Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Politics of Indonesia’s Development Cooperation: Between Ideas, Institutions, and Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
G20 Rising Powers in the Changing International Development Landscape

Abstract

Indonesia’s international development evolved from the conjunction of political, economic, and socio-cultural cooperation of its South–South Cooperation and North–South Cooperation. These cooperations have generated specific structures and shaped the ideas, motivations, identity, norms, and mechanisms of Indonesia in international development. However, domestic political conditions also affirm the trajectory of Indonesia’s international development policy. This raises the question of how the Indonesian Government and its leaders have constructed and materialised its international development policies within global development cooperation. This chapter intends to examine the roles of Indonesia in international development cooperation. First, it explores the history, and how development cooperation experiences began in the aftermath of the 1945 independence from the Dutch and the Bandung Conference in 1955. Despite the peculiarity of its principles including mutual benefit and solidarity in Indonesia’s South–South Cooperation, the normative narrative extends to knowledge sharing in development cooperation. Second, it critically reviews current conditions as a rising power country and the changes occurring as to how Indonesia institutionalised its development cooperation within their national system. It also examines Indonesia’s implementation, modalities, and specific contents of cooperation in international development, including exposing development success stories in its international development programme. This chapter concludes with implications of Indonesia’s development cooperation structures of narratives and implementations that stimulate critical debates on its position in international development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Pancasila or the five state principles are divinity to God (pluralism of monotheism), humanitarianism or internationalism, national unity (nationalism), representative democracy, and social justice (social welfare).

  2. 2.

    Joko Widodo stated that ‘We also feel the global injustice when a group of established nations are reluctant to recognise that the world has changed. The view that world economic problems can only be solved by the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund, and the ADB is an outdated view. I am of the view that the management of the global economy cannot be left only to the three international financial institutions. We must build a new global economic order that is open to new emerging economic power. We push for a reform of the global financial architecture to eliminate the domination of one group of countries over other countries (GOI, 2015a).

  3. 3.

    Indonesia launches Indo-AID international assistance agency, https://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/10/19/indonesia-launches-indo-aid-international-assistance-agency.html.

  4. 4.

    CEAPAD was established in 2013 and initiated by Japan to support Palestinian independence, with participating countries and organisations including Indonesia, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, South Korea, Vietnam, Egypt, Brunei, IsDB, UN Relief Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), Arab League, the World Bank, and the Office of the Quartet (https://www.jica.go.jp/english/news/field/2012/130319_02.html; https://www.kemlu.go.id/en/berita/Pages/To-Host-CEAPAD,-RI-Reaffirms-Commitment-to-Support-Palestinians-Self-reliance.aspx; https://www.mofa.go.jp/me_a/me1/palestine/page3e_000879.html.

  5. 5.

    https://www.oic-oci.org/home/?lan=en (accessed 1 November 2021).

  6. 6.

    https://jakartaglobe.id/news/indonesia-commits-2m-aid-support-capacity-building-palestine/.

  7. 7.

    What is Indonesia—Africa Infrastructure Dialogue (https://iaid.kemlu.go.id/about/what-is-the-iaid, accessed on 24 November 2021).

  8. 8.

    The aid included loans, gifts, and agricultural supplies, as well as a military support programme (Van Der Eng, 1988).

  9. 9.

    Australia gave through the Colombo Plan, which Indonesia joined in 1953 (Hindley, 1963).

  10. 10.

    The Indonesian Government still considered traditional donors its significant partners in SSC programmes. Indonesia acknowledged cooperation with traditional donors in its SSC through Triangular Cooperation, which is discussed further in Chapter 6. The support conducted through the Triangular Cooperation programme included establishing a National Coordination Team (NCT) on SSTC, which also facilitated Triangular Cooperation with traditional donors (NCT–SSTC, 2015, 2016). However, the term ‘SSTC’ was changed to ‘SSC’ in 2018, as suggested by MOFA, to mark the transition period for strengthening the national management of SSC that was embedded into the state system (NCT, 2018).

  11. 11.

    Book 1, Chapter 7 of Medium-Term Development Program (Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional/RPJMN) 2015–2019 (GOI, 2015b).

  12. 12.

    RI, China to strengthen economic cooperation, The Jakarta Post, 28 January 2015, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2015/01/28/ri-china-strengthen-economic-cooperation.html; Jokowi between BRICS and a hard place: The Jakarta Post columnist, https://www.straitstimes.com/asia/se-asia/jokowi-between-brics-and-a-hard-place-the-jakarta-post-columnist; Indonesia forecasts multibillion-dollar belt and road investment in four growth regions, https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/geopolitics/article/3008036/indonesia-forecasts-multibillion-dollar-belt-and-road.

  13. 13.

    The AIIB established by the Chinese Government in 2014 and has stimulated much debate as to how it is challenging the roles of existing MDBs (Wang, 2017). In contrast, members of the AIIB, which consist of countries beyond BRICS, including other Southern countries and the European, the Pacific, and the Latin American countries, have recognised the expansion of its cooperation. The new bank’s framework, as argue by Lin and Wang (2017), refers to the beyond-Keynesian approach in indentifying the expanding role of the state in the global level of structural adjustment programme in infrastructure sector. The infrastructure model of cooperation also expands to ‘one belt, one road’ (one Silk Road economic belt and one maritime Silk Road) across Asia. This programme refers to the ideology of the shared prosperity vision based on Zhou Enlai’s Peaceful Co-existence and Confucianism’s moral vision (Kilby, 2017; Lin & Wang, 2017).

  14. 14.

    https://www.aiib.org/en/about-aiib/governance/senior-management/index.html.

  15. 15.

    The Mint countries: Next economic giants? BBC Online. https://www.bbc.com/news/magazine-25548060 (accessed on 10 September 2021).

References

  • Abdel-Malek, T. (2015). The global partnership for effective development cooperation: Origins, actions and future prospects. Bonn, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdenur, A. E., & da Fonseca, J. M. E. M. (2013). The north’s growing role in South–South Cooperation: Keeping the foothold. Third World Quarterly, 34(8), 1475–1491.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulgani, R. (1957). Perkembangan politik luar negeri Indonesia dalam tahun 1956 (The Progress of Indonesian Foreign Policy in 1956). Jakarta: Pertjetakan Negara.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, A. (2015). Indonesia matters: Asia’s emerging democratic power. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adloff, F., & Mau, S. (2006). Giving social ties, reciprocity in modern society. European Journal of Sociology, 47(1), 93–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agensky, J., & Barker, J. (2012). Indonesia and the liberal peace: Recovering southern agency in global governance. Globalizations, 9(1), 107–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agung, I. A. A. G. (1973). Twenty years Indonesian foreign policy 1945–1965. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aneja, U. (2019). South–South cooperation and competition: A critical history of the principles and their practice. In E. Fiddian-Qasmiyeh & P. O. Daley (Eds.), Routledge handbook of South–South relations (pp. 141–152). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, D. F. (1994). Indonesia’s foreign policy after the Cold War. Southeast Asian Affairs, 146–163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergamaschi, I., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). Introduction: South–South Cooperation beyond the myths—A critical analysis. In I. Bergamaschi, P. Moore, & A. B. Tickner (Eds.), South–South Cooperation beyond the myths: Rising donors, new aid practices? (pp. 1–27). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bergamaschi, I., Tickner, A. B., & Durán, J. (2017). Going South to Reach the North?: The Case of Colombia. In I. Bergamaschi, P. Moore, & A. B. Tickner (Eds), South–South Cooperation beyond the myths: Rising donors, new aid practices? (pp. 245–269). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P. (2016). BRICS banking and the debate over sub-imperialism. Third World Quarterly, 37(4), 611–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell, F. P. (1966). Guided democracy foreign policy: 1960–1965: President Sukarno moves from non-alignment to confrontation. Indonesia, 2, 37–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A., & Sugema, I. (2005). How significant and effective has foreign aid to Indonesia been? ASEAN Economic Bulletin, 22(2), 186–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Renzio, P., & Seifert, J. (2014). South–South Cooperation and the future of development assistance: Mapping actors and options. Third World Quarterly, 35(10), 1860–1875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durotoye, A. (2014). The MINT countries as emerging economic power bloc: Prospects and challenges. Developing Country Studies, 4(15), 99–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. N. (2017). South–South Cooperation strategies in Indonesia: Domestic and international drivers. In A. Graf & A. Hashim (Eds.), African–Asian encounters: Creating cooperations and dependencies (pp. 155–182). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel, S. (2019). South–South Cooperation in Southeast Asia: From Bandung and solidarity to norms and rivalry. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 38(2), 218–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esteves, P., & Assunção, M. (2014). South–South Cooperation and the international development battlefield: Between the OECD and the UN. Third World Quarterly, 35(10), 1775–1790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eyben, R., & Savage, L. (2013). Emerging and submerging powers: Imagined geographies in the new development partnership at the Busan fourth high level forum. Journal of Development Studies, 49(4), 457–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furia, A. (2015). The foreign aid regime: Gift-giving, states and global dis/order. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, A. L. (2005). Economic crises and political change: Indonesia, South Korea, and Malaysia. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 31(4), 232–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, G. Z., & Esteves, P. (2018). The BRICS effect: Impacts of South–South Cooperation in the social field of international development cooperation. IDS Bulletin, 49(3). Retrieved from https://bulletin.ids.ac.uk/idsbo/article/view/2984/Online%20article (accessed on the 1 September 2021).

  • Gore, C. (2013). The new development cooperation landscape: Actors, approaches, architecture. Journal of International Development, 25(6), 769–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (1955). Speech by President Soekarno at the opening of the Asian–African Conference. Jakarta, Indonesia: GOI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2007). Museum of the Asian–African Conference. Jakarta, Indonesia: MOFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2009). The Jakarta commitment. Jakarta, Indonesia: BAPPENAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015a). Declaration on reinvigorating the new Asian–African strategic partnership. Jakarta, Indonesia: MOFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2015b). National medium-term development plan 2015b–2019. Jakarta, Indonesia: BAPPENAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2019). Jakarta, Indonesia: MOFA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). National medium-term development plan 2020–2024. Jakarta, Indonesia: BAPPENAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadiwinata, B. S. (2008). International relations in Indonesia: Historical legacy, political intrusion, and commercialization. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 9(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatta, M. (1953). Indonesia’s foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 31(3), 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermawan, Y. P., & Habir, A. D. (2015). Indonesia and international institutions: Treading new territory. In C. Roberts, A. D. Habir, & L. Sebastian (Eds.), Indonesia’s ascent: Power, leadership and the regional order (pp. 177–194). London, UK: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindley, D. (1963). Foreign aid to Indonesia and its political implications. Pacific Affairs, 26(2), 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosono, A. (2018). Potential and challenges for emerging development partners: The case of Indonesia. IDS Bulletin, 49(2), 13–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Hutchison, J. (2012). Development effectiveness and the politics of commitment. Third World Quarterly, 33(1), 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, G. H. (1966). Afro–Asia and non-alignment. London, UK: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janus, H., Klingebiel, S., & Mahn, T. C. (2014). How to shape development cooperation? The global partnership and the Development Cooperation Forum (Briefing Paper No. 3/2014). Bonn, Germany: Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik.

    Google Scholar 

  • Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA). (2013). Indonesia—Japan: Fostering global development through South–South and Triangular Cooperation. Tokyo, Japan: JICA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahin, G. M. (1952). Nationalism and revolution in Indonesia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, P. (2012). The changing development landscape in the first decade of the 21st century and its implications for development studies. Third World Quarterly, 33(6), 1001–1017. https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2012.681494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, P. (2017). China and The United States as aid donors: Past and future trajectories (Vol. 77). East-West Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, P. (2018). DAC is dead? Implications for teaching development studies. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 59(2), 226–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kowalski, R. (2011). The Gift–Marcel Mauss and international aid. Journal of Comparative Social Welfare, 27(3), 189–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, C. (2008). Foreign aid: Diplomacy, development, domestic politics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y., & Wang, Y. (2017). Going beyond aid: Development cooperation for structural transformation. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malacalza, B. (2020). The politics of aid from the perspectives of international relations theories. In I. Olivié & A. Pérez (Eds.), Aid power and politics. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, R. (2006). Will ‘emerging donors’ change the face of international co‐operation? Development Policy Review, 24(4), 371–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2012a). From recipients to donors: Emerging powers and the changing development landscape. London, UK: Zed Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2012b). The changing geographies of foreign aid and development cooperation: Contributions from gift theory. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 37(2), 256–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2015). Development geography 1: Cooperation, competition and convergence between ‘North’ and ‘South’. Progress in Human Geography, 41(1), 108–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2018). The ‘Southernisation’ of development? Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 59(2), 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E. (2019). South–South Cooperation 3.0? Managing the consequences of success in the decade ahead. Oxford Development Studies, 47(3), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawdsley, E., Savage, L., & Kim, S. M. (2014). A ‘post‐aid world’? Paradigm shift in foreign aid and development cooperation at the 2011 Busan High-Level Forum. Geographical Journal, 180(1), 27–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, S. (2009). Justice, geography, and steel: Technology and national identity in Indonesian industrialization. Osiris, 24(1), 253–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muhibat, S. (2016). Charting the path to development effectiveness: Indonesia’s SSC challenges. In A. Mulakala (Ed.), Asian approaches to development cooperation: Contemporary Asian perspectives on South–South Cooperation. Korea: Korean Development Institute and The Asia Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A. M. (2009). Indonesia returns to the international stage: Good news for the United States. Orbis, 53(1), 65–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalegawa, M. M. (2015). Indonesia's diplomacy pays regional dividends. East Asia Forum Quarterly, 7(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South and Triangular Cooperation. (2015). Annual report of Indonesia’s South–South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTC) 2014. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South and Triangular Cooperation. (2016). Annual report of Indonesia’s South–South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTC) 2015. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South Cooperation. (2017a). Handbook Indonesia’s South–South and Triangular Cooperation. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South Cooperation. (2017b). Annual report of Indonesia’s South–South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTC) 2016. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South Cooperation. (2018). Annual report of Indonesia’s South–South and Triangular Cooperation (SSTC) 2017. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coordination Team on South–South Cooperation. (2019). Handbook on Indonesia’s SSC. Jakarta, Indonesia: NCT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negara, S. D. (2016). Indonesiea’s infrastructure development under the jokowi administration. Southeast Asian Affairs, 2016(1), 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinandita, A. (2019, 18 October). Indonesia launches international assistance agency. The Jakarta Post. Retrieved from http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2019/10/18/indonesia-launches-international-assistance-agency.html (accessed on the 15 October 2021)

  • Pollard, A. (2009). Power in doubt: Aid, effectiveness, and harmonization amongst donors in Indonesia (Doctoral thesis). Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisen, H. (2015). Will the AIIB and the NDB help reform multilateral development banking? Global Policy, 6(3), 297–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riddell, R. C. (2007). Does foreign aid really work? Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R., & Rosser, A. (1998). Contesting reform: Indonesia's new order and the IMF. World Development, 26(8), 1593–1609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosyidin, M. (2017). Foreign policy in changing global politics: Indonesia’s foreign policy and the quest for major power status in the Asian century. South East Asia Research, 25(2), 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salim, Z. (2011). Indonesia in the G20: Benefits and challenges amidst national interests and priorities. In W. Hofmeister (ed.), G20 (pp. 95–108). https://www.kas.de/c/document_library/get_file?uuid=844944a6-44ef-a892-09e1-8b864ed068e3&groupId=252038

  • Shekhar, V. (2018). Indonesia’s foreign policy and grand strategy in the 21st century: Rise of an Indo–Pacific power. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazu, N. (2014). Diplomacy as theatre: Staging the Bandung Conference of 1955. Modern Asian Studies, 48(01), 225–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinaga, L. C. (2018). The dynamics of Indonesia–China relations in politics, defense-security, and economy in Southeast Asia: An Indonesian perspective. In L. C. Sinaga (Ed.), Six decades of Indonesia-China relations (pp. 1–15). Singapore: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Six, C. (2009). The rise of postcolonial states as donors: A challenge to the development paradigm? Third World Quarterly, 30(6), 1103–1121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. L. (2000). Indonesia’s foreign policy under Abdurrahman Wahid: Radical or status quo state? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(3), 498–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahalele, M. (2021, 22 February). Indonesian AID: The politics and bureaucracy of Indonesia’s development cooperation. Devpolicy Blog. Retrieved from https://devpolicy.org/indonesian-aid-the-politics-and-bureaucracy-of-indonesias-development-cooperation-20210222-2/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=indonesian-aid-the-politics-and-bureaucracy-of-indonesias-development-cooperation-20210222-2) (Accessed on the 30 September 2021).

  • Tan, P. J. (2007). Navigating a turbulent ocean: Indonesia’s worldview and foreign policy. Asian Perspective, 31(3), 147–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, I. (2014). Foreign aid and emerging powers: Asian perspectives on official development assistance. London, UK: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wicaksana, I. G. W. (2016). The changing perspective of international relations in Indonesia. International Relations of the Asia–Pacific, 18(2), 133–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winanti, P. S., & Alvian, R. A. (2019). Indonesia’s South–South cooperation: When normative and material interests converged. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 0, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winters, M. S. (2012). The obstacles to foreign aid harmonization: Lessons from decentralization support in Indonesia. Studies in Comparative International Development, 47(3), 316–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme. (2013). The rise of the South: Human progress in a diverse world. New York, NY: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Programme & BAPPENAS. (2014). South–South and Triangular Cooperation: Stocktaking and strategy review. Jakarta: UNDP & BAPPENAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Eng, P. (1988). Marshall aid as a catalyst in the decolonization of Indonesia, 1947–49. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 19(2), 335–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warburton, E. (2016). Jokowi and the new developmentalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 52(3), 297-320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. (2017). New multilateral development banks: Opportunities and challenges for global governance. Global Policy, 8(1), 113–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, F. B. (1976). Indonesian Foreign Policy and the dilemma of dependence: from Sukarno to Soeharto. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Widodo, J., & Kalla, J. (2014). Jalan Perubahan untuk Indonesia yang Berdaulat, Mandiri, and Berkepribadian (The transformative road to a sovereign, independent, and dignified Indonesia). Jakarta, Indonesia: National Election Commission (Komis Pemilihan Umum).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Humanities, Department of International Relations, Bina Nusantara (BINUS) University, Jakarta, Indonesia

    Miranda P. Tahalele

Authors
  1. Miranda P. Tahalele
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miranda P. Tahalele .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Emel Parlar Dal

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tahalele, M.P. (2022). The Politics of Indonesia’s Development Cooperation: Between Ideas, Institutions, and Structures. In: Parlar Dal, E. (eds) G20 Rising Powers in the Changing International Development Landscape. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07857-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation