Abstract
Most commercial project management software packages include planning methods to devise schedules for resource-constrained projects. As it is proprietary information of the software vendors which planning methods are implemented, the question arises how the software packages differ in quality with respect to their resource-allocation capabilities. We experimentally evaluate the resource-allocation capabilities of eight recent software packages by using 1,560 instances with 30, 60, and 120 activities of the well-known PSPLIB library. In some of the analyzed packages, the user may influence the resource allocation by means of multi-level priority rules, whereas in other packages, only few options can be chosen. We study the impact of various complexity parameters and priority rules on the project duration obtained by the software packages. The results indicate that the resource-allocation capabilities of these packages differ significantly. In general, the relative gap between the packages gets larger with increasing resource scarcity and with increasing number of activities. Moreover, the selection of the priority rule has a considerable impact on the project duration. Surprisingly, when selecting a priority rule in the packages where it is possible, both the mean and the variance of the project duration are in general worse than for the packages which do not offer the selection of a priority rule.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Farid F, Manoharan S (1996) Comparative analysis of resource-allocation capabilities of project management software packages. Proj Manag J 27:35–44
Herroelen W (2005) Project scheduling–theory and practice. Prod Oper Manag 14:413–432
Johnson R (1992) Resource constrained scheduling capabilities of commercial project management software. Proj Manag J 22:39–43
Kastor A, Sirakoulis K (2009) The effectiveness of resource levelling tools for resource constraint project scheduling problem. Int J Proj Manag 27:493–500
Khattab M, Søyland K (1996) Limited resource-allocation in construction projects. Comput Ind Eng 31:229–232
Kolisch R (1999) Resource allocation capabilities of commercial project management software packages. Interfaces 29:19–31
Lawler E (1976) Combinatorial optimization: networks and Matroids. Holt, Rinehard, and Winston, New York
Liberatore M, Pollack-Johnson B (2003) Factors influencing the usage and selection of project management software. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 50:164–174
Lova A, Tormos P (2001) Analysis of scheduling schemes and heuristic rules performance in resource-constrained multiproject scheduling. Ann Oper Res 102:263–286
Maroto C, Tormos P (1994) Project management: an evaluation of software quality. Int Trans Oper Res 1:209–221
Mellentien C, Trautmann N (2001) Resource allocation with project management software. OR Spectr 23:383–394
Trautmann N, Baumann P (2009) Resource-allocation capabilities of commercial project management software: an experimental analysis. In: Kacem I (ed) Proceedings of the 39th international conference on computers & industrial engineering, Troyes, pp 1155–1160
White D, Fortune J (2002) Current practice in project management–anempirical study. Int J Proj Manag 20:1–11
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baumann, P., Trautmann, N. (2015). Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling with Project Management Information Systems. In: Schwindt, C., Zimmermann, J. (eds) Handbook on Project Management and Scheduling Vol. 2. International Handbooks on Information Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05915-0_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05914-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05915-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)