Skip to main content

Space in Socio-technical Systems: Exploring the Agent-Space Relation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021 (ICCSA 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 12953))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Socio-technical systems (STS) described in literature today rely on multiple and different interaction patterns for their characterization. With the development of multi-agent systems (MAS) and formal interaction languages, the logical modeling of STS has improved. Yet these rich ongoing approaches require perspective changes and new features.

Developing within a research line on spatial urban studies, this paper takes physical space experience as a core perspective in the analysis of STS. Space experience is naturally central in human understanding and acting, and human spatial cognition provides therefore a powerful approach. This study explores the kind of knowledge that is centered on space in STS, and questions whether and how its variety can be managed and formalized.

In particular, the paper explored aspects of the configuration and relationships of the agentive and spatial components of urban environments, from an STS perspective, toward possible MAS-based prototypes of decision support architectures in urban contexts.

The present study was carried out by the authors as a joint research work. Nonetheless, S.Borgo wrote §1, D.Camarda wrote §2 and §4, M.R.Stufano Melone wrote §3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Arrow, K.J.: A difficulty in the concept of social welfare. J. Political Econ. 58, 328–346 (1950)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values. Wiley, New York (1963)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baccini, P., Brunner, P.H.: Metabolism of the Anthroposphere: Analysis, Evaluation Design. MIT Press, Cambridge (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Badham, R., Clegg, C., Wall, T.: Socio-technical theory. In: Handbook of Ergonomics, John Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balke, T., Gilbert, N.: How do agents make decisions? A survey. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17, 13 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Batty, M.: Agents, cells, and cities: new representational models for simulating multiscale urban dynamics. Environ Plan A 37, 1373–1394 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Baxter, G., Sommerville, I.: Socio-technical systems: from design methods to systems engineering. Interact. Comput. 23, 4–17 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Böhme, G.: Atmosphere as the subject matter of architecture. In: Ursprung, P. (ed.) Natural Histories. Lars Müller, Zurich (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Borgo, S.: An ontological view of components and interactions in behaviorally adaptive systems. J. Integr. Des. Process. Sci. 23, 17–35 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgo, S., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Stufano Melone, M.R.: An ontological analysis of cities, smart cities and their components. In: Nagenborg, M., Stone, T., González Woge, M., Vermaas, P.E. (eds.) Technology and the City. PET, vol. 36, pp. 365–387. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-52313-8_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Davoudi, S.: Planning as practice of knowing. Plan. Theory 14, 316–331 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dennett, D.C.: The Intentional Stance. MIT Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Entrikin, J.N.: The Betweenness of Place. Springer, London (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21086-2_2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  14. Etzioni, A.: Mixed-scanning: a “third” approach to decision-making. Public Adm. Rev. 27, 385–392 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferber, J.: Multi-Agent Systems: An Introduction to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. Addison-Wesley, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fono, L.A., Donfack-Kommogne, V., Gabriel Andjiga, N.: Fuzzy arrow-type results without the Pareto principle based on fuzzy pre-orders. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 160, 2658–2672 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Forester, J.: Bounded rationality and the politics of muddling through. Public Adm. Rev. 44, 23–31 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gehrlein, W.V.: Condorcet’s paradox. Theory Decis. 15, 161–197 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Gibilisco, M.B., Gowen, A.M., Albert, K.E., Mordeson, J.N., Wierman, M.J., Clark, T.D.: Arrow and the aggregation of fuzzy preferences. In: Fuzzy Social Choice Theory. SFSC, vol. 315, pp. 53–87. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05176-5_4

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Gray, J.: The epistemology of geometry. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2019). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2019/entries/epistemology-geometry//. Accessed 19 May 2021

  21. Guarino, N., Bottazzi, E., Ferrario, R., Sartor, G.: Open ontology-driven sociotechnical systems: transparency as a key for business resiliency. In: De Marco, M., Te’eni, D., Albano, V., Za, S. (eds.) Information systems: crossroads for organization, management, accounting and engineering, pp. 535–542. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7908-2789-7_58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Le Page, C., Becu, N., Bommel, P., Bousquet, F.: Participatory agent-based simulation for renewable resource management: the role of the Cormas simulation platform to nurture a community of practice. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 15, 10 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindblom, C.E.: The science of “muddling through.” Public Adm. Rev. 19, 79–88 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Locke, J.: An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Penguin Books Limited, London (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Montaner, J.M.: Espacio. In: de Solá-Morales, I. (ed.) Introducción a la arquitectura. Conceptos fundamentales. Universitat Politécnica de Catalunya, Barcelona (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Mordeson, J.N., Clark, T.D.: Fuzzy Arrow’s theorem. New Math. Nat. Comput. 05, 371–383 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Okner, T., Preston, R.: Smart cities and the symbiotic relationship between smart governance and citizen engagement. smart cities: foundations, principles and applications, pp. 344–372 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Oliveira, V.: Urban Morphology: An Introduction to the Study of the Physical Form of Cities. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32083-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Pasini, R.: Landscape Paradigms and Post-urban Spaces: A Journey Through the Regions of Landscape. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77887-7

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Phillips, R.A., Reichart, J.: The environment as a stakeholder? a fairness-based approach. J. Bus. Ethics 23, 185–197 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rabino, G.A.: Processi Decisionali e Territorio nella Simulazione Multi-Agente. Società Editrice Esculapio, Milano (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rossi, A.: The Architecture of the City. MIT Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Saar, M., Palang, H.: The dimensions of place meanings. Living Rev. Landscape Res. 3, 5–24 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Searle, J.R.: Social ontology: some basic principles. Anthropol. Theory. 6, 12–29 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Secchi, B.: La città europea contemporanea e il suo progetto. Territorio. 20, 78–92 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Simon, H.A.: Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-making Processes in Administrative Organization. Macmillan, London (1945)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial. MIT Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stufano, R., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Borgo, S.: Knowledge of places: an ontological analysis of the social level in the city. In: Papa, R., Fistola, R., Gargiulo, C. (eds.) Smart Planning: Sustainability and Mobility in the Age of Change. GET, pp. 3–14. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77682-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Stufano, R., Borri, D., Camarda, D., Borgo, S.: Knowledge of places: an ontological analysis of the social level in the city. In: Gervasi, O., et al. (eds.) Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2017. LNCS, vol. 10407, pp. 687–694. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62401-3_50

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Tavassoli, M.: Form, Space and Design: From the Persian to the European Experience. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15831-6

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Thompson, E.A.: A Pareto optimal group decision process. Pap. Non-Market Decis. Making. 1, 133–140 (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Weiss, G.: Multiagent Systems: A Modern Approach to Distributed Artificial Intelligence. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Weyns, D., Holvoet, T.: Synchronous versus asynchronous collaboration in situated multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wooldridge, M.: An Introduction to Multi-Agent Systems. Wiley, London (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Wooldridge, M.: Reasoning About Rational Agents. MIT Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  46. Zadeh, L.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8, 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Rosaria Stufano Melone .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Melone, M.R.S., Borgo, S., Camarda, D. (2021). Space in Socio-technical Systems: Exploring the Agent-Space Relation. In: Gervasi, O., et al. Computational Science and Its Applications – ICCSA 2021. ICCSA 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12953. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86976-2_33

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86976-2_33

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86975-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86976-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics