Abstract
This study examines the effect of specific factors (including user features, such as propensity for conspiracy thinking, and news item features, such as news frame and news source) on the accuracy of social media users in fake news recognition. Being a part of a larger research on fake news perception, this study uses the data from an online experiment that asks social media users from three countries (Russia, Ukraine and Kazakhstan) to evaluate a set of news items constructed with specific conditions. Namely, the users receive true and fake news about the neighboring countries framed differently and ascribed to either domestic or foreign sources. We then assess users’ accuracy in detecting fake news. The results of the study confirm the important role of conspiracy thinking style in false news recognition (leading to a decrease in accuracy) and users’ capability for deliberation on social media more broadly. However, the influence of contextual factors is mixed. While news sources exhibit no influence on the accuracy of fake or true news detection, dominant framing tends to increase the accuracy of true news only. More predictors of news recognition accuracy are discussed in the paper. As a result, this research contributes to the theory of fake news susceptibility by revealing a rich set of individual factors and interaction effects that influence human judgment about news truthfulness and impact deliberation possibilities in socially mediated environments.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Buller, D.B., Burgoon, J.K.: Interpersonal deception theory. Commun. Theor. 6, 203–242 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1996.tb00127.x
Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., Eyal, K., Lemus, D.R., Mccann, R.M.: Credibility for the 21st century: integrating perspectives on source, message, and media credibility in the contemporary media environment. Ann. Int. Commun. Assoc. 27, 293–335 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2003.11679029
Colquitt, J.A., Scott, B.A., LePine, J.A.: Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: a meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 92, 909–927 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909
Gill, H., Boies, K., Finegan, J.E., McNally, J.: Antecedents of trust: establishing a boundary condition for the relation between propensity to trust and intention to trust. J. Bus Psychol. 19, 287–302 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-004-2229-8
Porshnev, A., Miltsov, A.: The effects of thinking styles and news domain on fake news recognition by social media users: evidence from Russia. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12194, pp. 305–320. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_21
Flynn, D.J., Nyhan, B., Reifler, J.: The Nature and origins of misperceptions: understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics: nature and origins of misperceptions. Adv. Polit. Psychol. 38, 127–150 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12394
Robinson, P., Goddard, P., Parry, K., Murray, C., Taylor, P.M.: Pockets of Resistance: British News Media, War and Theory in the 2003 Invasion of Iraq. Manchester University Press, Oxford (2016)
Zollmann, F.: Bringing propaganda back into news media studies. Crit. Sociol. 45, 329–345 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517731134
Nisbet, M.C., Brossard, D., Kroepsch, A.: Framing science: the stem cell controversy in an age of press/politics. Harvard Int. J. Press/Polit. 8, 36–70 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02251047
Berinsky, A.J.: Rumors and health care reform: experiments in political misinformation. Brit. J. Polit. Sci. 47, 241–262 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186
Allcott, H., Gentzkow, M.: Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31, 211–236 (2017)
Bronstein, M.V., Pennycook, G., Bear, A., Rand, D.G., Cannon, T.D.: Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. J. Appl. Res. Mem. Cogn. 8, 108–117 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005
Pennycook, G., Cannon, T.D., Rand, D.G.: Prior exposure increases perceived accuracy of fake news. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 147, 1865–1880 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465
Pennycook, G., Rand, D.G.: Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188, 39–50 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
Coe, C.M.: Tell Me Lies: Fake News, Source Cues, and Partisan Motivated Reasoning, (2018)
Anthony, A., Moulding, R.: Breaking the news: belief in fake news and conspiracist beliefs. Aust. J. Psychol. 71, 154–162 (2019)
van Prooijen, J.-W., Douglas, K.M.: Belief in conspiracy theories: basic principles of an emerging research domain. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/ejsp.2530. Accessed 4 Sept 2019
Edelson, J., Alduncin, A., Krewson, C., Sieja, J.A., Uscinski, J.E.: The effect of conspiratorial thinking and motivated reasoning on belief in election fraud. Polit. Res. Q. 70, 933–946 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912917721061
Abalakina-Paap, M., Stephan, W.G., Craig, T., Gregory, W.L.: Beliefs in conspiracies. Polit. Psychol. 20, 637–647 (1999)
Goertzel, T.: Belief in conspiracy theories. Polit. Psychol. 15, 731 (1994). https://doi.org/10.2307/3791630
Stojanov, A., Halberstadt, J.: The Conspiracy mentality scale: distinguishing between irrational and rational suspicion. Soc. Psychol. 50, 215–232 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000381
Uscinski, J.E., Olivella, S.: The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change. Res. Polit. 4, 205316801774310 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017743105
Iyengar, S., Simon, A.: News coverage of the Gulf crisis and public opinion: a study of agenda-setting, priming, and framing. Commun. Res. 20, 365–383 (1993)
McCombs, M.E., Shaw, D.L.: The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opin. Q. 36, 176 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1086/267990
Scheufele, D.: Framing as theory for media effects. J. Commun. 20, 103–122 (1999)
D’Angelo, P., Kuypers, J.A. (eds.): Doing News Framing Analysis: Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives. Routledge, New York (2010)
Pavik, J.V.: News framing and new media: Digital tools to re-engage an alienated citizenry. In: Reese, S.D., Gandy, O.H., Grant, A.E. (eds.) Framing Public Life: Perspectives on Media and Our Understanding of the Social World, pp. 311–321. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, N.J. (2001)
Gitlin, T.: The Whole World is Watching: Mass Media in the Making & Unmaking of the New Left. University of California Press, Berkeley, CA (2003)
Dusyk, N., Axsen, J., Dullemond, K.: Who cares about climate change? The mass media and socio-political acceptance of Canada’s oil sands and Northern gateway pipeline. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 37, 12–21 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.07.005
Kwon, K.H., Chadha, M., Pellizzaro, K.: Proximity and terrorism news in social media: a construal-level theoretical approach to networked framing of terrorism in Twitter. Mass Commun. Soc. 20, 869–894 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2017.1369545
Carragee, K.M., Roefs, W.: The neglect of power in recent framing research. J. Commun. 54, 214–233 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02625.x
Coleman, C.-L., Dysart, E.V.: Framing of Kennewick man against the backdrop of a scientific and cultural controversy. Sci. Commun. 27, 3–26 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005278609
Kohring, M., Matthes, J.: Trust in news media: development and validation of a multidimensional scale. Commun. Res. 34, 231–252 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650206298071
Pan, Z., Kosicki, G.: Framing analysis: an approach to news discourse. Polit. Comm. 10, 55–75 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1993.9962963
Semetko, H.A., Valkenburg, P.M.V.: Framing European politics: a content analysis of press and television news. J. Commun. 50, 93–109 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2000.tb02843.x
Su, M.-H., Liu, J., McLeod, D.M.: Pathways to news sharing: Issue frame perceptions and the likelihood of sharing. Comput. Hum. Behav. 91, 201–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.09.026
Druckman, J.N.: Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir)relevance of framing effects. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98, 671–686 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041413
Chong, D., Druckman, J.N.: Spanish abstract. J. Commun. 57, 99–118 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00331_3.x
Slothuus, R.: More than weighting cognitive importance: a dual-process model of issue framing effects: a dual-process model of issue framing effects. Polit. Psychol. 29, 1–28 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2007.00610.x
Morris, M.R., Counts, S., Roseway, A., Hoff, A., Schwarz, J.: Tweeting is believing?: Understanding microblog credibility perceptions. In: Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work - CSCW 2012, p. 441. ACM Press, Seattle, Washington, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145274.
Pornpitakpan, C.: The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades’ evidence. J. Appl. Soc. Pyschol. 34, 243–281 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2004.tb02547.x
Horne, B.D., Adalı, S.: This just in: fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In: The Workshops of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media AAAI (ICWSM-17) Technical Report WS-17–17: News and Public Opinion, pp. 759–766 (2017)
Colliander, J.: “This is fake news”: investigating the role of conformity to other users’ views when commenting on and spreading disinformation in social media. Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 202–215 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.032
Vendemia, M.A., Bond, R.M., DeAndrea, D.C.: The strategic presentation of user comments affects how political messages are evaluated on social media sites: evidence for robust effects across party lines. Comput. Hum. Behav. 91, 279–289 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.007
Borah, P.: The hyperlinked world: a look at how the interactions of news frames and hyperlinks influence news credibility and willingness to seek information. J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 19, 576–590 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12060
Turcotte, J., York, C., Irving, J., Scholl, R.M., Pingree, R.J.: News recommendations from social media opinion leaders: effects on media trust and information seeking. J. Comput.-Mediat. Comm. 20, 520–535 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12127
Craciun, G., Moore, K.: Credibility of negative online product reviews: reviewer gender, reputation and emotion effects. Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 104–115 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.010
Graefe, A., Haim, M., Haarmann, B., Brosius, H.-B.: Readers’ perception of computer-generated news: credibility, expertise, and readability. Journalism 19, 595–610 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884916641269
Chung, M.: The message influences me more than others: how and why social media metrics affect first person perception and behavioral intentions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 91, 271–278 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.10.011
Meyer, H.K., Marchionni, D., Thorson, E.: The journalist behind the news: credibility of straight, collaborative, opinionated, and blogged “news.” Am. Behav. Sci. 54, 100–119 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764210376313
Vziatysheva, V., Sinyavskaya, Y., Porshnev, A., Terpilovskii, M., Koltcov, S., Bryanov, K.: Testing users’ ability to recognize fake news in three countries. An experimental perspective. In: Social Computing and Social Media. Design, Ethics, User Behavior, and Social Network Analysis. Springer, Cham (in press). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1
Kazun, A., Pashakhin, S.: ‘Alien elections’: neighboring state news on the 2018 Russian presidential elections. J. Econ. Sociol. 22, 71–91 (2021)
Koltsova, O., Judina, D., Pashakhin, S., Kolycheva, A.: Coverage of Presidential Elections in Kazakhstan and Ukraine by Russian Media. POLIS (in press)
Inglehart, R., et al. (eds.): World Values Survey: Round Six, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/WVSDocumentationWV6.jsp (2014)
Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., Walker, S.: Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. J. Stat. Soft. 67 (2015). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
Gigerenzer, G., Gaissmaier, W.: Heuristic decision making. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 62, 451–482 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120709-145346
Koltsova, O., Sinyavskaya, Y., Terpilovskii, M.: Designing an experiment on recognition of political fake news by social media users: factors of dropout. In: Meiselwitz, G. (ed.) HCII 2020. LNCS, vol. 12194, pp. 261–277. Springer, Cham (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49570-1_18
Acknowledgements
The research was implemented in the framework of the Russian Scientific Fund Grant № 19–18-00206 at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) in 2021.
The authors acknowledge the research and data collection assistance by Maxim Terpilowski, Yadviga Sinyawskaya, and Victoria Vziatysheva.
Compliance with Ethical Standards. The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (National Research University Higher School of Economics Institution Research Board decision, 23.04.2020).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix 1. Supplementary Material
Appendix 1. Supplementary Material
Supplementary tables associated with this article can be found, in the online version, at https://fakenewsproject.org/HCI2021/Appendix_1.pdf.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Porshnev, A., Miltsov, A., Lokot, T., Koltsova, O. (2021). Effects of Conspiracy Thinking Style, Framing and Political Interest on Accuracy of Fake News Recognition by Social Media Users: Evidence from Russia, Kazakhstan and Ukraine. In: Meiselwitz, G. (eds) Social Computing and Social Media: Experience Design and Social Network Analysis . HCII 2021. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12774. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77626-8_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-77625-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-77626-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)