Abstract
Standards, guidelines and many support resources to help developers create accessible websites and applications are widely available. Yet, the majority of web content available on the Internet still exhibits critical accessibility issues.
While some factors leading to this situation (such as a general lack of interest by stakeholders) cannot be controlled, we argue that there is room for improvements to the current situation from a technical point of view. In fact, we argue that:
-
Creating truly accessible content still requires highly specialized knowledge often unavailable among web developers and content authors.
-
Existing tools do little or nothing to let non-disabled people perceive accessibility issues in their code and their impact on people with disabilities.
-
Accessibility is not enforced at the implementation level by existing web technologies and user agents.
Therefore, we propose a threefold approach to rethink web accessibility from the ground up, creating:
-
Saharian, an innovative manual testing tool that can map accessibility issues to concepts that developers are already familiar with.
-
AX, a declarative framework of web components capable of enforcing the generation of accessible markup as much as possible.
-
A11A, a categorized, structured repository of accessibility-related resources currently available on the Internet.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allan, J., Patch, K., Lowney, G., Spellman, J.F.: User Agent Accessibility Guidelines (UAAG) 2.0. W3C note, W3C, December 2015. https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-UAAG20-20151215/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Australian Government Federal Register of Legislation: Disability Discrimination Act (1992). https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2018C00125. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Baule, S.M.: Evaluating the accessibility of special education cooperative websites for individuals with disabilities. TechTrends 64(1), 50–56 (2020)
Camera dei deputati e Senato della Repubblica Italiana: Disposizioni per favorire l’accesso dei soggetti disabili agli strumenti informatici, January 2004. https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2004/01/17/004G0015/sg. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Campbell, A., Cooper, M., Kirkpatrick, A., Connor, J.O.: Web content accessibility guidelines (WCAG) 2.1. W3C recommendation, W3C, June 2018. https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-WCAG21-20180605/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Champbell, A., Cooper, M., Kirkpatrick, A.: Techniques for WCAG 2.1. W3C note, W3C, July 2020. https://www.w3.org/WAI/WCAG21/Techniques/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: European Disability Strategy 2010–2020: A Renewed Commitment to a Barrier-Free Europe, November 2010. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:0636:FIN:en:PDF. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Union of Equality: Strategy for the Rights of Persons with Disabilities 2021–2030, March 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2021%3A101%3AFIN. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Craig, J., Cooper, M., McCarron, S., Schwerdtfeger, R., Diggs, J.: Accessible Rich Internet Applications (WAI-ARIA) 1.1. W3C recommendation, W3C, December 2017. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-wai-aria-1.1-20171214/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Deque Systems, I.: Deque Systems: Web Accessibility Software, Services & Training, November 2021. https://www.deque.com. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Deque Systems, INC.: Axe: accessibility testing for development teams, October 2020. https://www.deque.com/axe/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Diggs, J., Cooper, M., Garaventa, B.: Accessible Name and Description Computation 1.1. W3C recommendation, W3C, December 2018. https://www.w3.org/TR/2018/REC-accname-1.1-20181218/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
European Commission: Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations and Administrative Provisions of the Member States as Regards the Accessibility Requirements for Products and Services, December 2015. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52015PC0615. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
European Parliament and Council of the European Union: Directive (EU) 2016/2102 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 October 2016 on the accessibility of the websites and mobile applications of public sector bodies, October 2016. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32016L2102&qid=1644420047022. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Ferri, D., Favalli, S.: Web accessibility for people with disabilities in the European union: paving the road to social inclusion. Societies 8(2), 40 (2018)
Gay, G., Li, C.Q.: AChecker: open, interactive, customizable, web accessibility checking. In: Proceedings of the 2010 International Cross Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility (W4A), pp. 1–2 (2010)
Glazkov, D., Ito, H.: Introduction to web components. W3C note, W3C, July 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/NOTE-components-intro-20140724/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Google, INC.: Lighthouse - Tools for Web Developers, October 2020. https://developers.google.com/web/tools/lighthouse. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Government of Canada: Standard on Web Accessibility, August 2011. https://www.tbs-sct.gc.ca/pol/doc-eng.aspx?id=23601. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Hanson, V.L., Richards, J.T.: Progress on website accessibility? ACM Trans. Web (TWEB) 7(1), 1–30 (2013)
Henka, A., Zimmermann, G.: Persona based accessibility testing. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) HCI 2014. CCIS, vol. 435, pp. 226–231. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07854-0_40
LLC., T.: tenon.io (2017). https://tenon.io. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Michael Cooper, J.O.C., Kirkpatrick, A.: Understanding WCAG 2.1. W3C note, World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), October 2016. https://www.w3.org/TR/2016/NOTE-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20161007/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Web Accessibility in Mind: United States Law: Overview of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (2013). http://webaim.org/articles/laws/usa/rehab. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Web Accessibility in Mind: The WebAIM Million - an annual accessibility analysis of the top 1,000,000 home pages (2021). https://webaim.org/projects/million/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Web Accessibility in Mind: WebAIM —Homepage, November 2021. https://webaim.org. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Parliament of the United Kingdom: Equality Act 2010 (2010). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/15/contents. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Richards, J., Spellman, J.F., Treviranus, J.: Authoring Tool Accessibility Guidelines (ATAG) 2.0. W3C recommendation, W3C, September 2015. https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/REC-ATAG20-20150924/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Rubano, V.: A11A - All About Accessibility, November 2021. https://a11a.disi.unibo.it. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Rubano, V., Vitali, F.: Making accessibility accessible: strategy and tools. In: 2021 IEEE 18th Annual Consumer Communications & Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2021)
Scheuhammer, J., Snow-Weaver, A., Diggs, J., Cooper, M., Leventhal, A., Schwerdtfeger, R.: Core Accessibility API Mappings 1.1. W3C recommendation, W3C, December 2017. https://www.w3.org/TR/2017/REC-core-aam-1.1-20171214/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Schwerdtfeger, R., et al.: WAI-ARIA Authoring Practices 1.1. W3C note, W3C, August 2019. https://www.w3.org/TR/2019/NOTE-wai-aria-practices-1.1-20190814/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Shaheen, N.L., Lazar, J.: K-12 technology accessibility: the message from state governments. J. Spec. Educ. Technol. 33(2), 83–97 (2018)
Sik-Lanyi, C., Orbán-Mihálykó, É.: Accessibility testing of European health-related websites. Arab. J. Sci. Eng. 44(11), 9171–9190 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-019-04017-z
Smith, J., Whiting, J.: WAVE - Web Accessibility Evaluation tool (2016). https://wave.webaim.org/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Spellman, J.F., Richards, J., Treviranus, J.: Implementing ATAG 2.0. W3C note, W3C, September 2015. https://www.w3.org/TR/2015/NOTE-IMPLEMENTING-ATAG20-20150924/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
United Nations: Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, December 2006. https://www.un.org/development/desa/disabilities/convention-on-the-rights-of-persons-with-disabilities.html. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
United Nations Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities - Office for Civil Rights: Your rights under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act (2006). https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ocr/civilrights/resources/factsheets/504.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
United States Congress: Rehabilitation Act of 1973, September 1973. https://www.eeoc.gov/rehabilitation-act-1973-original-text. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
US Congress: Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990. Public Law 101–336, 26 July 1990. https://beta.ada.gov/law-and-regs/ada/. Accessed 8 Feb 2022
Vigo, M., Brown, J., Conway, V.: Benchmarking web accessibility evaluation tools: measuring the harm of sole reliance on automated tests. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Cross-Disciplinary Conference on Web Accessibility, pp. 1–10 (2013)
Yang, Y.T., Chen, B.: Web accessibility for older adults: a comparative analysis of disability laws. Gerontologist 55(5), 854–864 (2015)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Rubano, V., Vitali, F., Lengua, C. (2022). Tools for an Innovative Approach to Web Accessibility. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Novel Design Approaches and Technologies. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13308. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05028-2_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05028-2_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05027-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05028-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)