Abstract
Smart things are everywhere, from smart watches to smart toys. Children are used to them but they do not know how they are made. Engaging children in the design of smart things can help them learn of them and develop their own. Smart-thing design with children was usually held in person, in informal settings, with a learning by-doing and playful approach, and collaboratively, so as to sustain children’s learning over time. Recently the COVID pandemics has made this type of design with children impossible, e.g., due to physical distancing restrictions. Smart-thing design with children has thus adapted to the mutated settings and moved at a distance. What children can learn when designing at a distance, though, remains an open question. This paper tackles such issue. It reports on at-a-distance design workshops with 20 children, aged 8–16 years old. In this paper, data are processed in relation to children’s learning of smart-thing programming, before and after the workshops. Results indicate that design workshops, held at a distance, can help children learn how to program their own smart thing ideas. A significant positive correlation was also found between age and learning.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Arduino: Arduino (2019). https://www.arduino.cc. Accessed 6 Sept 2019
Bekker, T., Bakker, S., Douma, I., van der Poel, J., Scheltenaar, K.: Teaching children digital literacy through design-based learning with digital toolkits in schools. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 5, 29–38 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2015.12.001
Bonani, A., Gennari, R., Del Fatto, V.: Interactive objects for the scaffolding of graph algorithmic thinking at school - a journey from primary to high school. Ph.D. thesis, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano (2020). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.34628.37760
Foundation, M.E.: micro:bit. (2019). https://microbit.org. Accessed 6 Sept 2019
Gennari, R., Matera, M., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M., Roumelioti, E.: Reflection and awareness in the design process: children ideating, programming and prototyping smart objects. Multimedia Tools Appl. 1–24 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-020-09927-x
Gennari, R., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M., Bonani, A.: Design of IoT tangibles for primary schools: a case study. In: Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter, CHItaly 2017, pp. 26:1–26:6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3125571.3125591
Gorissen, P.: Collaborating on maker education in primary education: iXspace. In: Proceedings of FabLearn Netherlands 2018. Maker Education in the Netherlands – State of Play and Lessons for the Future, pp. 19–25. Creating 010, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (2018). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1413632
Hsu, Y.-C., Baldwin, S., Ching, Y.-H.: Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends 61(6), 589–594 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0172-6
Iversen, O.S., Smith, R.C., Dindler, C.: From computational thinking to computational empowerment: a 21st century PD agenda. In: Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference (PDC), pp. 7:1–7:11 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3210586.3210592
Kalelioglu, F., Sentance, S.: Teaching with physical computing in school: the case of the micro:bit. Educ. Inf. Technol. 25(4), 2577–2603 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10080-8
Kinnula, M., Iivari, N.: Empowered to make a change: guidelines for empowering the young generation in and through digital technology design. In: Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe Conference, pp. 16:1–16:8 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335071
Markopoulos, P., Read, J.C., MacFarlane, S., Hoysniemi, J.: Evaluating Children’s Interactive Products: Principles and Practices for Interaction Designers. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-374111-0.X0001-1
Melonio, A., Rizvi, M., Roumelioti, E., De Angeli, A., Gennari, R., Matera, M.: Children’s beliefs and understanding of smart objects: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI), pp. 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3399715.3399828
Merkouris, A., Chorianopoulos, K., Kameas, A.: Teaching programming in secondary education through embodied computing platforms: robotics and wearables. ACM Trans. Comput. Educ. (TOCE) 17(2), 1–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3025013
Microsoft: MakeCode (2019). https://makecode.microbit.org. Accessed 6 Sept 2019
Pitkänen, K., Iwata, M., Laru, J.: Supporting fab lab facilitators to develop pedagogical practices to improve learning in digital fabrication activities. In: Proceedings of the FabLearn Europe 2019 Conference, pp. 1–9 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3335055.3335061
Puntambekar, S., Kolodner, J.L.: Toward implementing distributed scaffolding: helping students learn science from design. J. Res. Sci. Teach. 42(2), 185–217 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20048
Raspberry-Pi-Foundation: Raspberry Pi Pico (2021). https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-pico/. Accessed 7 May 2021
Roumelioti, E., Gennari, R., Matera, M., Melonio, A., Rizvi, M.: Towards making children independent in design. In: Companion Publication of the ACM Designing Interactive Systems (DIS) Conference, pp. 227–232 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3393914.3395849
Roumen, G.J., Fernaeus, Y.: Envisioning Arduino action: a collaborative tool for physical computing in educational settings. Int. J. Child-Comput. Interact. 100277 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100277
Seraj, M., Katterfeldt, E.S., Autexier, S., Drechsler, R.: Impacts of creating smart everyday objects on young female students’ programming skills and attitudes. In: Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE), pp. 1234–1240 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3328778.3366841
Sunyaev, A.: The internet of things. Internet Computing: Principles of Distributed Systems and Emerging Internet-Based Technologies, pp. 301–337 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34957-8_10
Teknikio: tekniverse (2021). https://tekniverse.teknikio.com. Accessed 19 Apr 2021
Acknowledgments
We thank collaborators from Perlatecnica, Daniela D’Agostino and Rosaria Cianelli, for acting as observers and being actively involved in the workshops, as well as all the participating children and their parents.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Roumelioti, E., Pellegrino, M.A., Gennari, R., D’Angelo, M. (2022). What Children Learn in Smart-Thing Design at a Distance: An Exploratory Investigation. In: De la Prieta, F., et al. Methodologies and Intelligent Systems for Technology Enhanced Learning, 11th International Conference. MIS4TEL 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 326. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-86618-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-86617-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-86618-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)