Skip to main content

User Movement for Safety Training in a Virtual Chemistry Lab

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Education, Aviation and Industry (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Virtual Reality (VR) has become a large area of focus especially after the effects of COVID-19. During the lockdown students had to partake in different methods of learning outside of the traditional face-to-face classroom setting. In this paper, we focus on the type of locomotion that students would utilize when traversing in a virtual environment. We studied the effectiveness of two types of movement the first being Embodied Movement, or movement through the Head Mounted Display (HMD) device such as the Oculus Quest, or the HTC VIVE, and the second form of movement being Joystick Movement through the use of a thumb stick on an attached controller. To test these movements, we implemented a scenario in a virtual chemistry lab, where the user’s vision is impaired, and they would need to navigate throughout the scene to reach a safety shower that once activated would restore their vision. Our results show that using the joystick controller was more suitable for this type of experiment in terms of user preference and the speed of which the user completed the task. Our results also show that for some subjects when partaking in the study, mild cyber-sickness was prevalent and further investigation is needed on how to mitigate its effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Simpson, M., Zhao, J., Klippel, A.: Take a Walk: Evaluating Movement Types for Data Visualization in Immersive Virtual Reality. Immersive Analytics: Exploring Future Interaction and Visualization Technologies for Data Analytics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elmqvist, N., Dragicevic, P., Fekete, J.: Rolling the dice: multidimensional visual exploration using scatterplot matrix navigation. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graph. 14(6), 1539–1148 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2008.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Amini, F., Rufiange, S., Hossain, Z., Ventura, Q., Irani, P., McGuffin, M.J.: The impact of interactivity on comprehending 2D and 3D visualizations of movement data. IEEE Trans. Visual Comput. Graph. 21(1), 122–135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2014.2329308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smith, H.J., Neff, M.: Communication behavior in embodied virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kitson, A., Hashemian, A.M., Stepanova, E.R., Kruijff, E., Riecke, B.E.: Lean into it: exploring leaning-based motion cueing interfaces for virtual reality movement. In: 2017 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 215–216 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892253

  6. Gillies, M.: What is movement interaction in virtual reality for? In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Movement and Computing (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gresty, M.A., Waters, S., Bray, A., Bunday, K., Golding, J.F.: Impairment of spatial cognitive function with preservation of verbal performance during spatial disorientation. Curr. Biol. 13(21) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bozgeyikli, E., Raij, A., Katkoori, S., Dubey, R.: Point teleport locomotion technique for virtual reality. In: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Demirel, D., Hamam, A., Scott, C., Karaman, B., Toker, O., Pena, L.: Towards a new chemistry learning platform with virtual reality and haptics. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds.) Learning and Collaboration Technologies: Games and Virtual Environments for Learning, HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12785. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77943-6_16

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Henry, A.C.: Questioning the value of general chemistry labs. Chem. Eng. News 98(18) (2020). https://cen.acs.org/education/undergraduate-education/Questioning-value-general-chemistry-labs/98/i18

  11. Jo, C.C.: Virtualizing Organic Chemistry Labs. DELTA News (2018). https://delta.ncsu.edu/news/2018/12/19/virtualizing-organic-chemistry-labs/

  12. Bretz, S.L.: Evidence for the importance of laboratory courses. J. Chem. Educ. 96(2), 193–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.8b00874

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Hofstein, A., Lunetta, V.N.: The laboratory in science education: foundations for the twenty-first century. Sci. Educ. 88, 28–54 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nicola, J.: Simulated labs are booming. Nature 562, S5–S7 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-018-06831-1

  15. Slater, M., Sanchez-Vives, M.V.: Enhancing our lives with immersive virtual reality. Front. Robot. AI 3, 74 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moore, C., Smith, S., Avner, R.A.: Facilitation of laboratory performance through CAI. J. Chem. Educ. 57(3), 196 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1021/ed057p196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Krummel, T.M.: Surgical simulation and virtual reality: the coming revolution. Ann. Surg. 228(5) (1998). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/1998/11000/Surgical_Simulation_and_Virtual_Reality__The.2.aspx

  18. Marescaux, J., et al.: Virtual reality applied to hepatic surgery simulation: the next revolution. Ann. Surg. 228(5) (1998). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/1998/11000/Virtual_Reality_AppAppl_to_Hepatic_Surgery.1.aspx

  19. Seymour, N.E., et al.: Virtual reality training improves operating room performance: results of a randomized, double-blinded study. Ann. Surg. 236(4) (2002). https://journals.lww.com/annalsofsurgery/Fulltext/2002/10000/Virtual_Reality_Training_Improves_Operating_Room.8.aspx

  20. Pharr, M., Jakob, W., Humphreys, G.: Physically Based Rendering: From Theory to Implementation (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schlick, C.: An inexpensive BRDF model for physically-based rendering. Comput. Graph. Forum 13(3), 233–246 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ashikhmin, M., Shirley, P.: An anisotropic phong BRDF model. J. Graph. Tools 5(2), 25–32 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ashikmin, M., Premože, S., Shirley, P.: A microfacet-based BRDF generator. In: Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, pp. 65–74 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/344779.344814

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdelwahab Hamam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Ben-Zaken, D., Hamam, A., Demirel, D. (2022). User Movement for Safety Training in a Virtual Chemistry Lab. In: Chen, J.Y.C., Fragomeni, G. (eds) Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality: Applications in Education, Aviation and Industry. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13318. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06015-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06015-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06014-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06015-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics