Abstract
Hispanic/Latina breast cancer survivors (BCS) in the United States experience disparities in survivorship outcomes, including worse health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and symptom burden than non-Hispanic/Latina BCS. Despite documented efficacy among BCS in general, few psychosocial interventions are specifically designed for Hispanic/Latina BCS. With increasing technology use among US Hispanics/Latinos, e-health interventions such as smartphone applications can deliver more easily accessible, scalable, and culturally tailored psychosocial interventions. Two culturally informed smartphone applications for Hispanic/Latina BCS—My Guide (intervention) and My Health (control)—were developed and evaluated. Results demonstrated the feasibility of study procedures and the high acceptability of both applications, which showed improvements in breast cancer well-being and symptom burden over time. A third application—My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment—was developed to expand the focus of My Guide to Hispanic/Latina women currently in active treatment for breast cancer; a second pilot randomized controlled trial will compare this new application to usual enhanced care. Given the lack of culturally tailored, evidence-based, e-health psychosocial interventions for Hispanic/Latina BCS, My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment may bridge a gap in cancer care, providing needed psychosocial resources to this underrepresented population. E-health supportive and behavioral interventions focused on breast cancer, and its treatment may improve patient engagement as well as patient-reported outcomes among Hispanic/Latina women during active treatment for breast cancer and into survivorship.
You have full access to this open access chapter, Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
E-health Interventions for Breast Cancer
Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among Hispanic/Latina women, and epidemiological data indicate that there are approximately 220,000 Hispanic/Latina breast cancer survivors (BCS) currently living in the United States [1]. Continued increases in the numbers of BCS are expected because of advancements in early detection and cancer treatments. As such, there has been a greater focus on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), which represents the impact of health on one’s physical, functional, emotional, and social functioning. Compared to non-Hispanic/Latina BCS, Hispanics/Latinas report poorer HRQOL, worse symptom burden, and more cancer-related psychosocial needs [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]; Hispanic/Latina cancer survivors also report greater unmet needs than non-Hispanic/Latina White cancer survivors [11]. Furthermore, Hispanic/Latina BCS report greater unmet needs than both prostate and colorectal cancer survivors (OR 2.33–5.86 [1.27–14.01]), with the highest unmet needs existing in the domains of psychological, health system and information, patient care and support, and physical and daily living [11].
Despite these documented disparities, few psychosocial interventions [12,13,14] have specifically targeted Hispanic/Latina BCS [2, 8, 15]. Research has demonstrated the importance of culturally appropriate interventions, as they are more effective when tailored to a particular racial/ethnic group [16] and show moderate to large effects [17]. Specific Hispanic/Latina cultural beliefs and values such as familismo, marianismo, and personalismo may need to be considered, as they can indirectly impact health and well-being outcomes [18, 19]. Thus, there is a need for culturally and linguistically appropriate interventions that address the unique needs and specific concerns of Hispanic/Latina BCS.
E-health platforms are increasingly being used to deliver psychosocial and supportive care interventions to cancer survivors, with preliminary data indicating benefits for psychosocial outcomes and lifestyle behaviors [20, 21]. Broadly, e-health platforms refer to health services delivered through the use of information technology, including the Internet and mobile and wireless applications. Notably, Hispanic/Latino individuals in the United States seek health information online at similar or higher rates than other racial/ethnic groups [22], and the use of smartphone technologies has increased with eight out of ten Hispanics/Latinos now owning a smartphone [23]. E-health interventions reduce the need to travel for in-person cancer care and support, and they may be especially appealing to minority and underserved patients who may have more logistical barriers to accessing in-person cancer care. Therefore, harnessing technology-based interventions such as smartphone applications and additional e-health interventions has the potential to increase the accessibility of scalable, evidence-based supportive care interventions that are culturally and linguistically appropriate for Hispanic/Latina patient populations.
Despite the increasing use of e-health platforms to deliver programs for cancer patients and survivors, more studies are needed to evaluate their efficacy and effectiveness, especially for racial/ethnic minority and underrepresented cancer patients. A systematic review revealed that the majority of available smartphone applications for cancer patients still lack evidence for their effectiveness [24]. Another recent systematic review identified 24 e-health psychosocial interventions for improving HRQOL in BCS, including six e-health platforms for health management and four mobile applications for physical activity [25]. A majority of these studies demonstrated encouraging results, including improvement of health literacy, disease and treatment knowledge, coping abilities, and social support [25]. However, some results were inconclusive, negative, or mixed. Furthermore, the feasibility and effectiveness of e-health platforms among Hispanic/Latina BCS have not been established, as only a handful of e-health studies have focused on Hispanic/Latina cancer patients and survivors [26]. Given the increasing focus on e-health platforms in the delivery of supportive care interventions, evaluating whether and how Hispanics/Latina BCS benefit from these programs is an essential step toward reducing documented cancer disparities.
To address this gap in the literature, our research team developed a culturally informed, evidence-based psychosocial smartphone application called My Guide to improve the HRQOL and symptom burden among Hispanic/Latina BCS who completed active treatment within the past 2 years. In this chapter, we briefly describe the development and evaluation of My Guide and discuss future directions for culturally tailored e-health intervention platforms for Hispanic/Latina BCS and patients.
My Guide
Intervention Development
A key aspect of My Guide development was our existing partnership with the Latina Breast Cancer Association of Chicago [27]. This community organization provides educational and emotional support programs for Hispanic/Latina BCS and their families in the Chicagoland area. The goal of our partnership was to identify the highest priority needs of Hispanic/Latina BCS in the Chicagoland area and address those needs via a bilingual and culturally tailored smartphone application [27]. Guided by principles of community-engaged research [28], our team developed the My Guide smartphone-based intervention through an iterative process that began with meetings with our community partner to identify specific concerns of this population and relevant topics to include within My Guide.
Our team used an iterative process of developing My Guide to ensure that both the content and delivery of the material were relevant to Hispanic/Latina BCS. Our first step was to conduct field interviews with nine Hispanic/Latina BCS to obtain thematic information on the experiences of Hispanic/Latina BCS, specifically related to aspects of emotional and physical HRQOL during the transition from active breast cancer treatment to breast cancer survivorship. Important themes identified included managing symptoms and side effects, coping with cancer, impact of cancer on friends and family, financial concerns, and additional cancer-related resources for Hispanic/Latina survivors. These themes were used to inform the content development within the My Guide application. Cultural issues such as the importance of family values within the Hispanic/Latina communities, perceived stigma regarding illness perceptions and cancer, and language barriers were also integrated within the application.
The second step in our iterative design process was to evaluate the usability of the initial prototypes of the My Guide application to ensure the appeal and ease of use among Hispanic/Latina BCS. We conducted two rounds of usability testing with 28 college students and 9 Hispanic/Latina BCS. Results indicated high usability feedback among the Hispanic/Latina BCS with an average response of 4.23 out of a maximum of 5 (SD = 0.9) on the usability questionnaire. Additionally, Hispanic/Latina BCS expressed a preference to be able to listen to the content within the application and to have less content or text in each section. Before transitioning to the next stage of development, participant feedback was integrated within application development [29]. Specifically, our team developed audio content that was embedded throughout the application, which allowed participants to choose to read or listen to the content in each section. The audio content also helped address concerns related to low literacy.
Our third step was to finalize the programming through a brief 4-week, single-arm field trial of the My Guide application with 25 Hispanic/Latina BCS [30]. Consistent with previous e-health intervention studies, we incorporated a weekly telecoaching protocol to enhance supportive accountability in using My Guide. From the initial trial, recruitment and retention rates exceeded 70%, participants used My Guide for an average of 9.25 hours across the 4 weeks (2.31 hours/week), and the mean score on the satisfaction survey was 65.91 out of a possible 70 points (range: 42–70), in which higher scores reflect greater satisfaction. Breast cancer knowledge significantly improved across time (d = 0.59), and there was a trend for improved HRQOL over the course of 4 weeks that did not reach statistical significance. There were several key lessons learned from our field trial. For example, we observed that most eligible patients had their own smartphones, with less than 20% of study participants relying on a study-issued smartphone. Additionally, approximately half of the study participants engaged with My Guide at the recommended levels of weekly use (2 hours/week). Based on this observation, our team recommended future use of a stepped-care telecoaching protocol to minimize calls for those meeting adherence goals and to provide more support for those struggling to meet study usage goals.
Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Following the single-arm field trial, our team conducted a pilot RCT to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of My Guide relative to an attention-control condition. Thus, we developed a second smartphone application titled My Health [31]. Both My Guide and My Health were web-based applications accessible on smartphones as well as computers and tablets, and available in English and Spanish. Similar to attention-control content used in other psychosocial intervention studies among cancer populations [32, 33], we designed My Health to provide easy-to-understand and evidence-based recommendations for promoting healthy lifestyles (e.g., nutrition, physical activity, prevention of chronic illness).
Study Procedures
Participants completed a baseline (T1) survey of sociodemographic information, primary intervention outcomes (i.e., symptom burden, HRQOL), and secondary intervention outcomes (i.e., nutrition, physical activity). Participants were randomized 1:1 to My Guide or My Health for 6 weeks and were encouraged to use their assigned smartphone application for 2 hours/week. Follow-up surveys were administered immediately post-intervention (T2) and 2 weeks after the T2 assessment (T3). Similar to the single-arm field trial, we used a telecoaching protocol to encourage participants’ weekly use of their assigned application [30, 34]. All participants received telecoaching calls in their preferred language before Week 1, Week 2, and Week 6 of the intervention. In the remaining weeks, a stepped-care approach informed the need for additional telecoaching, with 90 minutes of application use in a given week (out of the recommended 2 hours) used as the threshold.
Results and Discussion
Of 80 participants enrolled and randomized, 2 were lost to follow-up (one from each condition) and 78 were analyzed (My Guide: n = 39, My Health: n = 39). Sociodemographic and clinical characteristics did not differ between study conditions. Participants were an average of 52.54 years old (SD = 11.36). Most participants were born outside the United States (71%), reported Mexican ancestry (64%) and preferred to communicate in Spanish (64%). More than half of the participants had a high school education or less (54%) and an annual household income of <$25,000 (53%). Most participants had stage II disease (41%) and received chemotherapy (58%) and/or radiation therapy (71%).
Consistent with prior studies [32, 35,36,37], we considered a 70% recruitment rate and an 80% retention rate feasible. We also considered 90 minutes of application use per week feasible based on our single-arm field trial [30]. In this pilot RCT, we successfully recruited 79% of eligible women and retained 95% of enrolled participants through the T3 assessment, indicating good feasibility [38]. On average, participants used the My Guide and My Health smartphone applications for 86.58 minutes/week (SD = 66.08) and 72.80 minutes/week (SD = 62.57), respectively, neither of which reached the 90 minutes/week threshold to indicate feasibility. However, average use exceeded 1 hour/week for both applications, which is more time than a patient might expect to spend individually with an in-person counselor (typically 50-minute appointments once a week or less) [38]. Acceptability was evaluated at T2 with a survey assessing participant satisfaction with each smartphone application. The vast majority of participants were satisfied (My Guide = 97%, My Health = 92%) and would recommend their assigned application to another woman with breast cancer (My Guide = 100%, My Health = 95%). Specifically, one participant stated, “I would recommend My Guide because I no longer feel alone. It helped with my side effects and helped me realize that others are going through the same thing,” and another said, “Of course I would recommend My Guide! While using My Guide you learn so much about everything and things that you didn’t even realize you didn’t know. I would love if everyone could have access to this information.” Participants expressed that “My Guide is a form of support…” and “the videos of other survivors and learning how to relax was so helpful to deal with my anxiety. How to manage my symptoms was very helpful as well.” In addition, most participants indicated that they would like to continue using the application for longer than the 6-week study period (My Guide = 92%, My Health = 84%) [38].
In terms of preliminary efficacy, we evaluated breast cancer symptom burden and HRQOL (primary outcomes) with the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial symptom questionnaire [39] and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast [40, 41], respectively. We assessed differences in symptom burden and HRQOL domains between study conditions over time using linear mixed-effects models controlling for language preference, education, and application use (i.e., whether or not the participant used their assigned application for an average 90 minutes/week). Across both study conditions, breast cancer symptom burden declined from T1 to T2 (d = 0.08), breast cancer well-being improved from T1 to T2 (d = 0.20), and improvements in breast cancer well-being were maintained at T3 (d = 0.17) [38]. We also evaluated nutrition and physical activity (secondary outcomes) with the Brief Dietary Assessment Tool for Hispanics [42] and the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF) [43, 44], respectively. My Health participants reported a greater decrease in daily fat sources from T1 to T2 compared to My Guide participants (d = 0.30), and this was maintained at T3 (d = 0.47). In addition, participants in both conditions reported increased time spent walking from T1 to T2 (d = 0.31) [45].
To our knowledge, this was the first study to design and evaluate two culturally informed smartphone applications for Hispanic/Latina BCS, My Guide (intervention) and My Health (control). Results demonstrated that the study procedures were feasible and acceptability was high for both applications. Both My Guide and My Health reported improvements in breast cancer symptom burden and breast cancer well-being over time; however, there were no differential effects between study conditions. Additionally, improvements in symptom burden were not sustained at the two-week follow-up assessment. These results suggest that technology-based interventions may facilitate engagement in care post-treatment among Hispanic/Latina BCS.
My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment
Throughout the field trial [30] and pilot RCT [38], many women reported that it would have been even more beneficial if they had access to their assigned application during active breast cancer treatment. Additionally, My Guide participants expressed wanting more information about general health and lifestyle behaviors, while My Health participants wanted more information specific to breast cancer and coping strategies. To address this feedback, our team developed a new smartphone application, My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment [46], for Hispanic/Latina women in active treatment for breast cancer.
Given the high use of My Guide and My Health, both smartphone applications [31] were combined and content was adapted to be more relevant for Hispanic/Latina women currently receiving treatment for breast cancer. Notably, the My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment intervention includes information specific to breast cancer and its treatment and symptom and stress management strategies, as well as content promoting healthy diet and physical activity for breast cancer patients during treatment. Additional notable differences between My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment include a longer study period of 12 weeks versus 6 weeks, tailored content, and gamification features. A 12-week intervention timeframe was selected as it is the expected length of adjuvant treatments, and prior behavioral interventions reported benefits in symptom burden and HRQOL after 10 weeks [47,48,49]. Additionally, this revised intervention highlights targeted content based on the participants’ concerns and needs, which are assessed every 2 weeks. Finally, participant adherence and motivation to use the My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment application are reinforced by virtual awards based on different levels of weekly use (e.g., ribbon for 30 minutes/week, medal for 45 minutes/week, and trophy for 60 minutes/week).
My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment is currently undergoing evaluation among a sample of 60 Hispanic/Latina women in active treatment for breast cancer. Participants are randomized 1:1 to the intervention or enhanced usual care control condition, which in addition to care as usual includes educational materials regarding breast cancer and survivorship from the National Cancer Institute [50] and a list of supportive care resources and organizations in the Chicagoland area. Control participants will be given access to My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment after the study completion.
Conclusion
With increasing technology access and use among Hispanics/Latinos in the United States [22, 23], e-health platforms provide an innovative opportunity to deliver more easily accessible, scalable, and tailored psychosocial and symptom management interventions to those with limited access to culturally and linguistically appropriate supportive care resources. Growing evidence indicates high acceptability of technology-based interventions among Hispanic/Latino cancer patients [26, 51, 52]. However, few e-health interventions have been developed specifically for Hispanic/Latina BCS [2, 8, 15] despite documented disparities in HRQOL and psychosocial outcomes [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. Additionally, cultural and linguistic factors should be considered in terms of the design and delivery of e-health interventions for the Hispanic/Latino population [53]. For example, aside from language barriers, a number of cultural attitudes and beliefs may impact health behaviors and should be included in the intervention such as importance of family values, taking care of others, gender roles, and relationship with the provider [53]. And given their high use, smartphones may be the optimal technology platform to deliver English and Spanish evidence-based resources to address the unmet psychosocial needs of this underserved population.
Using community-engaged approaches, our team developed a culturally informed, evidence-based psychosocial intervention, the My Guide smartphone application, which demonstrated feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy in improving breast cancer symptom burden and HRQOL over time. However, of note, there were no differential effects in outcomes between My Guide and the attention-control My Health application. Participants expressed wanting to have used their assigned application during active breast cancer treatment in addition to post-treatment. As such, our team expanded the scope and focus of My Guide to be relevant for Hispanic/Latina women in active breast cancer treatment. To the best of our knowledge, both smartphone applications (My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment) are among the first bilingual and culturally informed supportive care interventions for Hispanic/Latina women who completed or are currently undergoing active treatment for breast cancer. Technology-based supportive and behavioral interventions that focus on breast cancer treatment and self-management may improve patient engagement as well as patient-reported outcomes during active treatment for breast cancer and into survivorship. Additionally, the self-guided My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment applications may offer much needed patient support to Hispanic/Latina BCS. During patient interviews, some of our study participants expressed feelings of loneliness and difficulties obtaining or asking for support from their families, and often noted concerns of burdening their loved ones. Findings from other qualitative studies with Hispanic/Latina BCS have indicated family as the main source of support, but some have similarly noted feeling alone and wanting more emotional support [2].
Our studies are expected to contribute to the limited cancer survivorship research in Hispanic/Latino communities and establish whether e-health interventions are feasible and effective for delivering supportive oncology interventions to this underrepresented patient population. Future studies should consider the inclusion of a social networking component, especially given the importance of and desire for more social support, as well as the integration of evidence-based, patient-centered tools into electronic health records. In addition, given the multiple components of these psychosocial interventions, the effect of each component should be individually evaluated in order to identify the most effective intervention elements on study outcomes. Finally, an additional area for future directions includes establishing the efficacy of My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment across a nationwide, diverse sample of Hispanic/Latina BCS. If found efficacious, future efforts will focus on disseminating the applications to Hispanic/Latino communities across the United States, increasing the public health impact among Hispanic/Latina women with breast cancer. And future research focused on implementing culturally appropriate interventions for Hispanic/Latina BCS should evaluate the cultural nuances at the system level as well. Given the lack of culturally tailored, evidence-based, e-health psychosocial interventions for Hispanic/Latina BCS, My Guide and My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment may help bridge a gap in cancer care and have the potential to reduce disparities in psychosocial outcomes among Hispanic/Latina BCS.
References
National Cancer Institute. Cancer of the breast (invasive). United States cancer prevalence estimates. SEER Cancer Statistics Review 1975–2017 [database on the Internet]. Available from: https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2017/browse_csr.php?sectionSEL=4&pageSEL=sect_04_table.24#b. Accessed 1 June 2020.
Ashing-Giwa KT, Padilla GV, Bohorquez DE, Tejero JS, Garcia M. Understanding the breast cancer experience of Latina women. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2006;24(3):19–52.
Eversley R, Estrin D, Dibble S, Wardlaw L, Pedrosa M, Favila-Penney W. Post-treatment symptoms among ethnic minority breast cancer survivors. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005;32(2):250–6.
Spencer SM, Lehman JM, Wynings C, Arena P, Carver CS, Antoni MH, et al. Concerns about breast cancer and relations to psychosocial well-being in a multiethnic sample of early-stage patients. J Cancer Educ. 1999;18(2):159–68.
Yoon J, Malin JL, Tisnado DM, Tao ML, Adams JL, Timmer MJ, et al. Symptom management after breast cancer treatment: is it influenced by patient characteristics? Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008;108(1):69–77.
Fu O, Crew K, Jacobson J, Greenlee H, Yu G, Campbell J, et al. Ethnicity and persistent symptom burden in breast cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2009;3(4):241–50.
Sammarco A, Konecny L. Quality of life, social support, and uncertainty among Latina and Caucasian breast cancer survivors: a comparative study. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2010;37(1):93–9.
Yanez B, Thompson EH, Stanton AL. Quality of life among Latina breast cancer patients: a systematic review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv. 2011;5(2):191–207.
Luckett T, Goldstein D, Butow PN, Gebski V, Aldridge LJ, McGrane J, et al. Psychological morbidity and quality of life of ethnic minority patients with cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12(13):1240–8.
Moadel AB, Morgan C, Dutcher J. Psychosocial needs assessment among an underserved, ethnically diverse cancer patient population. Cancer. 2007;109(S2):446–54.
Moreno PI, Ramirez AG, San Miguel-Majors SL, Castillo L, Fox RS, Gallion KJ, et al. Unmet supportive care needs in Hispanic/Latino cancer survivors: prevalence and associations with patient-provider communication, satisfaction with cancer care, and symptom burden. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(4):1383–94.
Andersen BL, Yang HC, Farrar WB, Golden-Kreutz DM, Emery CF, Thornton LM, et al. Psychologic intervention improves survival for breast cancer patients: a randomized clinical trial. Cancer. 2008;113(12):3450–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23969.
Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, Wimberly SR, Sifre T, Urcuyo KR, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(6):1143–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1152.
Antoni MH, Wimberly SR, Lechner SC, Kazi A, Sifre T, Urcuyo KR, et al. Reduction of cancer-specific thought intrusions and anxiety symptoms with a stress management intervention among women undergoing treatment for breast cancer. Am J Psychiatry. 2006;163(10):1791–7. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.163.10.1791.
Molina Y, Thompson B, Espinoza N, Ceballos R. Breast cancer interventions serving US-based Latinas: current approaches and directions. Women’s Health (Lond Engl). 2013;9(4):335–50. https://doi.org/10.2217/whe.13.30.
Griner D, Smith TB. Culturally adapted mental health intervention: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Theory Res Pract Train. 2006;43(4):531–48.
Rathod S, Gega L, Degnan A, Pikard J, Khan T, Husain N, et al. The current status of culturally adapted mental health interventions: a practice-focused review of meta-analyses. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2018:165–78.
Nápoles-Springer A, Ortíz C, O’Brien H, Díaz-Méndez M. Developing a culturally competent peer support intervention for Spanish-speaking Latinas with breast cancer. J Immigr Minor Health. 2009;11(4):268–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-008-9128-4.
Interian A, Díaz-Martínez AM. Considerations for culturally competent cognitive-behavioral therapy for depression with Hispanic patients. Cogn Behav Pract. 2007;14(1):84–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2006.01.006.
Duncan M, Moschopoulou E, Herrington E, Deane J, Roylance R, Jones L, et al. Review of systematic reviews of non-pharmacological interventions to improve quality of life in cancer survivors. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e015860.
Seiler A, Klaas V, Tröster G, Fagundes CP. eHealth and mHealth interventions in the treatment of fatigued cancer survivors: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Psycho-Oncology. 2017;26(9):1239–53.
Lopez MH, Gonzalez-Barrera A, Patten E. Closing the digital divide: Latinos and technology adoption. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2013. http://www.pewhispanic.org/2013/03/07/closing-the-digital-divide-latinos-and-technology-adoption/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
Pew Research Center. Mobile fact sheet. Pew Research Internet & Technology Project 2019. http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheet/mobile/. Accessed 28 June 2020.
Bender JL, Yue RYK, To MJ, Deacken L, Jadad AR. A lot of action, but not in the right direction: systematic review and content analysis of smartphone applications for the prevention, detection, and management of cancer. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15(12):e287.
Triberti S, Savioni L, Sebri V, Pravettoni G. eHealth for improving quality of life in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Cancer Treat Rev. 2019;74:1–14.
Nápoles AM, Santoyo-Olsson J, Chacón L, Stewart AL, Dixit N, Ortiz C. Feasibility of a mobile phone app and telephone coaching survivorship care planning program among Spanish-speaking breast cancer survivors. JMIR Cancer. 2019;5(2):e13543.
Oswald LB, Guitelman J, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Iacobelli F, Perez-Tamayo A, et al. Community perspectives: developing and implementing a smartphone intervention for Latina breast cancer survivors in Chicago. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2019;13(5):131–6.
Michener L, Cook J, Ahmed SM, Yonas MA, Coyne-Beasley T, Aguilar-Gaxiola S. Aligning the goals of community-engaged research: why and how academic health centers can successfully engage with communities to improve health. Acad Med. 2012;87(3):285–91.
Iacobelli F, Adler RF, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Corden ME, Perez-Tamayo A, et al. Designing an mHealth application to bridge health disparities in Latina breast cancer survivors: a community-supported design approach. Des Health. 2018;2(1):58–76.
Buscemi J, Buitrago D, Iacobelli F, Penedo F, Maciel C, Guitleman J, et al. Feasibility of a smartphone-based pilot intervention for Hispanic breast cancer survivors: a brief report. Transl Behav Med. 2018;9(4):8. https://doi.org/10.1093/tbm/iby058.
Yanez BR, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Iacobelli F, Adler RF, Corden ME, et al. Study design and protocol for my guide: an e-health intervention to improve patient-centered outcomes among Hispanic breast cancer survivors. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018;65:61–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.018.
Yanez B, McGinty HL, Mohr DC, Begale MJ, Dahn JR, Flury SC, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology-assisted psychosocial intervention for racially diverse men with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2015:9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29658.
Penedo FJ, Fox RS, Oswald LB, Moreno PI, Boland CL, Estabrook R, et al. Technology-based psychosocial intervention to improve quality of life and reduce symptom burden in men with advanced prostate cancer: results from a randomized controlled trial. Int J Behav Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-019-09839-7.
Mohr DC, Cuijpers P, Lehman K. Supportive accountability: a model for providing human support to enhance adherence to eHealth interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2011;13(1):e30. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1602.
Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, Cofta-Woerpel L, Linnan L, Weiner D, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002.
Campbell LC, Keefe FJ, Scipio C, McKee DC, Edwards CL, Herman SH, et al. Facilitating research participation and improving quality of life for African American prostate cancer survivors and their intimate partners. Cancer. 2007;109(S2):414–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.22355.
Kissane DW, Grabsch B, Clarke DM, Smith GC, Love AW, Bloch S, et al. Supportive-expressive group therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer: survival and psychosocial outcome from a randomized controlled trial. Psycho-Oncology. 2007;16(4):277–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.1185.
Yanez B, Oswald LB, Baik SH, Buitrago D, Iacobelli F, Perez-Tamayo A, et al. Brief culturally informed smartphone interventions decrease breast cancer symptom burden among Latina breast cancer survivors. Psychooncology. 2020;29(1):195–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5281.
Stanton AL, Bernaards CA, Ganz PA. The BCPT symptom scales: a measure of physical symptoms for women diagnosed with or at risk for breast cancer. JNCI: J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(6):448–56. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji069.
Brady MJ, Cella DF, Mo F, Bonomi AE, Tulsky DS, Lloyd SR, et al. Reliability and validity of the functional assessment of cancer therapy-breast quality-of-life instrument. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15(3):974–86.
Cella D, Hernandez L, Bonomi AE, Corona M, Vaquero M, Shiomoto G, et al. Spanish language translation and initial validation of the functional assessment of cancer therapy quality-of-life instrument. Med Care. 1998;36(9):1407–18.
Wakimoto P, Block G, Mandel S, Medina N. Development and reliability of brief dietary assessment tools for Hispanics. Prev Chronic Dis. 2006;3(3):A95.
Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1381–95. https://doi.org/10.1249/01.MSS.0000078924.61453.FB.
Lee PH, Macfarlane DJ, Lam TH, Stewart SM. Validity of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form (IPAQ-SF): a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:115. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-115.
Buscemi J, Oswald LB, Baik SH, Buitrago D, Iacobelli F, Phillips SM, et al. My health smartphone intervention decreases daily fat sources among Latina breast cancer survivors. J Behav Med. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-020-00136-3.
Yanez B, Baik SH, Oswald LB, Buitrago D, Buscemi J, Iacobelli F, et al. An electronic health intervention for Latina women undergoing breast cancer treatment (My Guide for Breast Cancer Treatment): protocol for a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019;21(12):e14339.
Wagner LI, Duffecy J, Penedo F, Mohr DC, Cella D. Coping strategies tailored to the management of fear of recurrence and adaptation for E-health delivery: the FoRtitude intervention. Cancer. 2017;123(6):906–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.30602.
Yanez B, McGinty HL, Mohr DC, Begale MJ, Dahn JR, Flury SC, et al. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a technology-assisted psychosocial intervention for racially diverse men with advanced prostate cancer. Cancer. 2015;121(24):4407–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29658.
Antoni MH, Lechner SC, Kazi A, Wimberly SR, Sifre T, Urcuyo KR, et al. How stress management improves quality of life after treatment for breast cancer. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2006;74(6):1143–52. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.74.6.1143.
National Cancer Institute. Facing forward: life after cancer treatment. 2018.
Banas JR, Victorson D, Gutierrez S, Cordero E, Guitleman J, Haas N. Developing a peer-to-peer mHealth application to connect Hispanic cancer patients. J Cancer Educ. 2017;32(1):158–65.
Yanez B, Oswald LB, Baik SH, Buitrago D, Iacobelli F, Perez-Tamayo A, et al. Brief culturally informed smartphone interventions decrease breast cancer symptom burden among Latina breast cancer survivors. Psycho-Oncology. 2019:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.5281.
Victorson D, Banas J, Smith J, Languido L, Shen E, Gutierrez S, et al. eSalud: designing and implementing culturally competent ehealth research with Latino patient populations. Am J Public Health. 2014;104(12):2259–65.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Baik, S.H. et al. (2023). Advancing E-health Interventions in Cancer Control and Survivorship for Hispanic/Latina Breast Cancer Patients. In: Ramirez, A.G., Trapido, E.J. (eds) Advancing the Science of Cancer in Latinos. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14436-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14436-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-14435-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-14436-3
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)