Skip to main content

Wild, Weedy and Domesticated Plants for Food Security and Sovereignty

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Ethnobotany of the Mountain Regions of Mexico

Abstract

Archaeological studies have revealed that humans have inhabited the territory that today is Mexico for more than 20,000 years, while ethnobotanical research has identified that these peoples have made use of nearly 8,000 plant species, according to current information. More than 2,000 species are edible plants, that were and are included in their diet together with animals, mushrooms and a diverse microbiota responsible of fermentation of plant and animal substrates. Most edible species were and are obtained through gathering, hundreds of species have been managed in forests and anthropogenic areas to ensure their availability and a small fraction (nearly 250 species) became fully domesticated crops, managed in production systems that started practicing more than 10,000 years ago. Gathering and food production have coexisted for thousands of years, and crops have progressively displaced wild and weedy plants as main components of diet, but these plants are still important components of traditional food, especially in rural areas. This chapter gathers information from different regions and human cultures of Mexico that our research group has studied. It is directed to evaluate how important are wild and weedy products in human diet at present, how they are used and managed, and what role they play in food sovereignty in rural contexts. Information from 19 communities and regional markets among the Mixtec, Nahua, Mazahua, Rarámuri, Cuicatec, Ixcatec, Popoloca, and mestizo people was analyzed in La Montaña of Guerrero, the Sierra Tarahumara, the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, and the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Biosphere Reserve. In each community we carried out inventories of plants and other organisms used as food. The amounts of wild and weedy organisms consumed throughout the year were evaluated and compared with the food provided by the principal components of diet obtained from local production systems and/or interchanged in markets. We found that the proportion of wild and weedy plants that forms part of the annual diet may vary from 6.4% in mestizo communities of the Tehuacan Valley to nearly 21.9% in the Rarámuri community of Cuiteco in the Sierra Tarahumara, northern Mexico. The weight of wild and weedy plants in diet is not necessarily related to the diversity of products that are available; for example, the diversity of edible plants is higher in the Tehuacan Valley than in the Sierra Tarahumara. It is seemingly more related to human culture since, in general, the indigenous communities and households studied consume higher amounts of wild and weedy food than the mestizo communities and households. In some cases, it is also related to the level of deficit in the production of staple products through agriculture, which was recorded in all households sampled. Wild and weedy food importantly complement the edible biomass that the production systems are unable to cover; in addition, in all cases studied the highest consumption of wild and weedy products occurred during the period of greater scarcity of products from agriculture. The complementarity of products obtained through gathering is therefore clear in all cases analyzed. But, as mentioned, the cultural aspects were also relevant. Consuming wild and weedy products is associated to the indigenous people diet. In some cases, it is a motive of proud and is an element of cultural identity, in some others it is motive of discrimination. It is imperative to recognize that wild and weedy products complement the diet in biomass and nutriments, thus contributing to food security. But in addition, these edible products are part of a culinary culture and therefore important pieces of food sovereignty. In some areas, these products are being displaced by industrialized food of poor nutrimental quality but that, for some sectors of the population, have higher prestige. Therefore, promoting the cultural value of native food may be a way to combat the consumption of harmful industrialized food, maintaining culinary culture and enhancing food sovereignty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abad-Fitz I, Maldonado-Almanza B, Aguilar-Dorantes K, Gómez-Caudillo L, Casas A, Blancas J, Beltrán-Rodríguez L, Sierra-Huelsz JA, Cristians-Nizawa S, Moreno-Calles AI, García-Rodríguez Y, Espinosa-García F, Sánchez-Méndez L. Consequences of traditional management in the production and quality of copal resin (Bursera bipinnata (Moc. & Sessé ex DC.) Engl.) in Mexico. Forests. 2020;11(9):991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguirre-Dugua X, González A, Eguiarte L, Casas A. Large and round: morphological and genetic consequences of artificial selection on the gourd tree Crescentia cujete by the Maya from the Yucatán Peninsula, Mexico. Ann Bot. 2012;109(7):1307–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ardelean CF, Becerra-Valdivia L, Pedersen MW, Schwenninger JL, Oviatt CG, Macías-Quintero JI, Arroyo-Cabrales J, Sikora M, Ocampo-Díaz YZE, Rubio-Cisneros II, Watling JG, Medeiros VB, Oliveira PE, Barba-Pingarón J, Ortiz-Butrón A, Blancas-Vázquez J, Rivera-González I, Solís-Rosales C, Rodríguez-Ceja M, Gandy DA, Navarro-Gutierrez Z, De La Rosa-Díaz JJ, Huerta-Arellano V, Marroquín-Fernández MB, Martínez-Riojas LM, López-Jiménez A, Higham T, Willerslev E. Evidence of human occupation in Mexico around the Last Glacial Maximum. Nature. 2020;584:87–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arellanes Y, Casas A, Arellanes-Meixueiro A, Vega E, Blancas J, Vallejo M, Torres I, Solís L, Pérez-Negrón E. Influence of traditional markets and interchange on plant management in the Tehuacán Valley. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:38.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano E, Casas A. Morphological variation and domestication of Escontria chiotilla (Cactaceae) under silvicultural management in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2003;50(4):439–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancas J, Casas A, Lira R, Caballero J. Traditional management and morphological patterns of Myrtillocactus schenckii (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico. Econ Bot. 2009;63(4):375–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancas J, Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Torres I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Moreno AI, Delgado A, Parra F, Arellanes Y, Caballero J, Cortés L, Lira R, Dávila P. Plant management in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley. Econ Bot. 2010;64(4):287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blancas J, Casas A, Pérez-Salicrup D, Caballero J, Vega E. Ecological and sociocultural factors influencing plant management in Náhuatl communities of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2013;9:39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Boege E. El patrimonio biocultural de los pueblos indígenas de México: hacia la conservación in situ de la biodiversidad y agrodiversidad en los territorios indígenas. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Comisión Nacional para el Desarrollo de Pueblos Indígenas; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boege E. El reto de la conservación de la biodiversidad en los territorios de los pueblos indígenas. In: Capital natural de México (Vol. II): Estado de conservación y tendencias de cambio. Mexico City: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO); 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero J, Cortés L. Percepción, uso y manejo tradicional de los recursos vegtales en Mexico. In: Rendón-Aguilar B, Rebollar-Domínguez S, Caballero J, Martínez-Alfaro MA, editors. Plantas, cultura y sociedad. Estudios sobre la relación entre seres humanos y plantas en los albores del siglo XXI. México City: Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Secretaría del Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca; 2001. p. 79–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caballero J, Casas A, Cortés L, Mapes C. Patrones en el conocimiento, uso y manejo de plantas en pueblos indígenas de México. Estudios Atacameños. 1998;16:181–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera J, Casas A, Rojas MC, Viveros JL. Alimentos en la Naturaleza. Algunas plantas comestibles, silvestres, arvenses y ruderales. Mexico City: Secretaría del Medio Ambiente Recursos Naturales y Pesca; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callen EO. Analysis of the Tehuacan coprolites. In: The prheistory of the Tehuacan Valley, Volume one, environment and subsistence pp. 261–289, Byers DS (ed.), University of Texas Press, Austin. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camou-Guerrero A, Reyes-García V, Martínez-Ramos M, Casas A. Knowledge and use value of plant species in a Raramuri community: a gender perspective. Hum Ecol. 2008;36:259–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J. Traditional management and morphological variation in Leucaena esculenta (Moc. et Sessé ex A.DC.) Benth. in the Mixtec region of Guerrero, Mexico. Econ Bot. 1996;50(2):167–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Etnobotánica mixteca: sociedad, cultura y recursos naturales en la Montaña de Guerrero. México City: Instituto Nacional Indigenista-Consejo Nacional para la Cultura y las Artes (CONACULTA) Mexico City, Mexico; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Vázquez MC, Viveros JL, Caballero J. Plant management among the Nahua and the Mixtec of the Balsas River basin: an ethnobotanical approach to the study of plant domestication. Hum Ecol. 1996;24(4):455–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Mapes C, Zárate S. Manejo de la vegetación, domesticación de plantas y origen de la agricultura en Mesoamérica. Bol Soc Bot México. 1997;61:31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Caballero J, Valiente-Banuet A, Soriano JA, Dávila P. Morphological variation and the process of domestication of Stenocereus stellatus (Cactaceae) in Central Mexico. Am J Bot. 1999;86(4):522–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Valiente-Banuet A, Viveros JL, Dávila P, Lira R, Caballero J, Cortés L, Rodríguez I. Plant resources of the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2001;55(1):129–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Otero-Arnaiz A, Pérez-Negrón E, Valiente-Banuet A. In situ management and domestication of plants in Mesoamerica. Ann Bot. 2007;100(5):1101–15.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Rangel-Landa S, Torres-García I, Pérez-Negrón E, Solís L, Parra F, Delgado A, Blancas J, Farfán B, Moreno AI. In situ management and conservation of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico: an ethnobotanical and ecological approach. In: Albuquerque UP, Alves-Ramos M, editors. Current topics in ethnobotany. Kerala: Research Signpost; 2008. p. 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Torres-Guevara J, Parra F. Domesticación en el continente americano. Volumen 1. Manejo de biodiversidad y evolución dirigida por las culturas del Nuevo Mundo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Lima, Perú. 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casas A, Torres-Guevara J, Parra F. Domesticación en el continente americano. Volumen 2. Perspectivas de investigación y manejo sustentable de recursos genéticos en el Nuevo Mundo. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina. Morelia, Michoacán, México. 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clement CR, Casas A, Parra-Rondinel FA, Levis C, Peroni N, Hanazaki N, Cortés-Zárraga L, Rangel-Landa S, Alves RP, Ferreira MJ, Cassino MF, Coelho SD, Cruz-Soriano A, Pancorbo-Olivera M, Blancas J, Martínez-Ballesté A, Lemes G, Lotero-Velásquez E, Bertin VM, Mazzochini GG. Disentangling domestication from food production systems in the Neotropics. Quaternay. 2021;4(1):4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corona E, Casas A, Argueta-Villamar A, Alvarado-León CI. La domesticación de especies y paisajes en México. In: Bali J, editor. México. Grandeza y diversidad. Mexico City: Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia (INAH); 2021. p. 78–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz M, Casas A. Reproductive biology and morphological variation of Polaskia chende (Cactaceae) under domestication in Central Mexico. J Arid Environ. 2002;51:561–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dávila P, Arizmendi MC, Valiente-Banuet A, Villaseñor JL, Casas A, Lira R. Biological diversity in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico. Biodivers Conserv. 2002;11:421–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echeverría Y. Ecología de los recursos vegetales en una comunidad Mixteca del Valle de Tehuacán. Bachelor thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Morelia; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán Heredia B. Ecología de los recursos vegetales en una comunidad Mazahua de la reserva de la Mariposa Monarca, Michoacán. Bachelor thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Morelia; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán-Heredia B. Guía didáctica para la identificación de hongos silvestres del oriente de Michoacán. Michoacán: Editorial Universidad Intercultural Indígena de Michoacán/ELIFAR Grupo especializado en proyectos ambientales S.C; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farfán-Heredia B, Casas A, Ibarra G, Pérez-Negrón E. Mazahua ethnobotany and people subsistence in the Monarch Butterfly Biosphere Reserve, Mexico. Econ Bot. 2007;61(2):173–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV. The vertebrate fauna and hunting patterns. In: The prhistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Volume one, environment and subsistence, pp. 132–177, Byers DS (ed.). University of Texas Press, Austin. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flannery KV. Guilá Naquitz. New York: Academic; 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández-Corchado R. Proletarianization and dispossession of Mixtec workers: roots of indigenous migration to New York. Íconos Rev Ciencias Soc. 2019;63:19–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • INEGI Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía. Censos y Conteos de Población y Vivienda. Series históricas. Consulted in https://www.inegi.org.mx/datos/?ps=Programas. 30 Mar 2021.

  • Instituto Nacional de Pueblos Indígenas de México (INPI). Indicadores Socioeconómicos de los Pueblos Indígenas de México. https://www.gob.mx/inpi/articulos/indicadores-socioeconomicos-de-los-pueblos-indigenas-de-mexico-2015-116128. Mexico City; 2015.

  • MacNeish RS. A summary of the subsistence. In: Byers D, editor. The prehistory of the Tehuacan Valley. Environment and subsistence. Austin: University of Texas Press; 1967. p. 290–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacNeish RS. The origins of agriculture and settled life. New York: Oklahoma University Press; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mapes C, Basurto F. Biodiversity and edible plants of Mexico. In: Lira R, Casas A, Blancas J, editors. Ethobotany of Mexico. New York: Springer; 2016. p. 83–132.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Morales-Hernández R. Análisis regional de la marginación en el estado de Guerrero, México. Papeles de Población. 2015;84:251–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olvera Espinosa A. ¡Que viva el quelite! ¡Mayolliti in kilitl! Recetario de quelites de Coyomeapan, Puebla. Bachelor thesis. Environmental Sciences Programme, UNAM, Morelia; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero-Arnaiz A, Casas A, Hamrick JL, Cruse J. Genetic variation and evolution of Polaskia chichipe (Cactaceae) under domestication in the Tehuacán Valley, Central Mexico analyzed by microsatellite polymorphism. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(6):1603–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paredes-Flores M, Lira Saade R, Dávila-Aranda PD. Estudio etnobotánico de Zapotitlán Salinas, Puebla. Acta Bot Mex. 2007;79:13–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parra F, Casas A, Peñaloza-Ramírez JM, Cortés-Palomec AC, Rocha-Ramírez V, González-Rodríguez A. Evolution under domestication: ongoing artificial selection and divergence of wild and managed Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) populations in the Tehuacán Valley, Mexico. Ann Bot. 2010;106:483–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Parra F, Blancas J, Casas A. Landscape management and domestication of Stenocereus pruinosus (Cactaceae) in the Tehuacán Valley: human guided selection and gene flow. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012;8:32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Negrón E, Casas A. Use, extraction rates and spatial availability of plant resources in the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley, Mexico: the case of Quiotepec, Oaxaca. J Arid Environ. 2007;70(2):356–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Landa S, Lemus-Fernández R. Aspectos etnobotánicos y ecológicos de los recursos vegetales entre los Ixcatecos de Santa María Ixcatlán, Oaxaca. Bachelor thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Morelia; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Landa S, Casas A, Rivera-Lozoya E, Torres I, Vallejo M. Ixcatec ethnoecology: biocultural principles of plant management in Oaxaca, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2016;12:30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rangel-Landa S, Casas A, García-Frapolli E, Lira R. Socio- cultural and ecological factors influencing plants management: comparing edible, medicinal and ceremonial plants in Santa María Ixcatlán, Oaxaca, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2017;13:59.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Smith B. Reassessing Coxcatlan Cave and the early history of domesticated plants in Mesoamerica. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2005;102(27):9438–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Solís L. Etnoecología cuicateca en San Lorenzo Pápalo, Oaxaca. Master thesis. Postgraduate in Biological Sciences, UNAM, Morelia; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solís L, Casas A. Cuicatec ethnozoology: traditional knowledge, use and management of fauna by people of San Lorenzo Pápalo, Oaxaca, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2019;15:58.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM. Biocultural diversity and local power in Mexico. In: Maffi L, editor. On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge and the environment. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press; 2001a. p. 472–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM. Indigenous peoples and biodiversity. In: Levin SA, editor. Encyclopedia of biodiversity. San Diego: Academic; 2001b. p. 451–63.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Ordóñez MJ. The biodiversity of Mexico: a review of terrestrial habitats. In: Ramamoorthy TP, Bye R, Lot A, Fa J, editors. Biological diversity of Mexico. Origins and distribution. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1993. p. 757–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toledo VM, Boege E, Barrera-Bassols N. The biocultural heritage of Mexico: an overview. Landscape. 2010;2(6):7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres I. Aspectos Etnobotánicos y Ecológicos de los Recursos Vegetales en la comunidad de San Luis Atolotitlán, Municipio de Caltepec, Puebla, México. Bachelor thesis, Universidad Michoacana de San Nicolás de Hidalgo. Morelia; 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres I, Blancas J, León A, Casas A. TEK, local perceptions of risk, and diversity of management practices of Agave inaequidens in Michoacán, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2015;11:61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal O, Brusca RC. Mexico’s biocultural diversity in peril. Rev Biol Trop. 2020;68(2):669–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viveros JL, Casas A, Caballero J. Las plantas comestibles y la alimentación entre los mixtecos guerrerenses. In: Leff E, Carabias J, editors. La dimensión cultural del desarrollo sustentable. Mexico City: Centro de Investigaciones Interdisciplinarias en Humanidades, U.N.A.M-Porrúa Editores Mexico City, Mexico.; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarazúa-Carbajal M, Chávez-Gutiérrez M, Romero-Bautista Y, Rangel-Landa S, Moreno-Calles AI, Alvarado-Ramos F, Blancas-Vázquez J, del Val de Gortari E, Arizmendi MC, Casas A. Use and management of wild fauna by peoples of the Tehuacán-Cuicatlán Valley and the surrounding areas, Mexico. J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2020;16(4):1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. Origin of agriculture and plant domestication in West Mesoamerica. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2010;57:813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zizumbo-Villarreal D, Colunga-GarcíaMarín P. La milpa del occidente de Mesoamérica: profundidad histórica, dinámica evolutiva y rutas de dispersión a Suramérica. Rev Geogr Agrícola. 2017;58:33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología (CONACYT research project A1-S-14306), Mexico, the Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico (DGAPA, UNAM, research project IN206520, IN224023), and the Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad (CONABIO/GEF/FAO, research project RG023, GEF project ID 9380 770) for financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandro Casas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Casas, A., Farfán-Heredia, B., Camou-Guerrero, A., Torres-García, I., Blancas Vázquez, J.J., Rangel-Landa, S. (2023). Wild, Weedy and Domesticated Plants for Food Security and Sovereignty. In: Casas, A., Blancas Vázquez, J.J. (eds) Ethnobotany of the Mountain Regions of Mexico. Ethnobotany of Mountain Regions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99357-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics