Skip to main content

A Multi-dimensional Quality Assessment Instrument for Engineering Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
3rd International Conference on Science and Technology Education 2022 (STE 2022)

Abstract

The results of teaching evaluations are very often used by universities as a basis for personnel decision making, including promotion and tenure of instructors. The evaluations are commonly based on end-of-semester students’ ratings of their teachers through the qualitative Likert-type Student Evaluations of Teaching (SETs). Unfortunately, research on the validity of the SET-type evaluations frequently produces misleading results. One serious problem is the use of survey questions that are qualitative rather than quantitative, result in evaluations that reflect the students’ personal opinion of the class, rather than the effectiveness of the teaching. The focus of this paper is to present a design for an effective student evaluation that embraces the constructivist approach to teaching. The role of the teacher becomes that of a coach who creates a collaborative work environment, presenting relevant and interesting problems for students to solve. Assessing the educational quality of such a method requires a multi-dimensional instrument that qualitatively measures the effectiveness of both teaching and learning. Our study accentuates the need for an effective, knowledgeable teacher-coach, along with skilled, motivated students, and a supportive cohesive university atmosphere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. Criteria for Accrediting Engineering Programs Effective for Reviews during the 2020–2021 Accreditation Cycle (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  • Aizman, A., Bernold, L., Díaz, B., Olivares, A., Mora, C., Alarcón, H.: Introduction to engineering: a STEM approach. In: Proceeding of the 7th Research in Engineering Education. Research in Engineering Education Network, July 6–8, pp. 715–722. Bogota, Colombia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernold, L.E.: Evaluations for construction engineering and management: opportunity to move us forward. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. ASCE, 133(2), 146–156 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernold, L., Ubilla, J., Alarcon, H., Garcia, G.: Coaching engineering learning skills to freshman class using STEAM and PBL. In: Proceeding of Sociedad Chilena de Educación en Ingeniería (SOCHEDI), 10–12 Oct, Vina de Mar. Chile (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, B.S.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: the classification of educational goals. Cognitive Domain (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A., Saeki, H.: Employability and Skill Set of Newly Graduated Engineers in India. American Psychological Association (APA) (2011). https://doi.org/10.1037/e596532012-001

  • Boyer Commission on Educating Undergraduates in the Research University: Reinventing Undergraduate Education: A Blueprint for America's Research Universities. State University of New York at Stony Brook for the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrell, S.E., West, J.E.: Does professor quality matter? Evidence from random assignment of students to professors. J. Polit. Econ. 118(3), 409–432 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. Macmillan, NJ (1923)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J.: Experience and Education. Collier-MacMillan Canada Ltd., Toronto (1938)

    Google Scholar 

  • Díaz, B., Bernold, L., González, L.F., Aizman, A.: STE (A) M: Art, design and architecture in the formation of engineers at UTFSM. In: Proceeding of the 7th Research in Engineering Education. Research in Engineering Education Network, July 6–8, pp. 826–834. Bogota, Colombia (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  • Engineering Council.: Standard for professional Engineering competence and Commitment (UK-SPEC). https://www.engc.org.uk/ukspec (2021)

  • Engineers Australia.: The Engineering profession, A Statistical Overview, Fourteenth Edution. https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/resources/Public%20Affairs/2019/The%20Engineering%20Profession%2C%20A%20Statistical%20Overview%2C%2014th%20edition%20-%2020190613b.pdf (2019)

  • Hampden-Thompson, G., Bennett, J.: Science teaching and learning activities and students’ engagement in science. Int. J. Sci. Educ. 35(8), 1325–1343 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M., Robinson, G.M.: How to motivate US students to pursue STEM (science, technology, engineering and mathematics) careers. Online Submission, US-China Education Review A 4, p. 442–451 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D.: Factors influencing job attainment in recent bachelor graduates. High. Educ. 68(1), 135–153 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9696-7

  • Johnson, V.E.: Grade Inflation: A Crisis in College Education. Springer Science & Business Media (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D.A.: Organizational Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ, USA (1971)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J.E.: Employability in engineering education: are engineering students ready for work? In: Christensen, S.H., Delahousse, B., Didier, C., Meganck, M., Murphy, M. (eds.) The Engineering-Business Nexus: Symbiosis, Tension and Co-Evolution, pp. 499–520. Springer International Publishing (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_22

  • Krautmann, A.C., Sander, W.: Grades and student evaluations of teachers. Econ. Educ. Rev. 18(1), 59–63 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markes, I.: A review of literature on employability skill needs in engineering. Null 31(6), 637–650 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790600911704

  • McKeachie, W.J.: Student ratings: the validity of use. Am. Psychol. 52, 1218–1225 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M.A., Jewell, R.T., Kim, M.: What determines student evaluation scores? A random effects analysis of undergraduate economics classes. East. Econ. J. 35(1), 37–51 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.eej.9050042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M.A.: Determinants of how students evaluate teachers. J. Econ. Educ. 37(1), 3–20 (2006). https://doi.org/10.3200/JECE.37.1.3-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montaigne.: 1580 On Schoolmasters’ Learning. M. Screech, trans., Book I, p. 154 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, E.S., Harris, S.E.: A new tool for measuring student behavioral engagement in large university classes. J. Coll. Sci. Teach. 44(6), 83–91 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loconte, J.: Bologna: Birthplace of the University. National Review (2021). https://www.nationalreview.com/2021/08/bologna-birthplace-of-the-university/

  • Oakley, B., Sejnowski, T., McConville, A.: Learning How to Learn: How to Succeed in School Without Spending all Your Time Studying; A Guide for Kids and Teens. Penguin (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, S., Riordan, D.G.: Engage to excel: producing one million additional college graduates with degrees in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Report to the president. Executive Office of the President (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Hum. Dev. 15, 1–12 (1972). https://dx.doi.org/10.1159/000271225

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J.: Piaget’s Theory. In P. H. Mussen, & W. Kessen (eds.) Handbook of Child Psychology, vol. I History, Theory, and Methods (pp. 41–102). New York: John Wiley (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget and Vygotsky: theory and practice in early education. In: Good, T.L. (ed.) 21st Century Education: A Reference Handbook, vol. 1. Sage Publication (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramadi, E., Ramadi, S., Nasr, K.: Engineering graduates’ skill sets in the MENA region: a gap analysis of industry expectations and satisfaction. Eur. J. Eng. Educ. 41(1), 34–52 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seldin, P.: The use and abuse of student ratings of professors. Chronicle High. Educ. 39(46), A40 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  • Simkin, J.: Education in the Roman Empire. Spartacus Educational Publisher, Ltd. (2020). www.spartacus-educational.com. Accessed 1 June 2022

  • Vygotsky, L.S., Cole, M.: Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, B.A., Hashimoto, M., Fleisher, B.M.: Evaluating teaching in higher education. J. Econ. Educ. 40(3), 227–261 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Leonhard E. Bernold or Brayan Díaz-Michell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Bernold, L.E., Díaz-Michell, B. (2023). A Multi-dimensional Quality Assessment Instrument for Engineering Education. In: da Silva, L.F.M., Ferreira, A.J.M. (eds) 3rd International Conference on Science and Technology Education 2022. STE 2022. Proceedings in Engineering Mechanics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-25401-7_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics