Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Generational Approach to Fight Fake News: In Search of Effective Media Literacy Training and Interventions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design, Interaction and Technology Acceptance (HCII 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNCS,volume 13330))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The rise of Internet and the pervasiveness of communication and information technologies have allowed many societies to successfully reduce inequalities in access to information. However, the spread of fake news endangers the value and trustworthiness of the information being accessed. Although the dominant approach to reduce the spread of fake news includes legal measures and technological innovations (e.g., automatic fact-checking applications), Media Literacy Training and Interventions are also ways to empower people to fight fake news. The present scoping literature review examines the Media Literacy Training and Intervention options available, offering an overview of the extent to which they include an explicit fake news component, whether they are evidence based and the social groups (including different generations) for which they were tailored. We found that students and educators were the main target groups, almost wholly to the exclusion of other groups; that they took place mainly in educational settings; and that, at least in the case of the training sessions, they were not evidence based, which meant that neither the long-term nor short-term efficacy could be tested. Such findings shed light on the relatively poor reliability of the available training and interventions, and on their limited effectiveness in the target groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Flanagin, A.J., Metzger, M.J.: The role of site features, user attributes, and information verification behaviors on the perceived credibility of web-based information. New Media Soc. 9(2), 319–342 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807075015

  2. Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., Medders, R.B.: Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J. Commun. 60(3), 413–439 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01488.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Loos, E., Nijenhuis, J.: Consuming fake news: a matter of age? The perception of political fake news stories in Facebook ads. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12209, pp. 69–88. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-50232-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Singh, L., et al.: A first look at COVID-19 information and misinformation sharing on Twitter. Arxiv (2020). https://arxiv.org/pdf/2003.13907.pdf

  5. Rodríguez, C.P., Carballido, B.V., Redondo-Sama, G., Guo, M., Ramis, M., Flecha, R.: False news around COVID-19 circulated less on Sina Weibo than on Twitter. How to overcome false information? RIMCIS 9(2), 107–128 (2020). https://doi.org/10.17583/rimcis.2020.5386

  6. Conroy, N.K., Rubin, V.L., Chen, Y.: Automatic deception detection: methods for finding fake news. Proc. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 52(1), 1–4 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2015.145052010082

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhou, X., Zafarani, R., Shu, K., Liu, H.: Fake news: fundamental theories, detection strategies and challenges. In: Proceedings of the twelfth ACM international conference on web search and data mining, Melbourne, Australia, 11–15 February 2019, Association for Computing Machinery: New York, United States, pp. 836–837 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3291382

  8. De Jong, J., Rizvi, G.: The State of Access: Success and Failure of Democracies to Create Equal Opportunities. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, D.C. (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Van den Hoven, M.J.: Towards Ethical Principles for Designing Politico-Administrative Information Systems. In: Weckert, J. (eds.) Computer Ethics, 1st ed. Routledge, London, England, pp. 193–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315259697

  10. Rawls, J.: A Theory of Justice. Belknap Press and Harvard University Press, Cambridge, United States (1971)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Hargittai, E., Dobransky, K.: Old dogs, new clicks: digital inequality in skills and uses among older adults. Can. J. Commun. 42(2), 195–212 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bovens, M.A.P.: Information rights. Citizenship in the information society. J. Polit. Philos. 10(3), 317–341 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9760.00155

  13. Bovens, M.A.P., Loos, E.F.: The digital constitutional state: democracy and law in the information society. Inf. Polity 7(4), 185–197 (2002). https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2002-0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tandoc, E.C., Jr., Ling, R., Westlund, O., Duffy, A., Goh, D., Zheng Wei, L.: Audiences’ acts of authentication in the age of fake news: a conceptual framework. New Media Soc. 20(8), 2745–2763 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444817731756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Leu. D.J., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., Cammack, D.: Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other ICT. In: Ruddell, R.B., Unrau, N. (eds.) Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading, pp. 1570–1613, 5th ed. International Reading Association, Newark, USA (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Loos, E., Ivan, L., Leu, D.: Save the pacific northwest tree octopus: a hoax revisited. Or: how vulnerable are school children to fake news? Inf. Learn. Sci. 119(9–10), 514–528 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2018-0031

  17. Buckingham, D.: The Media Education Manifesto. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brites, M.J., Amaral, I., Simões, R.B., Santos, S.J.: Generational perspectives on EU documents tackling disinformation. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds.) HCII 2021. LNCS, vol. 12786, pp. 349–360. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78108-8_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Eisemann, C., Pimmer, C.: Educational approaches to address fake news–preliminary insights from a systematic review. In: Proceedings of the CELDA 2020: 17th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age. Lisbon, Portugal, 18–20 November 2020

    Google Scholar 

  20. Insights, M., Chapman, M.: Mapping of media literacy practices and actions in EU-28, European Audiovisual Observatory and Council of Europe (2016). https://ketlib.lib.unipi.gr/xmlui/handle/ket/1185

  21. De Cock Buning, M.: A multi-dimensional approach to disinformation: Report of the independent High level Group on fake news and online disinformation, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg (2018).https://doi.org/10.2759/739290

  22. European Commission: Fake News and Disinformation Online. Flash Eurobarometer 464, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium (2018). https://doi.org/10.2759/559993

  23. Shu, K., Liu, H.: Detecting fake news on social media. Morgan & Claypool, Williston United States (2019).https://doi.org/10.2200/S00926ED1V01Y201906DMK018

  24. Chiluwa, I.E., Samoilenko, S.A.: Handbook of Research on Deception, Fake News, and Misinformation Online. IGI Global (2019). https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.4018/978-1-5225-8535-0

  25. Newman, N., Fletcher, R., Kalogeropoulos, A., Levy, D., Nielsen, R.K.: Reuters Institute digital news report (2017). https://ssrn.com/abstract=3026082

  26. Cacioppo, J.T., Petty, R.E.: The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. NA–Adv. Consum. Res. 19(11), 673–675 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2), 175–220 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175

  28. Roozenbeek, J., van der Linden, S.: Fake news game confers psychological resistance against online misinformation. Palgrave Commun. 5(1), 1–10 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-019-0279-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roozenbeek, J., van Der Linden, S.: The fake news game: actively inoculating against the risk of misinformation. J. Risk Res. 22(5), 570–580 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1443491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maertens, R., Roozenbeek, J., Basol, M., van der Linden, S.: Long-term effectiveness of inoculation against misinformation: three longitudinal experiments. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 27(1), 1–16 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Roozenbeek, J., Van der Linden, S.: Breaking harmony square: a game that inoculates against political misinformation. HKS Misinf. Rev. 1(8) (2020). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-47

  32. Chang, Y.K., et al.: News literacy education in a polarized political climate: how games can teach youth to spot misinformation. HKS Misinf. Rev. (2020). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-020

  33. Grace, L., Hone, B.: Factitious: large scale computer game to fight fake news and improve news literacy. In: Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 4–9 May 2019, pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, United States (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3299046

  34. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I.: Effects of task instruction and personal epistemology on the understanding of multiple texts about climate change. Discourse Process. 47(1), 1–31 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530902959646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. McGrew, S., Ortega, T., Breakstone, J., Wineburg, S.: The challenge that’s bigger than fake news: civic reasoning in a social media environment. Am. Educ. 41(3), 4–9 (2017). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1156387.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2021

  36. van Helvoort, J., Hermans, M.: Effectiveness of educational approaches to elementary school pupils (11 Or 12 Years Old) to combat fake news. Media Lit. Acad. Res. 3(2), 38–47 (2020). https://bit.ly/3m2Eo6m. Accessed 18 May 2021

  37. Anderson, K.: CML Pilots Media Literacy Unit for Obesity, Nutrition Education. Center for Media Literacy (2005). https://bit.ly/2ZvTQQI. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  38. Tripp, A.: Workshop report: How to do Assessment and Evaluation in Media Literacy. Center for Media Literacy (2017). https://bit.ly/3COTQd3. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  39. Tripp, A.: Workshop report: Integrating Media Literacy across the curriculum. Center for Media Literacy (2000). https://bit.ly/3m0MkFb. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  40. Tripp, A.: Summer seminars take on hot topics in media literacy. Center for Media Literacy (n.a). https://bit.ly/3i6ZMpH. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  41. Hobbs, R.: Teaching media literacy. In: Dennis, E., Pease, E. (eds.) Children and the media, pp. 103–111. Transaction Press, New Brunswick, United States (1996). https://bit.ly/3i1ltr1. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  42. Phillips, M.: It’s Not a Pipe: Teaching Kids to Read the Media. Edutopia (2012). https://edut.to/3zySFwc. Accessed 14 Sep 2021

  43. Meyrowitz, J.: Multiple media literacies. J. Commun. 48(1), 96–108 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1998.tb02740.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Potter, W.J.: Media Literacy, 9th edn. Sage Publications, London, England (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Ivan, L., Frunzaru, V.: The use of ICT in students’ learning activities. J. Media Res. 7(1/2), 3–15 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Dumitru, E.A.: Testing children and adolescents’ ability to identify fake news: a combined design of quasi-experiment and group discussions. Societies 10(3), 71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/soc10030071

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Communication Department, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, 012244, Bucharest, Romania

    Elena-Alexandra Dumitru & Loredana Ivan

  2. Utrecht University School of Governance, 3511 ZC, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Eugène Loos

Authors
  1. Elena-Alexandra Dumitru
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Loredana Ivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Eugène Loos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elena-Alexandra Dumitru .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Tsinghua University, Beijing, China

    Qin Gao

  2. Chongqing University, Chongqing, China

    Jia Zhou

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Dumitru, EA., Ivan, L., Loos, E. (2022). A Generational Approach to Fight Fake News: In Search of Effective Media Literacy Training and Interventions. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design, Interaction and Technology Acceptance. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_22

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_22

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05580-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05581-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation