Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

PICCOLO: Observing and Coaching Caregiver-Child Interaction to Support Early Development in Children With and Without Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Family-Centered Care in Childhood Disability

Abstract

This chapter focuses on the construct of parent-child interaction (PCI) as measured by the Parenting Interactions with Children: Checklist of Observations Linked to Outcomes (PICCOLO). PICCOLO was developed for practitioners but it has strong psychometric properties that make it a solid measure for use in assessment, basic research, and program evaluation. The process of identifying simple, reliable indicators of developmentally supportive PCI, where each indicator predicts positive child development outcomes, has resulted in a checklist of behaviors that families and practitioners easily understand and that can be reliably observed and successfully used in practice. These features—simple, reliable, and relevant—make the 29 items of the measure well suited to the process of coaching families where feedback can clearly focus on child development as an outcome of the parenting behavior. The practitioner as family coach can use the PICCOLO to easily identify parenting strengths and build on those. This chapter discusses the need for a PCI focus in prevention and intervention services and how PICCOLO can be used as a coaching tool. This process both supports and drives family-centered practices in home visiting interventions. The development of the PICCOLO tool and it’s use in research and evaluation are reviewed. Cross-cultural comparisons of PICCOLO are presented and find strong support for PICCOLO use both psychometrically and practically. The use of PICCOLO to build PCI in varied contexts further demonstrates PICCOLO’s utility. The chapter provides a cogent case for usefulness of the PICCOLO in research, evaluation, and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Innocenti MS, Roggman LA, Cook GA. Using the PICCOLO with parents of children with a disability. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):307–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Provenzi L, Grumi S, Rinaldi E, Giusti L. The porridge-like framework: a multidimensional guidance to support parents of children with developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2021;117:104048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2021.104048.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Masten AS. Ordinary magic: resilience processes in development. Am Psychol. 2001;56(3):227–38. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shonkoff JP. From neurons to neighborhoods: old and new challenges for developmental and behavioral pediatrics. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;24(1):70–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004703-200302000-00014.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Peterson CA, Hughes-Belding K, Rowe N, Fan L, Walter M, Dooley L, et al. Correction to: triadic interactions in MIECHV: relations to home visit quality. Matern Child Health J. 2018;22(Suppl 1):115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-018-2620-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Norman V, Christiansen K, Anderson S. Parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes (PICCOLO) User’s guide. Baltimore: Brookes; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gao W, Alcauter S, Smith JK, Gilmore JH, Lin W. Development of human brain cortical network architecture during infancy. Brain Struct Funct. 2015;220(2):1173–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-014-0710-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ilyka D, Johnson MH, Lloyd-Fox S. Infant social interactions and brain development: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;130:448–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Fox SE, Levitt P, Nelson CA 3rd. How the timing and quality of early experiences influence the development of brain architecture. Child Dev. 2010;81(1):28–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01380.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Bronfenbrenner U. A report on longitudinal evaluations of preschool programs: is early intervention effective? vol. 2. Washington, DC: Office of Child Development; 1974. p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bronfenbrenner U. The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1979.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li J, Julian MM. Developmental relationships as the active ingredient: a unifying working hypothesis of “what works” across intervention settings. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012;82(2):157–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.2012.01151.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bethell C, Jones J, Gombojav N, Linkenbach J, Sege R. Positive childhood experiences and adult mental and relational health in a statewide sample: associations across adverse childhood experiences levels. JAMA Pediàtrics. 2019;173(11):e193007.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Jeong J, Franchett EE, Ramos de Oliveira CV, Rehmani K, Yousafzai AK. Parenting interventions to promote early child development in the first three years of life: a global systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2021;18(5):e1003602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1003602.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tomeny KR, McWilliam RA, Tomeny TS. Caregiver-implemented intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review of coaching components. Rev J Autism Dev Disord. 2020;7(2):168–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-019-00186-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Hamby DW. Research synthesis and meta-analysis of studies of family-centered practices. Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Division for Early Childhood. DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014 [Internet]; 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices.

  18. Office of Head Start Start. Head start program performance standards, 1302.35 [Internet]. Washington, DC: Administration for Children Youth and Families; 2016. https://eclkc.ohs.acf.hhs.gov/policy/45-cfr-chap-xiii/1302-35-education-home-based-programs.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parents as Teachers. Quality standards; 2011. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56be46a6b6aa60dbb45e41a5/t/57e0042737c581c512ae181d/1474298924087/PAT_2013_Quality_Standards.pdf.

  20. Pinquart M, Teubert D. Effects of parenting education with expectant and new parents: a meta-analysis. J Fam Psychol. 2010;24(3):316–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wyatt Kaminski J, Valle LA, Filene JH, Boyle CL. A meta-analytic review of components associated with parent training program effectiveness. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2008;36(4):567–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-007-9201-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hadders-Algra M, Boxum AG, Hielkema T, Hamer EG. Effect of early intervention in infants at very high risk of cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(3):246–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.13331.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoffman TK. An exploration of service delivery in early intervention over the last two decades. Int J Early Child Spec Educ. 2016;8(2):107–12. https://doi.org/10.20489/intjecse.284568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Landa RJ. Efficacy of early interventions for infants and young children with, and at risk for, autism spectrum disorders. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2018;30(1):25–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540261.2018.1432574.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. McWilliam RA. Metanoia in early intervention: transformation to a family-centered approach. Rev Latinoamericana Educ Inclusiva. 2016;10:155–73.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Vilaseca R, Ferrer F, Rivero M, Bersabé RM. Early intervention services during the COVID-19 pandemic in Spain: toward a model of family-centered practices. Front Psychol. 2021;12:738463. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.738463.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. UNESCO. Inclusive early childhood care and education: from commitment to action. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization; 2021. https://www.unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000378076.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Bruder MB, Dunst C, Maude SP, Schnurr M, Van Polen A, Frolek Clark G, Winslow A, Gethmann D. Practitioner appraisals of their desired and current use of the 2014 division for early childhood recommended practices. J Early Interv. 2020;42(3):259–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119886105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Corr C, Spence C, Miller D, Marshall AA, Santos RM. Beyond “hoping for the best”: home visits in impoverished urban areas. Young Except Child. 2018;21(2):111–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250616674332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hughes-Belding K, Peterson CA. Home visiting: intersection of quality and processes. In: Biennial Conference on Research Innovations in Early Intervention, February, San Diego, CA; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Grupo de Atención Temprana. La realidad actual de la Atención Temprana en España [the current reality of early childhood intervention in Spain]. Madrid: Real Patronato sobre Discapacidad. Ministerio de Sanidad, Política Social e Igualdad; 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/11181/3190.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Vilaseca RM, Giné CG, García-Dié MT, Gràcia M. La participación de los padres en la Atención Temprana en Catalunya: hacia un cambio de paradigma [the participation of parents in early intervention in Catalonia: towards a paradigm shift]. Rev Atenc Tempr. 2004;7(1):48–57.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Innocenti MS, Roggman LA. Increasing quality in-person and virtual home visits. In: Virtual workshop for the Wyoming MIECHV parents as teachers Community of Practice. Casper, WY; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Roggman L, Innocenti M, Traube D. Virtual coaching: innovations in professional development. In: Panel presentation at the National Home Visit Summit [virtual]; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen D, McFarland L. Home visits with families and their infants who are deaf-blind. Deaf Blind Perspect. 2009;16(2):4–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Jump Norman V, Boyce LK, Christiansen K, Peterson CA. Home visit quality variations in two early head start programs in relation to parenting and child vocabulary outcomes. Infant Ment Health J. 2016;37(3):193–207. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21565.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman M, Murphy N, Morrato EH. Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(1):e187529. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Allen K, Huff NL. Family coaching: an emerging family science field. Fam Relat. 2014;63(5):569–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/FARE.12087.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rush DD, Shelden ML, Hanft BE. Coaching families and colleagues: a process for collaboration in natural settings. Infants Young Child. 2003;16(1):33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Lorio CM, Romano M, Woods JJ, Brown J. A review of problem solving and reflection as caregiver coaching strategies in early intervention. Infants Young Child. 2020;33(1):35–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Artman-Meeker K, Fettig A, Barton EE, Penney A, Zeng S. Applying an evidence-based framework to the early childhood coaching literature. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2015;35(3):183–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415595550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Elek C, Page J. Critical features of effective coaching for early childhood educators: a review of empirical research literature. Prof Dev Educ. 2019;45(4):567–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2018.1452781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gupta SS, Daniels J. Coaching and professional development in early childhood classrooms: current practices and recommendations for the future. NHSA Dialog. 2012;15(2):206–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15240754.2012.665509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Isner T, Tout K, Zaslow M, Soli M, Quinn K, Rothenberg L, Burkhauser M. Coaching in early care and education programs and quality rating and improvement systems (QRIS): identifying promising features. Bethesda, MD: Child Trend; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Powell DR, Diamond KE. Implementation fidelity of a coaching-based professional development program for improving head start teachers’ literacy and language instruction. J Early Interv. 2013;35(2):102–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113516678.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Juffer F, Struis E, Werner C, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Effective preventive interventions to support parents of young children: illustrations from the video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting and sensitive discipline (VIPP-SD). J Prev Interv Community. 2017;45(3):202–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10852352.2016.1198128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Kasari C, Gulsrud A, Paparella T, Hellemann G, Berry K. Randomized comparative efficacy study of parent-mediated interventions for toddlers with autism. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2015;83(3):554–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039080.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Kennedy H, Ball K, Barlow J. How does video interaction guidance contribute to infant and parental mental health and well-being? Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2017;22(3):500–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104517704026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Roggman LA, Boyce LK, Innocenti MS. Developmental parenting: a guide for early childhood practitioners. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Provenzi L, Giusti L, Caglia M, Rosa E, Mascheroni E, Montirosso R. Evidence and open questions for the use of video-feedback interventions with parents of children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Front Psychol. 2020;11:1374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01374.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Wetherby AM, Woods J, Guthrie W, Delehanty A, Brown JA, Morgan L, Holland R, Schatschneider C, Lord C. Changing developmental trajectories of toddlers with autism spectrum disorder: strategies for bridging research to community practice. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61(11):2615–28. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-RSAUT-18-0028.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  52. Festante F, Antonelli C, Chorna O, Corsi G, Guzzetta A. Parent-infant interaction during the first year of life in infants at high risk for cerebral palsy: a systematic review of the literature. Neural Plast. 2019;2019:5759694. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5759694.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Chen D, Klein MD, Haney M. Promoting interactions with infants who have complex multiple disabilities: development and field-testing of the PLAI curriculum. Infants Young Child. 2007;20(2):149–62. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iyc.0000264482.35570.32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Provenzi L, Rosa E, Visintin E, Mascheroni E, Guida E, Cavallini A, et al. Understanding the role and function of maternal touch in children with neurodevelopmental disabilities. Infant Behav Dev. 2020;58:101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101420.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Anderson CJ, Sawin DB. Enhancing responsiveness in mother-infant interaction. Infant Behav Dev. 1983;6(2–3):361–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0163-6383(83)80044-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Kuhn O, Wudernitz M, Monshi A, Aarts M, Ritschl V. Marte Meo as a video interaction guidance method to support interpersonal relationships in families: a systematic review protocol with a descriptive meta-analysis; 2020. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.27754.88005.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  57. Vik K, Rohde R. Tiny moments of great importance: the Marte Meo method applied in the context of early mother–infant interaction and postnatal depression. Utilizing Daniel Stern’s theory of ‘schemas of being with’in understanding empirical findings and developing a stringent Marte Meo methodology. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2014;19(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104512468286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Fisher PA, Frenkel TI, Noll LK, Berry M, Yockelson M. Promoting healthy child development via a two-generation translational neuroscience framework: the filming interactions to nurture development video coaching program. Child Dev Perspect. 2016;10(4):251–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12195.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Juffer F, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van Ijzendoorn MH. Video-feedback intervention to promote positive parenting and sensitive discipline. In: Handbook of attachment-based interventions, vol. 74. New York: Guilford; 2018. p. 1346.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Whitehouse AJO, Varcin KJ, Pillar S, Billingham W, Alvares GA, Barbaro J, et al. Effect of preemptive intervention on developmental outcomes among infants showing early signs of autism: a randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis: a randomized clinical trial of outcomes to diagnosis. JAMA Pediatr. 2021;175(11):e213298. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.3298.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Kraft MA, Blazar D, Hogan D. The effect of teaching coaching on instruction and achievement: a meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Rev Educ Res. 2018;88(4):547–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Kilmer RP, Cowen EL, Wyman PA. A micro-level analysis of developmental, parenting, and family milieu variables that differentiate stress-resilient and stress-affected children. J Community Psychol. 2001;29(4):391–416. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.1025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Brotman LM, O’Neal CR, Huang K-Y, Gouley KK, Rosenfelt A, Shrout PE. An experimental test of parenting practices as a mediator of early childhood physical aggression. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50(3):235–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.01929.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Caspi A, Moffitt TE, Morgan J, Rutter M, Taylor A, Arseneault L, et al. Maternal expressed emotion predicts children’s antisocial behavior problems: using monozygotic-twin differences to identify environmental effects on behavioral development. Dev Psychol. 2004;40(2):149–61. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.40.2.149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Dodici BJ, Draper DC, Peterson CA. Early parent—child interactions and early literacy development. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2003;23(3):124–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214030230030301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Farah MJ, Betancourt L, Shera DM, Savage JH, Giannetta JM, Brodsky NL, et al. Environmental stimulation, parental nurturance and cognitive development in humans. Dev Sci. 2008;11(5):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00688.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Kim-Cohen J, Moffitt TE, Caspi A, Taylor A. Genetic and environmental processes in young children’s resilience and vulnerability to socioeconomic deprivation. Child Dev. 2004;75(3):651–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00699.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Petrill SA, Deater-Deckard K. Task orientation, parental warmth and SES account for a significant proportion of the shared environmental variance in general cognitive ability in early childhood: evidence from a twin study. Dev Sci. 2004;7(1):25–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2004.00319.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Kellerman AM, Schwichtenberg AJ, Abu-Zhaya R, Miller M, Young GS, Ozonoff S. Dyadic synchrony and responsiveness in the first year: associations with autism risk. Autism Res. 2020;13(12):2190–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2373.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  70. Maselko J, Kubzansky L, Lipsitt L, Buka SL. Mother’s affection at 8 months predicts emotional distress in adulthood. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(7):621–5. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2009.097873.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Waller R, Shaw DS, Forbes EE, Hyde LW. Understanding early contextual and parental risk factors for the development of limited prosocial emotions. J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2015;43(6):1025–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-014-9965-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  72. Bernier A, Carlson SM, Bordeleau S, Carrier J. Relations between physiological and cognitive regulatory systems: infant sleep regulation and subsequent executive functioning: sleep and executive functioning. Child Dev. 2010;81(6):1739–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01507.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bernier A, Carlson SM, Deschênes M, Matte-Gagné C. Social factors in the development of early executive functioning: a closer look at the caregiving environment: caregiving and child executive functioning. Dev Sci. 2012;15(1):12–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2011.01093.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Bozicevic L, De Pascalis L, Montirosso R, Ferrari PF, Giusti L, Cooper PJ, et al. Sculpting culture: early maternal responsiveness and child emotion regulation- a UK-Italy comparison. J Cross Cult Psychol. 2021;52(1):22–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022120971353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Hirsh-Pasek K, Burchinal M. Mother and caregiver sensitivity over time: predicting language and academic outcomes with variable- and person-centered approaches. Merrill Palmer Q. 2022;52(3):449–85. https://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/mpq/vol52/iss3/5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Davidov M, Grusec JE. Untangling the links of parental responsiveness to distress and warmth to child outcomes. Child Dev. 2006;77(1):44–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00855.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Guttentag C. A responsive parenting intervention: the optimal timing across early childhood for impacting maternal behaviors and child outcomes. Dev Psychol. 2008;44(5):1335–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013030.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Landry SH, Smith KE, Swank PR, Assel MA, Vellet S. Does early responsive parenting have a special importance for children’s development or is consistency across early childhood necessary? Dev Psychol. 2001;37(3):387–403. https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.37.3.387.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Tamis-LeMonda CS, Bornstein MH, Baumwell L. Maternal responsiveness and children’s achievement of language milestones. Child Dev. 2001;72(3):748–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00313.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Wade M, Jenkins JM, Venkadasalam VP, Binnoon-Erez N, Ganea PA. The role of maternal responsiveness and linguistic input in pre-academics kill development: a longitudinal analysis of pathways. Cogn Dev. 2018;45:125–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2018.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Ward KP, Lee SJ. Mothers’ and fathers’ parenting stress, responsiveness, and child well being among low-income families. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2020;116:105218.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Eshelman VT, Lieberman-Betz RG, Vail CO, Brown JA. An examination of patterns of caregiver responsiveness and toddler communication in early childhood classrooms. J Early Child Teach Educ. 2021;44:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2021.2005189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Ispa JM, Fine MA, Halgunseth LC, Harper S, Robinson J, Boyce L, et al. Maternal intrusiveness, maternal warmth, and mother-toddler relationship outcomes: variations across low-income ethnic and acculturation groups. Child Dev. 2004;75(6):1613–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00806.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Hubbs-Tait L, Culp AM, Culp RE, Miller CE. Relation of maternal cognitive stimulation, emotional support, and intrusive behavior during head start to children’s kindergarten cognitive abilities. Child Dev. 2002;73(1):110–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00395.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Lucca K, Horton R, Sommerville JA. Keeptrying!: parental language predicts infants’ persistence. Cognition. 2019;193:104–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104025.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. Kelley SA, Brownell CA, Campbell SB. Mastery motivation and self-evaluative affect in toddlers: longitudinal relations with maternal behavior. Child Dev. 2000;71(4):1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00209.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Masten AS, Herbers JE, Desjardins CD, Cutuli JJ, Mccormick CM, Sapienza JK, et al. Executive function skills and school success in young children experiencing homelessness. Educ Res. 2012;41(9):375–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X12459883.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Laurin DE, Guss SS, Horm D. Caregiver-infant and toddler interactions during diapering: caregiver responsiveness and child well-being and involvement. Infant Ment Health J. 2021;42(4):546–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Bingham GE. Maternal literacy beliefs and the quality of mother-child book-reading interactions: associations with children’s early literacy development. Early Educ Dev. 2007;18(1):23–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409280701274428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Cook GA, Roggman LA, Boyce LK. Fathers’ and mothers’ cognitive stimulation in early play with toddlers: predictors of 5th grade reading and math. Fam Sci. 2011;2(2):131–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424620.2011.640559ç.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Séguin JR, Parent S, Tremblay RE, Zelazo PD. Different neurocognitive functions regulating physical aggression and hyperactivity in early childhood. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2009;50(6):679–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02030.x.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. Weisleder A, Cates CB, Harding JF, Johnson SB, Canfield CF, Seery AM, et al. Links between shared reading and play, parent psychosocial functioning, and child behavior: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr. 2019;213:187–195.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.06.037.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Einziger T, Zilberman-Hayun Y, Atzaba-Poria N, Auerbach JG, Berger A. How important is early home environment in the prediction of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in adolescence? The protective role of early cognitive stimulation. Infant Child Dev. 2019;28(5):e2138. https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Kisker EE, Spellmann M, Ta Kisker EE, Brooks-Gunn J, Chazan-Cohen R, Jeral J, Kresh E, Raikes H, Tarullo LB, Love JM, et al. Early head start research and evaluation project (EHSRE). Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 1996. https://www.researchconnections.org/childcare/resources/34450. Accessed 26 Apr 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  95. Love JM, Kisker EE, Ross C, Schochet PZ, Brooks-Gunn J, Paulsell D, et al. Making a difference in the lives of infants and toddlers and their families: the impacts of early head start. In: Final technical report [and] appendixes [and] local contributions to understanding the programs and their impacts, vol. 2. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Head Start Bureau; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Fuligni AS, Brooks-Gunn J. Mother–child interactions in early head start: age and ethnic differences in low-income dyads. Parenting. 2013;13(1):1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2013.732422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Jump Norman V, Christiansen K. Parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes (PICCOLO) in diverse ethnic groups: PICCOLO parenting measure in a diverse sample. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):290–306. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. Anderson S, Roggman LA, Innocenti MS, Cook GA. Dads’ parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes (PICCOLO-D): the PICCOLO-D. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):339–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  99. Boller K, Bradley R, Cabrera N, Raikes H, Pan B, Shears J, et al. The early head start father studies: design, data collection, and summary of father presence in the lives of infants and toddlers. Parent Sci Pract. 2006;6(2):117–43. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327922par0602&3_1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  100. Rivero M, Vilaseca R, Ferrer F, Guilera G. Assessing parenting interactions with children: Spanish validation of PICCOLO with fathers. Front Psychol. 2021;12:747716. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.747716.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Jump Norman V, Christiansen K. Validity of the PICCOLO tool in child care settings: can it assess caregiver interaction behaviors? Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):319–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  102. Harms T, Clifford RM, Cryer D. Early childhood environment rating scale-revised edition (ECERS-R). New York: Teachers College Press; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  103. Harms T, Cryer D, Clifford RM. Infant-toddler environment rating scale revised edition (ITERS-R). New York, NY: Teachers College Press; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  104. Harms T, Cryer D, Clifford RM. Family child care environment rating scale-revised edition (FCCERS-R). New York: Teachers College Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  105. Arnett J. Caregivers in day-care centers: does training matter? J Appl Dev Psychol. 1989;10(4):541–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/0193-3973(89)90026-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Lippard CN, Riley KL, Hughes-Belding K. Observing toddlers’ individual experiences in classrooms: initial use of the parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes. Infant Ment Health J. 2016;37(5):549–59. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21584.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. La Paro KM, Hamre BK, Pianta RC. Classroom assessment scoring system (CLASS) manual, toddler. Baltimore: Brookes; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  108. Porter T, Reiman K. Examining quality in a family childcare network: an evaluation of all our kin. In: Early care and education consulting. Larchmont, NY; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  109. Belsky J, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, Van IJzendoorn MH. For better and for worse: differential susceptibility to environmental influences. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(6):300–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. Clark J. Notes for observing PICCOLO with babies. University of New Mexico; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  111. Gurko KL. Socioeconomic status influence on mothers’ interactions with infants: contributions to early infant development. Doctoral dissertation, Utah State University; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  112. Roggman L, Gurko K, Olson T, Park S. Developmental parenting and child development outcomes with US infants age 3–9 months: expanding the validity of PICCOLO to infancy. Rome: World Association of Infant Mental Health; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  113. Innocenti MS. Symposium discussant, parenting interactions and children’s outcomes: results from Chile, China, Spain, and the USA. Rome: World Association of Infant Mental Health; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  114. Keller-Schuhmacher K, Sarimski K, Watson M. Piccolo-manual: Einschätzung von Eltern-kind-Interaktionen [piccolo-manual: assessment of parent-child interactions]. Munich: Ernst Reinhardt Verlag; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  115. Farkas C, Álvarez C, Cuellar MDP, Avello E, Gómez DM, Pereira P. Mothers’ competence profiles and their relation to language and socioemotional development in Chilean children at 12 and 30 months. Infant Behav Dev. 2020;59:101443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2020.101443.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Schneider A. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of strengths-based parenting measures in Brazil: PICCOLO and cognitive sensitivity scale. Doctoral dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada); 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  117. Bayoğlu B, Unal Ö, Elibol F, Karabulut E, Innocenti MS. Turkish validation of the PICCOLO (parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes): Turkish validation of the PICCOLO. Infant Ment Health J. 2013;34(4):330–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. Vilaseca R, Rivero M, Bersabé RM, Navarro-Pardo E, Cantero MJ, Ferrer F, et al. Spanish validation of the PICCOLO (parenting interactions with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes). Front Psychol. 2019;10:680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00680.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  119. Montirosso R, Castagna A, Butti N, Innocenti MS, Roggman LA, Rosa E. A contribution to the Italian validation of the parenting interaction with children: checklist of observations linked to outcome (PICCOLO). Frontiers in Psychology 2023;14:1421. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105218.

  120. Vilaseca R, Rivero M, Bersabé RM, Navarro-Pardo E, Cantero MJ, Ferrer F, Valls-Vidal C. Interacciones parentales con los/as niños/as. Lista de ítems de observación vinculados al desarrollo (PICCOLO) Guía del usuario. [Parenting interactions with children. Checklist of observations linked to outcomes (PICCOLO) User’s guide]. Valencia and Barcelona: Publicacions Universitat de València and Universitat de Barcelona Edicions; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  121. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Norman VJ, Christiansen K, Anderson S. PICCOLO™-Manual: Adattamento italiano [Italian adaptation] (R. Montirosso & L. Giusti, Trans.). Firenze, ITALY: Hogrefe, 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  122. Bayley N. Escalas Bayley de desarrollo infantil (Bayley-III) [Bayley scales of child development (Bayley-III)]. 3rd ed. Madrid: Pearson; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  123. Gray DE. Coping over time: the parents of children with autism. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50:970–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00933.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  124. Kersh J, Hedvat TT, Hauser-Cram P, Warfield ME. The contribution of marital quality to the well-being of parents of children with developmental disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2006;50(Pt 12):883–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2006.00906.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  125. Dabrowska A, Pisula E. Parenting stress and coping styles in mothers and fathers of pre-school children with autism and down syndrome. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2010;54(3):266–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01258.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  126. Cabrera NJ, Fitzgerald HE, Bradley RH, Roggman L. The ecology of father-child relationships: an expanded model. J Fam Theory Rev. 2014;6:336–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Pennington L, McConachie H. Predicting patterns of interaction between children with cerebral palsy and their mothers. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43(2):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0012162201000147.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Salisbury CL, Copeland CG. Progress of infants/toddlers with severe disabilities: perceived and measured change. Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2013;33(2):68–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121412474104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Totsika V, Hastings RP, Emerson E, Hatton C. Early years parenting mediates early adversity effects on problem behaviors in intellectual disability. Child Dev. 2020;91(3):e649–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Vilaseca R, Rivero M, Bersabé RM, Cantero M-J, Navarro-Pardo E, Valls-Vidal C, Ferrer F. Demographic and parental factors associated with developmental outcomes in children with intellectual disabilities. Front Psychol. 2019;10:872. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00872.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  131. Rivero M, Vilaseca R, Cantero MJ, Bersabé RM, Valls-Vidal C. Relations between parenting assessed with PICCOLO and child’s developmental outcomes. Abstract retrieved from the XVIth congress of the world Association for Infant Mental Health. Infant Ment Health J. 2018:39.

    Google Scholar 

  132. Warren SF, Brady N, Sterling A, Fleming K, Marquis J. Maternal responsivity predicts language development in young children with fragile X syndrome. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2010;115(1):54–75. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-115.1.54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  133. Roseberry S, Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM. Skype me! Socially contingent interactions help toddlers learn language. Child Dev. 2014;85(3):956–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12166.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Tamis-Lemonda CS, Kuchirko Y, Song L. Why is infant language learning facilitated by parental responsiveness? Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2014;23:121–6. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414522813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  135. Summers JA, Boller K, Schiffman RF, Andraikes HH. The meaning of “good fatherhood”: low-income fathers’ social construction of their roles. Parenting Sci Pract. 2006;6:145–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. Roggman LA, Boyce LK, Cook GA, Cook J. Getting dads involved: predictors of father involvement in early head start and with their children. Infant Ment Health J. 2002;23(1–2):62–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.10004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. Cabrera NJ, Volling BL, Barr R. Fathers are parents, too! Widening the lens on parenting for children’s development. Child Dev Perspect. 2018;12(3):152–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  138. Vilaseca R, Rivero M, Ferrer F, Bersabé RM. Parenting behaviors of mothers and fathers of young children with intellectual disability evaluated in a natural context. PloS One. 2020;15(10):e0240320. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240320.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  139. Bornstein M, Hendricks C, Haynes OM, Painter K. Maternal sensitivity and child responsiveness: associations with social context, maternal characteristics, and child characteristics in a multivariate analysis. Infancy. 2007;12(2):189–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7078.2007.tb00240x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  140. Brophy-Herb HE, Stansbury K, Bocknek E, Horodynski MA. Modeling maternal emotion-related socialization behaviors in a low-income sample: relations with toddlers’ self-regulation. Early Child Res Q. 2012;27(3):352–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.11.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. Bornstein MH. Parenting and child mental health: a cross-cultural perspective. World Psychiatry. 2013;12(3):258–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20071.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  142. Manz PH, Levert D, Lee M, Cai Y, Solé M, Gross Y. Assessment of parents’ support of young children’s learning through a sociocultural lens. In: Psychoeducational assessment of preschool children. 5th ed. New York, NY: Routledge; 2020. p. 98–128.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  143. Fugate M. Parenting interaction with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes. In: Carlson JF, Geisinger KF, Jonson JL, editors. The twentieth mental measurements yearbook [electronic version]. Retrieved from the Buros Institute’s Mental Measurements Yearbook online database; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  144. Reisener CD. Parenting interaction with children: checklist of observations linked to outcomes. In: Carlson JF, Geisinger KF, Jonson JL, editors. The twentieth mental measurements yearbook [electronic version]. Retrieved from the Buros Institute's Mental Measurements Yearbook online database; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  145. Choi Y, Kim M, Pae S. The relationship among toddler’s symbolic play level, mother’s responsiveness and verbal interaction. J Korean Home Manage Assoc. 2016;34(5):83–98. https://doi.org/10.7466/jkhma.2016.34.5.83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. Dexter CA, Stacks AM. A preliminary investigation of the relationship between parenting, parent-child share dreading practices, and child development in low-income families. J Res Child Educ. 2014;28(3):394–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2014.913278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Goodlett BD, Trentacosta CJ, Mclear C, Crespo L, Wheeler R, Williams A, et al. Maternal depressive symptoms and at-risk young children’s internalizing problems: the moderating role of mothers’ positivity. Merrill-palmer quarterly (Wayne State University). Merrill-Palmer Q. 2017;63(1):77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Almeida ML, Frizzo GB. Digital media and quality of mother-infant interaction: literature review. Health Hum Dev. 2021;9(3):1.

    Google Scholar 

  149. Hildayani R, Savitri LS, Dwyniaputeri A, Tertia DV, Wukiranuttama R, Gracia T. Electronic vs non-electronic toys: which one is better for mother–child interaction? In: Diversity in Unity: perspectives from psychology and behavioral sciences. London: Routledge; 2017. p. 115–21.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  150. Lee J, Wood E. Examining parent–child spatial play interaction using traditional toys and touch screen tablets. Parent Sci Pract. 2021;21(4):304–31. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2020.1811062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  151. Wooldridge MB, Shapka J. Playing with technology: mother-toddler interactions core slower during play with electronic toys. J Appl Dev Psychol. 2012;33(5):211–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2012.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. Sung J. How young children and their mothers experience two different types of toys: a traditional stuffed toy versus an animated digital toy. Child Youth Care Forum. 2018;47(2):233–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-017-9428-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  153. Sansour T. Interactional style and subjective stress in mothers of young children with fragile X syndrome, Down’s syndrome or typical development. Eur J Spec Educ Res. 2016;2:100. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejse.v0i0.241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Martać VI, Vučinić VJ, Anđelković MM, Vladisavljević ZG. Characteristics of interaction between parents and children with visual impairment at preschool age. Spec Edukac Rehabil. 2020;19(4):213–26. https://doi.org/10.5937/specedreh19-29874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  155. Ayar G, Yalçın SS, Bayoğlu B. Do the children of mothers with optimum PICCOLO scores have better Denver II test results? Turk Arch Pediatr. 2021;56(5):423–8. https://doi.org/10.5152/TurkArchPediatr.2021.20194.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  156. Bagnato S, Tepe J, Larson T. Healthy infants: prevention & promotion supports for vulnerable infants and families final 2-year report. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Office of Child Development; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  157. Benatar S, Sandstrom H, Howell E, Triplett T, Hill I, Wilkinson M, et al. Effects of welcome baby home visiting: findings from the 24-month child & family survey. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  158. Stahmer AC, Rieth SR, Dickson KS, Feder J, Burgeson M, Searcy K, et al. Project ImPACT for toddlers: pilot outcomes of a community adaptation of an intervention for autism risk. Autism. 2020;24(3):617–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361319878080.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  159. Sandstrom H, Benatar S, Greenberg E, Hill I, Howell E, Triplett T, et al. Welcome baby home visiting: findings from the 36-month child & family survey and 3-year longitudinal results. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  160. Vogel CA, Caronongan P, Thomas J, Bandel E, Xue Y, Henke J, et al. Toddlers in early head start: a portrait of 2-year-olds, their families, and the programs serving them. In: Age 2 report, vol. 1; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  161. Xue Y, Boller K, Vogel CA, Thomas J, Caronongan P, Aikens N. Early head start family and child experiences survey (baby FACES). Design options report. Princeton, NJ: Mathematica Policy Research; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  162. Alquraini T, Al-Odaib A, Al-Dhalaan H, Merza H, Mahoney G. Feasibility of responsive teaching with mothers and young children with autism in Saudi Arabia. J Early Interv. 2018;40(4):304–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815118789176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. Alquraini T, Al-Odaib A, Al-Dhalaan H, Merza H, Mahoney G. Relationship-based intervention with young children with autism in Saudi Arabia: impediments and consequences of parenting stress and depression. Intl J Disabil Dev Educ. 2019;66(3):233–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912x.2018.1487042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  164. Alves CRL, Gaspardo CM, Altafim ERP, Linhares MBM. Effectiveness of a longitudinal psychosocial intervention to strengthen mother–child interactions: the role of biological and contextual moderators. Child Youth Serv Rev. 2022;133(106333):106333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. Schindler HS, Fisher PA, Shonkoff JP. From innovation to impact at scale: lessons learned from a cluster of research-community partnerships. Child Dev. 2017;88(5):1435–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12904.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  166. Larson TK, Bagnato SJ, Miglioretti MA, Barone-Martin C, Mcneal R. Healthy infants: fostering responsive caregiving via tiered mentoring for high-risk teen mothers and infants. Perspectives. 2017;2(1).

    Google Scholar 

  167. Design Options for Home Visitation Evaluation. The DOHVE compendium of measurement tools for maternal, infant, and early childhood home visiting (MIECHV) grantees. Arlington VA: James Bell; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  168. Fernald LC, Prado E, Kariger P, Raikes A. A toolkit for measuring early childhood development in low and middle-income countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank; 2017.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  169. Korfmacher JC, Chawla N. Toolkit of recommended curricula and assessments for early childhood home visiting. Geneva: UNICEF; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  170. National Center on Parent. Family, and community engagement for the Office of Head Start. Tracking progress in early care and education: program, staff, and family measurement tools. Boston, MA: Boston Children’s Hospital; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  171. Shah H, Niland K, Kharsa M, Caronongan P, Moiduddin E. Competencies of infant and toddler teachers and caregivers: a compendium of measures. Washington, DC: Office of Planning; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  172. Keilty B. Assessing the home environment to promote infant-toddler learning with in every day family routines. Young Except Child. 2020;23(4):199–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250619864076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  173. Kemp C. Research informing practice in early childhood intervention: how hard can it be? Infants Young Child. 2020;33(3):163–72. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0000000000000168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. Newbury J, Sutherland D. Measurement of child-directed speech: a survey of clinical practice. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2020;22(4):399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549507.2019.1650111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  175. Bagnato S, Neisworth JT, Pretti-Frontczak K. Linking authentic assessment and early childhood interventions: best measures for best practices. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  176. Wainer AL, Hepburn S, McMahon GE. Remembering parents in parent-mediated early intervention: an approach to examining impact on parents and families. Autism. 2017;21(1):5–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361315622411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  177. Wheeler RM, Ludtke M, Helmer J, Barna N, Wilson KA, Oleksiak C. Implementation of the PICCOLO in infant mental health practice: a case study. Traditio. 2013;34:352–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. Dolan B. PICCOLO in home visits from a parent educator’s perspective. In: Parents as Teachers Conference, Oct 2–5, Atlanta GA; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  179. Cahill J. Using PICCOLO in home visiting. In: Parents as teachers conference, St Louis MO; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  180. Humani DA, Hildayani R, Hartianti F. Effectiveness of training on four key aspects to develop the interaction between mother and children in early childhood. In: 1st international conference on intervention and applied psychology (ICIAP 2017). Amsterdam: Atlantis Press; 2017. p. 94–106.

    Google Scholar 

  181. Childress DC, Raver SA, Eckhoff A, Gear SB. Technology-mediated professional development for early intervention service providers: connecting adult learning with caregiver support. Prof Dev Educ. 2021;4:1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  182. Roggman LA, Cook GA, Innocenti MS, Jump Norman VK, Boyce LK, Olson TL, et al. The home visit rating scales: revised, restructured, and revalidated. Infant Ment Health J. 2019;40(3):315–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/imhj.21781.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  183. Squires J, Twombly E, Bricker DD, Potter L. ASQ-3 user’s guide. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  184. Twombly E, Fink G. ASQ-3 learning activities. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  185. Roggman L, Olson T, Rinaldi MC, Cook G, Innocenti M. Tele-visiting to support families with infants and toddlers. In: Proceedings of the Zero to Three Annual Conference, virtual, 25–27 Oct; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  186. Mas JM, Cañadas M, Balcells-Balcells A, Giné C, Serrano AM, Dunst CJ. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the family-centred practices scale for use with families of young children receiving early childhood intervention. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2018;31(5):851–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12442.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  187. Jackson-Maldonado D, Marchman VA, Fernald LC. Short-form versions of the Spanish MacArthur–bates communicative development inventories. Appl Psycholinguist. 2013;34(4):837–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716412000045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. Wenger E. Communities of practice: learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press; 1998. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  189. Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating communities of practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Brighton, MA: Harvard Business Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  190. Buysse V, Sparkman KL, Wesley PW. Communities of practice: connecting what we know with what we do. Except Child. 2003;69(3):263–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. Lave J, Wenger E. Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice. In: Supporting lifelong learning. London: Routledge; 2001. p. 121–36.

    Google Scholar 

  192. Vygotsky LS. Educational psychology. Boca Raton, FL: St. Lucie Press; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  193. Innocenti MS, Roggman LA, Cook GA. Implementing a coaching-based community of practice to improve home visitor skills: a relationship-based, strengths-based and reflective approach. Lauderdale, FL: Zero to Three Annual Conference; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  194. Innocenti MS, Roggman LA. Impacts of a community of (family-centered) practice for home visiting practitioners: quantitative and qualitative lessons learned. Sydney: June International Society for Early Intervention; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  195. Pawl JH, St John M. How you are is as important as what you do... in making a positive difference for infants, toddlers and their families. Washington, DC: Zero to Three; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  196. Shulman L. Models of supervision: parallel processes and honest relationships. Social Work Podcast series; 2008. http://www.insocialwork.org/episode.asp?ep=5.

  197. Dunst CJ, Trivette CM, Raab M. An implementation science framework for conceptualizing and operationalizing fidelity in early childhood intervention studies. J Early Interv. 2013;35(2):85–101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815113502235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. Fixsen D, Naoom S, Blase K, Friedman R, Wallace F. Implementation research: a synthesis of the literature. Tamps, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, National Implementation Research Network; 2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utah State University, Logan, UT, USA

    Mark S. Innocenti & Lori Roggman

  2. University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Rosa Vilaseca

Authors
  1. Mark S. Innocenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rosa Vilaseca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lori Roggman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark S. Innocenti .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

    Livio Provenzi

  2. Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy

    Serena Grumi

  3. Pediatric Neuroscience Center, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy

    Renato Borgatti

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Innocenti, M.S., Vilaseca, R., Roggman, L. (2023). PICCOLO: Observing and Coaching Caregiver-Child Interaction to Support Early Development in Children With and Without Disabilities. In: Provenzi, L., Grumi, S., Borgatti, R. (eds) Family-Centered Care in Childhood Disability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34252-3_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34252-3_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-34251-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-34252-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation