Abstract
This chapter examines the rationale for an overhaul of the system of social security in South Africa, and takes account of long-term social and economic factors resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic shone a spotlight to South Africa’s lack of a comprehensive social security system. It argues that government’s responses during the pandemic have been inadequate. Further, it is essential that the government implements support measures to keep employees in their jobs, or to provide temporary relief. In addition, the government should put in place registration processes that do not just cover beneficiaries but also contributors. The core argument of the chapter is that South Africa needs to prioritize the design and implementation of a comprehensive system of social security. It sets out several recommendations on how the country’s fragmented institutions could be reconfigured to ensure that they provide better service to the public, and those who need social security and protection the most.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
These can involve co-contributions by an income earner, an employer, and even government. The contribution would be proportional to income, with benefits that can also vary to a degree by income.
- 2.
This is consistent with the Constitutional Court’s understanding that a distinction should be made between the right of “access to adequate housing” and the right “to adequate housing.” Whereas the latter may refer to an obligation to provide housing, the former requires that the enabling conditions be established for people to buy their own houses. “The state must create the conditions for access to adequate housing for people at all economic levels of society” (Constitutional Court of South Africa 2000, par 35).
References
Barr, N. 2012. Economic theaory 2: Insurance. In Economics of the welfare state, 4th ed., ed. N. Barr, 83–101. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budlander, G. 2003. Justiciability of the right to housing—The South Africa experience. Legal Resources centre, Cape Town. Retrieved from https://docs.escr-net.org/usr_doc/budlenderhousing.pdf.
Burns, J., M. Keswell, and M. Leibbrandt. 2005. Social assistance, gender, and the aged in South Africa. Feminist Economics 11 (2): 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545700500115944.
Cichon, M., W. Scholz, A. van de Meerendonk, K. Hagemejer, F. Bertranou, and P. Plamondon. 2004. Financing social protection. Geneva: International Labour Office.
Department of Social Development. 2007a. Concept design options for the institutional framework [of Social Security]. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.za/publications/other/ssrr/Session%20Five%20Papers/SS%20IDTG%20Institutional%20Sept2007%20v2.pdf.
Department of Social Development. 2007b. Reform of retirement provisions. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.za/publications/other/ssrr/General%20Papers/SocDev%20Reform%20Retirement%20Provisions.pdf.
Department of Social Development. 2009. Creating our shared future: Strategic considerations for a comprehensive system of social security. Pretoria: Department of Social Development.
Department of Social Development. 2017. Wits School of Governance, & Oxford Policy Management. Social Budget Bulletin. Pretoria.
Finn, A., M. Leibbrandt, and M. Oosthuizen. 2014. Poverty, inequality, and prices in post-Apartheid South Africa (2014/127). Retrieved from https://www.wider.unu.edu/sites/default/files/wp2014-127.pdf.
Frye, I., G. Wright, T. Elsley, M. Noble, H. Barnes, J. Jele, F. Masekesa, W. Zembe-mkabile, and D. McLennan. 2018. Towards a decent life for all: Decent standard of living index. Retrieved from Johannesburg. http://spii.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/DSL-Report-SD-v3.doc.pdf.
Goldblatt, B. 2009. Gender, rights and the disability grant in South Africa. Development Southern Africa 26 (3): 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/03768350903086689.
Government of the Republic of South Africa and Others vs Grootboom and Others. Constitutional Court of South Africa. 2000. Retrieved from http://collections.concourt.org.za/bitstream/handle/20.500.12144/2107/Full%20judgment%20%28478%20Kb%29-2798.pdf?sequence=4&isAllowed=y.
Hall, K., and W. Sambu. 2016. Demography of South Africa’s children. In South African child gauge 2016, ed. S.J. Aislinn Delany and Lori Lake, 106–110. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.
Hoeller, P., I. Joumard, M. Pisu, and D. Bloch. 2012. Less income inequality and more growth—Are they compatible? Part 1. Mapping inequality across the OECD. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/5k9h297wxbnr-en.
Howell, D.R., and M. Rehm. 2009. Unemployment compensation and high European unemployment: A reassessment with new benefit indicators. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 25 (1): 60–93.
Hundenborn, J., M. Leibbrandt, and I. Woolard. 2016. Drivers of Inequality in South Africa (194). Retrieved from http://opensaldru.uct.ac.za/bitstream/handle/11090/853/2016_194_Saldruwp.pdf?sequence=3.
Inter-departmental Task Team on Social Security. 2012. Comprehensive social security in South Africa, a discussion document. Retrieved from https://static.pmg.org.za/161128Comprehensive_Social_Security_in_South_Africa.pdf.
International Labour Office. (UD). The ILO Multi-Pillar pension model: Building equitable and sustainable pension systems. Retrieved from Geneva: https://www.social-protection.org/gimi/RessourcePDF.action?id=55234.
Minister of Social Development. 2015. White Paper on the rights of persons with disabilities (39792). Pretoria: Government Gazette. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201603/39792gon230.pdf.
Mkandawire, T. 2005. Targeting and universalism in poverty reduction. Retrieved from Geneva: https://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/955FB8A594EEA0B0C12570FF00493EAA/$file/mkandatarget.pdf.
National Planning Commission. 2011. National Development Plan 2030, our future, make it work (978–0–621–41180–5). Retrieved from Pretoria: https://www.gov.za/issues/nationaldevelopment-plan-2030.
National Treasury. 2007. Social security and retirement reform, second discussion document. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.za/publications/other/ssrr/General%20Papers/SocDev%20Reform%20Retirement%20Provisions.pdf.
National Treasury. 2013. Charges in South African retirement funds. Retrieved from http://www.treasury.gov.za/public%20comments/charges%20in%20south%20african%20retirement%20funds.pdf.
OECD. 2015. In it together: Why less inequality benefits all. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264235120-en.
OECD. 2020. Income distribution. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/data/data-00654-en.
Ostry, J. D., A. Berg, and C. G. Tsangarides. 2014. Redistribution, inequality and growth (SDN/14/02). Retrieved from http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2014/sdn1402.pdf.
Ozkan, U.R. 2014. Comparing formal unemployment compensation systems in 15 OECd countries. Social Policy & Administration 48 (1): 44–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12010.
Republic of South Africa. 1996. Constitution of the Republic of South Africa. Retrieved from https://www.gov.za/documents/constitution-republic-south-africa-1996.
Rønsen, M., and T. Skarðhamar. 2009. Do welfare-to-work initiatives work? Evidence from an activation programme targeted at social assistance recipients in Norway. Journal of European Social Policy 19 (1): 61–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928708098524.
Rusconi, R. 2007. South Africa’s mandatory defined contribution retirement saving system: Provider accreditation Reform of retirement provisions, feasibility studies, 51–120. Pretoria, South Africa: Internal Communication.
Samson, M. 2007. An options assessment with respect to making the state old age pension universal reform of retirement provisions, feasibility studies, 1–17. Pretoria, South Africa: Department of Social Development.
StatsSA. 2018. General household survey 2018. Online: Statistics South Africa.
Surender, R., M. Noble, G. Wright, and P. Ntshongwana. 2010. Social assistance and dependency in South Africa: An analysis of attitudes to paid work and social grants. Journal of Social Policy 39: 203–221. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279409990638.
Taylor Committee. 2002. Transforming the present—Protecting the future: Report of the Committee of Inquiry into a Comprehensive System of Social Security for South Africa.
van den Heever, A. M. 2010. Alignment of risk benefits provided by social security agencies. Retrieved from Johannesburg: https://www.gtac.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Alignmentof-Risk-Benefits-Provided-by-Social-Security-Agencies.pdf.
van den Heever, A. M. 2011. Achieving a responsive social security system. In Future inheritance, 1st ed., ed. D. Plaatjies, 236–251. Aukland Park, South Africa: Jacana Media (pty) Ltd.
van den Heever, A. M. 2012. Social protection floor for south africa, concept note. Retrieved from http://socialprotection.org/discover/publications/social-protection-floor-south-africa.
van den Heever, A. M. 2016. Pregnancy and maternal support for the protection of mothers and young children. In South African child gauge 2016, ed. S. J. Aislinn Delany and Lori Lake, 84–87. Cape Town: Children’s Institute, University of Cape Town.
van den Heever, A. M. 2021. Case G: Comprehensive social protection reform in South Africa. In Handbook on social protection systems, ed. S. Esther and Loewe Markus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Vijaya, R.M., R. Lahoti, and H. Swaminathan. 2014. Moving from the household to the individual: Multidimensional poverty analysis. World Development 59: 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.01.029.
Wits School of Governance. 2020. Social Budget Report complete dataset. https://www.dsd.gov.za/index.php/documents?task=download.send&id=344&catid=63&m=0
Wittenberg, M. 2017. Wages and wage inequality in South Africa 1994–2011: Part 2—Inequality measurement and trends. South African Journal of Economics 85 (2): 298–318. https://doi.org/10.1111/saje.12147.
Woolard, I., K. Harttgen, and S. Klasen. 2011. The history and impact of social security in South Africa: Experiences and lessons. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne D’études Du Développement 32 (4): 357–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/02255189.2011.647654.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
van den Heever, A. (2022). Social Security and Social Protection in South Africa. In: Qobo, M., Soko, M., Xenia Ngwenya, N. (eds) The Future of the South African Political Economy Post-COVID 19. International Political Economy Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10576-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10576-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-10575-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-10576-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)