Skip to main content

The Who of Systemic Thinking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Systemic Thinking

Part of the book series: Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality ((TSRQ,volume 26))

  • 2430 Accesses

Abstract

The main focus of the who question of systemic thinking is on the stakeholders associated with our mess. We take the occasion in this chapter to discuss our approach for the analysis and management of stakeholders. First, the introduction provides a brief background of stakeholder analysis and an overview of our approach to stakeholder analysis, which is then followed by a detailed discussion of each of these steps. Finally, a framework is presented for stakeholder analysis and management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams KM (2011) Systems principles: foundation for the SoSE methodology. Int J Syst Syst Eng 2(2/3):120–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Barrat A, Barthélemy M, Pastor-Satorras R, Vespignani A (2004) The architecture of complex weighted networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(11):3747–3752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bavelas A (1948) A mathematical model for group structures. Appl Anthropol 7(3):16–30

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bonacich P (1987) Power and centrality: a family of measures. Am J Sociol 92(5):1170–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borgatti SP (2005) Centrality and network flow. Soc Netw 27(1):55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Borgatti SP, Carley KM, Krackhardt D (2006) On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Soc Netw 28(2):124–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brandes U (2001) A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. J Mathe Sociol 25(2):163–177

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cilliers P (1998) Complexity and postmodernism: understand complex systems. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dahl RA (1957) The concept of power. Behav Sci 2(3):201–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks: conceptual clarification. Soc Netw 1(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  12. Freeman RE (1994) The politics of stakeholder theory: some future directions. Bus Ethics Q 4(4):409–421

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hester PT, Adams KM (2013) Determining stakeholder influence using input-output modeling. Proc Comput Sci 20:337–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hester PT, Bradley JM, Adams KM (2012) Stakeholders in systems problems. Int J Syst Syst Eng 3(3/4):225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hitch CJ (1953) Sub-optimization in operations problems. J Oper Res Soc Am 1(3):87–99

    Google Scholar 

  16. Leontief WW (1951) Input-output economics. Sci Am 185(4):15–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McCulloch WS (1959) Embodiments of mind. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mitchell RK, Agle BR, Wood DJ (1997) Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Acad Manag Rev 22(4):853–886

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newman, M. E. J. (2001). Scientific collaboration networks.I. Network construction and fundamental results. Phys Rev E 64(1):0161311–0161318

    Google Scholar 

  20. Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J (2010) Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Netw 32(3):245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Opsahl T, Colizza V, Panzarasa P, Ramasco JJ (2008) Prominence and control: the weighted rich-club effect. Phys Rev Lett 101(16):1167024–1687021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pfeffer J (1981) Power in organizations. Pitman, Marshfield

    Google Scholar 

  23. Savage GT, Nix TW, Whitehead CJ, Blair JD (1991) Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders. Executive 5(2):61–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shannon CE (1948a) A mathematical theory of communication. Part 1 Bell Syst Tech J 27(3):379–423

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shannon CE (1948b) A mathematical theory of communication. Part 2 Bell Syst Tech J 27(4):623–656

    Google Scholar 

  26. Suchman MC (1995) Managing legitimacy: strategic and institutional approaches. Acad Manage Rev 20(3):571–610

    Google Scholar 

  27. Weber M (1947) The theory of social and economic organization. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick T. Hester .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hester, P.T., Adams, K.M. (2014). The Who of Systemic Thinking. In: Systemic Thinking. Topics in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07629-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07629-4_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07628-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07629-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics