Skip to main content

Computerized Tools: Allograft Selection

  • Chapter
Computer-Assisted Musculoskeletal Surgery
  • 803 Accesses

Abstract

Various techniques for defect reconstruction after oncologic orthopaedics surgery exist, and the use of each technique vary depending on the complexity of the case. Biological reconstruction in great defects is a huge challenge for orthopaedics due to the high complication rate. However, bone allografts are highly recommended for major defects especially in younger patients. Clinical reports propose that this technique preserves the durability of bone stock and limb functionality plus a responsible handling of bone banks decreases loss of the usually scarce cadaver bone stock. Access to allografts has been improved owing to centralised bone banks, which develop threedimensional copies for storage and use them for the selection process. Virtual modelling has been recently demonstrated to be a potential predictor to select adequate allograft in preoperative virtual planning. Moreover, shape matching is the foremost method for proper allograft selection.

Manual selection based on key measurements has been for years the industry standard. Computerized manual selection has developed so as to step forward in the allograft selection process. Donors stock can be compared with the patient’s anatomy and make the selection more accurate than before. This chapter will depict the optimistic results of using automatic allograft selection method based on surface registration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ozger H, Bulbul M, Eralp L. Complications of limb salvage surgery in childhood tumors and recommended solutions. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2010;5:11–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Matejovsky Z, Kofranek I. Massive allografts in tumour surgery. Int Orthop. 2006;30:478–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Ranalletta M. Partial epiphyseal preservation and intercalary allograft reconstruction in osteosarcoma of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg. 2004;86:2686–93.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muscolo DL, Ayerza MA, Aponte-Tinao L, Farfalli G. Allograft reconstruction after sarcoma resection in children younger than 10 years old. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466:1856–62.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ramseier LE, Malinin TI, Temple HT, Mnaymneh WA, Exner GU. Allograft reconstruction for bone sarcoma of the tibia in the growing child. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2006;88:95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Donati D, Di Bella C, Frisoni T, Cevolani L, DeGroot H. Alloprosthetic composite is a suitable reconstruction after periacetabular tumor resection. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469:1450–8.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malhotra R, Kumar V. Acetabular revision using a total acetabular allograft. Indian J Orthop. 2009;43:218–21.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Mankin HJ, Gebhardt MC, Jennings L, Springfield DS, Tomford WW. Long-term results of allograft replacement in the management of bone tumors. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996;324:86–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ritacco LE, Espinoza Orias AA, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo DL, de QuirĂ³s FGB, Nozomu I. Three-dimensional morphometric analysis of the distal femur: a validity method for allograft selection using a virtual bone bank. Studies Health Technol Inform. 2010;160:1287–90.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mankin H, Gebhardt M, Tomford W. The use of frozen cadaveric allografts in the management of patients with bone tumors of the extremities. Orthop Clin North Am. 1987;18:275–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Delloye C, Banse X, Birchard B, Docquier PL, Cornu O. Pelvic reconstruction with a structural pelvic allograft after resection of a malignant bone tumor. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89:579–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Juergens P, Krol Z, Zeilhofer HF, Beinemann J, Schicho K, Ewers R, Klug C. Computer simulation and rapid prototyping for the reconstruction of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67:2167–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Paul L, Docquier PL, Cartiaux O, Cornu O, Delloye C, Banse X. Selection of massive bone allografts using shape-matching 3-dimensional registration. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:252–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delloye C, Cornu O, Druez V, Barbier O. Bone allografts: what they can offer and what they cannot. J Bone Joint Surg. 2007;89:574–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Paul L, Docquier PL, Cartiaux O, Cornu O, Delloye C, Banse X. Inaccuracy in selection of massive bone allograft using template comparison method. Cell Tissue Bank. 2008;9:83–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bousleiman H, Paul L, Nolte L-P, Reyes M. Comparative evaluation of pelvic allograft selection methods. Ann Biomed Eng. 2013;41(5):931–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Bou Sleiman H, Ritacco LE, Aponte-Tinao L, Muscolo DL, Nolte L-P, Reyes M. Allograft selection for transepiphyseal tumor resection around the knee using 3-dimensional surface registration. Ann Biomed Eng. 2011;39(6):1720–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bielack S, Kempf-Bielack B, Schwenzer D, Birkfellner T, Delling G, Ewerbeck V, et al. Neoadjuvant therapy for localized osteosarcoma of extremities. Results from the cooperative osteosarcoma study group COSS of 925 patients. Klin Padiatr. 1999;211(4):260–70.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Paulussen M, Ahrens S, Dunst J, Winkelmann W, Exner GU, Kotz R, et al. Localized Ewing tumor of bone: final results of the cooperative Ewing’s Sarcoma Study CESS 86. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(6):1818–29.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Seiler C, Weber S, Schmidt W, Fischer F, Reimers N, Reyes M. Automatic landmark propagation for left and right symmetry assessment of tibia and femur: a computational anatomy based approach. In: Proceedings of 9th Ann Meeting of CAOS International. 2009:195–8.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schmidt W, Reyes M, Fischer F, Geesink R, Nolte LP, Racanelli J, et al. Quantifying human knee anthropometric differences between ethnic groups and gender using shape analysis. In: Proceedings of Ann Meeting American Society of Biomechanics. 2009:26–9.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Habib Bousleiman PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bousleiman, H. (2016). Computerized Tools: Allograft Selection. In: Ritacco, L., Milano, F., Chao, E. (eds) Computer-Assisted Musculoskeletal Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12943-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12943-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12942-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12943-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics