Skip to main content

Effect of Different Secondary Tasks Types on the Driving Safety of Older Drivers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Supporting Everyday Life Activities (HCII 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12787))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 995 Accesses

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of different types of secondary tasks on older drivers’ driving safety. The study used a dual-task experimental design, the older participants need to perform three different secondary tasks while performing driving tasks on the simulated driver, including touch tasks, reading tasks, and conversation tasks. The study collected various metrics of older drivers in various distraction types of tasks, such as vehicle position, speed, acceleration, brake pedal force, distraction times and reaction time to emergencies. Results showed that the touch task has the longest reaction time and the most possibility of collision; the reading task has the largest lane offset and lateral acceleration. The indicators of the conversation task perform better than the other two tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenberg, J., et al.: Driver distraction: evaluation with event detection paradigm. Transp. Res. Rec. 1843(1), 1–9 (2003). https://doi.org/10.3141/1843-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Summala, H., Nieminen, T., Punto, M.: Maintaining lane position with peripheral vision during in-vehicle tasks. Hum. Factors 38(3), 442–451 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1518/001872096778701944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Noy, Y.I., Lemoine, T.L., Klachan, C., Burns, P.C.: Task interruptability and duration as measures of visual distraction. Appl. Ergon. 35(3), 207–213 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Wickens, C.D.: The structure of attentional resources. Attention Perform. VIII 8, 239–257 (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Strayer, D.L., Drews, F.A.: Cell-phone–induced driver distraction. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16(3), 128–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2007.00489.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Goodsell, R., Cunningham, M., Chevalier, A.: Driver distraction: a review of scientific literature (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J.: The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: an analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ziakopoulos, A., Theofilatos, A., Papadimitriou, E., Yannis, G.: A meta analysis of the impacts of operating in-vehicle information systems on road safety. IATSS res. 43(3), 185–194 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.01.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stelmach, G.E., Nahom, A.: Cognitive-motor abilities of the elderly driver. Hum. Factors 34(1), 53–65 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1177/001872089203400107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zagaria, M.A.E.: Vision, cognition, and mobility challenges for elderly drivers. US Pharmacist 32(1), 36 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chaparro, A., Wood, J.M., Carberry, T.: Effects of age and auditory and visual dual tasks on closed-road driving performance. Optom. Vis. Sci. 82(8), 747–754 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1097/01.opx.0000174724.74957.45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Karthaus, M., Falkenstein, M.: Functional changes and driving performance in older drivers: assessment and interventions. Geriatrics 1(2), 12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics1020012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shinar, D., Tractinsky, N., Compton, R.: Effects of practice, age, and task demands, on interference from a phone task while driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 37(2), 315–326 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rizzo, M., Stierman, L., Skaar, N., Dawson, J.D., Anderson, S.W., Vecera, S.P.: Effects of a controlled auditory–verbal distraction task on older driver vehicle control. Transp. Res. Rec. 1865(1), 1–6 (2004). https://doi.org/10.3141/1865-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson, K.R., Johnson, A.M., Emerson, J.L., Dawson, J.D., Boer, E.R., Rizzo, M.: Distracted driving in elderly and middle-aged drivers. Accid. Anal. Prev. 45, 711–717 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mullakkal-Babu, F.A., Wang, M., He, X., van Arem, B., Happee, R.: Probabilistic field approach for motorway driving risk assessment. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 118, 102716 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Aven, T., et al.: Society for risk analysis glossary. In: Society for Risk Analysis, August 2018

    Google Scholar 

  18. Zou, Y., Tarko, A.P., Chen, E., Romero, M.A.: Effectiveness of cable barriers, guardrails, and concrete barrier walls in reducing the risk of injury. Accid. Anal. Prev. 72, 55–65 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Son, J., Lee, Y., Kim, M.H.: Impact of traffic environment and cognitive workload on older drivers’ behavior in simulated driving. Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf. 12(1), 135–141 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Engström, J., Markkula, G., Victor, T., Merat, N.: Effects of cognitive load on driving performance: the cognitive control hypothesis. Hum. Factors 59(5), 734–764 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817690639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Engström, J., Johansson, E., Östlund, J.: Effects of visual and cognitive load in real and simulated motorway driving. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 97–120 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kountouriotis, G.K., Spyridakos, P., Carsten, O.M., Merat, N.: Identifying cognitive distraction using steering wheel reversal rates. Accid. Anal. Prev. 96, 39–45 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.07.032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Reimer, B.: Impact of cognitive task complexity on drivers’ visual tunneling. Transp. Res. Rec. 2138(1), 13–19 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3141/2138-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.L., Engström, J.A.: Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-vehicle task difficulty. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 8(2), 167–190 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2005.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Karthaus, M., Wascher, E., Falkenstein, M., Getzmann, S.: The ability of young, middle-aged and older drivers to inhibit visual and auditory distraction in a driving simulator task. Transp. Res. F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 68, 272–284 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinjun Xia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Xia, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Y., Xu, N. (2021). Effect of Different Secondary Tasks Types on the Driving Safety of Older Drivers. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Supporting Everyday Life Activities. HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12787. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78111-8_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-78110-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-78111-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics