Skip to main content

Abstract

Rashes are the most common dermatologic sign that leads patients to seek medical attention, regardless of their cause. Usually they represent a major diagnostic challenge for general practitioners, emergency physicians, and even dermatologists, since different diseases can clinically yield very similar rashes, and the same disease can be differently displayed on the skin. Moreover, many of these diseases need a very quick and accurate diagnosis for prompt therapeutic management. In this chapter, the etiology of rash is divided into adult and pediatric causes. Drugs reactions remain the leading cause of rash and exanthem in the adult population and infections, usually the viral ones, account for the greater number of these occurrences in children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ACD:

Allergic contact dermatitis

AGEP:

Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis

COVID-19:

Coronavirus disease 19

DRESS:

Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms

EM:

Erythema multiforme

FTA-abs:

Fluorescent treponemal antibody absorption

GCS:

Gianotti–Crosti syndrome

HFMD:

Hand-foot-mouth disease

HHV:

Human herpes virus

HIV:

Human immunodeficiency virus

HSV:

Herpes simplex virus

ICD:

Irritant contact dermatitis

Ig:

Immunoglobulin

IVIG:

Intravenous human immunoglobulin

KD:

Kawasaki disease

LDH:

Lactate dehydrogenase

MHA-TP:

Microhemagglutination treponema pallidum test

MRSA:

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

PB19:

Parvovirus B19

PR:

Pityriasis rosea

RT-PCR:

Reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction

SARS-CoV-2:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

SJS:

Stevens–Johnson syndrome

SSSS:

Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome

TEM:

Toxic epidermal necrolysis

VDRL:

Venereal disease research laboratory

VZV:

Varicella zoster virus

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Drago F, Rampini P, Rampini E, Rebora A. Atypical exanthems: morphology and laboratory investigations may lead to an aetiological diagnosis. About 70% of cases. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147:255–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ely JW, Stone MS. The generalized rash: differential diagnosis. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(6 Pt 1):735–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ely JW, Stone MS. The generalized rash: diagnostic approach. Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(6 Pt 2):726–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleischer AB, Feldman SR, Bullard CN. Patients can accurately identify when they have a dermatologic condition. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1999;41:784–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan KP, Goh KT, Chong CY, Teo ES, Lau G, Ling AE. Epidemic hand, foot and mouth disease caused by human enterovirus 71, Singapore. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003;9(1):78–85. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid1301.020112.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Stock I. Hand, foot and mouth disease -more than a harmless “childhood disease”. Med Monatsschr Pharm. 2014;37(1):4–10. quiz 11-2

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chatproedprai S, Tempark T, Wanlapakorn N, Puenpa J, Wananukul S, Poovorawan Y. Unusual skin manifestation of hand, foot and mouth disease associated with coxsackievirus A6: cases report. Springer Plus. 2015;4:362. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1143-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Cai K, et al. Clinical characteristics and managements of severe hand, foot and mouth disease caused by enterovirus A71 and coxsackievirus A16 in Shanghai, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):285.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang L-Y, et al. Clinical features and risk factors of pulmonary edema after enterovirus-71-related hand, foot, and mouth disease. Lancet. 1999;354:1682–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Neal S, Young MD, Kevin E, Brown MD. Parvovirus B19. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:586–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Azzi A, Morfini M, Mannucci PM. The transfusion-associated transmission of parvovirus B19. Transfus Med Rev. 1999;13:194–204.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Naides SJ. Rheumatic manifestations of parvovirus b19 infection. Rheum Dis Clin N Am. 1998;24(2):375–401.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Magro CM, Dawood MR, Crowson N. The cutaneous manifestations of human parvovirus B19 infection. Hum Pathol. 2000;31(4):488–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naides SJ, Piette W, Veach LA, Argenyi Z. Human parvovirus B19-induced vesiculopustular skin eruption. Am J Med. 1988;84(5):968–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown KE, Young NS. Parvovirus B19 infection and hematopoiesis. Blood Rev. 1995;9(3):176–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Setúbal S, Adelmo GHD, Nascimento JP, Oliveira SA. Aplastic crisis caused by parvovirus B19 in an adult patient with sickle-cell disease. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2000;33(5):477–81. Online. Accessed 27 Dec 2020

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Neely G, Cabrera R, Hojman L. Parvovirus B19: Un virus ADN asociado a múltiples manifestaciones cutáneas. Rev Chil Infectol. 2018;35(5):518–30. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-10182018000500518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stoeckle MY. The spectrum of human herpesvirus 6 infection: from roseola infantum to adult disease. Annu Rev Med. 2000;51:423–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zerr DM, et al. A population-based study of primary human herpesvirus 6 infection. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:768–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sadao S, Kyoko S, Masaru I, Tetsushi Y, Yuji K, Takao O, et al. Clinical characteristics of febrile convulsions during primary HHV-6 infection. Arch Dis Child. 2000;82:62–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Larry J, Strausbaugh MT, Caserta DJM, Stephen D. Human herpesvirus 6. Clin Infect Dis. 2001;33(6):829–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Chiou CS, et al. Epidemiology and molecular characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes recovered from scarlet fever patients in central Taiwan from 1996 to 1999. J Clin Microbiol. 2004;42(9):3998–4006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Escarlatina: Orientações Para Surtos. Boletim Epidemiológico Paulista. [online] [acesso em Dez 2020] SES; 49(46). Disponível em http://periodicos.ses.sp.bvs.br/pdf/bepa/v4n46/v4n46a03.pdf. ISSN 1806.423-X

  24. Stevens DL. Severe group A streptococcal infections associated with a toxic shock-like syndrome and scarlet fever toxin A. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Dong H, et al. β-Haemolytic group A streptococci emm75 carrying altered pyrogenic exotoxin A linked to scarlet fever in adults. J Infect. 2008;56(4):261–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lobo IM, Santos ACL, Júnior JAS, Passos RO, Pereira CU. Vírus varicela zoster. RBM Rev Bras Med. 2015;72(6):231–8.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Bozzola E, et al. Varicella associated pneumonia in a pediatric population. Ital J Pediatr. 2017;43(1):49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. American Academy of Pediatrics. Varicella-zoster infections. In: Pickering LK, editor. Red book: 2012 report of the committee on infectious diseases, 29th ed, vol. 2012. Elk Grove Village: American Academy of Pediatrics. p. 774–89.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moss WJ, Griffin DE. Measles. Lancet. 2012;379(9811):153–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Patel MK, et al. The epidemiology of rubella, 2007–18: an ecological analysis of surveillance data. Lancet Glo Health. 2020;8(11):e1399–407. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30320-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patel MK, Goodson JL, Alexander JP Jr, et al. Progress toward regional measles elimination — worldwide, 2000–2019. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(45):1700–5. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6945a6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Rosa C. Rubella and rubeola. Semin Perinatol. 1998;22(4):318–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Orenstein WA, Perry RT, Halsey NA. The clinical significance of measles: a review. J Infect Dis. 2004;189(Suppl 1):S4–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lambert N, Strebel P, Orenstein W, Icenogle J, Poland GA. Rubella. Lancet. 2015;385(9984):2297–307.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Manual for the surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases, Atlanta. 2012. Disponível em URL: http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/pubs/surv-manual/chpt14-rubella.html.

  36. Kawasaki T. Kawasaki disease. Int J Rheum Dis. 2014;17:597–600.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Castro PA, Urbano LMF, Costa IMC. Doença de Kawasaki. An Bras Dermatol. 2009;84(4):317–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Akca UK, et al. Kawasaki-like disease in children with COVID-19. Rheumatol Int. 2020;40(12):2105–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-020-04701-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Ouldali N, et al. Emergence of Kawasaki disease related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an epicentre of the French COVID-19 epidemic: a time-series analysis. Lancet Child Adolescent Health. 2020;4(9):662–668. doi:10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30175-9.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ayusawa M, Sonobe T, Uemura S, Ogawa S, Nakamura Y, Kiyosawa N, et al. Kawasaki Disease Research Committee. Revision of diagnostic guidelines for Kawasaki disease (5th revised edition). Pediatr Int. 2005;47:232–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Newburger JW, Takahashi M, Gerber MA, Gewitz MH, Tani LY, Burns JC, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a statement for health professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Am Heart Assoc. 2004;110(17):2747–71.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Brewer JD, et al. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome and toxic shock syndrome after tooth extraction. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(2):342–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Patel GKL, Finlay AY. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome: diagnosis and management. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(3):165–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Patel NN, Patel DN. Staphylococcal scalded skin syndrome. Am J Med. 2010;123(6):505–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Caputo R, Gelmetti C, Ermacora E, et al. Gianotti-crosti syndrome: a retrospective analysis of 308 cases. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1992;26:207–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chuh AA. Diagnostic criteria for Gianotti-Crosti syndrome: a prospective case-control study for validity assessment. Cutis. 2001;68:207–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lima DA, Rocha DM, Miranda MFR. Gianotti-Crosti syndrome: clinical, laboratorial features, and serologic profiles of 10 cases from Belém, State of Para, Brazil. An Bras Dermatol. 2004;79(6):699–707. Rio de Janeiro

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Nguyen TA, Ortega-Loayza AG, Stevens MP. Miliaria-rash after neutropenic fever and induction chemotherapy for acute myelogenous leukemia. An Bras Dermatol. 2011;86(4 Suppl 1):104–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Al-Hilo MM, Al-Saedy SJ, Alwan AI. Atypical presentation of miliaria in Iraqi patients attending Al -Kindy teaching Hospital in Baghdad: a clinical descriptive study. Am J Dermatol Venereol. 2012;1(3):41–6.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Kirk JF, Wilson BB, Chun W, Cooper PH. Miliaria profunda. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;35(5 Pt 2):854–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rosenstein NE. Meningococcal disease. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:1378–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Dwilow R, Fanella S. Invasive meningococcal disease in the 21st century – an update for the clinician. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15(3):2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sabatini C, et al. Clinical presentation of meningococcal disease in childhood. J Prev Med Hyg. 2012;53:116–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Hill WR, Kinney TD. The cutaneous lesions in acute meningococcemia: a clinical and pathologic study. JAMA. 1947;134(6):513–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Mockenhaupt M. Epidemiology of cutaneous adverse drug reactions. Chem Immunol Allergy. 2012;97:1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Borch JE, Andersen KE, Bindslev-Jensen C. The prevalence of acute cutaneous drug reactions in a Scandinavian university hospital. Acta Derm Venereol. 2006;86:518–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Roujeau JC, Stern RS. Severe adverse cutaneous reactions to drugs. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:1272–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Hernandez-Salazar A, Ponce-de-Leon Rosales S, Rangel-Frausto S, et al. Epidemiology of adverse cutaneous drug reactions: a prospective study in hospitalized patients. Arch Med Res. 2006;37:899–902.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sharma VK, Sethuraman G, Kumar B. Cutaneous adverse drug reactions: clinical pattern and causative agents – a 6 year series from Chandigarh, India. J Postgrad Med. 2001;47:95–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Zaraa I, Jones M, Trojjet S, Cheikh Rouhou R, El Euch D, Mokni M, et al. Severe adverse cutaneous drug eruptions: epidemiological and clinical features. Int J Dermatol. 2011;50:877–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini R. Dermatologia. Reações a medicamentos. 2nd ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier Saunder; 2012. p. 301–20. Cap. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Grando LR, Schmitt TAB, Bakos RM. Severe cutaneous reactions to drugs in the setting of a general hospital. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89(5):758–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  63. Djien V, Bocquet H, Dupuy A, et al. Symptomatology and markers of the severity of erythematous drug eruptions. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 1999;126:247–50.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Marzano AV, Borghi A, Cugno M. Adverse drug reactions and organ damage: the skin. Eur J Intern Med. 2015;7(15):00414–8. pii: S09536205

    Google Scholar 

  65. Szatkowski J, Schwartz RA. Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): a review and update. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015;73(5):843–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Sokumbi O, Wetter DA. Clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of erythema multiforme: a review for the practicing dermatologist. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(8):889–902. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2011.05348.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Volcheck GW. Clinical evaluation and management of drug hypersensitivity. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2004;24:357–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Lamoreux MR, Sternbach MR, Hsu WT. Erythema multiforme. Am Fam Physician. 2006;74(11):1883–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Lerch M, Mainetti C, Terziroli Beretta-Piccoli B, Harr T. Current perspectives on erythema mulltiforme. Clin Rev in Allergy Immunol. 2018;54(1):177–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-017-8667-7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Duarte IAG, Lazzarini R, Bedikrow RB, Pires MC. Contact dermatitis. An Bras Dermatol. 2000;75(5):529–48.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Peiser M, Tralau T, Heidler J, et al. Allergic contact dermatitis: epidemiology, molecular mechanisms, in vitro methods and regulatory aspects. Current knowledge assembled at an international workshop at BfR, Germany. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2012;69(5):763–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-011-0846-8. Epub 2011 Oct 14

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Martin SF. New concepts in cutaneous allergy. Contact Dermatitis. 2014;72:2–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Bolognia JL, Jorizzo JL, Rapini R. Dermatologia. 2nd ed. New York: Publisher Elsevier; 2012. p. 209–30. Cap.15 e 16

    Google Scholar 

  74. Brasch J, Becker D, Aberer W, et al. Guideline contact dermatitis. Allergo J Int. 2014;23:126–38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Chuh AA, Chan HH. Prospective case-control study of chlamydia, legionella and mycoplasma infections in patients with pityriasis rosea. Eur J Dermatol. 2002;12:170–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Bitencourt MSM, Delmaestro D, Miranda PB, Filgueira AL, Pontes LFL. Pityriasis rosea. An Bras Dermatol. 2008;83(5):461–9.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Stulberg DL, Wolfrey J. Pityriasis rosea. Am Fam Physician. 2004;69(1):87–91.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Fuente MJ. Syphilis a resurgent disease. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2010;101(10):817–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Gállego-Lezáun C, Arrizabalaga Asenjo M, González-Moreno J, et al. Syphilis in men who have sex with men: a warning sign for HIV infection. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015;106(9):740–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Tuddenham S, Ghanem KG. Emerging trends and persistent challenges in the management of adult syphilis. BMC Infect Dis. 2015;15:351.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Clement ME, et al. Treatment of syphilis: a systematic review. JAMA. 2014;312(18):1905–17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Dupin N, Farhi D. Syphilis. Presse Med. 2013;42(4 Pt 1):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Dylewski J, Duong M. The rash of secondary syphilis. CMAJ. 2007;176(1):33–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  84. Pan American Health Organization/World Health Organization. Epidemiological update: dengue. Washington, DC: PAHO/WHO; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  85. World Health Organization. Dengue control (2016) Disponível em URL http://www.who.int/denguecontrol/en/

  86. Lupi O, Carneiro CG, Coelho ICB. Manifestações mucocutâneas da dengue. An Bras Dermatol. 2007;82(4):291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. Oliveira Melo AS, Malinger G, Ximenes R, Szejnfeld PO, Alves Sampaio S, Bispo de Filippis AM. Zika virus intrauterine infection causes fetal brain abnormality and microcephaly: tip of the iceberg? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2016;47:6–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Antoniou E, et al. Zika virus and the risk of developing microcephaly in infants: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(11):3806. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113806.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  89. Mlakar J, et al. Zika virus associated with microcephaly. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(10):951–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Pialoux G, Gaüzère B, Jauréguiberry S, Strobel M. Chikungunya, an epidemic arbovirosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2007;7:319–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Zhu N, Zhang D, Wang W, Li X, Yang B, Song J, et al. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:727–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  92. WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 27 Dec 2020.

  93. Freemann EE, et al. The spectrum of COVID-19- associated dermatologic manifestations: an international registry of 716 patient from 31 countries. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(4):1118–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2020.06.1016.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Casas C, Catala A, Hernandez G, Jimenez RP, Nieto D, Lario A. Classification of the cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19: a rapid prospective nationwide consensus study in Spain with 375 cases. Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.19163.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Mahé A, Birckel E, Krieger S, Merklen C, Bottlaender L. A distinctive skin rash associated with coronavirus disease 2019? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Jun;34(6):e246–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv16471.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  96. Gupta S, Gupta N, Gupta N. Classification and pathophysiology of cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19. Int J Res Dermatol. 2020;6:584–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. Bellini WJ, Helfand RF. The challenges and strategies for laboratory diagnosis of measles in an international setting. J Infect Dis. 2003;187(Suppl 1):S283–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Levin C, Maibach HI. An overview of the eficacy of topical corticosteroids in experimental human nickel contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis. 2000;43:317–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Cascella M, Rajnik M, Cuomo A, et al. (2020) Features, evaluation, and treatment of coronavirus. In: StatPearls[Internet]. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; PMID(COVID-19) [Updated 2020 Aug 10]. PMID: 32150360.

    Google Scholar 

  100. Cai K, Wang Y, Guo Z, et al. Clinical characteristics and managements of severe hand, foot and mouth disease caused by enterovirus A71 and coxsackievirus A16 in Shanghai, China. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):285. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-019-3878-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Saripalli YV, Gadzia JE, Belsito DV. Tacrolimus ointment 0.15 in the treatment of nickel-induced allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49:477–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  102. Eritro Leenutaphong V, Jiamton S. UVB phototerapy for pityriasis rosea: a bilateral comparison study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33:996–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Bukhari IA. Oral erythromycin is ineffective in the treatment of pityriasis rosea. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7(7):625.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Drago F, Vecchio F, Rebora A. Use of high-dose acyclovir in pityriasis rosea. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2006;54(1):82–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Morales-Múnera CE, Fuentes-Finkelstein PA, Vall MM. Update on the diagnosis and treatment of syphilis. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015;106(1):68–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the treatment of Treponema pallidum (syphilis). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  107. Rajapaske S, Rodrigo C, Rajapaske A. Treatment of dengue fever. Infect Drug Resist. 2012;5:103–12. https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S22613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. Mehta P, McAuley DF, Brown M, et al. COVID-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395(10229):1033–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Further Reading

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Glossary

Biett’s collarette

A syphilitic symptom characterized by a thin white ring of scales on the surface of a macule or papule.

Filatov’s sign

A typical sign of scarlet fever characterized by paleness around the mouth and congestion of the cheeks.

Koplik spots

Spots characterized by clustered, small, white lesions on the buccal mucosa (opposite the upper first and second molars), pathognomonic for measles. The spots resemble tiny grains of white sand, each surrounded by a red ring.

Papular-purpuric gloves and socks syndrome

An acute dermatosis characterized by a papular-purpuric edematous rash in a distinct “gloves and socks” distribution often accompanied by fever, asthenia, and lymphadenopathies. It is mainly caused by parvovirus B19 (B19V) although other viruses and drugs may be involved.

Pastia’s lines

A clinical sign whereby pink or red lines formed of confluent petechiae occur in areas of skin creases, such as the axilla, the neck, the antecubital fossa, and the popliteal fossa. This is a typical sign of scarlet fever.

Blister

Raised lesion, more than 1 cm wide, with internal liquid content.

Macula

Flat nonpalpable lesions, less than 1 cm wide, showing inconspicuous texture and/or color change.

Nodule

Palpable raised and indurated lesion usually deeper than the papule.

Patch

Flat nonpalpable lesion, more than 1 cm wide, showing discrete texture and/or color change.

Papule

Circumscribed palpable lesion, above skin surface, less than 1 cm wide.

Plaque

Palpable and raised lesion, above skin surface, more than 1 cm wide.

Pustule

Raised surface lesion with internal yellow content (pus).

Vesicle

Raised lesion, less than 1 cm wide, with internal light liquid content.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

da Rosa Hoefel, I., de Moraes, M.R., Hartung Lovato, B. (2023). Rash. In: Rangel Bonamigo, R. (eds) Dermatology in Public Health Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13505-7_72

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-13505-7_72

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-13504-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-13505-7

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics