Abstract
The majority of municipal institutions in Denmark have some form of collective co-production with associations, but the scope varies considerably across welfare areas. While nine out of ten elementary schools and social help institutions collaborate, this applies to much fewer institutions for health promotion and institutions for childcare. The purpose of this chapter is to explain these differences. The analysis is based on historical studies, interviews and surveys of municipal institutions and associations. The theoretical framework is three approaches of new-institutional theory which provide useful explanations for these differences. In both the elementary school area and social help area, there is a stronger supportive framework for collective co-production, the attitude towards collaboration is more positive and there is a longer tradition of collaboration than in the other two welfare areas.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anheier, H. K., & Salamon, L. M. (2006). The nonprofit sector in comparative perspective. In W. W. Powell & R. Steinberg (Eds.), The non-profit sector: A research handbook (pp. 89â114). Yale.
Boje, T., Ibsen, B., Fridberg, T., Habermann, U., Sokolowski, S. W., & Salamon, L. M. (2017). Denmark. A social democratic pattern with a twist. In L. M. Salamon, W. W. Sokolowski, & M. A. Haddock (Eds.), Explaining civil society development. A social origins approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Center for frivilligt socialt arbejde. (2018). Tal om det frivillige Danmark â Analyse af befolkningens frivillige engagement. Center for frivilligt socialt arbejde.
Christensen, J. G., Christiansen, P. M., & Ibsen, M. (2006). Politik og forvaltning. 2. Udgave. Academica.
DGI. (2020). Retrieved May 15, 2020, from https://www.dgi.dk/samarbejd/om-vores-indsatser/programomraader/dgi-skoler-institutioner/aaben-skole/for-foreningen
Elmose-Ăsterlund, K., & Iversen, E. B. (2020). Do public subsidies and facility coverage matter for voluntary sports clubs? Sport Management Review, 23(2), 315â329.
Enjolras, B., & StrĂžmnes, K. (Eds.). (2018). Scandinavian civil society and social transformation. Springer.
Fehsenfeld, M. (2019). Politisering af frivillighed i samspillet mellem den offentlige og den frivillige sektor: âVi skal tĂŠnke gadekĂŠret indâ. Politica â Tidsskrift for politisk videnskab, 51(4), 507â525.
Fehsenfeld, M., & Ibsen, B. (2020). Den frivillige og den offentlige sektor â historie og italesĂŠttelse. In I. Bjarne Ibsen (Ed.), Den frivillige kommune: samspillet mellem den frivillige og den offentlige sektor (pp. 22â45). Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Forebyggelseskommissionen. (2009). Vi kan leve lĂŠngere og sundere. Ministeriet for Sundhed og Forebyggelse.
Forsberg, P., & Iversen, E. B. (2019). The influence of voluntary sports clubs on the management of community sports facilities in Denmark. International Journal of Sport Policy and Politics, 11(3), 399â414.
Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232â267). University of Chicago Press.
Greve, B., & Jespersen, J. (2019). Den offentlige sektors Ăžkonomi. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Harrits, G. S., & Larsen, L. T. (2016). Professional claims to authority: A comparative study of Danish doctors and teachers (1950â2010). Journal of Professions and Organization, 3(2), 154â169.
Henriksen, L. S., & Bundesen, P. (2004). The moving frontier in Denmark: Voluntary-state relationships since 1850. Journal of Social Policy, 33, 605â625. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0047279404008025
Henriksen, L. S., Smith, S. R., & Zimmer, A. (2012). At the eve of convergence? Transformations of social service provision in Denmark, Germany, and the United States. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 23(2), 458â501. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-011-9221-5
Henriksen, L. S., StrĂžmsnes, K., & Svedberg, L. (Eds.). (2019). Civic engagement in Scandinavia. Springer.
Hill, & Lynn. (2003, October 9â11). Why do organizations collaborate? Empirical evidence from Chicago Public Schools. Prepared for the National Public Management Research Conference, Washington, DC.
Huxham, C., & Vangen, S. (2005). Managing to collaborate. The theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routledge.
Ibsen, B. (2014). Uddannelse og kvalificering i det frivillige arbejde. In T. Fridberg & L. S. Henriksen (Eds.), Udviklingen i frivilligt arbejde 2004â2012 (SFI â Det nationale forskningscenter for velfĂŠrd). KĂžbenhavn.
Ibsen, B. (Ed.). (2020a). Den frivillige kommune: samspillet mellem den frivillige og den offentlige sektor. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Ibsen, B. (2020b). Frivillige pÄ sygehuse: Hjerteforeningens patientstÞtte. In B. Ibsen (Ed.), Den frivillige kommune. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Ibsen, B., & Eichberg, H. (2006). Dansk idrĂŠtspolitik. Mellem frivillighed og statslig styring. IdrĂŠttens Analyseinstitut.
Ibsen, B., Fehsenfeld, M., Petersen, L.S., Levinsen, K. & Iveresen, E.B. (2017). 16 cases med samarbejde mellem kommunale institutioner og civile aktĂžrer. Movements 2017: 4. University of Southern Denmark.
Ibsen, B., & Habermann, U. (1997). Den frivillige sektor i Danmark â 150 Ă„rs udvikling. https://frivillighed.dk/sites/frivillighed.dk/files/media/images/definition_af_den_frivillige_sektor_i_danmark_2005.pdf
Ibsen, B., & Habermann, U. (2005). Defining the nonprofit sector: Denmark. Working papers of The Johns Hopkins Comparative Nonprofit Sector Project. Johns Hopkins University.
Ibsen, B., & Habermann, U. (2006). Definition af den frivillige sektor i Danmark. https://pure.sfi.dk/ws/files/257954/0619_Den_frivillige_sektor.pdf
Ibsen, B., & Levinsen, K. (2019). Foreninger og frivillige i samspil med kommunale institutioner og forvaltninger 2018. Movements 2019: 6. University of Southern Denmark.
Ibsen, B., Levinsen, K., Petersen, L. S., Iversen, E. B., & Fehsenfeld, M. (2018, December). ForstÄelse af de frivilliges faglighed pÄ forskellige velfÊrdsomrÄder. Dansk PÊdagogisk Tidsskrift.
Ibsen, B., ThĂžgersen, M., & Levinsen, K. (2013). Kontinuitet og forandring i foreningslivet. Movements: 2013: 11. University of Southern Denmark.
Iversen, E., Ibsen, B., & Levinsen, K. (2020). Den kommunale styring og organisering af samspillet med civilsamfundet. In B. Ibsen (Ed.), Den frivillige Kommune. Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
Kriesi, H. (1995). The political opportunity structure of new social movements: Its impact on their mobilization. In J. G. Jenkins & B. Klandermans (Eds.), The politics of social protest. Comparative perspectives on states and social movements. UCL Press.
Kristensen, T., & Ibsen, B. (2018). Frivillige pĂ„ plejecentre. Venneforening eller âegne frivilligeâ. Kort Fortalt. Center for forskning i IdrĂŠt, Sundhed og Civilsamfund. Syddansk Universitet.
Larsen, C. A., & Andersen, J. G. (Eds.). (2015). Den universelle velfĂŠrdsstat. Frydenlund Academic.
Levinsen, K., & Ibsen, B. (2017). Foreningers samarbejde med kommunale institutioner. Movements 2017:2. University of Southern Denmark
March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. Free Press.
Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340â363.
Micheletti, M. (1995). Civil society and state relations in Sweden. Avebury.
Ministry of Health. (1989). Regeringens forebyggelsesprogram. Sundhedsministeriet.
North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97â112.
Peters, B. G. (2012). Institutional theory: The ânew institutionalismâ in political science. Bloomsbury.
RambĂžll. (2016). Evaluering af frivilligcentrene. Socialstyrelsen.
Regeringen. (2002). Sund hele livet â de nationale mĂ„l og strategier ofr folkesundhed 2002â10. Indenrigs- og Sundhedsministeriet.
Region Syddanmark. (2015). Region Syddanmarks frivillighedsstrategi. Region Syddanmark.
Retsinformation. (2018). BekendtgĂžrelse af lov om stĂžtte til folkeoplysende voksenundervisning, frivilligt folkeoplysende foreningsarbejde og daghĂžjskoler samt om Folkeuniversitetet (folkeoplysningsloven). LBK nr 1115 af 31/08/2018.
Salamon, L. M., & Anheier, H. K. (1998). Social origins of civil society: Explaining the nonprofit sector cross-nationally. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 9, 213â248. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022058200985
Salamon, L. M., Sokolowski, W. W., & Haddock, M. A. (2017). Explaining civil society development. A social origins approach. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Sage.
Scott, W. R. (2013). Institutions and Organizations. Ideeas, Interests, and Identities. SAGE Publication.
Sivesind, K. H., & Saglie, J. (Eds.). (2017). Promoting active citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
Skocpol, T., & Pierson, P. (2002). Historical institutionalism in contemporary political science. In I. Katznelson & H. V. Milner (Eds.), Political science: State of the discipline (pp. 693â721). W.W. Norton.
Social- og Integrationsministeriet, Kulturministeriet, Ministeriet for sundhed og forebyggelse og Ăkonomi- og indenrigsministeriet. (2013). Charter for samspil mellem den frivillige verden og det offentlige. Social- og Integrationsministeriet.
Socialstyrelsen. (2014). AfdÊkning af muligheder og udfordringer i forhold til Þget inddragelse af frivillige pÄ plejecentre i tre kommuner. Resumé. Socialstyrelsen.
Socialstyrelsen. (2016). Frivillige pÄ plejecentre. Erfaringsopsamling og inspirationsmateriale. Socialstyrelsen.
Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organization. In J. G. March (Ed.), Handbook of 92 organizations. Skokie.
ThĂžgersen, M. (2013). Selvejende institutioner i Danmark. CIFRI. Arbejdsnotat. NetvĂŠrk for forskning i Civilsamfund & Frivillighed. Center for frivilligt socialt arbejde.
ThĂžgersen, M. (2017). Local governance of schools in scandinavia â Between state, market and civil society. In K. H. Sivesind & J. Saglie (Eds.), Promoting active citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan.
Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333â1157.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ibsen, B., Levinsen, K., Fehsenfeld, M., Iversen, E.B. (2021). Voluntary-Public Sector Co-production in Denmark: Why Differences Between Welfare Areas?. In: Ibsen, B. (eds) Voluntary and Public Sector Collaboration in Scandinavia . Palgrave Studies in Third Sector Research. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72315-6_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-72314-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-72315-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)