mueller, M. P., & Tippins, D. (2012). The future of citizen science. Democracy and Education, 20, 2.
National Research Council. (2011). Successful K-12 STEM education: Identifying effective approaches in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Committee on Highly Successful Science Programs for K-12 Science Education. Board on Science Education and Board on Testing and Assessment, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Pajak, E., & Blase, J. (1989). The impact of teachers’ personal lives on professional role enactment: A qualitative analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 26, 283–310.
Parise, L., & Spillane, J. (2010). Teacher learning and instructional change: How formal and on-the-job learning opportunities predict change in elementary school teachers’ practice. The Elementary School Journal, 110, 321–346.
Patrichi, M. (2011, April). Threats to using mass collaboration in education. Paper presented at the 7th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education, Bucharest, Romania.
Penuel, B., & Means, B. (2004). Implementation variation and fidelity in an inquiry science program: Analysis of GLOBE data reporting patterns. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41, 294–315.
Polman, J. L. (2000). Designing project-based science: Connecting learners through guided inquiry. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Powell, R. R. (1992). The influence of prior experiences on pedagogical constructs of traditional and nontraditional preservice teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 8, 225–238.
Powell, R. R. (1996). Epistemological antecedents to culturally relevant and constructivist classroom curricula: A longitudinal study of teachers’ contrasting world views. Teaching and Teacher Education, 12, 365–384.
Putnam, R. T., & Borko, H. (2000). What do new views on knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teacher learning? Educational Researcher, 29, 4–15.
Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Carney, K., Gyuk, G., Borne, K., Wallin, J., … Planetarium, A. (2009). Citizen science: Status and research directions for the coming decade. AGB Stars and Related Phenomenastro 2010. Position Paper at the Astronomy and Astrophysics Decadal Survey, 46.
Rippel, M., Schaefer, D., Mistree, F., & Panchal, J. H. (2009). Fostering collaborative learning and mass-customization of education in a graduate engineering design course. International Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 729.
Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., … Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17, 2.
Trautmann, N. M., Shirk, J. L., Fee, J., & Krasny, M. E. (2012). Who poses the question?: Using citizen science to help K-12 teachers meet the mandate for inquiry. In J. L. Dickinson & R. Bonney (Eds.), Citizen science: Public participation in environmental research (pp. 179–190). Ithaka, NY: Comstock.
Trumbull, D. J., Bonney, R., Bascom, D., & Cabral, A. (2000). Thinking scientifically during participation in a citizen-science project. Science Education, 84, 265–275.
Wals, A. E., Brody, M., Dillon, J., & Stevenson, R. B. (2014). Convergence between science and environmental education. Science, 344, 583–584.
Wiggins, A., & Crowston, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In Proceedings of the 44th Annual Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences, Koloa, Hawaii. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
Acknowledgment
This work is supported by the National Science Foundation Cyberlearning program (Grant REC-1124568) and Learning in Informal and Formal Environments Science of Learning Center, a National Science Foundation-funded (Grant REC-354453) effort seeking to understand and advance human learning through a simultaneous focus on implicit, informal, and formal learning, thus cultivating generalizable interdisciplinary theories that can guide the design of effective new technologies and learning environments. We also acknowledge and thank “Mr. Paulson,” the Vital Signs staff members, and the other teachers, students, and parents who contributed their time and invaluable expertise and ideas to this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Barron, B., Martin, C.K., Mertl, V., Yassine, M. (2016). Citizen Science: Connecting to Nature Through Networks. In: Cress, U., Moskaliuk, J., Jeong, H. (eds) Mass Collaboration and Education. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Series, vol 16. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13536-6_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13535-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13536-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)