Abstract
This paper studies the impact of different types of secondary tasks on older drivers’ driving safety. The study used a dual-task experimental design, the older participants need to perform three different secondary tasks while performing driving tasks on the simulated driver, including touch tasks, reading tasks, and conversation tasks. The study collected various metrics of older drivers in various distraction types of tasks, such as vehicle position, speed, acceleration, brake pedal force, distraction times and reaction time to emergencies. Results showed that the touch task has the longest reaction time and the most possibility of collision; the reading task has the largest lane offset and lateral acceleration. The indicators of the conversation task perform better than the other two tasks.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Greenberg, J., et al.: Driver distraction: evaluation with event detection paradigm. Transp. Res. Rec. 1843(1), 1–9 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1843-01
Summala, H., Nieminen, T., Punto, M.: Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Hum. Factors 38(3), 442–451 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778701944
Noy, Y.I., Lemoine, T.L., Klachan, C., Burns, P.C.: Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. Appl. Ergon. 35(3), 207–213 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.012
Wickens, C.D.: The structure of attentional resources. Attention Perform. VIII 8, 239–257 (1980)
Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A.: Cell-phone–induced driver distraction. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16(3), 128–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00489.x
Goodsell, R., Cunningham, M., Chevalier, A.: Driver distraction: a review of scientific literature (2019)
Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J.: The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data (2006)
Ziakopoulos, A., Theofilatos, A., Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G.: A meta analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety. IATSS res. 43(3), 185–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.01.003
Stelmach, G.E., Nahom, A.: Cognitive-motor abilities of the elderly driver. Hum. Factors 34(1), 53–65 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400107
Zagaria, M.A.E.: Vision, cognition, and mobility challenges for elderly drivers. US Pharmacist 32(1), 36 (2007)
Chaparro, A., Wood, J.M., Carberry, T.: Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance. Optom. Vis. Sci. 82(8), 747–754 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000174724.74957.45
Karthaus, M., Falkenstein, M.: Functional changes and driving performance in older drivers: assessment and interventions. Geriatrics 1(2), 12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics1020012
Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N., Compton, R.: Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 37(2), 315–326 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.007
Rizzo, M., Stierman, L., Skaar, N., Dawson, J.D., Anderson, S.W., Vecera, S.P.: Effects of a controlled auditory–verbal distraction task on older driver vehicle control. Transp. Res. Rec. 1865(1), 1–6 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3141/1865-01
Thompson, K.R., Johnson, A.M., Emerson, J.L., Dawson, J.D., Boer, E.R., Rizzo, M.: Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 711–717 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.040
Mullakkal-Babu, F.A., Wang, M., He, X., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: Probabilistic field approach for motorway driving risk assessment. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 118, 102716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102716
Aven, T., et al.: Society for risk analysis glossary. In: Society for Risk Analysis, August 2018
Zou, Y., Tarko, A.P., Chen, E., Romero, M.A.: Effectiveness of cable barriers, guardrails, and concrete barrier walls in reducing the risk of injury. Accid. Anal. Prev. 72, 55–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.013
Son, J., Lee, Y., Kim, M.H.: Impact of traffic environment and cognitive workload on older drivers’ behavior in simulated driving. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12(1), 135–141 (2011)
Engström, J., Markkula, G., Victor, T., Merat, N.: Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: the cognitive control hypothesis. Hum. Factors 59(5), 734–764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690639
Engström, J., Johansson, E., Östlund, J.: Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 97–120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012
Kountouriotis, G.K., Spyridakos, P., Carsten, O.M., Merat, N.: Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates. Accid. Anal. Prev. 96, 39–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.032
Reimer, B.: Impact of cognitive task complexity on drivers’ visual tunneling. Transp. Res. Rec. 2138(1), 13–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3141/2138-03
Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.L., Engström, J.A.: Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 167–190 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.014
Karthaus, M., Wascher, E., Falkenstein, M., Getzmann, S.: The ability of young, middle-aged and older drivers to inhibit visual and auditory distraction in a driving simulator task. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 68, 272–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Xia, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, N. (2021). Effect of Different Secondary Tasks Types on the Driving Safety of Older Drivers. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Supporting Everyday Life Activities. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_32
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_32
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78110-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78111-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)