Skip to main content

A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Assessing the Preparedness Level for the Implementation of Logistics 4.0: A Case Study in the Food Industry

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers (HCII 2023)

Abstract

Industries must prepare diagnoses that indicate their actual state in using Industry 4.0 technologies, especially in Logistics 4.0. So then, focused on the food sector industries, designing and testing a model to carry out this diagnosis is necessary. This project aims to present a Diagnostic and Characterization Model for the Food Sector Industries of the city of Barranquilla based on multifactorial strategies that help them evaluate and make decisions to increase the possibilities of implementing and adopting technologies established under the Logistics 4.0 in your supply chain. In this context, designing and testing a Diagnostic and Characterization Model for the Food Sector Industries will be carried out, applying a multicriteria methodology as AHP-TOPSIS and thus generating a tool that allows its applicability in the medium and long term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Universidad de la Rioja, “El impacto de la Industria 4.0 en la Logística: 6 avances que yarevolucionan el sector | UNIR,” (2019). https://www.unir.net/ingenieria/revista/el-impacto-de-la-industria-4-0-en-la-logistica-6-avances-que-ya-revolucionan-el-sector/. Accessed 23 Feb 2023

  2. Interempresa, “La industria 4.0 alimentaria no despega por la dificultad de acceso a las tecnologías y a la financiación - Alimentación,” (2021). https://www.interempresas.net/Alimentaria/Articulos/369826-industria-40-alimentaria-no-despega-dificultad-acceso-tecnologias-financiacion.html. Accessed 23 Feb 2023

  3. Logistec, “8 TENDENCIAS TECNOLÓGICAS DE LA CADENA DE SUMINISTRO PARA 2022 Y MÁS ALLÁ | LinkedIn,” Revista Logistec (2022). https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/8-tendencias-tecnológicas-de-la-cadena-suministro-para-revista/?originalSubdomain=es. Accessed 23 Feb 2023

  4. Büyüközkan, G., Göçer, F.: Digital supply chain: literature review and a proposed framework for future research. Comput. Ind.. Ind. 97, 157–177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COMPIND.2018.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Paciarotti, C., Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F.E., Mazzuto, G., Postacchini, L.: An efficiency analysis of food distribution system through data envelopment analysis. Int. J. Oper. Res. 36(4), 538–554 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1504/IJOR.2019.104056

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. “La revolución industrial 4.0 y eladvenimiento de una logística 4.0 | Publicación | Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe.” https://www.cepal.org/es/publicaciones/45454-la-revolucion-industrial-40-advenimiento-logistica-40. Accessed 23 Feb 2023

  7. Martínez, T.R.: Estudio De La Aplicación De La Industria 4.0 En El Ámbito De La Logística. Universidad de Valladolid (2019). https://uvadoc.uva.es/bitstream/handle/10324/36767/TFM-I-1140.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  8. Aidimme, Amuebla, Cenfim, and Cetem, “Análisis de viabilidad para la Implantación de la Industria 4. 0 en el sector hábitat,” Madrid (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fernandes, A.G.: Diagnóstico general: nivel de desarrollo de la Industria 4. 0 enel desarrollo de una Hoja de Ruta (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Díaz, N., Cruz, A.L., Ruiz, H.S.: Instrumento de diagnóstico y autoevaluación para medir las condicionesorganizacionales hacia la nueva revolución industrial 4.0. Revista Internacional de Investigación e Innovación Tecnológica 6(35), 1–14 (2018). http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-97532018000500002&lang=es%0Ahttp://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2007-97532018000500002&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=es

  11. Caballero, R., Rivera, B.: Blockchain: una alternativa para permitir la trazabilidaden la cadena de suministro agrícola en Panamá. In: 2019 7th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC), pp. 46–51 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Duran, C.A., Fernandez-Campusano, C., Carrasco, R., Vargas, M., Navarrete, A.: Boosting the decision-making in smart ports by using blockchain. IEEE Access 9, 128055–128068 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3112899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guevara, A.: Análisis De Los Retos De Logística 4.0 En Colombia Durante Los Próximos 5 Años, pp. 1–18 (2020). https://repository.unimilitar.edu.co/bitstream/handle/10654/37134/GuevaraLadinoAndersonCamilo2020.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

  14. Susana, P.C.A.: Propuesta de implementación de la industria 4.0 enel sector manufacturero de bogotá. Universidad Católica de Colombia (2020). https://repository.ucatolica.edu.co/bitstream/10983/25322/1/PROPUESTADEIMPLEMENTACIÓNDELAINDUSTRIAL4.0ENELSECTORMANUFACTURERODEBOGOTÁ.pdf

  15. Jimenez, G., Santos, G., Félix, M., Hernández, H., Rondón, C.: Good practices and trends in reverse logistics in the plastic products manufacturing industry. Proc. Manuf. 41, 367–374 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2019.09.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jimenez-Delgado, G., Balmaceda-Castro, N., Hernández-Palma, H., de la Hoz-Franco, E., García-Guiliany, J., Martinez-Ventura, J.: An integrated approach of multiple correspondences analysis (MCA) and fuzzy AHP method for occupational health and safety performance evaluation in the land cargo transportation. In: Duffy, V.G. (ed.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11581, pp. 433–457. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22216-1_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez, L., Jimenez, G.: Characterization of the current conditions of the its a data centers according to standards of the green data centers friendly to the environment. Adv. Intell. Syst. Comput. 574 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57264-2_34

  18. Hernández, L., Rios, C.E.U., Pranolo, A.: Design a model-based on nonlinear multiple regression to predict the level of user satisfaction when optimizing a traditional WLAN using SDWN. Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol. 11(4), 1487–1493 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18517/ijaseit.11.4.14463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jimenez, G.: Procedimientos para elmejoramiento de la calidad y la implantación de la Norma ISO 9001 aplicado al proceso de Asesoramiento, no. November, p. 22 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Shemshadi, A., Shirazi, H., Toreihi, M., Tarokh, M.J.: A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(10), 12160–12167 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2011.03.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hernandez-Collantes, L., et al.: An Integrated framework based on fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS and multiple correspondences analysis (MCA) for evaluate the technological conditions of the teleworker in times of pandemic: a case study. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 13097, pp. 459–475. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90966-6_32

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wibawa, A.P., Fauzi, J.A., Isbiyantoro, S., Irsyada, R., Dhaniyar, D., Hernández, L.: VIKOR multicriteria decision making with AHP reliable weighting for article acceptance recommendation. Int. J. Adv. Intell. Inform. 5(2) (2019). https://doi.org/10.26555/ijain.v5i2.172

  23. Saaty, T.L.: Multicriteria Decision Making, vol. 1. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation, vol. 36, no. 3. McGraw-Hill (1990). http://mansci.journal.informs.org/cgi/doi/10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259%5Cn, http://www.jstor.org/stable/2631947%5Cn, http://www.amazon.com/Multicriteria-Decision-Analytic-Hierarchy-Process/dp/0962031720

  24. Jiménez-Delgado, G., Santos, G., Félix, M.J., Teixeira, P., Sá, J.C.: A combined AHP-TOPSIS approach for evaluating the process of innovation and integration of management systems in the logistic sector. In: Stephanidis, C., et al. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12427, pp. 535–559. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_40

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

Gilberto Santos acknowledge Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) I.P., under the project UIDB/04057/2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Genett Jimenez-Delgado .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Jimenez-Delgado, G. et al. (2023). A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decision-Making Approach for Assessing the Preparedness Level for the Implementation of Logistics 4.0: A Case Study in the Food Industry. In: Mori, H., Asahi, Y., Coman, A., Vasilache, S., Rauterberg, M. (eds) HCI International 2023 – Late Breaking Papers. HCII 2023. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 14056. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48044-7_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-48044-7_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-48043-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-48044-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics