Abstract
The development of virtual worlds (VWs) in the field of language education evolved from purely text-based environments to two- and eventually three-dimensional spaces. VWs date back to the adventure games and simulations of the 1970s. Unlike traditional classroom settings, which are anchored in brick-and-mortar buildings, VWs give language learners the opportunity to practice languages in simulated, visually rich settings. Collaborative and communicative learning opportunities in VWs, together with the ubiquitous growth of online learning platforms and online degrees, raise questions on the long-term outlook for language teaching and learning in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Although both the Russian Federation and the United States have a multitude of programmes, education degrees and certifications with specific competency requirements for future language teachers and higher education faculty, are there common long-term concerns about domains and respective definitions in technology, multicultural education and language acquisition? To shed light on these questions, the authors analysed US and Russian national missions and second language teaching standards for communication study teacher preparation programmes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agency of Strategic Innovations. n.d. What is University 20.35. https://2035.university/en/. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Association for Educational Communications and Technology. 2018. The definition and terminology committee. https://aect.org/aectnews.php. Accessed 16 Nov 2019
Bradford, Linda. 2012. The viability of virtual worlds in higher education: can creativity thrive outside the traditional classroom environment? 29012 Brigham Young University BYU Scholars Archive. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4238&context=etd. Accessed 29 Nov 2019.
Burlakova, Daria. 2018. Virtual reality has come to school. https://tass.ru/obschestvo/ 5000093. Accessed 3 July 2019.
Dell Technologies. 2019. Research: The gen Z effect. https://www.delltechnologies.com/en-us/perspectives/gen-z.htm. Accessed 18 Nov 2019.
Google. 2016. Gen Z: A look inside its mobile-first mindset. https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/interactive-report/gen-z-a-look-inside-its-mobile-first-mindset/#dive-deeper. Accessed 15 Nov 2019.
Johnson Foundation. 1993. An American imperative: higher expectations for higher education. an open letter to those concerned about the American future. Report of the Wingspread Group on Higher Education. Racine, WI: Johnson Foundation.
Johnston, Ryan. 2018. DeVos: Technology enables educators to ‘rethink’ school. https://edscoop.com/devos-technology-can-allow-educators-to-rethink-school/. Accessed 11 Nov 2019.
Kluckhohn, Florence R., Fred L. Strodtbeck, and John M. Roberts. 1961. Variations in value orientations. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
Levy, Michael. 1997. Computer-assisted language learning: context and conceptualization. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Machado, Christian David Vázquez. n.d. Kinesthetic language learning in virtual reality. https://www.media.mit.edu/posts/kinesthetic-language-learning-in-virtual-reality/. Accessed 10 Nov 2019.
Makeeva, Anna. 2018. Half of universities expelled in Russia. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3540086. Accessed 1 Aug 2019.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education. 2018. The national project ‘education’. https://www.minobrnauki.gov.ru/common/upload/library/2019/07/NP_Obrazovanie.htm. Accessed 1 Aug 2019.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education. 2015. On approval of the federal state standards of higher education in the subject of ‘pedagogy’. http://fgosvo.ru/uploadfiles/fgosvob/440301.pdf. Accessed 12 July 2019.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. 2018a. 5–100 Russian Academic Excellence Projects. https://5top100.ru/en/. Accessed 23 July 2019.
Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation. 2018b. Support universities RF. http://flagshipuniversity.ntf.ru/universities. Accessed 2 July 2019.
Muzafarova, Anna D., Tatiana P. Rasskazova, and Natalya O. Verbitskaya. 2015. Comparative analysis of international standards for teaching a foreign language in the context of competencies of a modern specialist. https://www.science-education.ru/pdf/2015/3/571.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2019.
National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. 2010. English as a New Language Standard. https://www.nbpts.org/wp-content/uploads/ECYA-ENL.pdf. Accessed 26 Sept 2019.
National Center for Education Statistics. 2002. Defining and assessing learning: exploring competency-based initiatives (NCES 2002–159). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition. n.d. Resource library. https://www.ncela.ed.gov/resource-library. Accessed 01 Nov 2019.
Petrova, N. V. 2020. The methodology of forming ICT competency for future master degree students with a major in foreign languages on the basis of social constructivist approach. http://research.sfu-kras.ru/sites/research.sfu-kras.ru/files/Avtoreferat_Petrova.pdf. Accessed 3 July 2020.
Ravipati, Sri. 2016. Long road ahead for digital literacy in higher education. https://campustechnology.com/articles/2016/11/08/long-road-ahead-for-digital-literacy-in-higher-ed.aspx. Accessed 19 Oct 2019.
RIA News. 2017. Vasilieva: Only 16% of teachers have good computer skills. https://sn.ria.ru/20171222/1511515019.html. Accessed 22 Sept 2019.
Schwab, Charles. 2017. World economic forum. https://www.weforum.org/about/the-fourth-industrial-revolution-by-klaus-schwab. Accessed 12 Nov 2019.
Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc. 2008. TESOL technology standards framework. https://www.tesol.org/docs/default-source/books/bk_technologystandards_framework_721.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.
US Department of Education. n.d.b. Teacher professional and career development. https://www.ed.gov/oii-news/teacher-professional-and-career-development. Accessed 22 Sept 2019.
US Department of Education. 2010. Evaluation of evidence-based practices in online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. https://www2.ed.gov/rschstat/eval/tech/evidence-based-practices/finalreport.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2019.
US Department of Education. 2019. Accreditation in the United States. https://www2.ed.gov/admins/finaid/accred/accreditation.html#Overview. Accessed 15 Oct 2019.
Velleman, David J. 2007. Bodies selves. SSRN Electronic Journal 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1006884.Accessed22Sept.
Virtual worlds best practices in education. 2020. https://www.vwbpe.org/about-vwbpe. Accessed 22 April 2020.
Zheng, Dongping, Matthew M. Schmidt, Ying Hu, Min Liu, and Jesse Hsu. 2017. Eco-dialogical learning and translanguaging in open-ended 3D virtual learning environments: Where place, time, and objects matter. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 33. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.2909.
Zinchenko, Yuri P., Galina Y. Menshikova, Yuri M. Bayakovsky, Alexandr M. Chernorizov, and Alexander E. Voiskounsky. 2010. Technologies of virtual reality in the context of worldwide and Russian psychology: Methodology, comparison with traditional methods, achievements and perspectives. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art 1: 11–45.
Digital Literacy Resources
Association of College and Research Libraries Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education (go.nmc.org/alainfolit). The Association of College and Research Libraries provides a framework for assessing and developing information on pedagogical practices for literacy in postsecondary education.
Common Sense Media: Copyright and Fair Use (https://www.go.nmc.org/commsense).
Digital Pedagogy Lab (go.nmc.org/digpedlab). The Digital Pedagogy Lab offers new approaches to teaching with technology and professional development.
Jisc Digital Capability Codesign Challenge Blog (go.nmc.org/digcapa). This blog has a wealth of resources for helping build digital literacies, specifically with regard to leadership, pedagogy and efficiencies.
Open University of British Columbia: Open Education Accessibility Toolkit (go.nmc.org/openubc). This Open Educational Resources Accessibility Toolkit offers suggestions for creating accessible content for educators.
Wikimedia Foundation: What is Creative Commons? (go.nmc.org/wikifound). This short video overview with related resources explains and models how to share creative works using a Creative Commons license.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cowin, J.B., Saulembekova, D.S. (2021). Language Acquisition in Virtual Worlds Versus Traditional Classroom Environments: A Comparative Overview Between the United States and Russia. In: Sukhova, N.V., Dubrovskaya, T., Lobina, Y.A. (eds) Multimodality, Digitalization and Cognitivity in Communication and Pedagogy. Numanities - Arts and Humanities in Progress, vol 20. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84071-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84071-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-84070-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-84071-6
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)