Abstract
In today’s dynamic digitalization environment, companies must continually seek to make improvements while still retaining their current position. This requires the use of new sustainable models that will ensure design efforts, addresses customer and societal needs during the entire product lifecycle phases (PLC). To succeed in improvements Design for X (DFX) requires addressing these issues across multiple factors X’s that generates value for each stakeholder in the value chain. However, a variety of DFX techniques have been developed which makes the practitioners and researchers facing great difficulty to decide which techniques to use in which PLC phase to ensure which business strategy. In this respect, the aim of this paper is first to present a review of the most used and applicable DFX techniques to the sustainability dimension and PLC phases. Then, to define the hierarchical structure of the relationships among the identified DFX techniques and to analyze the characteristics power of each one, “interpretive structural modeling” (ISM) and MICMAC are implemented. The proposed framework would be useful for academics and practitioners because it demonstrates the interrelationships of DFX techniques and also offers an additional viewpoint for handling these techniques using the integrated ISM-MICMAC approach. The major implications and limitations are discussed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., Benghabrit, Y.: Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) for supply chain 4.0 risks management. In: Masrour, T., Cherrafi, A., El Hassani, I. (eds.) A2IA 2020. AISC, vol. 1193, pp. 89–102. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51186-9_7
Zekhnini, K., Cherrafi, A., Bouhaddou, I., et al.: Supply chain management 4.0: a literature review and research framework. Benchmarking: Int. J. (2020)
Benabdellah, A.C., Benghabrit, A., Bouhaddou, I., Benghabrit, O.: Design for relevance concurrent engineering approach: integration of IATF 16949 requirements and design for X techniques. Res. Eng. Design 31(3), 323–351 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00163-020-00339-4
Ahmad, S., Wong, K.Y., Tseng, M.L., Wong, W.P.: Sustainable product design and development: a review of tools, applications and research prospects. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 132, 49–61 (2018)
Benabdellah, A.C., Benghabrit, A., Bouhaddou, I.: Complexity drivers in engineering design. J. Eng. Des. Technol. (2020)
Arnette, A.N., Brewer, B.L., Choal, T.: Design For Sustainability (DFS): the intersection of supply chain and environment. J. Clean. Prod. 83, 374–390 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.021
Benabdellah, A.C., Bouhaddou, I., Benghabrit, A., Benghabrit, O.: A systematic review of design for X techniques from 1980 to 2018: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 102(9–12), 3473–3502 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-019-03418-6
Kuo, T.-C., Huang, S.H., Zhang, H.-C.: Design for manufacture and design for ‘X’: concepts, applications, and perspectives. Comput. Ind. Eng. 41, 241–260 (2001)
Bashir, H., Ojiako, U.: An integrated ISM-MICMAC approach for modelling and analysing dependencies among engineering parameters in the early design phase. J. Eng. Des. 31, 461–483 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2020.1817347
Movahedipour, M., Zeng, J., Yang, M., Wu, X.: An ISM approach for the barrier analysis in implementing sustainable supply chain management: an empirical study. MD 55, 1824–1850 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-12-2016-0898
Benabdellah, A.C., Bouhaddou, I., Benghabrit, A.: Holonic multi-agent system for modeling complexity structures of product development process. In: 2019 4th World Conference on Complex Systems (WCCS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2019)
Bouhaddou, I., Benabdelhafid, A., Ouzizi, L., Benghabrit, Y.: PLM (Product Lifecycle Management) model for supply chain optimization. In: Rivest, L., Bouras, A., Louhichi, B. (eds.) PLM 2012. IAICT, vol. 388, pp. 134–146. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35758-9_12
Li, Y., Wan, L., Xiong, T.: Product data model for PLM system. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 55, 1149–1158 (2011)
Herstatt, C., Verworn, B.: Innovation process models and their evolution. In: Bringing Technology and Innovation into the Boardroom, pp. 326–346. Springer, Cham (2004).https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230512771_15
López-Mesa, B., Thompson, G.: On the significance of cognitive style and the selection of appropriate design methods. J. Eng. Des. 17, 371–386 (2006)
Chiu, M.-C., Okudan, G.E.: Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: a literature review. In: Volume 6: 15th Design for Manufacturing and the Lifecycle Conference; 7th Symposium on International Design and Design Education, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, pp. 171–182. ASMEDC (2010)
Sy, M., Mascle, C.: Product design analysis based on life cycle features. J. Eng. Des. 22, 387–406 (2011)
Seroka-Stolka, O.: The development of green logistics for implementation sustainable development strategy in companies. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 151, 302–309 (2014)
Tran, H.D., Tran, N.D., Pham, T.N.: Design For Maintainability - DFM. Sci. Technol. Dev. J. 12, 14–24 (2009). https://doi.org/10.32508/stdj.v12i5.2240
Fiksel, J., Wapman, K.: How to design for environment and minimize life cycle cost. In: Proceedings of 1994 IEEE International Symposium on Electronics and the Environment, San Francisco, CA, USA, pp. 75–80. IEEE (1994)
Hatcher, G.D., Ijomah, W.L., Windmill, J.F.C.: Design for remanufacture: a literature review and future research needs. J. Clean. Prod. 19, 2004–2014 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.06.019
Li, B., Wang, Y., Wang, Z.: Managing a closed-loop supply chain with take-back legislation and consumer preference for green design. J. Clean. Prod. 282, 124481 (2021)
Kwak, M.: Green profit design for lifecycle. PhD thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (2012)
Shen, B., Cao, Y., Xu, X.: Product line design and quality differentiation for green and non-green products in a supply chain. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58, 148–164 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1656843
Raja Ghazilla, R.A., Sakundarini, N., Taha, Z., et al.: Design for environment and design for disassembly practices in Malaysia: a practitioner’s perspectives. J. Clean. Prod. 108, 331–342 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.033
Warfield, J.N.: Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. SMC-4, 81–87 (1974)
Attri, R., Dev, N., Sharma, V.: Interpretive Structural Modelling (ISM) approach: an overview. Res. J. Manage. Sci. 2319, 1171 (2013)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chaouni Benabdellah, A., Zekhnini, K., Bouhaddou, I., Benghabrit, A. (2022). Analysis and Modeling the Intersection of Design for X Techniques, Business Strategies and Product Life-Cycle Management. In: Canciglieri Junior, O., Noël, F., Rivest, L., Bouras, A. (eds) Product Lifecycle Management. Green and Blue Technologies to Support Smart and Sustainable Organizations. PLM 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 639. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94335-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-94335-6_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-94334-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-94335-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
