Skip to main content

The Performance of Strategic Alliances Revisited: A Conceptual Framework Using the Market Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 1998 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference

Abstract

We propose a conceptual framework that uses the market model to evaluate the performance of strategic alliances. Even though application of the framework is limited to venture partners whose stocks are publicly traded. its use offers several insights and advantages. The framework also offers the opportunity to analyze the impact of strategic alliances on the degree of riskiness of the venture partners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bettis, R. 1981. "Performance differences in related and unrelated firms," Strategic Management Journal, 2: 379-393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettis, R., and W. K. Hall. 1982. "Diversification strategy, accounting determined risk, and accounting determined return," Academy of Management Journal, 25: 254-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouthers, K. D., Brouthers, L. E., and T. J. Wilkinson. 1995. "Strategic Alliances: Choose Your Partners," Long Range Planning, V.28: 18-26

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. J., and J. B. Warner. 1985. ''Using Daily Stock Returns: The Case of Event Studies," Journal of Financial Economics, 14:3-31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, S., and C. L. Cooper. 1989. "Predicting success in joint venture organizations in infonnation technology," Journal of General Management, 15: 39-52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrigan, K.R. 1988. "Strategic alliances and Partners Asymmetries," Management International Review, Special Issue: 53-73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. 1991. "Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire," Management Science, 37: 19-33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y. 1995. ''Business Strategy, Market Structure, and performance of lnternational Joint Ventures: The Case of Joint Ventures in China," Management International Review, 35: 241-264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel A and Shaked, I. M. 1984. "Does business diversification affect performance?" Financial Management Journal Winter, 13: 18-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaan, J-L. 1988. "How to control a joint venture even as a minority partner," Journal of General Management, 14: 4-16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Academy of Marketing Science

About this paper

Cite this paper

Koku, P.S. (2015). The Performance of Strategic Alliances Revisited: A Conceptual Framework Using the Market Model. In: Ford, J., Honeycutt, Jr., E. (eds) Proceedings of the 1998 Academy of Marketing Science (AMS) Annual Conference. Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13084-2_48

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics