Abstract
The making of porous proposals for bone ingrowth into dental implant materials has undergone recent advances, which have been discussed. Due to the same design criteria for dental implants and different materials created for orthopedic implants in accumulation bone tissue engineering. Utilizing conventional techniques to produce porous titanium is difficult. To simulate the biological and mechanical characteristics of natural bone, a designer can now create more regular porous structures with varied pore sizes, shapes, percentages, and distributions. This is made possible by the advancement of additive manufacturing technology. The research in this field is encouraging and lays the groundwork for innovative advancements in dental implant proposal for patient role with lessened bone remedial.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Han, Q., Wang, C., Chen, H., Zhao, X., & Wang, J. (2019). Porous tantalum and titanium in orthopedics: A review. ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, 5(11), 5798–5824.
Jemat, A., Ghazali, M. J., Razali, M., & Otsuka, Y. (2015). Surface modifications and their effects on titanium dental implants. BioMed Research International, 2015.
Pałka, K., & Pokrowiecki, R. (2018). Porous Titanium implants: A review. Advanced Engineering Materials, 20(5), 1–18.
Bencharit, S. et al. (2014). Development and applications of porous tantalum trabecular metal-enhanced titanium dental implants. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 817–826.
Schiefer, H., Bram, M., Buchkremer, H. P., & Stöver, D. (2009). Mechanical examinations on dental implants with porous titanium coating. Journal of Materials Science. Materials in Medicine, 20(8), 1763–1770.
Asaoka, K., Kuwayama, N., Okuno, O., & Miura, I. (1985). Mechanical properties and biomechanical compatibility of porous titanium for dental implants. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 19(6), 699–713.
Saini, M. (2015). Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World Journal of Clinical Cases, 3(1), 52.
Anitua, E., Tapia, R., & Luzuriaga, F (2009). The adaptation of implant osseointe.
Trueba, P., Navarro, C., Rodríguez-Ortiz, J. A., Beltrán, A. M., García-García, F. J., & Torres, Y. (2021) Fabrication and characterization of superficially modified porous dental implants. Surface and Coatings Technology, 408(January).
Keller, J. C., Young, F. A., & Hansel, B. (1985). Systemic effects of porous Ti dental implants. Dental Materials, 1(2), 41–42.
Xiong, Y., Gao, R., Zhang, H., & Li, X. (2019). Design and fabrication of a novel porous titanium dental implant with micro/nano surface. International Journal of Applied Electromagnetics and Mechanics, 59(3), 1097–1102.
Piglionico, S., Bousquet, J., Fatima, N., Renaud, M., Collart-dutilleul, P. Y., & Bousquet, P. (2020). Porous tantalum versus Titanium implants: Enhanced mineralized matrix formation after stem cells proliferation and differentiation. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(11), 1–15.
Fialho, L., Grenho, L., Fernandes, M. H., & Carvalho, S. (2021). Porous tantalum oxide with osteoconductive elements and antibacterial core-shell nanoparticles: A new generation of materials for dental implants. Materials Science and Engineering C, 120, 111761.
Edelmann, A. R., Patel, D., Allen, R. K., Gibson, C. J., Best, A. M., & Bencharit, S. (2019). Retrospective analysis of porous tantalum trabecular metal–enhanced titanium dental implants. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 121(3), 404–410.
Revathi, A., Borrás, A. D., Muñoz, A. I., Richard, C., & Manivasagam, G. (2017). Degradation mechanisms and future challenges of titanium and its alloys for dental implant applications in oral environment, vol. 76. Elsevier B.V.
Menu, A. (1999). Search menu announcement thumb _ up textsms, 9.
Smith, T. M. (2014). Current trends in dental morphology research.
Topkaya, T., Solmaz, M. Y., Dündar, S., & Eltas, A. (2015). Numerical analysis of the effect of implant geometry to stress distributions of the three different commercial dental implant system. Cumhuriyet Dental Journal, 18(1), 17–24.
Baggi, L., Cappelloni, I., Maceri, F., & Vairo, G. (2008). Stress-based performance evaluation of osseointegrated dental implants by finite-element simulation. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 16(8), 971–987.
“Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 January 2011 Article contents”, (January), 9–10.
Menu, J. With interconnected 3D porous structures (I3D) a proof-of-concept, 1–10.
Weinstein, A. M., Klawitter, J. J., Anand, S. C., & Schuessler, R. (1977). Stress analysis of porous rooted dental implants. Implantologist, 1(2), 104–109.
Franciosa, P., & Martorelli, M. (2012). Stress-based performance comparison of dental implants by finite element analysis. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing, 6(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-012-0155-y
Stability, E. (2008). Applied osseointegration, 6(February).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sonawane, V., Ghorpade, R.R. (2024). Overview of Mechanics of Porous Dental Implants. In: Pawar, P.M., et al. Techno-societal 2022. ICATSA 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34644-6_61
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34644-6_61
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34643-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34644-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)