Skip to main content
Log in

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy from the Parents’ Perspective

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

Parent-Child Interaction Therapy (PCIT) is an evidence-based parent training programme, distinctive in its live coaching of parents with children via an ear-piece and one-way mirror. Yet few studies have explored the acceptability of PCIT to parents—and those which do exist have typically relied upon quantitative methods such as inventories or rating scales. The current study aimed to gain in-depth insight into parents’ experiences, and perspectives of PCIT utilising a qualitative methodology.

Methods

Sixteen parents who had participated in PCIT in a community setting in New Zealand took part in semi-structured face-to-face interviews. Thematic analysis of verbatim transcripts led to the emergence of several themes.

Results

Despite early scepticism, self-consciousness, and initial discomfort with the use of particular strategies (e.g., time out), parents described an effective treatment that facilitated a progression from feelings of inadequacy to confidence, and despair to optimism. Child-led play, an essential component of PCIT, was viewed as surprisingly effective by parents. Parenting skills which initially felt awkward and un-natural, became more intuitive and instinctive through repeated rehearsal and coaching support. Parents also consistently described the influential role of the coach in facilitating change—particularly in improving parent emotion regulation abilities.

Conclusions

This detailed account of the parent experience of progression through PCIT enhances existing knowledge of factors related to parent engagement with, and attrition from the programme. It also highlights the multidimensional role of the therapist coach in supporting parent emotion regulation abilities—an area which warrants further empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., Phelan, R., Heap, J., & Howe, D. (2017). “Being in a group with others who have mental illness makes all the difference”: the views and experiences of parents who attended a mental health parenting program. Children and Youth Services Review, 78, 104–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coghill, D. (2013). Editorial: do clinical services need to take conduct disorder more seriously? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 54(9), 921–923. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comer, J. S., Furr, J. M., Miguel, E. M., Cooper-Vince, C. E., Carpenter, A. L., Elkins, R., & Chase, R. (2017). Remotely delivering real-time parent training to the home: an initial randomized trial of Internet-delivered parent-child interaction therapy (I-PCIT). Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 85(9), 909–917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. M., & Funderburk, B. (2011). Parent-child interaction therapy protocol. PCIT International, Inc. Gainesville, FL: PCIT International.

  • Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., Ginn, N., Bhuiyan, N., & Boggs, S. (2013). Dyadic parent-child interaction coding system: comprehensive manual for research and training (4th ed.). Gainesville, FL: PCIT International.

  • Eyberg, S. M., & Pincus, D. B. (1999). Eyberg child behavior inventory and sutter-eyberg student behavior inventory-revised: professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

  • Furlong, M., & McGilloway, S. (2012). The Incredible Years parenting program in Ireland: a qualitative analysis of the experience of disadvantaged parents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104511426406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M., & McGilloway, S. (2015). The longer term experiences of parent training: a qualitative analysis. Child: Care, Health and Development, 41(5), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/cch.12195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furlong, M., McGilloway, S., Bywater, T., Hutchings, J., Smith, S. M., & Donnelly, M. (2013). Cochrane review: behavioural and cognitive-behavioural group-based parenting programmes for early-onset conduct problems in children aged 3 to 12 years (Review). Evidence-Based Child Health, 8(2), 318–692. https://doi.org/10.1002/ebch.1905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graziano, P. A., Bagner, D. M., Slavec, J., Hungerford, G., Kent, K., Babinski, D., & Pasalich, D. (2015). Feasibility of intensive parent–child interaction therapy (I-PCIT): results from an open trial. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 37(1), 38–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-014-9435-0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, C., Park, J. L., & Miller, N. V. (2018). Parental cognitions: relations to parenting and child behavior. In M. R. Sanders & A. Morawska (Eds.), Handbook of parenting and child development across the lifespan (pp. 395–414). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

  • Kaehler, L. A., Jacobs, M., & Jones, D. J. (2016). Distilling common history and practice elements to inform dissemination: Hanf-model BPT programs as an example. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 19(3), 236–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-016-0210-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kimonis, E. R., Fleming, G., Briggs, N., Brouwer-French, L., Frick, P. J., Hawes, D. J.,… Dadds, M. (2018). Parent-child interaction therapy adapted for preschoolers with callous-unemotional traits: an open trial pilot study. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology. 48(Sup1), S347–S361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levac, A. M., McCay, E., Merka, P., & Reddon-D’Arcy, M. L. (2008). Exploring parent participation in a parent training program for children’s aggression: understanding and illuminating mechanisms of change. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Nursing, 21(2), 78–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, E. M., Feely, M., Seay, K. D., Fedoravicius, N., & Kohl, P. L. (2016). “Child welfare involved parents and pathways triple P: perceptions of program acceptability and appropriateness”: erratum. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 25(12), 3782–3782. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-016-0599-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matos, M., Torres, R., Santiago, R., Jurado, M., & Rodriguez, I. (2006). Adaptation of parent-child interaction therapy for puerto rican families: a preliminary study. Family Process, 45(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, K. M., Yeh, M., Garland, A. F., Lau, A. S., & Chavez, G. (2005). The GANA program: a tailoring approach to adapting parent child interaction therapy for Mexican Americans. Education and Treatment of Children, 28(2), 111–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, C. B., & Hembree-Kigin, T. L. (2011). Parent-child interaction therapy (2nd ed.). Springer. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media.

  • Mejia, A., Ulph, F., & Calam, R. (2016). Exploration of mechanisms behind changes after participation in a parenting intervention: a qualitative study in a low-resource setting. American Journal of Community Psychology, 57(1-2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajcp.12020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Niec, L. N., Abrahamse, M. E., Egan, R., Coelman, F. J. G., & Heiner, W. D. (2018). Global dissemination of parent-child interaction therapy: the perspectives of Dutch trainees. Children and Youth Services Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.08.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J., Morgan, S., Cawthorne, K., & Barnett, B. (2008). Pilot evaluation of parent-child interaction therapy delivered in an Australian community early childhood clinic setting. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 42(8), 712–719. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048670802206320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piotrowska, P. J., Tully, L. A., Lenroot, R., Kimonis, E., Hawes, D., Moul, C., & Dadds, M. R. (2017). Mothers, fathers, and parental systems: a conceptual model of parental engagement in programmes for child mental health—connect, attend, participate, enact (CAPE). Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 20(2), 146–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-016-0219-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Reitman, D., & McMahon, R. J. (2013). Constance “Connie” Hanf (1917–2002): the mentor and the model. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 20(1), 106–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2012.02.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivenbark, J. G., Odgers, C. L., Caspi, A., Harrington, H., Hogan, S., Houts, R. M., & Moffitt, T. E. (2017). The high societal costs of childhood conduct problems: evidence from administrative records up to age 38 in a longitudinal birth cohort. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.12850.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothenberg, W. A., Weinstein, A., Dandes, E. A., & Jent, J. F. (2019). Improving child emotion regulation: effects of parent-child interaction-therapy and emotion socialization strategies. Journal of Child & Family Studies, 28(3), 720–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-018-1302-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawrikar, V., & Dadds, M. (2018). What role for parental attributions in parenting interventions for child conduct problems? Advances from research into practice. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 21(1), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10567-017-0243-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S., & Gardner, F. (2015). Parenting programs. In A. Thapar, D. S. Pine, J. F. Leckman, S. Scott, M. J. Snowling, & E. Taylor (Eds), Rutter’s child and adolescent psychiatry. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

  • Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Emotional development: the organization of emotional life in the early years: Cambridge University Press. New York.

  • Thomas, R., Abell, B., Webb, H. J., Avdagic, E., & Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J. (2017). Parent-child interaction therapy: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics, 140(3). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2017-0352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiano, J. D., Grate, R. M., & McNeil, C. B. (2013). Comparison of mothers’ and fathers’ opinions of parent-child interaction therapy. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 35(2), 110–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2013.789358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmer, S. G., Urquiza, A. J., & Zebell, N. (2006). Challenging foster caregiver–maltreated child relationships: the effectiveness of parent–child interaction therapy. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.01.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotter, H., & Rafferty, H. (2014). A follow-up to the Incredible Years parenting programme: the reflections of mothers one to two years later. Educational & Child Psychology, 31(4), 40–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, M. J., & Lambie, I. (2019). Can parent-child interaction therapy (PCIT) remain effective where parents have a mental health issue? An audit of a case series in a community setting. Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/23794925.2019.1633246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Kerin, J. L., Webb, H. J., Gardner, A. A., Campbell, S. M., Swan, K., & Timmer, S. G. (2018). Improved perceptions of emotion regulation and reflective functioning in parents: two additional positive outcomes of parent-child interaction therapy. Behavior Therapy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beth.2018.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zlomke, K. R., Jeter, K., & Murphy, J. (2017). Open-trial pilot of parent-child interaction therapy for children with autism spectrum disorder. Child and Family Behavior Therapy, 39(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317107.2016.1267999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research was conducted during tenure of a Foxley Fellowship for Dr Melanie Woodfield from the Health Research Council of New Zealand.

Author Contributions

M.W.: designed and executed the study, analysed the data, and wrote the paper. C.C.: collaborated with the design of the study, data analyses and editing of the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melanie J Woodfield.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

M.W. is a Level 1 trainer for PCIT International – though receives no additional remuneration for this role – and was the treatment provider for several families. An independent interviewer was contracted to ensure that families were more able to speak openly of their experiences. An independent collaborator, the second author C.C., assisted with data analysis to ensure impartiality.

Ethical Approval

Ethical approval for this study was obtained from both New Zealand’s Health and Disability Ethics Committee [18/NTB/12], and the Auckland District Health Board Research Review Committee [#7674]. The study was carried out in accordance with the ethical standards of these groups, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Participants were provided with a detailed Participant Information Sheet, and key points were explained aloud. In every case, both the researcher (or researcher’s representative) and participants signed a detailed consent form after this discussion. Both the Participant Information Sheet and the Consent Form were reviewed and approved by both New Zealand’s Health and Disability Ethics Committee [18/NTB/12], and the Auckland District Health Board Research Review Committee [#7674] prior to the study commencing. Pseudonyms were assigned, and identifying information removed prior to the interview transcripts being uploaded to data analysis software and shared with the second author.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodfield, M.J., Cartwright, C. Parent-Child Interaction Therapy from the Parents’ Perspective. J Child Fam Stud 29, 632–647 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01611-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-019-01611-5

Keywords

Navigation