Skip to main content

Numerical Study of the Column Reinforced with Shape Memory Alloy

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of SECON’21 (SECON 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 171))

  • 1329 Accesses

Abstract

Columns are the primary load carrying members in buildings and bridges. Hence for better seismic performances the permanent drift after severe earthquake has to be reduced to make the structure functional with less maintenance. The use of the shape memory alloys in critical region can reduce the residual displacement due to its super-elastic nature. Super-elastic shape memory alloy bars have higher linear elastic range of 4–12% and can return back to its initial shape upon removal of load. In this numerical study full scale circular column with various types of nickel, iron and copper based shape memory alloy (SMA) bars in the critical region under reverse cyclic loading with constant axial load of 10%. The seismic performance of the SMA-steel reinforced column was compared with the steel reinforced normal column. The column reinforced with FeMnAlNi SMA in critical region shows better seismic performance considering load carrying capacity, displacement ductility, maximum displacement, lesser permanent deformation and energy dissipation capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Auricchio F, Sacco E (1997) A superelastic Shape-memory alloy beam model. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 8:489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Billah, AHMM, Alam MS (2012) Seismic performance of concrete columns reinforced with hybrid shape memory alloy and FRP bars. Constr Build Mater 28:730–742

    Google Scholar 

  3. Billah, AHMM, Alam MS (2016) Performance based seismic design of SMA reinforced concrete bridge pier II: methodology and design example. J Struct Eng 04016140

    Google Scholar 

  4. Billah AHMM, Alam MS (2016) Plastic hinge length of shape memory alloy (SMA) reinforced bridge pier. Eng Struct 117:321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Billah AHMM, Alam MS (2018) Probablistic seismic risk assessment of concrete bridge piers reinforced with different types of shape memory alloys. Eng Struct 162:97–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hosseini F, Gencturk B (2018) Seismic response of bridge columns with high performance materials. In: 16th European conference on earthquake engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalsky MJ, Priestly MJN, Seible F (1996) Shear and flexural behaviour of lightweight concrete bridge column in seismic region. Am Concr Inst Struct J 96(1):136–148

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mander JB, Priestly MJN, Park R (1988) Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. J Struct Eng ASCE 114(8):1804–1826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Menegotto M, Pinto PE (1973) Method of analysis for cyclically loaded R.C. plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behaviour of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Symposium on the resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well-defined repeated loads, International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, pp 15–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Paulay T, Priestley MNJ (1992) Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. Willey, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Saiidi MS, Wang SH (2006) Exploratory study of seismic response of concrete column with SMA reinforcement. ACI Struct J 103(3):436–443

    Google Scholar 

  12. Saiidi MS, O’Brien M, Zadeh MS (2009) Cyclic response of concrete bridge columns using superelastic nitinol and bendable concrete. ACI Struct J 106(1):69–77

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tazarv M, Saiidi MS (2013) Analytical studies of seismic performance of full scale SMA reinforced bridge column. Int J Bridge Eng (IJBE) 1(1):37–50

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

George, G., Bindhu, K.R., Nambissan, A.K. (2022). Numerical Study of the Column Reinforced with Shape Memory Alloy. In: Marano, G.C., Ray Chaudhuri, S., Unni Kartha, G., Kavitha, P.E., Prasad, R., Achison, R.J. (eds) Proceedings of SECON’21. SECON 2021. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 171. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_92

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80312-4_92

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80311-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80312-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics