Skip to main content

Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Building Project Delivery Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation (ARCA 2022)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 397 Accesses

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to assess the climate change mitigating strategies adopted at the stages of the building project supply chain towards enhancing the sustainable construction process.

Design/Methodology/Approach: Primary data used for the study were collected through questionnaires administered on 102 construction professionals comprising; architects, quantity surveyors, engineers, and builders in Lagos State, Nigeria. These are major construction professionals that represent various organizations in the supply chain of the building delivery process. Data retrieved were analyzed using both descriptive and inferential statistics.

Findings: Respondents indicated their opinion that the top four stages of the building project supply chain that contribute most to climate change ranked in the order of; the processing of raw materials with means score (MS = 4.14), extraction process (MS = 4.12), and transportation processes (MS = 3.83). The assembling process (MS = 3.40), maintenance operations (MS = 3.32), and other operations such as heating, lighting, etc. (MS = 3.26) were also significant on the scale of assessment used in the questionnaire but they stayed in the category of lesser ranked variables. Findings also indicated that mitigating strategies including waste reduction, waste re-use, and waste recycling (MS = 3.72), more efficient construction processes (MS = 3.62), use of sustainable building materials (MS = 3.59), increased use of local materials (MS = 3.59), were rated more important than those of retrofitting of existing buildings (MS = 3.16), carbon sequestration (MS = 3.03), and carbon mitigation offsets, emissions trading, and carbon tax (MS = 3.01).

Research Limitations: A larger sample size and inclusion of case study projects could bring the findings to a broader perspective.

Practical Implications: More awareness about climate change and its impact should be created by government and professional bodies through the regular advertisement, workshops and seminars to update the knowledge of clients and construction professionals.

Social Implications: Government should enact laws that will regulate indiscriminate extraction of raw materials to minimize its contribution to climate change.

Originality/Value: The study provided implications for climate change mitigating measures and sustainability in building project delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ametepey, S.O., Ansah, S.K.: Impacts of construction activities on the environment: the case of Ghana. J. Const. Project Manage. Innov. 4(1), 934–948 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayoade, J.O.: Climate Change: A Synopsis of its nature, causes, effects and management. Vantage Publishers, Ibadan (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cadez, S., Czerny, A., Letmathe, P.: Stakeholder Pressures and Corporate Climate Change Mitigation Strategies. Bus. Strateg. Environ. 28, 1–14 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou, J.S., Yeh, K.C.: Life cycle carbon dioxide emissions simulation and environmental cost analysis for building construction. J. Clean. Prod. 101, 137–147 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fawzy, S., Osman, A.I., Doran, J., Rooney, D.W.: Strategies for mitigation of climate change: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 18(6), 2069–2094 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01059-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intini, F., Kuehtz, S.: Recycling in buildings: an LCA case study of a thermal insulation panel made of polyester fiber, recycled from post-consumer PET bottles. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 16, 306–315 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. IPCC factsheet: what is the IPCC? (2013). https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploa ds/2018/02/FS_what_ipcc.pdf

  • Kang, Y., Kim, C., Son, H., Lee, S., Limsawasd, C.: Comparison of preproject planning for green and conventional buildings. J. Const. Eng. Manage. 139(2013), 1–10 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Klufallah, M., Nuruddin, M., Khamidi, M., Jamaludin, N.: Assessment of carbon emission reduction for buildings projects in Malaysia-a comparative analysis. In: E3S Web of Conference 3. p. 01016 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20140301016

  • Masia, T., KajimoShakantu, K., Opawole, A.: A case study on the implementation of green building construction in Gauteng Province SouthAfrica. Manage. Environ. Qual. 31(3), 602–623 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngxito, B., Kajimo-Shakantu, K., Opawole, A.: Assessment of alternative building technologies (ABT) for pre-tertiary school infrastructure delivery in the Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Manage. Environ. Qual. 30(5), 1152–1170 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oke, P.R., Roughan, M., Cetina-Heredia, P., Pilo, G.S.: Revisiting the circulation of the East Australian Current: Its path, separation, and eddy field (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102139

  • Olanipekun, A.: Successful delivery of green building projects: A review and future directions. J. Const. 8(1), 31–40 (2015). https://www.asocsa.org/documents/JoC-March2015-vol8-no1.pdf

  • Olapade, O.J.: Application of alternative construction materials and components in building projects in Lagos State, Unpublished B.Sc, dissertation, Department of Quantity Surveying, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponi, F., Moncaster, A.: Embodied carbon mitigation and reduction in the built environment – What does the evidence say? (2016). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.036

  • Tunji-Olayeni, P.F., Omuh, I.O., Afolabi, A.O., Ojelabi, R.A., Eshofonie, E.E.: Effects of construction activities on the planetary boundaries. J. Phys. 1299, 012005 (2019). 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunji-Olayeni, P., Osabuohien, E., Oluwatobi, S., Babajide, A., Adeleye, N., Agboola, M.: Climate change mitigation strategies: a case of manufacturing companies in Ota, Nigeria, IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 655 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/655/1/012068

  • Sattary, A., Thorpe, D.: Optimizing embodied energy of building construction through bioclimatic principles. In: Smith, S.D. (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, Edinburgh, UK, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, pp. 1401–1411 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • UN: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992). https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/backgroundpublications_html.pdf/

  • Yue, X.L., Gao, Q.X.: Contributions of natural systems and human activity to greenhouse gas emissions. Adv. Clim. Change Res. 9, 243–252 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Opawole .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Opawole, A., Kajimo-Shakantu, K. (2023). Assessment of Climate Change Mitigation Strategies in Building Project Delivery Process. In: Aigbavboa, C., et al. Sustainable Education and Development – Sustainable Industrialization and Innovation. ARCA 2022. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25998-2_36

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics