Skip to main content

Comparison Between Natural Rubber, Liquid Natural Rubber, and Recycled Natural Rubber as Secondary Matrix in Epoxy/Natural Rubber/Graphene Nano-platelet System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recycled Polymer Blends and Composites
  • 184 Accesses

Abstract

A comparison is made between the effects of natural rubber (NR), liquid natural rubber (LNR), and recycled natural rubber (rNR) in the filled epoxy systems on the physical, mechanical, thermal, and electrical performances of filled epoxy systems. The results show that flexural strength and modulus values were improved. The toughness properties of the filled epoxy system were enhanced with NR phases (72 MPa, 2317 MPa, 4.2 MPa.m½), as compared to those with LNR (55 MPa, 2100 MPa, 3.2 MPa.m½) and rNR (52 MPa, 2000 MPa, 2.3 MPa.m½) at 5 vol.%. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) analysis revealed that the particle sizes of NR phases dispersed within the epoxy matrix were smaller and more uniform (0.29–1.65 μm) as compared to those with LNR (0.64–3.57 μm) and rNR (≥250 μm) phases. The incorporation of NR, LNR, and rNR phases improved the thermal stability of the filled system. This is attributed to more heat energy being needed to overcome good interfacial bonding between epoxy matrices and the small NR phases. X-ray diffraction analysis results showed that the filled epoxy/NR/GNP system has higher 2θ values, indicating that d-spacing in GNP nano-fillers has the closer distance. Electrical bulk conductivity values of filled epoxy/NR/GNP systems were the highest, 4.50 × 10−3 1/Ω.cm at 20 vol.%. Small NR phases acted as elastomer spacers, which provided better GNP packing efficiency and realigned the GNP nano-fillers to form more effective conductive pathways for electron transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their gratitude for the support of the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE). The financial support of Fundamental Research Grant Scheme (FRGS) under grant number FRGS/1/2018/TK05/UNIMAP/02/13 is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. L. Teh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kam, K.W., Teh, P.L., Yeoh, C.K. (2023). Comparison Between Natural Rubber, Liquid Natural Rubber, and Recycled Natural Rubber as Secondary Matrix in Epoxy/Natural Rubber/Graphene Nano-platelet System. In: Ismail, H., S. M., S., R. A., I. (eds) Recycled Polymer Blends and Composites. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37046-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics