Skip to main content

Compatibility of Wrought Superalloys with Supercritical CO2

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives (TMS 2023)

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 742 Accesses

Abstract

Supercritical CO2 (sCO2) power cycles, particularly direct-fired cycles, have the possibility of revolutionizing clean fossil energy with peak temperatures above 700 °C and wrought precipitation strengthened alloys like Haynes 282™ for structural components. At temperatures <650 °C, it would be desirable to use less expensive alloys, however, steels are known to be susceptible to carburization. Laboratory 300 bar sCO2 autoclave results were collected on a range of alloys including less expensive Ni-based alloys like 825 compared to advanced austenitic steels like alloy 709 at 600 °C. Both alloys 825 and 709 formed thin, protective Cr-rich oxides after 1,000 h. Alloy 825 also was exposed for 1,000 h in sCO2 at 800 °C and compared to a range of Ni-based alloys. Comparing alloys 625, 825, and 282, the mass gain increased with increasing alloy Ti content under these conditions. High Al superalloys did not perform significantly better under these conditions at 800 °C.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dostal V, Hejzlar P, Driscoll MJ (2006) The supercritical carbon dioxide power cycle: Comparison to other advanced power cycles. Nucl. Technol. 154(3):283–301.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen H, Goswami DY, Stefanakos EK (2010) A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Rev 14:3059–3067.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Iverson BD, Conboy TM, Pasch JJ, Kruizenga AM (2013) Supercritical CO2 Brayton cycles for solar-thermal energy. Applied Energy 111:957–970.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allam R, Martin S, Forrest B, Fetvedt J, Lu X, Freed D, Brown, Jr. GW, Sasaki T, Itoh M, Manning J (2017) Demonstration of the Allam Cycle: An Update on the Development Status of a High Efficiency Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Process Employing Full Carbon Capture. Energy Procedia 114:5948–5966.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Olivares RI, Young DJ, Marvig P, Stein W (2015) Alloys SS316 and Hastelloy-C276 in Supercritical CO2 at High Temperature. Oxid. Met. 84:585–606.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Pint BA, Keiser JR, Initial Assessment of Ni-Base Alloy Performance in 0.1 MPa and Supercritical CO2. JOM 67(11):2615–2620.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mahaffey J, Adam D, Brittan A, Anderson M, Sridharan K (2016) Corrosion of Alloy Haynes 230 in High Temperature Supercritical Carbon Dioxide with Oxygen Impurity Additions. Oxid. Met. 86:567–580.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dheeradhada V, Thatte A, Karadge M, Drobnjak M (2016) Corrosion of Supercritical CO2 Turbomachinery Components. in Proceedings of the EPRI International Conference on Corrosion in Power Plants, EPRI, Charlotte, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pint BA, Brese RG, Keiser JR (2017) Effect of Pressure on Supercritical CO2 Compatibility of Structural Alloys at 750°C. Mater. Corros. 68:151–158.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Oleksak RP, Tylczak JH, Carney CS, Holcomb GR, Dogan ON (2018) High-Temperature Oxidation of Commercial Alloys in Supercritical CO2 and Related Power Cycle Environments JOM 70:1527–1534.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pint BA (2018) Performance of Wrought Superalloys in Extreme Environments. in E. Ott et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives, TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp.165–178.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pint BA, Lehmusto J, Lance MJ, Keiser JR (2019) The Effect of Pressure and Impurities on Oxidation in Supercritical CO2. Mater. Corros. 70:1400–1409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pint BA, Pillai R, Lance MJ, Keiser JR (2020) Effect of Pressure and Thermal Cycling on Long-Term Oxidation in CO2 and Supercritical CO2. Oxid. Met. 94:505–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feher EG (1968) The Supercritical Thermodynamic Power Cycle. Energy Conversion 8:85–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Viswanathan R, Shingledecker J, Purgert R (2010) Evaluating Materials Technology for Advanced Ultrasupercritical Coal-Fired Plants. Power 154(8):41–45.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhao SQ, Xie XS, Smith GD, Patel SJ (2003) Microstructural stability and mechanical properties of a new nickel based superalloy. Mater. Sci. Eng. A 355:96–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Pike LM (2008) Development of a Fabricable Gamma-Prime (γ´) Strengthened Superalloy. In: Superalloys 2008, R. C. Reed et al. eds, TMS, Warrendale, PA, pp.191–200.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gong Y, Young DJ, Kontis P, Chiu YL, Larsson H, Shin A, Pearson JM, Moody MP, Reed RC (2017) On the breakaway oxidation of Fe9Cr1Mo steel in high pressure CO2. Acta Mater. 130:361–374.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Sarrade S, Férona D, Rouillard F, Perrin S, Robin R, Ruiz JC, Turc HA (2017) Overview on corrosion in supercritical fluids. J. Supercritical Fluids 120:335–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shingledecker JP, Pint BA, Sabau AS, Fry AT, Wright IG (2013) Managing Steam-Side Oxidation and Exfoliation in USC Boiler Tubes. Adv. Mater. Processing, 171(1):23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Furukawa T, Inagaki Y, Aritomi M (2011) Compatibility of FBR structural materials with supercritical carbon dioxide. Progress in Nuclear Energy 53:1050–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. McCoy HE (1965) Type 304 Stainless Steel vs Flowing CO2 at Atmospheric Pressure and 1100–1800°F. Corrosion 21:84–94.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Fujii CT, Meussner RA (1967) Carburization of Fe-Cr Alloys During Oxidation in Dry Carbon Dioxide. J. Electrochem. Soc. 114:435–442.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Meier GH, Coons WC, R. A. Perkins RA (1982) Corrosion of Iron-, Nickel- and Cobalt-Base Alloys in Atmospheres Containing Carbon and Oxygen. Oxid. Met. 17:235–262.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Young DJ, Zhang J, Geers C, Schütze M (2011) Recent advances in understanding metal dusting: A review. Mater. Corros. 62:7–28.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Gheno T, Monceau D, Young DJ (2013) Kinetics of breakaway oxidation of Fe-Cr and Fe-Cr-Ni alloys in dry and wet carbon dioxide. Corrosion Science 77:246–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pint BA, Pillai R, Keiser JR (2021) Effect of Supercritical CO2 on Steel Ductility at 450°–650°C. ASME Paper #GT2021–59383, for Turbo Expo 2021, New York, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Pint BA, Keiser JR (2022) Exploring Material Solutions for Supercritical CO2 Applications above 800°C,” Oxid. Met. 98:545–559.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Pint BA (1996) Experimental Observations in Support of the Dynamic Segregation Theory to Explain the Reactive Element Effect. Oxid. Met. 45:1–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lehmusto J, Ievlev AV, Keiser JR, Pint BA (2021) A tracer study on sCO2 corrosion with multiple oxygen-bearing impurities. Oxid. Met. 96 (2021) 571–587.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Pint BA, Lance MJ, Pillai R, Keiser JR (2022) Compatibility of Steels at 450°–650°C in Supercritical CO2 with O2 and H2O Additions. AMPP (formerly NACE) Paper C 2022–18018, Houston, TX.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The experimental work was conducted by B. Johnston, J. Keiser, T. Lowe, M. Lance, V. Cox, and D. Newberry at ORNL. Y.-F. Su and S. Dryepondt provided useful comments on the manuscript. Research sponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Fossil Energy and Carbon Management, Crosscutting Technology Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Pint .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Ethics declarations

Disclaimer

This manuscript has been authored by UT-Battelle, LLC under Contract No. DE-AC05-00OR22725 with the U.S. Department of Energy. The United States Government retains and the publisher, by accepting the article for publication, acknowledges that the United States Government retains a non-exclusive, paid-up, irrevocable, worldwide license to publish or reproduce the published form of this manuscript, or allow others to do so, for United States Government purposes. The Department of Energy will provide public access to these results of federally sponsored research in accordance with the DOE Public Access Plan (http://energy.gov/downloads/doe-public-access-plan).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pint, B.A. (2023). Compatibility of Wrought Superalloys with Supercritical CO2. In: Ott, E.A., et al. Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Superalloy 718 and Derivatives. TMS 2023. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27447-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics