Skip to main content

Educational Robots and Their Control Interfaces: How Can We Make Them More Accessible for Special Education?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity (HCII 2022)

Abstract

Existing design standards and guidelines provide guidance on what factors to consider to produce interactive systems that are not only usable, but also accessible. However, these standards are usually general, and when it comes to designing an interactive system for children with Learning Difficulties or Disabilities (LD) and/or Autism Spectrum Conditions (ASC) they are often not specific enough, leading to systems that are not fit for that purpose. If we dive into the area of educational robotics, we face even more issues, in part due to the relative novelty of these technologies. In this paper, we present an analysis of 26 existing educational robots and the interfaces used to control them. Furthermore, we present the results of running focus groups and a questionnaire with 32 educators with expertise in Special Education and parents at four different institutions, to explore potential accessibility issues of existing systems and to identify desirable characteristics. We conclude introducing an initial set of design recommendations, to complement existing design standards and guidelines, that would help with producing future more accessible control interfaces for educational robots, with an especial focus on helping pupils with LDs and/or ASC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.softbankrobotics.com/emea/en/nao.

  2. 2.

    https://www.ez-robot.com/learn-robotics-getting-started-humanoid-robot-kit.html.

  3. 3.

    https://uk.makewonder.com/dash/.

  4. 4.

    https://sphero.com/collections/all/products/sphero-sprk-plus.

References

  1. Adams, C., Campbell, A., Montgomery, R., Cooper, M., Kirkpatrick, A.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.2, W3C Working Draft (May 2021). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG22/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022

  2. Andruseac, G.G., Adochiei, R.I., Păsărică, A., Adochiei, F., Corciovă, C., Costin, H.: Training program for dyslexic children using educational robotics. In: 2015 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB), pp. 1–4 (November 2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB.2015.7391547

  3. Angel-Fernandez, J.M., Vincze, M.: Towards a formal definition of educational robotics. In: Proceedings of the Austrian Robotics Workshop 2018, pp. 37–42. Innsbruck University Press (July 2018). https://doi.org/10.15203/3187-22-1-08

  4. Armesto, L., Fuentes-Durá, P., Perry, D.: Low-cost printable robots in education. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 81(1), 5–24 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-015-0199-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Barakova, E.I., Bajracharya, P., Willemsen, M., Lourens, T., Huskens, B.: Long-term LEGO therapy with humanoid robot for children with ASD. Expert Syst. 32(6), 698–709 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Braun, V., Clarke, V.: Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual. Res. Psychol. 3(2), 77–101 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 112: Principles for the presentation of information (iso 9241-112:2017). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 161: Guidance on visual user-interface elements (iso 9241-161:2016). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ergonomics of human- system interaction - part 171: Guidance on software accessibility (iso 9241-171:2008). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems (iso 9241-210:2010). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 420: Selection of physical input devices (iso 9241-420:2011). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ergonomics of human-system interaction part 920: Guidance on tactile and haptic interactions (iso 9241-920:2009). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  13. Information technology - user interface component accessibility - part 23: Visual presentation of audio information (including captions and subtitles) (iso/iec 20071-23:2018). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  14. Cruz, A.M., Rincon, A.M.R., Duenas, W.R.R., Torres, D.A.Q., Bohorquez-Heredia, A.F.: What does the literature say about using robots on children with disabilities? Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 12(5), 429–440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2017.131830. pMID: 28440095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Galvez Trigo, M.J., Standen, P.J., Cobb, S.V.G.: Robots in special education: reasons for low uptake. J. Enabling Technol. 13(2), 59–69 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/JET-12-2018-0070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Game Developers Conference: State of the Game Industry 2022 (January 2022). https://reg.gdconf.com/LP=3493. Accessed 10 Feb 2022

  17. van den Heuvel, R.J.F., Lexis, M.A.S., Gelderblom, G.J., Jansens, R.M.L., de Witte, L.P.: Robots and ICT to support play in children with severe physical disabilities: a systematic review. Disabil. Rehabil.: Assist. Technol. 11(2), 103–116 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Software ergonomics for multimedia user interfaces - part 2: Multimedia navigation and control (iso 14915-2:2003). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kay, J.S., Moss, J.G.: Using robots to teach programming to k-12 teachers. In: 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, pp. 1–6 (October 2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2012.6462375

  20. Kirkpatrick, A., Connor, J.O., Campbell, A., Cooper, M.: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, W3C Recommendation (June 2018). https://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG21/. Accessed 10 Feb 2022

  21. Knight, V.F., Wright, J., Wilson, K., Hooper, A.: Teaching digital, block-based coding of robots to high school students with autism spectrum disorder and challenging behavior. J. Autism Dev. Disord. 49(8), 3113–3126 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04033-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lees, D., Lepage, P.: Robots in education: the current state of the art. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 24(4), 299–320 (1996). https://doi.org/10.2190/39YJ-CHWF-NBL8-3WA4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nielsen, J., Mack, R.L. (eds.): Usability Inspection Methods. Wiley, New York (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Papert, S.: Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books Inc., New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 100: Introduction to standards related to software ergonomics (iso/tr 9241-100:2011). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 411: Evaluation methods for the design of physical input devices (iso/ts 9241-411:2014). Standard, International Organization for Standardization

    Google Scholar 

  27. Qbilat, M., Iglesias, A.: Accessibility guidelines for tactile displays in human-robot interaction. A comparative study and proposal. In: Miesenberger, K., Kouroupetroglou, G. (eds.) ICCHP 2018, Part II. LNCS, vol. 10897, pp. 217–220. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94274-2_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Qbilat, M., Iglesias, A., Belpaeme, T.: A proposal of accessibility guidelines for human-robot interaction. Electronics 10(5), 561 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics10050561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roscoe, J., et al.: Engaging students with profound and multiple disabilities using humanoid robots. In: Stephanidis, C., Antona, M. (eds.) UAHCI 2014, Part II. LNCS, vol. 8514, pp. 419–430. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07440-5_39

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  30. Wood, L.J., Robins, B., Lakatos, G., Syrdal, D.S., Zaraki, A., Dautenhahn, K.: Developing a protocol and experimental setup for using a humanoid robot to assist children with autism to develop visual perspective taking skills. Paladyn, J. Behav. Robot. 10(1), 167–179 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1515/pjbr-2019-0013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Jose Galvez Trigo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Galvez Trigo, M.J., Standen, P.J., Cobb, S.V.G. (2022). Educational Robots and Their Control Interfaces: How Can We Make Them More Accessible for Special Education?. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. User and Context Diversity. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13309. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05039-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05038-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05039-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics