Skip to main content

Worldviews, Environments and Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Outdoor Environmental Education in Higher Education
  • The original version of this chapter was revised: Page 28, first para, line no. 8, sentence starting “We are mindful…” was published with an error which has been corrected now. The correction to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75980-3_33

Abstract

This chapter explores the concept of worldviews in tertiary outdoor environmental education (OEE) programs. We discuss how worldviews are constructed based on our understandings of the world and our place within it, drawing on the role of social and cultural norms and assumptions influencing the ethical frameworks we might adopt. The chapter offers a critique of commonly employed approaches to the concept of worldviews, such as anthropocentrism, biocentrism and ecocentrism. Although our discussion is reflective of our positions and experiences, located in south eastern Australia, we suggest possibilities for considering broader perspectives and assemblages that might otherwise be overlooked. We suggest the provocations of posthumanist orientations and offer some introductory suggestions for deploying them constructively in OEE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 02 March 2022

    The original version of this book was published with an error in Chapter 3 wherein the line should read, "We are mindful that the artefacts that comprise our views of reality and nature are socially constructed and do not exist independently of human agency and activity" instead of “… do exist independently of human agency and activity”.

Notes

  1. 1.

    Returning to Haraway (1991), we are ‘somewhere in particular’. Our homes are in south eastern Australia - Noel in Melbourne, the second largest state capital, and Kathleen in Bendigo, close to the geographical centre of Victoria. Our particular positions and experiences are reflected in our writing in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    We adopt the position that our connection to the more-than-human world is artificially severed in modern Western culture by mind/body, nature/culture, subject/object dualisms. Hence, we choose the term ‘more-than-human’ to draw attention to our ethical accountability to the world.

  3. 3.

    Gough (2016) argues that challenging hierarchical anthropocentrism (i.e. challenging the assumption of human superiority) does not prevent us from acknowledging an ‘irreducible anthropocentrism,’ that is, accepting that we necessarily experience the world with species-specific biophysical limitations and possibilities. However, we must also consider how an understanding of irreducible anthropocentrism might be changed by accepting that we increasingly experience the world as posthumans, with perhaps (eventually) fewer species-specific biophysical limitations and with further possibilities provided by biophysical extensions and enhancements.

  4. 4.

    Karen Barad’s (2007) notion of ethico-onto-epistemology points to the inseparability of ethics, ontology and epistemology in knowledge production. See https://newmaterialism.eu/almanac/e/ethico-onto-epistem-ology.html for fuller discussion

  5. 5.

    See https://pkkp.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/PKKP-20200525-FINAL-Media-Release-Rio-Tinto-Juukan-Gorge-blasts.pdf

  6. 6.

    Describing worldviews thus, does not rule out the potential worldviews of more-than-human entities

  7. 7.

    The United Nations Permanent Forum on Indigenous Issues estimates there are more than 370 million Indigenous peoples spread across 70 countries worldwide, each practicing unique traditions, retaining social, cultural, economic and political characteristics that are distinct from those of the dominant societies in which they live (https://aiatsis.gov.au/)

  8. 8.

    Several tools are available for this exercise. Some employ CO2 measures (eg: https://www.carbonfootprint.com/calculator.aspx), while others calculate how many planets are required to maintain a particular lifestyle (eg: https://www.footprintcalculator.org/)

References

  • Affifi, R. (2020). Anthropocentrism’s fluid binary. Environmental Education Research, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1707484

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blades, G. (2015). Walking the ground: (Re)storying footprints. In M. Robertson, R. Lawrence, & G. Heath (Eds.), Experiencing the outdoors: Enhancing strategies for wellbeing (pp. 13–24). Sense.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, C. (1993). Education, cultural myths, and the ecological crisis: Toward deep changes. State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (1989). Outdoor education: Environmental education reinvented, or environmental education reconceived? Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 5, 15–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (2002). Lost in the Australian bush: Outdoor education as curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 34(4), 405–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (2006). Outdoor activity safety guidelines and unfamiliar environments: A hidden curriculum? Canadian Journal of Environmental Education (CJEE), 11(1), 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, A. (2015). Foundation myths and the roots of adventure education in the Anglosphere. In B. Humberstone, H. Prince, & K. Kenderson (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of outdoor studies (pp. 11–19). Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (2009). How do places become ‘pedagogical’? In M. Somerville, J. K. Power, & P. deCarteret (Eds.), Landscapes and learning: Place studies for a global world (pp. 155–173). Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N. (2016). Postparadigmatic materialisms: A ‘new movement of thought’ for outdoor environmental education research? Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 19(2), 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, N., & Adsit-Morris, C. (2020). Troubling the anthropocene: Donna Haraway, science fiction, and arts of un/naming. Cultural Studies↔ Critical Methodologies, 20(3), 213–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. In Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature (pp. 183–201). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, P. (2002). Main currents in western environmental thought. UNSW Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukes, S., Stewart, A., & Morse, M. (2019). Acknowledging the agency of a more-than-human world: Material relations on a Snowy River journey. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22(2), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J., & Mannion, G. (2016). Enacting a place-responsive research methodology: Walking interviews with educators. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 16(4), 330–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhie, J., & Clarke, D. (2018). Nature matters: Diffracting a keystone concept of environmental education research – Just for kicks. Environmental Education Research, 26(9–10), 1509–1526. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1531387

  • Mikaels, J., & Asfeldt, M. (2017). Becoming-crocus, becoming-river, becoming-bear: A relational materialist exploration of place(s). Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 20(2), 2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochelle, R. (1986). Future choice: An environment design approach. Curriculum Perspectives, 6(2), 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naess, A. (1973). The shallow and the deep, long-range ecology movement: A summary. Inquiry, 16(1), 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. A. (Eds.). (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonu, D., & Snaza, N. (2015). The fragility of ecological pedagogy: Elementary social studies standards and possibilities of new materialism. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 12(3), 258–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, A. (2020). Developing place-responsive pedagogy in outdoor environmental education: A rhizomatic curriculum autobiography. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • White, L. (1967). The historical roots of our ecologic crisis. Science, 155(3767), 1203–1207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pleasants, K., Gough, N. (2021). Worldviews, Environments and Education. In: Thomas, G., Dyment, J., Prince, H. (eds) Outdoor Environmental Education in Higher Education. International Explorations in Outdoor and Environmental Education, vol 9. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75980-3_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75980-3_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-75979-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-75980-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics