Skip to main content

Fault Analysis in the Field of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D Printing Using Artificial Intelligence

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Trends in Data Engineering Methods for Intelligent Systems (ICAIAME 2020)

Abstract

It is used for 3-dimensional (3D) production, which is called additive manufacturing, which emerged In the 1980s, with the inadequacy of traditional methods. Today, with the development of this technology, all kinds of geometry are produced rapidly. However, with 3D printing technology development, the problems are known as complexity have increased significantly. This situation made the fault analysis during the study a matter to be focused. User intervention is generally required in case of faulty in the parameters during printing using 3D printing technologies. The user must first observe whether there is any faulty and decide what to do. The study focused on automatic diagnostics to help the user diagnose the potential faulty and solve the problem. The data from the sensors belonging to the electronic card designed in the study were taken. The analog values were then read and analyzed, and the faulty conditions were checked according to the analysis. In the field of 3D printing technologies, a new approach has been presented by analyzing the data obtained in faulty analysis with the artificial intelligence method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T., Hui, D.: Additive manufacturing (3D printing): a review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos. B Eng. 143, 172–196 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Herzog, D., Seyda, V., Wycisk, E., Emmelmann, C.: Additive manufacturing of metals. Acta Mater. 117, 371–392 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh, S., Ramakrishna, S., Singh, R.: Material issues in additive manufacturing: a review. J. Manuf. Process. 25, 185–200 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Rey, D.F.V., St-Pierre, J.P.: Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. Handbook of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds: Volume One, 109 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tanzi, M.C., Farè, S., Candiani, G.: Foundations of Biomaterials Engineering. Academic Press, Cambridge (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Walker, J.L., Santoro, M.: Processing and production of bioresorbable polymer scaffolds for tissue engineering. In: Bioresorbable Polymers for Biomedical Applications, pp. 181–203. Woodhead Publishing (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. El Naqa, I., Haider, M.A., Giger, M.L., Ten Haken, R.K.: Artificial intelligence: reshaping the practice of radiological sciences in the 21st century. Br. J. Radiol. 93(1106), 1–15 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education Limited, Malaysia (2016)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Jiang, F., et al.: Artificial Intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke Vasc. Neurol. 2(4), 230–243 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hosny, A., Parmar, C., Quackenbush, J., Schwartz, L.H., Aerts, H.J.: Artificial Intelligence in radiology. Nat. Rev. Cancer 18(8), 500–510 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Erickson, B.J., Korfiatis, P., Akkus, Z., Kline, T.L.: Machine learning for medical imaging. Radiographics 37(2), 505–515 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Shokri, R., Stronati, M., Song, C., Shmatikov, V.: Membership inference attacks against machine learning models. In: 2017 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pp. 3–18. IEEE, May 2017

    Google Scholar 

  13. Biamonte, J., Wittek, P., Pancotti, N., Rebentrost, P., Wiebe, N., Lloyd, S.: Quantum machine learning. Nature 549(7671), 195–202 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bacha, A., Benhra, J., Sabry, A.H.: A CNC machine fault diagnosis methodology based on Bayesian networks and data acquisition. Commun. Appl. Electron. 5, 41–48 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He, K., Yang, Z., Bai, Y., Long, J., Li, C.: Intelligent fault diagnosis of delta 3D printers using attitude sensors based on support vector machines. Sensors 18(4), 1298 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shafique, M.T., Kamran, H., Arshad, H., Khattak, H.A.: Home energy monitoring system using wireless sensor network. In: 2018 14th International Conference on Emerging Technologies (ICET), pp. 1–6. IEEE, November 2018

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chen, T., Guestrin, C.: Xgboost: a scalable tree boosting system. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 785–794, August 2016

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nguyen, H., Bui, X.-N., Bui, H.-B., Cuong, D.T.: Developing an XGBoost model to predict blast-induced peak particle velocity in an open-pit mine: a case study. Acta Geophys. 67(2), 477–490 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11600-019-00268-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang, D., Qian, L., Mao, B., Huang, C., Huang, B., Si, Y.: A data-driven design for fault detection of wind turbines using random forests and XGboost. IEEE Access 6, 21020–21031 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dhaliwal, S.S., Nahid, A.A., Abbas, R.: Effective intrusion detection system using XGBoost. Information 9(7), 149 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mitchell, R., Frank, E.: Accelerating the XGBoost algorithm using GPU computing. PeerJ Comput. Sci. 3, e127 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yadav, S., Shukla, S.: Analysis of k-fold cross-validation over hold-out validation on colossal datasets for quality classification. In: 2016 IEEE 6th International Conference on Advanced Computing (IACC), pp. 78–83. IEEE, February 2016

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jung, Y.: Multiple predicting K-fold cross-validation for model selection. J. Nonparametric Stat. 30(1), 197–215 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wong, T.T., Yeh, P.Y.: Reliable accuracy estimates from k-fold cross validation. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 32(8), 1586–1594 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ruuska, S., Hämäläinen, W., Kajava, S., Mughal, M., Matilainen, P., Mononen, J.: Evaluation of the confusion matrix method in the validation of an automated system for measuring feeding behaviour of cattle. Behav. Proc. 148, 56–62 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Koray Özsoy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Özsoy, K., Halis, H.D. (2021). Fault Analysis in the Field of Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D Printing Using Artificial Intelligence. In: Hemanth, J., Yigit, T., Patrut, B., Angelopoulou, A. (eds) Trends in Data Engineering Methods for Intelligent Systems. ICAIAME 2020. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 76. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-79357-9_54

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics