Skip to main content

Ethical Leadership – How to Integrate Empirical and Ethical Aspects for Promoting Moral Decision Making in Business Practice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality between Facts and Norms

Part of the book series: Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy ((LOET,volume 32))

Abstract

Corporate ethical scandals, the financial and economic crisis of the past several years, and examples of misuse of power by prominent leaders have shocked the business world. They have not only called into question the role of the economic system design at large, but have also raised questions about the role of leaders in influencing ethics and ethical behavior in organizations. It is hardly controversial to state that aspects of management and leadership are crucial in determining the strategical direction and daily operations of an organization. Few would doubt that leaders are key figures in shaping ethical conduct. However, little is known about what constitutes ethical leadership. What are the relevant competencies leaders should acquire? The behavior of leaders and the extent to which they behave with moral integrity has also become a topic of high interest in the media and public discussion. Yet, many people believe that ethical leadership is simply a matter of having good character or having the “right values. “Although character and values are obviously important, the concept of ethical leadership is far more complex than those factors and there is little consensus on what precisely characterizes ethical leadership.In our contribution, we first want to highlight some typical features of the empirical and normative approaches to exploring ethical decision-making and behavior, and to sketch out how ethics and psychology can learn and benefit from each other. Second, based on previous empirical research and our own perspectives, we wish to shed light on some important components and competencies of ethical leaders. While discussing important characteristics of ethical leaders, we also aim to discover some unresolved key questions about ethical leadership. We argue that these questions reflect important points of intersection between empirical and normative approaches, and points where it appears beneficial that normative reflection comes in. These questions and their implications for the practice of moral behavior and leadership will be discussed in the final section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Audi, R. 2010. The Place of Ethical Theorie in Business Ethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, ed. G.G. Brenkert and T.L. Beauchamp, 46–69. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B.M., and P. Steidlmeier. 1999. Ethics, character, and authentic transformational leadership behavior. The Leadership Quarterly 10: 181–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L. 2010. Relativism, Multiculturalism, and Universal Norms: Their Role in Business Ethics. In The Oxford Handbook of Business Ethics, ed. G.G. Brenkert and T.L. Beauchamp, 235–266. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 1979/2001/2008. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 5/6th ed. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bleisch, B., and M. Huppenbauer. 2011. Ethische Entscheidungsfindung. Ein Handbuch für die Praxis. Zürich: Versus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. 1999. Business Ethics. A Kantian Perspective. Malden: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brehm, J.W.A. 1966. A theory of psychological reactance. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., and L.K. Treviño. 2006. Ethical Leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly 17: 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M.E., L.K. Treviño, and D.A. Harrison. 2005. Ethical Leadership. A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 97: 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J.B. 1999. The importance of leadership in shaping business values. Long Range Planning 32: 166–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J.B. 2003. The Ethics of Leadership. Balmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J.B. 2006. Ethics. The heart of leadership. In Responsible leadership, ed. T. Maak and N.M. Pless, 17–32. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, A., and D. Matten. 2010. Business Ethics. Managing Corporate Citizenship and Sustainability in the Age of Globalization, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A.R. 1994. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dane, E., and M.G. Pratt. 2007. Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 33–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W., and T. Donaldson. 2002. Untangling the Corruption Knot. Global Bribery through the Lens of Integrative Social Contract Theorie. In The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, ed. N.E. Bowie. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazio, R.H. 1990. Multiple processes by which attitude guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 23: 75–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraedrich, J., O.C. Ferrell, and L. Ferrell. 2011. Ethical Decision Making for Business, 8th ed. South-Western/Cengage Learning: Mason/Andover.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freemann, R.E., J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, B.L. Parmar, and S. de Colle. 2010. Stakeholder Theory. Cambridge: The State of the Art.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, W.L., B.J. Avolio, F. Luthans, D.R. May, and F.O. Walumbwa. 2005. “Can you see the real me?” A self-based model of authentic leader and follower development. The Leadership Quarterly 16: 343–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. 1995. Emotional Intelligence. New York: Bantam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodpaster, K.E. 2002. Teaching and Learning Ethics by the Case Method. In The Blackwell Guide to Business Ethics, ed. N. Bowie, 117–141. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haidt, J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review 108: 814–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanselmann, M., and C. Tanner. 2008. Taboos and conflicts in decision making: Sacred values, decision difficulty, and emotions. Judgment and Decision Making 3: 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogarth, R.M. 2001. Educating intuition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James Jr., S.H. 2000. Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Organizational Structure. Journal of Business Ethics 28: 43–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanungo, R.N. 2001. Ethical values of transactional and transformational leaders. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences 18: 257–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennett, J., and C. Fine. 2009. Will the Real Moral Judgment Please stand up? The Implications of Social Intuitionist Models of Cognition for Meta-ethics and Moral Psychology. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 12: 77–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1984/2003. Moral stages and moralization: The cognitive developmental approach. In Essays on moral development, Vol. 2. The psychology of moral development: The nature and validity of moral stages, ed. L. Kohlberg, 170–205. San Franciso: Harper & Row.Langan-Fox & Shirley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapsley, D.K., and D. Narvaez. 2005. The psychological foundations of everyday morality and moral expertise. In Character psychology and character education, ed. D.K. Lapsley and F.C. Power, 140–165. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K.M. 2006. On corporate responsibilty for human rights. http://www.novartisfoundation.org/. Accessed 15 July 2010.

  • Lennick, D., and F. Kiel. 2005. Moral Intelligence: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success. Upper Saddle River: Wharton Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G., and J.S. Lerner. 2003. The role of affect in decision making. In Handbook of affective sciences, ed. R.J. Davidson, K.R. Scherer, and H.H. Goldsmith, 619–642. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R.G., and D.J. Brown. 2001. Leadership, values, and subordinate self-concepts. The Leadership Quarterly 12: 133–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luce, M.F., J.R. Bettman, and J.W. Payne. 1997. Choice processing in emotionally difficult decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 23: 384–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., and P. Ulrich. 2007. Integre Unternehmensführung. Ethisches Orientierungswissen für die Wirtschaftspraxis. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manz, C.C., V. Anand, M. Joshi, and K.P. Manz. 2008. Emerging paradoxes in executive leadership: A theoretical interpretation of the tensions between corruption and virtuous values. The Leadership Quarterly 19: 385–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt, N., and R. Hoeger. 2009. The effect of implicit moral attitudes on managerial decision-making: An implicit social cognition approach. Journal of Business Ethics 85: 157–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, D.E., and B. Austin. 2010. Moral Competency Inventory Validation: Content, Construct, Convergent and Discriminant Approaches. Management Research Review 33(5): 437–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D.R., A.Y.L. Chan, T.D. Hodges, and B.J. Avolio. 2003. Developing the moral component of authentic leadership. Organizational Dynamics 32: 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mepham, B. 2008. Bioethics. An Introduction for the Biosciences, 2nd ed. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzger, M., D.R. Dalton, and J.W. Hill. 1993. The Organization of Ethics and the Ethics of Organizations: The Case for Expanded Organizational Ethics Audits’. Business Ethics Quarterly 3(1): 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. 2008. Grundsätze sozialer Gerechtigkeit (übersetzt von Ulrike Berger). Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miner, M., and A. Petocz. 2003. Moral Theory in Ethical Decision Making: Problems, Clarifications and Recommendations from a Psychological Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 42: 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monin, B., D.A. Pizarro, and J.S. Beer. 2007. Deciding versus reactiong: Conceptions of moral judgment and the reason-affect debate. Review of General Psychology 11: 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musschenga, A.W. 2005. Empirical Ethics, Context-Sensitivity, and Contextualism. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30: 467–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Musschenga, A.W. 2009. Moral intuitions, moral expertise, and moral reasoning. The Journal of Philosophy of Education 43: 597–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, D. 2005. The neo-Kohlbergian tradition and beyond: Schemas, expertise and character. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 51: Moral motivation through the lifespan, ed. G. Carlo and C. Pope-Edwards, 119–163. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. 2004. Sentimental Rules: On the Natural Foundations of Moral Judgment. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G. 2007. Organizational Integrity – Understanding the Dimensions of Ethical and Unethical Behavior in Corporations. In Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance, ed. W.C. Zimmerli, K. Richter, and M. Holzinger, 113–128. Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, L.S. 2006. A Compass for Decision making. In Responsible leadership, ed. T. Maak and N. Pless. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, T. 2008. Leadership Ethics. An introduction. Cambrige: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 2005. Political Liberalism, expanded version. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Resick, C.J., P.J. Hanges, M.W. Dickson, and J.K. Mitchelson. 2006. A cross-cultural examination of the endorsement of ethical leadership. Journal of Business Ethics 63: 345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.R. 1986. Moral development: Advances in research and theory. New York: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. 2003. Emotions. An Essay in Aid of Moral Psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, R.F. 2001. The role of values in servant leadership. Leadership & Organization Development Journal 22: 76–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salovey, P., and J.D. Mayer. 1990. Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition, and Personality 9: 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, W.H., and B.Z. Posner. 1982. Managerial values and expectations: The silent power in personal and organizational life. New York: Amacom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S.H. 1992. Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In Advances in experimental social psychology, vol. 25, ed. M.P. Zanna, 1–65. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sekerka, L.E., and R.P. Bagozzi. 2007. Moral courage in the workplace: moving to and from the desire and decision to act. Business Ethics: A European Review 16(2): 132–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M.S. 2000. Ethical and fair work behavior: A normative-empirical dialogue concerning ethics and justice. Journal of Business Ethics 28: 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 1992. Ethics and Excellence. Cooperation and Integrity in Business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 2003. Victims of Circumstances? A Defense of Virtue ethics in Business. Business Ethics Quarterly 13(1): 43–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R.C. 2009. Business ethics and virtue. In A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. R.E. Frederick, 30–37. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, J.R., and Y. Pan. 2010. Ethical Judgements in Business Ethics Research: Definition, and Research Agenda. Journal of Business Ethics 91: 405–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanner, C., A. Brügger, S. van Schie, and C. Lebherz. 2010. Actions Speak Louder Than Words. The Benefits of Ethical Behaviors of Leaders. Journal of Psychology 218(4): 225–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K. 2009. Business ethics and the social science. In A Companion to Business Ethics, ed. R.E. Frederick, 218–230. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K., and M.E. Brown. 2004. Managing to be ethical: Debunking five business ethics myths. Academy of Management Executive 18(2): 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K., L.P. Hartman, and M. Brown. 2000. Moral person and moral manager: How executives develop a reputation for ethical leadership. California Management Review 42: 128–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L.K., G.R. Weaver, and S.J. Reynolds. 2006. Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management 32: 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Thiel, G.J.M.W., and J.J.M. van Delden. 2010. Reflective Equilibrium as a Normative Empirical Model. Ethical Perspectives 17(2): 183–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verplanken, B., and R.W. Holland. 2002. Motivated Decision Making: Effects of Activation and Self-Centrality of Values on Choices and Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82(3): 434–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waterman, A.S. 1988. On the uses of psychological theory and research in the process of ethical inquiry. Psychological Bulletin 103(3): 283–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G.R.M., and L.K. Treviño. 1994. Normative and empirical business ethics: Separation, marriage of convenience, or marriage of necessity? Business Ethics Quarterly 4(29): 129–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, A. 2008. A 21st Century Ethical Toolbox, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, T., and J. Haidt. 2005. Hypnotically induced disgust makes moral judgments more severe. Psychological Science 16: 780–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Markus Huppenbauer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Huppenbauer, M., Tanner, C. (2014). Ethical Leadership – How to Integrate Empirical and Ethical Aspects for Promoting Moral Decision Making in Business Practice. In: Christen, M., van Schaik, C., Fischer, J., Huppenbauer, M., Tanner, C. (eds) Empirically Informed Ethics: Morality between Facts and Norms. Library of Ethics and Applied Philosophy, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01369-5_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics