Skip to main content

Input Accessibility: Effect of Input Device on Interaction Time and Accuracy - An Expanded Analysis of a Large Dataset

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
HCI International 2022 Posters (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1580))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1443 Accesses

Abstract

A large dataset of publicly available input data was released recently, containing mouse movements from hundreds of crowdsourced participants including those with and without self-reported motor impairments. This paper provides further analysis of that dataset, in particular by segmenting the input device between physical desktop mice and laptop touchpads. The input device as an independent variable provides significant differences in several input tasks, indicating that the input modality variable is as important as the previously reported analyzed variables. Our analysis provides additional validity to the dataset and its existing analysis based on self-reported motor impairment and participant age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Card, S., English, W., Burr, B.: Evaluation of mouse, rate-controlled isometric joystick, step keys, and text keys for text selection on a CRT. Ergonomics 21, 601–613 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1080/00140137808931762

  2. English, W., Engelbart, D., Berman, M.: Display-selection techniques for text manipulation. IEEE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. HFE-8(1), 5–15 (1967). https://doi.org/10.1109/THFE.1967.232994

  3. Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S., Magee, J.: Comparison of two methods to control the mouse using a keypad. In: Miesenberger, K., Bühler, C., Penaz, P. (eds.) ICCHP 2016. LNCS, vol. 9759, pp. 511–518. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-41267-2_72

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Findlater, L., Zhang, L.: Input accessibility: a large dataset and summary analysis of age, motor ability and input performance. In: The 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. ASSETS 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, New York (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3417031

  5. Hassan, M., Magee, J., MacKenzie, I.S.: A Fitts’ law evaluation of hands-free and hands-on input on a laptop computer. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) HCII 2019. LNCS, vol. 11573, pp. 234–249. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-23563-5_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hassan, M., Magee, J., MacKenzie, I.S.: Evaluating hands-on and hands-free input methods for a simple game. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12188, pp. 124–142. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49282-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. MacKenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ law as a research and design tool in human-computer interaction. Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7(1), 91–139 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. MacKenzie, I.S.: Human-Computer Interaction: An Empirical Research Perspective, 1st edn. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacKenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ Law, chap. 17, pp. 347–370. Wiley, Hoboken (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Magee, J., Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S.: Camera mouse + ClickerAID: dwell vs. single-muscle click actuation in mouse-replacement interfaces. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) UAHCI 2015. LNCS, vol. 9175, pp. 74–84. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-20678-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

NSF support for this project is acknowledged and greatly appreciated (#IIS-1551590).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Magee .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pham, L., Whitlow, S., Rosenbaum, E., Magee, J. (2022). Input Accessibility: Effect of Input Device on Interaction Time and Accuracy - An Expanded Analysis of a Large Dataset. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M., Ntoa, S. (eds) HCI International 2022 Posters. HCII 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1580. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_77

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06417-3_77

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06416-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06417-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics