Abstract
Various techniques for defect reconstruction after oncologic orthopaedics surgery exist, and the use of each technique vary depending on the complexity of the case. Biological reconstruction in great defects is a huge challenge for orthopaedics due to the high complication rate. However, bone allografts are highly recommended for major defects especially in younger patients. Clinical reports propose that this technique preserves the durability of bone stock and limb functionality plus a responsible handling of bone banks decreases loss of the usually scarce cadaver bone stock. Access to allografts has been improved owing to centralised bone banks, which develop threedimensional copies for storage and use them for the selection process. Virtual modelling has been recently demonstrated to be a potential predictor to select adequate allograft in preoperative virtual planning. Moreover, shape matching is the foremost method for proper allograft selection.
Manual selection based on key measurements has been for years the industry standard. Computerized manual selection has developed so as to step forward in the allograft selection process. Donors stock can be compared with the patient’s anatomy and make the selection more accurate than before. This chapter will depict the optimistic results of using automatic allograft selection method based on surface registration.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ozger H, Bulbul M, Eralp L. Complications of limb salvage surgery in childhood tumors and recommended solutions. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2010;5:11–5.
Matejovsky Z, Kofranek I. Massive allografts in tumour surgery. Int Orthop. 2006;30:478–83.
Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Ranalletta M. Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in osteosarcoma of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:2686–93.
Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Farfalli G. Allograft reconstruction after sarcoma resection in children younger than 10 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1856–62.
Ramseier LE, Malinin TI, Temple HT, Mnaymneh WA, Exner GU. Allograft reconstruction for bone sarcoma of the tibia in the growing child. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:95–9.
Donati D, Di Bella C, Frisoni T, Cevolani L, DeGroot H. Alloprosthetic composite is a suitable reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1450–8.
Malhotra R, Kumar V. Acetabular revision using a total acetabular allograft. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:218–21.
Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings L, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:86–97.
Ritacco LE, Espinoza Orias AA, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo DL, de QuirĂ³s FGB, Nozomu I. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the distal femur: a validity method for allograft selection using a virtual bone bank. Studies Health Technol Inform. 2010;160:1287–90.
Mankin H, Gebhardt M, Tomford W. The use of frozen cadaveric allografts in the management of patients with bone tumors of the extremities. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:275–89.
Delloye C, Banse X, Birchard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:579–87.
Juergens P, Krol Z, Zeilhofer HF, Beinemann J, Schicho K, Ewers R, Klug C. Computer simulation and rapid prototyping for the reconstruction of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2167–70.
Paul L, Docquier PL, Cartiaux O, Cornu O, Delloye C, Banse X. Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:252–7.
Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:574–9.
Paul L, Docquier PL, Cartiaux O, Cornu O, Delloye C, Banse X. Inaccuracy in selection of massive bone allograft using template comparison method. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008;9:83–90.
Bousleiman H, Paul L, Nolte L-P, Reyes M. Comparative evaluation of pelvic allograft selection methods. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(5):931–8.
Bou Sleiman H, Ritacco LE, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo DL, Nolte L-P, Reyes M. Allograft selection for transepiphyseal tumor resection around the knee using 3-dimensional surface registration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39(6):1720–27.
Bielack S, Kempf-Bielack B, Schwenzer D, Birkfellner T, Delling G, Ewerbeck V, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities. Results from the cooperative osteosarcoma study group COSS of 925 patients. Klin Padiatr. 1999;211(4):260–70.
Paulussen M, Ahrens S, Dunst J, Winkelmann W, Exner GU, Kotz R, et al. Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1818–29.
Seiler C, Weber S, Schmidt W, Fischer F, Reimers N, Reyes M. Automatic landmark propagation for left and right symmetry assessment of tibia and femur: a computational anatomy based approach. In: Proceedings of 9th Ann Meeting of CAOS International. 2009:195–8.
Schmidt W, Reyes M, Fischer F, Geesink R, Nolte LP, Racanelli J, et al. Quantifying human knee anthropometric differences between ethnic groups and gender using shape analysis. In: Proceedings of Ann Meeting American Society of Biomechanics. 2009:26–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bousleiman, H. (2016). Computerized Tools: Allograft Selection. In: Ritacco, L., Milano, F., Chao, E. (eds) Computer-Assisted Musculoskeletal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12943-3_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12943-3_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12942-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12943-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)